throbber
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`WASHINGTON, D.C.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Investigation No. 337-TA-____
`Docket No. 3655
`
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN LOCATION-SHARING
`SYSTEMS, RELATED SOFTWARE,
`COMPONENTS THEREOF, AND
`PRODUCTS CONTAINING THE SAME
`
`
`
`
`STATEMENT REQUESTING NON-INSTITUTION OF INVESTIGATION
`BY PROPOSED RESPONDENT CATERPILLAR INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Pursuant to the Commission’s notice,1 soliciting comments about the Complaint, Proposed
`
`Respondent Caterpillar Inc. (“Caterpillar”) respectfully requests that the Commission deny
`
`institution of the Complaint filed by Complainants AGIS Software Development LLC and
`
`Advanced Ground Information Systems, Inc. (collectively, “AGIS”) as to Caterpillar. The
`
`Complaint fails to sufficiently plead that Caterpillar has imported, sold for importation, or sold in
`
`the United States after importation any allegedly infringing article. Caterpillar licenses the
`
`“Caterpillar” brand to a third party—Bullitt Mobile Limited (“Bullitt”)—who makes, sells,
`
`distributes, and is responsible for the accused “Cat phone” products. The “catphones.com” website
`
`from which Complainant bought the Accused Product states that “Caterpillar Inc. is not in any way
`
`involved in the design, manufacture, sale or distribution of these products.”2 Even the
`
`Complainant’s own evidence shows that Caterpillar is not properly named here. Finally, other
`
`courts have already addressed the relationship between Caterpillar and Bullitt and found that
`
`Caterpillar is not responsible for Cat phones. Institution as to Caterpillar should be denied.
`
`I.
`
`Caterpillar Does Not Make, Sell, Distribute, or Import “Cat Phones”
`
`The Commission should non-institute with respect to Caterpillar because the Complaint
`
`fails to show that Caterpillar has imported, sold for importation, or sold in the United States after
`
`importation any allegedly infringing article. Cf. 19 C.F.R. 210.12(a)(3), (a)(9)(viii) (requiring
`
`a complaint to “[d]escribe specific instances of alleged unlawful importations. . .” and to
`
`include a “showing that each person named. . . is importing or selling the article covered by. . . each
`
`involved U.S. patent”); see also Certain Semiconductors and Devices and Products Containing
`
`Same, Including Printed Circuit Boards, Automotive Parts, and Automobiles, 337-TA-1332, Letter
`
`
`1 87 Fed. Reg. 72,509 (Nov. 25, 2022).
`2 Catphones website, Limited Warranty (Apr. 1, 2021),
`https://www.catphones.com/download/Warranty-Statements/Warranty%20Statement%20-
`%20English.pdf (emphasis added).
`
`1
`
`

`

`from ITC to C. Lehman (Oct. 2022) (declining to institute investigation as to certain respondents
`
`because “[t]he complaint, supplement, and exhibits . . . does not sufficiently describe the specific
`
`instances of importation or sale for [those] respondents.”). The Commission regularly exercises this
`
`authority to institute only portions of a requested investigation. See, e.g., Laerdal Med. Corp. v.
`
`ITC, 910 F.3d 1207, 1215 (Fed. Cir. 2018) (“[T]he Commission ultimately declined institution as
`
`to three of the four identified insufficiently pleaded allegations.”); Certain Stabilized Hull Units
`
`& Components Thereof & Sonar Units Utilizing Said Stabilized Hull Units, Inv. No. 337-TA-103,
`
`Order No. 5, 1981 WL 178568, at *3 (Aug. 13, 1981).
`
`
`
`Caterpillar does not make, import, distribute, or sell the accused Cat phone or other Cat
`
`phones. A third party, Bullitt, makes, sells, and distributes the phone. Bullitt is not owned, operated
`
`by, or affiliated with Caterpillar. Caterpillar merely licenses Bullitt to use certain Caterpillar
`
`trademarks and branding.3 This relationship is emphasized on the website from which Complainant
`
`purchased the phone: “catphones.com.” See Complaint Ex. 117. The warranty page states:
`
`The products subject to these terms and conditions are manufactured,
`sold, and distributed by Bullitt Mobile Limited under a trademark
`(branding) license from Caterpillar Inc. Caterpillar Inc. is not in any
`way involved in the design, manufacture, sale or distribution of these
`products, and is therefore not in any way responsible for product defects
`or other issues pertaining to the products or their functionality.4
`
`At the bottom of the main page for catphones.com, it again states that “trade dress as well as
`
`corporate and product identity used herein, are trademarks of Caterpillar and may not be used without
`
`permission,” and “Bullitt Mobile Ltd a licensee of Caterpillar Inc.”5
`
`Clicking on the “legal” link of catphones.com further reiterates that Bullitt, not Caterpillar,
`
`
`3 Consistent with Caterpillar’s ownership of its trademark rights, Caterpillar owns the domain
`name “catphones.com,” but Bullitt, not Caterpillar, creates and operates the website.
`4 Catphones website, Limited Warranty, supra note 2.
`5 Catphones website, Main Page, https://www.catphones.com/en-us/
`
`2
`
`

