`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
`
`
`
`LOGANTREE LP
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`GARMIN INTERNATIONAL, INC. and
`GARMIN USA, INC.
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 6:17-CV-01217
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFF LOGANTREE’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT GARMIN’S MOTION TO
`VACATE DEADLINES
`
`
`
`Pursuant to the Court’s Order dated September 7, 2021, the undersigned counsel on behalf
`
`of Plaintiff LoganTree (“Plaintiff” or “LoganTree”) provide this response to Defendant Garmin’s
`
`(“Defendant” or “Garmin”) Notice to the Court and Motion to Vacate Deadlines. The undersigned
`
`counsel confirm that Theodore Brann, LoganTree’s principal officer, passed away the morning of
`
`August 31, 2021. The undersigned counsel confirm that, prior to Theodore’s passing, the parties
`
`were engaged in the meet and confer process and were discussing resolution of all issues currently
`
`pending before the Court. It is also believed that the parties were making good progress on
`
`resolution of these issues but were unable to complete that process due to the death of LoganTree’s
`
`principal officer.
`
` Garmin’s request that the Court vacate the current deadlines from its August 5 Order (Dkt.
`
`138), as well as the remaining deadlines in the case (Dkt. 110) or, alternatively extend the deadlines
`
`under Local Rule 6.1 to allow LoganTree time to appoint a new principal officer, is not opposed.
`
`Also, Garmin’s request that the Court grant the parties 30 days to provide a status report, so that
`
`LoganTree may regroup with its new principal officer and the parties can resume their meet and
`
`confer process, is not opposed.
`
`
`
`Case 6:17-cv-01217-EFM-ADM Document 142 Filed 09/08/21 Page 2 of 3
`
`For the same reasons discussed above, it is respectfully requested that the Court grant a
`
`continuance of the September 14 in-person hearing set forth in the August 5 Order (Dkt. 138).
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted by:
`
`FOULSTON SIEFKIN LLP
`
`/s/Clayton J. Kaiser
`
`
`
`Clayton J. Kaiser, Kansas Bar #24066
`Foulston Siefkin LLP
`1551 N. Waterfront Pkwy, Suite 100
`Wichita, Kansas 67206
`(316) 291-9539
`(866) 280-2532 FAX
`Email: ckaiser@foulston.com
`
`and
`
`MCCATHERN, PLLC
`
`
`
`/s/ Christopher M. Barkley
`
`Arnold Shokouhi, TX (pro hac vice)
`Christopher Barkley (pro hac vice)
`James E. Sherry, TX (pro hac vice)
`McCathern, PLLC
`3710 Rawlins Street, Suite 1600
`Dallas, TX 75219
`(214) 443-4478
`(214) 741-4717 FAX
`Email: arnolds@mccathernlaw.com
`Email: cbarkley@mccathernlaw.com
`Email: jsherry@mccathernlaw.com
`
`Counsel for Plaintiffs
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 6:17-cv-01217-EFM-ADM Document 142 Filed 09/08/21 Page 3 of 3
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on September 8, 2021, I electronically filed a copy of the foregoing
`document with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of
`such filing to counsel of record for all parties in the case.
`
`/s/Clayton J. Kaiser
`
`Clayton J. Kaiser, #24066
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
