`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 6:17-cv-01217
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`LOGANTREE LP,
`
` Plaintiff,
`vs.
`
`GARMIN INTERNATIONAL, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`ORDER GRANTING LOGANTREE, LP’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
`FILE AN AMENDED RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO GARMIN’S MOTION FOR
`SUMMARY JUDGMENT
`
`Before the Court is LoganTree’s Unopposed Motion for Leave to File An Amended
`
`Response in Opposition to Garmin’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“the Motion”). For the
`
`reasons stated in the Motion, the Court finds that LoganTree’s request for leave satisfies the
`
`relevant standards. Accordingly, the Motion is GRANTED.
`
`It is therefore ORDERED that LoganTree’s motion for leave, Doc. 201, is granted and
`
`Exhibit A to LoganTree’s motion shall be filed in this case as LoganTree’s Amended Response in
`
`Opposition to Garmin’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`SIGNED on this 2nd day of March, 2022.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ERIC F. MELGREN
`CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`