`

`is responsible for Cat phones. It provides “Terms & Conditions,” which if expanded provide
`
`“COMPANY DETAILS,” listing Bullitt’s name and address:
`
`Bullitt MOBILE LIMITED
`ADDRESS: ONE VALPY, VALPY STREET, READING, ENGLAND, RG1 1AR
`COMPANY ID NUMBER: 06945690
`VAT NUMBER: GB 208035440
`FORM: LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY6
`
`Next, the “legal” portion provides a “Privacy Policy,” which explains who makes, sells, and
`
`distributes Cat phones: “Bullitt Mobile Limited designs, manufactures, markets and sells mobile
`
`devices under license from global brands.”7 The website of Bullitt also shows that they are
`
`responsible for Cat phones: “Cat phones (made by UK based company Bullitt Group) are designed
`
`specifically to be rugged.”8
`
`II.
`
`Complainant’s Evidence Shows that Caterpillar Is Not Responsible for “Cat Phones”
`
`Complainant’s own evidence shows that Caterpillar is not responsible for Cat phones. The
`
`Complaint incorrectly states that “[l]abels on the product state the product was made by Caterpillar,”
`
`citing “Exhibit 115.” Complaint ¶ 129. But Exhibit 115 nowhere states that Caterpillar “made” the
`
`phone. Instead, it states “Made in PRC” alongside www.catphones.com, listing “Bullitt Mobile Ltd.”
`
`who “is a licensee of Caterpillar Inc.”
`
`The other evidence fares no better. The Complaint cites an invoice for its phone purchase.
`
`See Complaint Ex. 114. But the invoice lists Bullitt’s address (compare supra), not Caterpillar’s.
`
`
`6 Catphones website, Terms & Conditions, https://www.catphones.com/en-us/legal/terms-
`conditions/
`7 See Catphones website, Privacy Policy, https://www.catphones.com/en-us/legal/privacy-policy/
`8 See Bullitt Group website, https://bullitt-group.com/cat-phones-lift-the-lid-on-rugged-to-the-
`core/; see also Catphones website, S62 Instruction Manual at 44 (2020),
`https://www.catphones.com/download/User-Manuals/Cat-S62-Pro-
`Smartphone/S62%20Pro_User_Manual_EN_V4_English.pdf (listing “Bullitt Mobile Limited” as
`the “Manufacturer”).
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Id. Finally, Complainant provides a shipping label (Ex. 116) and an invoice (Ex. 117) that point to
`
`“catphones.com.” As noted above, this website repeatedly states that Bullitt Mobile, not
`
`Caterpillar, is responsible for making, selling, and distributing Cat phones.
`
`The Complaint’s evidence does not support the conclusion that Caterpillar makes, imports,
`
`sells after importation, or distributes Cat phones. As the Federal Circuit explained, before
`
`institution “the Commission must have already ensured that the complaint sufficiently pleaded a
`
`statutory violation.” Laerdal Med. Corp., 910 F.3d at 1213 (emphasis added); see also id. at 1215
`
`(“While the Commission contends that [complainant] did not properly plead a § 1337 violation in
`
`the complaint, the time for that assessment was pre-institution.”).
`
`III. Courts Have Found that Caterpillar Is Not Responsible for “Cat Phones”
`
`Other courts have dismissed actions against Caterpillar because it does not make, sell, or
`
`import Cat phones. In Blue Spike LLC v. Caterpillar Inc., the Plaintiff sued Caterpillar for patent
`
`infringement based on the “Cat phone.” Blue Spike LLC v. Caterpillar Inc., No. 6:16-CV-1361
`
`RWS-JDL, 2017 WL 1829858, at *2 (E.D. Tex. May 8, 2017). Caterpillar submitted two sworn
`
`and unrebutted declarations from Caterpillar Senior Corporate Counsel Jamie Skinner and Bullitt
`
`Group Chief Operating Officer Lawrence Corbett. Id. The declarations stated
`
`that
`
`“Caterpillar's involvement in selling the accused Cat Phones is limited to being a trademark
`
`licensor and that Bullitt Group designs and markets Cat Phones, including by operating the
`
`catphones.com website.” Id. The judge found no evidence creating an issue of material fact that
`
`“Bullitt acted as an agent of Caterpillar” or that “Caterpillar made, used, sold, offered to sell or
`
`imported the accused products.” Id. As a result, the court dismissed the actions with prejudice
`
`against Caterpillar and entered final judgement. Id. The court went further and noted that the
`
`magistrate judge had “found that Rule 11(b)(3) sanctions may be appropriate in this case and,
`
`accordingly, ordered Blue Spike to show cause as to why it should not be sanctioned for filing and
`
`4
`
`

`

`maintaining a frivolous lawsuit against Caterpillar.” Id.
`
`In a subsequent action involving a different plaintiff, the district of Delaware similarly
`
`dismissed a patent infringement claim against Caterpillar over Cat phones. See Altair Logix LLC
`
`v. Caterpillar Inc., No. CV 18-2057 (MN), 2019 WL 3219485, at *2 (D. Del. July 17, 2019).
`
`Caterpillar moved for attorney fees. Id. While the court ultimately denied the fees, it noted:
`
`In the Court's view, Plaintiff and its counsel performed a sloppy pre-
`suit investigation, to say the least. There apparently were several
`sources of information that indicated that [Caterpillar] was not the
`proper party in the present action – e.g., product inserts with the
`accused CAT S41 phone, Wikipedia, etc. (See D.I. 20 ¶¶ 6, 8-9). In
`fact, the issue of which entity manufactures and sells CAT phones
`was previously adjudicated . . . in the Eastern District of Texas.
`
`Id. At *3. And Complainant’s counsel filed pleadings in another case stating that Bullitt Group
`
`Limited manufactures, sells, and imports Cat Phones, including the exact model, the CAT S62 Pro,
`
`that Complainant identified in this investigation.9 The findings and statements in these cases
`
`further show that Caterpillar has not imported into, sold for importation into, or sold in the United
`
`States after importation Cat phones.
`
`Date: December 5, 2022
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Daniel C. Cooley
`Daniel C. Cooley
`Mareesa A. Frederick
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P.
`901 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20001
`Telephone: (202) 408-4000
`Facsimile: (202) 408-4400
`
`Counsel for Caterpillar Inc.
`
`
`
`
`9 Longhorn HD LLC. v. Bullitt Group Ltd., No. 2-22-cv-00068, D.I. 1 ¶ 2, 10 (EDTX 2022).
`
`5
`
`

`

`CERTAIN LOCATION-SHARING SYSTEMS,
`RELATED SOFTWARE, COMPONENTS THEREOF,
`AND PRODUCTS CONTAINING THE SAME
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-
`Docket No. 3655
`
`
`I, Isabella P. Downey, hereby certify that on December 5, 2022, copies of the foregoing were
`
`filed with and served upon the following as indicated:
`
`
`The Honorable Katherine M. Hiner
`Acting Secretary to the Commission
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, SW, Suite 112
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`Counsel for Complainants AGIS Software Development LLC and
`Advanced Ground Information Systems, Inc.
`
`Evan J. Langdon
`FABRICANT LLP
`1101 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 300
`Washington, DC 20004
`Telephone: (202) 507-4899
`E-mail: Agis_ITC@fabricantllp.com
`
`Google LLC
`1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
`Mountain View, CA 94043
`Telephone: (650) 253-0000
`
`Samsung Electronics, Co., Ltd.
`12 Samsung-Ro
`Maetan-3dong, Yeongtong-gu
`Suwon, 443-742, South Korea
`Telephone: (822) 225-0114
`
`Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
`85 Challenger Rd.
`Ridgefield Park, New Jersey 07660
`Telephone: (201) 229-4000
`
`OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
`18F, Tairan Building, Block C
`Tairan 8th Road
`Chgongmiao, Futian District
`Shenzhen, Guangdong 518040, China
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Via First Class Mail
` Via Courier (FedEx)
` Via Hand Delivery
` Via Email (PDF File)
` Via EDIS
`
` Via First Class Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
`Via Overnight Courier
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via EDIS
`
` Via FedEx Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
`Via Overnight Courier
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via EDIS
`
` Via FedEx Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
`Via Overnight Courier
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via EDIS
`
` Via FedEx Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
`Via Overnight Courier
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via EDIS
`
` Via FedEx Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
`Via Overnight Courier
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via EDIS
`
`

`

`TCL Technology Group Corporation
`22/F, TCL Technology Building, No. 17
`Huifeng 3rd Road
`Zhongkai High-Tech Development District
`Huizhou, Guangdong, China 516006
`
`TCL Electronics Holdings Limited
`7th Floor, Building 22E
`22 Science Park East Avenue
`Hong Kong Science Park
`Hong Kong
`
`TCL Communication Technology Holdings
`Limited
`5/F, Building 22E,
`22 Science Park East Avenue
`Hong Kong Science Park, Shatin,
`New Territories, Hong Kong
`
`TCT Mobile (US) Inc.
`25 Edelman, Suite 200
`Irvine, CA 92618
`Telephone: (949) 892-2990
`
`Lenovo Group Ltd.
`6 Chuang ye Road, Haidian District
`Beijing 100085, China
`Telephone: (852) 2590-0228
`
`Lenovo (United States) Inc.
`1009 Think Place, Building One
`Morrisville, NC 27560
`Telephone: (855) 253-6686
`
`Motorola Mobility LLC
`222 W Merchandise Mart Plaza, Suite 1800
`Chicago, IL 60654
`Telephone: (800) 668-6765
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Via FedEx Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
`Via Overnight Courier
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via EDIS
`
` Via FedEx Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
`Via Overnight Courier
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via EDIS
`
` Via FedEx Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
`Via Overnight Courier
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via EDIS
`
` Via FedEx Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
`Via Overnight Courier
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via EDIS
`
` Via FedEx Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
`Via Overnight Courier
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via EDIS
`
` Via FedEx Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
`Via Overnight Courier
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via EDIS
`
` Via FedEx Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
`Via Overnight Courier
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via EDIS
`
`

`

`HMD Global
`Karaportti 2, FIN-02610
`Espoo, Finland
`
`HMD Global OY
`Bertel Jungin aukio 9, 02600
`Espoo, Finland
`
`HMD America, Inc.
`1200 Brickell Ave., Suite 510
`Miami, FL 33131
`
`Sony Corporation
`1-7-1 Konan Minato-ku
`Tokyo, 108-0075, Japan
`Telephone: 81-3-6748-2111
`
`Sony Mobile Communications, Inc.
`4-12-3 Higashi-Shinagawa, Shinagawa-ku
`Tokyo, 140-0002, Japan
`Telephone: (855) 806-8464
`
`ASUSTek Computer Inc.
`No. 15, Li-Te Rd.
`Beitou Dist., Taipei 112, Taiwan
`Telephone: (866) 2-2894-3447
`
`ASUS Computer International
`48720 Kato Rd.
`Fremont, CA 94538
`Telephone: (510) 739-3777
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Via FedEx Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
`Via Overnight Courier
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via EDIS
`
` Via FedEx Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
`Via Overnight Courier
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via EDIS
`
` Via FedEx Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
`Via Overnight Courier
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via EDIS
`
` Via FedEx Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
`Via Overnight Courier
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via EDIS
`
` Via FedEx Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
`Via Overnight Courier
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via EDIS
`
` Via FedEx Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
`Via Overnight Courier
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via EDIS
`
` Via FedEx Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
`Via Overnight Courier
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via EDIS
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Via FedEx Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
`Via Overnight Courier
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via EDIS
`
` Via FedEx Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
`Via Overnight Courier
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via EDIS
`
` Via FedEx Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
`Via Overnight Courier
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via EDIS
`
` Via FedEx Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
`Via Overnight Courier
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via EDIS
`
` Via FedEx Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
`Via Overnight Courier
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via EDIS
`
` Via FedEx Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
`Via Overnight Courier
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via EDIS
`
`BLU Products
`10814 NW 33rd Street
`Doral, FL 33172
`Telephone: (877) 639-6393
`
`Panasonic Corporation
`1006 Oaza Kadoma-shi
`Kadoma 571-8501
`Osaka, Japan
`Phone: +81-6-6908-1121
`Fax: +81-6-6908-2351
`
`Panasonic Corporation of North America
`1 Panasonic Way
`Secaucus, New Jersey 07094
`Phone: (201) 348-7000
`Fax: (201) 348-7016
`
`Kyocera Corporation
`6 Takeda Tobadono-cho, Fushmi-ku
`Kyoto, Japan 612-8501
`
`Xiaomi Corporation
`Maples Corporate Services Limited
`P.O. Box 309
`Ugland House
`Grand Cayman, KY1-1104, Cayman Islands
`
`Xiaomi H.K. Ltd.
`Unit 806, Tower 2 8/F
`Cheung Sha Wan Plaza
`833 Cheung Sha Wan Road
`Kowloon City, Hong Kong
`
`4
`
`

`

`Xiaomi Communications Co., Ltd.
`Xiaomi Office Building
`68 Qinghe Middle Street
`Haidian District
`Beijing, China 100085
`
`Xiaomi Inc.
`Xiaomi Office Building
`68 Qinghe Middle Street
`Haidian District
`Beijing, China 100085
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Via FedEx Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
`Via Overnight Courier
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via EDIS
`
` Via FedEx Mail
` Via Hand Delivery
`Via Overnight Courier
` Via Electronic Mail
` Via EDIS
`
`/s/ Isabella P. Downey
`Isabella P. Downey
`Senior Litigation Legal Assistant
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
` GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P.
`901 New York Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20001
`(202) 408-4000 (Telephone)
`(202) 408-4400 (Facsimile)
`isabella.downey@finnegan.com
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket