throbber
Case 6:17-cv-01217-EFM-ADM Document 135 Filed 07/15/21 Page 1 of 2
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
`
`
`
`
`
` Case No. 17-1217-EFM-ADM
`
`
`
`
`
`
`LOGANTREE LP,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`GARMIN INTERNATIONAL, INC. and
`GARMIN USA, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`
`The amended patent scheduling order requires that “[d]isclosures required by Fed. R.
`
`Civ. P. 26(a)(2), including reports from retained experts, must be served by the party bearing the
`
`burden of proof by July 5, 2021, with rebuttal expert disclosures served by August 20, 2021.”
`
`(ECF 110, at 3.) On June 30, LoganTree LP’s (“LoganTree”) counsel emailed the magistrate
`
`judge’s chambers to ask whether LoganTree was required to produce its infringement expert’s
`
`report by the July 5 deadline because, according to LoganTree, its infringement expert requires
`
`additional printed pages of source code—an issue that is now the subject of pending discovery
`
`motions. Chambers staff responded that, “If you are requesting an extension of a previously
`
`imposed deadline you will need to file a motion. The court will consider the motion, but counsel
`
`should not assume it will be granted.” On July 1, LoganTree filed a motion to modify the
`
`scheduling order to extend the July 5 deadline for initial expert disclosures. (ECF 123.)
`
`LoganTree then proceeded to not serve any infringement expert disclosure by the July 5
`
`deadline—even one that could later be supplemented if LoganTree ultimately prevailed in
`
`obtaining additional printed pages of source code—despite the fact that the court had
`
`

`

`Case 6:17-cv-01217-EFM-ADM Document 135 Filed 07/15/21 Page 2 of 2
`
`admonished LoganTree that it should not assume that the court would grant an extension of the
`
`July 5 deadline.
`
`LoganTree’s failure to serve expert disclosures on all issues on which it bears the burden
`
`of proof makes it impractical for defendants Garmin International, Inc. and Garmin USA, Inc.
`
`(collectively “Garmin”) to serve rebuttal expert disclosures. Accordingly, the court vacates the
`
`August 20 deadline for Garmin’s rebuttal expert disclosures. The court will reset Garmin’s
`
`rebuttal expert disclosure deadline in conjunction with its forthcoming ruling on the pending
`
`motions. LoganTree’s rebuttal expert disclosure deadline remains August 20, 2021.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated July 15, 2021, at Topeka, Kansas.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`s/ Angel D. Mitchell
`Angel D. Mitchell
`U.S. Magistrate Judge
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket