PUBLIC VERSION
`
`UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`WASHINGTON,D.C.
`
`Before The Honorable Doris Johnson Hines
`Administrative Law Judge
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN RECHARGEABLE BATTERIES
`
`AND COMPONENTS THEREOF
`
`
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1421
`
`JOINT UNOPPOSED MOTION TO TERMINATE THE INVESTIGATION AS TO
`
`RESPONDENTS DRAGONFLY ENERGY CORP. AND DRAGONFLY ENERGY
`HOLDINGS CORP. BASED ON SETTLEMENT AND REQUEST FOR LIMITED
`SERVICE OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT UNDER19 C.F.R. § 210.21(b)
`
`Pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 210.21(b), Complainants LithtumHub LLC, Lithiumhub
`
`Technologies LLC, and Martin Koebler (together, “Complainants” or “Lithium Hub”) and
`
`Respondents Dragonfly Energy Corp. and Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp.(together,
`
`“Dragonfly”) (collectively, the “Moving Parties”) respectfully move to terminate this
`
`Investigation as to Dragonfly based on a settlement between Lithium Hub and Dragonfly that
`
`resolvesall issues as to Lithium Hub and Dragonfly in this Investigation. Pursuant to 19 C.F.R. §
`
`210.21(b), the moving parties also request the ALJ limit service of the unredacted version of the
`
`attached confidential Settlement Agreement to Lithium Hub, Dragonfly, and the Commission
`
`Investigative Staff.
`
`Ground Rule 5.1 Certification: Pursuant to Ground Rule 5.1, the Moving Parties certify
`
`they made reasonable, good faith efforts to resolve this matter before filing the motion. No party
`
`opposes the motion to terminate Dragonfly. Respondent Navico Group Americas LLC and the
`
`Commission Investigative Staff (“Staff”) also do not oppose the Moving Parties’ request for
`
`limited service of the unredacted version of the Settlement Agreement.
`
`

`

`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`Respondents Renogy New Energy Co., LTD and RNGInternational opposelimiting
`
`service of the non-redacted agreement unless Complainants agree to withdraw their request for a
`
`bond. Respondents Bass Pro Outdoor World LLC; Cabela’s LLC; Relion Battery (Shenzhen)
`
`Technology Co.; Clean Republic SODO LLC; Shenzhen Fbtech Electronics LTD; Shenzhen
`
`LiTime Technology Co., LTD; and MillerTech Energy also opposelimiting service of the non-
`
`redacted agreement.
`
`Lithium Hubfiled its complaint on September 12, 2024, and the Commissioninstituted
`
`this Investigation by publication in the Federal Register on October 21, 2024. As to Dragonfly,
`
`the Complaint alleged violations of § 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 based upon the importation
`
`into the United States, sale for importation, and/or sale within the United States after importation
`
`of certain rechargeable batteries and components thereof by reason of infringementof certain
`
`claims of U.S. Patent No. 9,412,994 and U.S. Patent No. 9,954,207.
`
`Effective March 5, 2025, Lithium Hub and Dragonfly entered into a Settlement
`
`Agreement (“the Agreement”) that resolves all claims in the complaint asserted against
`
`Dragonfly in this Investigation. A copy of the unredacted Agreementis attached as Confidential
`
`Exhibit 1.! The Agreementcontains confidential business information within the meaning of 19
`
`C.F.R. § 201.6(a). Pursuant to Commission Rule 210.21(b)(1), a copy of the Agreement with
`
`confidential business information redacted is attached as Exhibit 2. Other than the Agreement,
`
`there are no other agreements, written or oral, express or implied, between Lithium Hub and
`
`Dragonfly concerning the subject matter of this Investigation. See 19 C.F.R. § 210.21(b)(1).
`
`' Consistent with the Moving Parties’ request to limit service of the Agreement, the non-Moving
`Parties will receive a fully redacted Exhibit 1.
`
`

`

`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`In view of the settlement reached by Lithium Hub and Dragonfly, there no longer exists a
`
`basis upon whichto continue this Investigation as to Dragonfly.It is therefore in the interest of
`
`the public and administrative economyto grant this motion. Further, the MovingParties are not
`
`aware of any adverse effects the Agreement would have on the public interest. See 19 C.F.R. §
`
`210.50(b)(2). Commission policy and the public interest generally favor terminating
`
`investigations on the basis of settlement, which preserves resources for both the Commission and
`
`the private parties. See, e.g., Certain Digital Cameras, Software, and Components Thereof, Inv.
`
`No. 337-TA-1059, Comm’n Notice, at 3 (Mar. 8, 2019) (“Moreover, the public interest favors
`
`settlement to avoid needlesslitigation and to conserve public and private resources.”); Certain
`
`LED Lighting Devices, LED Power Supplies, and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-1081,
`
`Order No. 42 at 2 (May 2, 2018) (“The public interest generally favors settlement to avoid
`
`needless litigation and to conserve public resources.”).
`
`The Moving Parties further request that service of the unredacted version of the
`
`Agreement be limited to Lithium Hub, Dragonfly, and Staff. See 19 C.F.R. § 210.21(b). Good
`
`cause exists to limit service of the Agreement in this manner. First, the Moving Parties should
`
`not be forced to disclose the precise financial terms of the Agreement or other key terms that
`
`were specifically negotiated by the Moving Parties and impacted the resulting financial terms.
`
`ALJs routinely restrict service of settlement agreements to non-settling respondents because
`
`forcing settling respondents to disclose the terms of the agreementto their direct competitors
`
`would necessarily discourage future settlements. See, e.g., Certain Mach. Vision Software, Mach.
`
`Vision Sys., & Prods. Containing Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-680, Order No. 17 at 4 (Oct. 26, 2009)
`
`(“[I]n section 337 investigations .
`
`.
`
`. forcing settling respondents and Complainants to reveal the
`
`precise terms oftheir settlements to non-settling respondents could discourage settlements, even
`
`

`

`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`if such disclosures were made only to counsel who have subscribedto the protective order.”);
`
`Certain Light-Emitting Diodes and Products Containing Same, Inv. No. 337- TA-785, Order No.
`
`37 at 2 (Aug. 29, 2012) (same); Certain Computing or Graphics Systems, Components Thereof,
`
`and Vehicles Containing Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-984, Order No. 33 at 2-3 (May 10, 2016)
`
`(same); Certain Machine Vision Software, Machine Vision Systems, and Products Containing the
`
`Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-680, Order No. 17 (Oct. 26, 2009) (holding that counsel for non-settling
`
`respondents werenotentitled to receive unreacted financial terms of settlement). Here,
`
`disclosure of the redacted terms to the remaining Respondents would negatively impact
`
`Complainants’ ability to negotiate and reach settlement agreements with those Respondents.
`
`Second, pursuant to Section 5 of the Agreement, the terms of the Agreementare to be
`
`kept strictly confidential and not disclosed except as required by law. See Certain Non-Volatile
`
`Memory Chips and Products Containing the Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-916, Order No. 30 at 3
`
`(Feb. 18, 2015) (granting motion to limit service: ““While the termination of the Investigation
`
`appliesto all the Respondents, the settlement agreementis confidential between Spansion and
`
`Macronix, and I therefore find that there is good cause to limit service to the settling parties and
`
`Staff. ..”). Limiting service of the Agreement would also implement the MovingParties’ intent to
`
`keep the Agreement confidential. See Certain Quartz Slabs and Portions Thereof, Inv. No. 337-
`
`TA-996, Order No. 19 (Oct. 12, 2016) (limiting service of an unredacted settlement agreementto
`
`the settling parties and Staff because doing so would “effect the parties’ intent” to keep the terms
`
`confidential and the terms were not relevant to the other Respondents); Certain Semiconductor
`
`Devices, Products Containing the Same, and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-1177, Order
`
`No. 5 at 3 (Nov. 25, 2019) (“[T]here is good causeto limit service of the settlement agreementin
`
`

`

`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`this investigation, where the settling parties have agreed to keep the terms of the agreement
`
`confidential’’).
`
`For the foregoing reasons, the Moving Parties respectfully request the ALJ terminate this
`
`investigation as to Dragonfly, and the Moving Parties respectfully request the ALJ limit service
`
`of the unredacted, confidential Agreement to Lithium Hub, Dragonfly, and Staff pursuant to 19
`
`C.F.R. § 210.21(b). Upon granting this motion and terminating the Investigation as to Dragonfly,
`
`Respondents Bass Pro Outdoor World LLC, Cabela’s LLC, Navico Group Americas LLC’,
`
`Renogy New Energy Co., Ltd., RNG International Inc., Shenzhen Fbtech Electronics Ltd,
`
`Shenzhen LiTime Technology Co., Ltd, Clean Republic SODO LLC, MillerTech Energy
`
`Solutions LLC, and Relion Battery (Shenzhen) Technology Co. will be the remaining
`
`Respondents in this Investigation.
`
`Dated: March 7, 2025
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`/s/ Thomas R. Burns, Jr.
`Paul M. Bartkowski
`Thomas R. Burns,Jr.
`Emi Ito Ortiz
`BARTKOWSKI PLLC
`6803 Whittier Ave., Suite 200A
`McLean, VA 22101
`E-Mail: LITH-ITC@dority-manning.com
`
`Timothy F. Williams
`Scott A. Cole
`Mark H. Johnson
`Dority & Manning LLP
`TwoLiberty Square
`75 Beattie Place, Suite 1100
`Greensville, SC 29601
`Email: LITH-ITC@dority-manning.com
`
`/s/ Elizabeth A. DiMarco
`Elizabeth A. DiMarco
`WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS,P.C.
`601 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
`Washington, D.C. 20001
`
`John S. Harmon
`WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS,P.C.
`600 Atlantic Avenue
`Boston, MA 02210
`Email: WGS-Dragonfly-
`ITC1421@WolfGreenfield.com
`
`Counselfor Respondents Dragonfly Energy
`Corp. and Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp.
`
`? Respondent Navico Group Americas, LLC has reached an agreementin principle to settle and
`has all procedural schedule deadlines stayed pending a motion to terminate.
`
`

`

`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`Nicole S. Cunningham
`Steven A. Moore
`Helen Zhang
`Dority & Manning LLP
`2869 Historic Decatur Rd.
`San Diego, CA 92106
`Email: LITH-ITC@dority-manning.com
`
`Howard Wisnia
`Wisnia PC
`12636 High Bluff Dr., Suite 400
`San Diego, CA 92130
`Email: howard@wisnialaw.com
`
`Complainants LithiumHub, LLC, Lithiumhub
`Technologies, LLC, and Martin Koebler
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`I, Laurie Ouchida, hereby certify that on March 7, 2025, copies of the foregoing were filed with
`and served upon the following as indicated:
`
`
`
` VIA EDIS
`
` VIA EMAIL
`Ryan.Schmid@usitc.gov
`
` VIA EDIS
` VIA BOX
` VIA EMAIL
`JohnsonHines1421@usitc.gov
`
`Lisa R. Barton
`Secretary to the Commission
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, SW, Room 112
`Washington, D.C. 20436
`
`The Honorable Doris Johnson Hines
`Administrative Law Judge
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, SW, Room 317
`Washington, D.C. 20436
`
`Ryan A. Schmid
`Office of Unfair Import Investigations
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, SW
`Washington, D.C. 20436
`
`Counsel for Respondents Bass Pro Outdoor World LLC and Cabela’s LLC:
`
`William D. Cramer
`Clark Hill PLC
`901 Main Street, Suite 6000
`Dallas, TX 75202
`
`Counsel for Respondent Navico Group Americas, LLC:
`
`Matthew J. Herko
`Jones Day
`110 N. Wacker Drive, Suite 4800
`Chicago, IL 60606
`
`Counsel for Respondents Dragonfly Energy Corp. and Dragonfly Energy Holdings
`Corp.:
`
`Elizabeth A. DiMarco
`Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
`601 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
`Washington, D.C. 20001
`
`
` VIA EMAIL
`ITC1421@ClarkHill.com
`BassCabela-ITC@reedsmith.com
`
` VIA EMAIL
`NavicoITC1421@jonesday.com
`
` VIA EMAIL
`WGS-Dragonfly-
`ITC1421@WolfGreenfield.com
`
`

`

` VIA EMAIL
`jhill@cov.com
`COV-ITC-Renogy@cov.com
`
`Counsel for Respondents Renogy New Energy Co., Ltd. and RNG International Inc.:
`
`Jessica C. Hill
`Covington & Burling LLP
`One CityCenter
`850 Tenth Street, NW
`Washington, D.C. 20001
`
`Counsel for Respondents Shenzhen Fbtech Electronics Ltd, Shenzhen LiTime
`Technology Co., Ltd, Clean Republic SODO LLC, MillerTech Energy Solutions LLC,
`and Relion Battery (Shenzhen) Technology Co.:
`
`Tony V. Pezzano
`Lippes Mathias LLP
`420 Lexington Avenue, Ste. 205
`New York, NY 10170
`
`
` VIA EMAIL
`LIPPES-ITC-1421@lippes.com
`guping@zhonglun.com
`
`
` /s/ Laurie Ouchida
`
`
`Laurie Ouchida
`Senior Paralegal
`BARTKOWSKI PLLC
`E: louchida@bartkowskipllc.com
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`REDACTED IN ITS ENTIRETY
`REDACTED IN ITS ENTIRETY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 2
`EXHIBIT 2
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
`This Settlement Agreement (“Agreement”), effective as of the date on which the last party has
`signed this Agreement (“Effective Date”), is entered into by and between LithiumHub, LLC;
`LithiumHub Technologies, LLC; and Martin Koebler (collectively “LithiumHub”); on the one
`hand, and Dragonfly Energy Corporation and Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp. (collectively,
`“Dragonfly”), on the other hand. Each of the above referenced entities may be referred to herein
`as a “Party” or collectively as the “Parties.”
`WHEREAS, LithiumHub (as Complainants) and Dragonfly (as Respondents) are parties to a
`proceeding before the U.S. International Trade Commission, entitled Certain Rechargeable
`Batteries and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-1421 (“Litigation”); and
`WHEREAS, the Parties desire to expeditiously fully and finally resolve all claims relating to the
`Litigation as between the Parties and enter into this Agreement.
`WHEREAS, LithiumHub Technologies, LLC (“Licensor”) is willing to grant a non-exclusive
`license in its patent rights, and Dragonfly desires to end its participation in the Litigation and
`enter into a non-exclusive license to Licensor’s patents asserted in the Litigation, while denying
`any infringement, altogether in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement;
`NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants set out herein and for other good
`and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged by
`each Party, the Parties, on behalf of themselves and their respective affiliates intending to be
`legally bound, covenant and agree as follows:
`1.
`PATENT LICENSE
`1.1
`Licensed Patents. “Licensed Patents” means U.S. Patent Nos. 9,412,994 and
`9,954,207, and any continuations, continuations-in-part, divisionals, reissues, foreign
`counterparts thereof, or any application or patent claiming priority thereto.
`1.2 Dragonfly Affiliates. “Dragonfly Affiliates” means: (i) any current, former, or
`future Dragonfly subsidiaries; (ii) all entities now or in the future controlling, controlled by, or
`under common control with Dragonfly for the period of time that such control exists; (iii) all
`entities in the past controlling, controlled by, or under common control with Dragonfly for the
`period of time that such control exists; and/or (iv) predecessors or successors, including all
`entities formed or acquired by Dragonfly in the future (unless such entity has been found to
`infringe the Licensed Patents in a final judgment before the acquisition by Dragonfly or has
`been alleged to infringe the Licensed Patents in an ongoing lawsuit or a written communication
`to DragonFly from LithiumHub before or at the time of the acquisition by Dragonfly). For
`purposes of this definition, the terms “control,” “controlled by,” and “under common control
`with” shall mean the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the
`direction of the management or policies of such person or entity and, shall include (a) in the case
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`of a corporate entity, direct or indirect ownership of more than 50 percent of the securities having
`the right to vote for the election of directions, and (b) in the case of a non-corporate entity, direct
`or indirect ownership of more than 50 percent of the equity interests and/or the power to direct
`the management and policies of such non-corporate entity.
`1.3 License Grant. Subject to the terms of this Agreement, Licensor hereby grants to
`Dragonfly and Dragonfly Affiliates (collectively, “Licensees”) a personal, non-exclusive, non-
`transferable license to the Licensed Patents, to make, have made, use, offer to sell, sell, and
`import lithium batteries and lithium battery products that were accused of infringement in the
`Litigation, were within the scope of the Litigation, any future versions of such products, and any
`other future products imported, sold, or manufactured by the Licensees in the United States that
`would infringe one or more claims of the Licensed Patents but for this Agreement.
`1.4
`No Other License. No other license or grant of rights, express or implied, is
`granted to Licensees either directly or by implication, estoppel, or otherwise. No rights or
`licenses are extended for products or services not expressly licensed by paragraph 1.2. No other
`Respondent in the Litigation is licensed, or receives any grant of rights, express or implied, by
`this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall authorize, permit, or license any unaffiliated
`third party (i.e., any entity that is not a Dragonfly Affiliate) to offer for sale, sell, import, or make
`lithium batteries or lithium battery products.
`2.
`CONSIDERATION
`2.1
`
`As consideration for the rights granted to Dragonfly in this Agreement (including
`the Release and Covenants), Dragonfly agrees to pay LithiumHub a total of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2.1.4 The consideration due to LithiumHub hereunder and Dragonfly’s payment
`obligations shall remain unaffected by the results of the Litigation and shall also not be
`affected or excused in any manner by any judgment or any other determination in any
`proceeding of any nature whatsoever that one or more claims of the Licensed Patents are
`invalid or unenforceable, including (but not limited to) any proceedings in a federal or
`state court or in the United States Patent and Trademark Office (e.g., patent reissue,
`reexamination, inter partes review, or other post-issuance proceedings).
`2.1.5
`
`
`
`
`material term of this Agreement.
`
`
`
`
`. This is a
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

` All payments shall be made to the LithiumHub by wire transfer using the
`2.1.6
`following information:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3.
`
`
`RELEASE AND DISMISSAL
`3.1
`Release of Liability. Effective upon receipt of
`LithiumHub hereby releases and discharges Dragonfly, its directors, officers,
`representatives, employees, customers, and distributors, and Dragonfly Affiliates from any and
`all claims, proceedings, causes of action, demands, damages, and liabilities, whether known or
`unknown, absolute or contingent, direct or indirect, that have arisen, could have arisen, or could
`arise out of the claims in the Litigation and the negotiation of the Agreement. This release does
`not include any other Respondent in the Litigation.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Release of Liability. Effective upon the Effective Date, Dragonfly hereby
`3.2
`
`releases and discharges LithiumHub, its directors, officers, representatives, employees, and
`customers, and LithiumHub Affiliates from any and all claims, proceedings, causes of action,
`demands, damages, and liabilities, whether known or unknown, absolute or contingent, direct or
`indirect, that have arisen, could have arisen, or could arise out of the claims in the Litigation and
`the negotiation of the Agreement.
`3.3
`Termination of the Litigation. Within five (5) business days after the Effective
`Date, the Parties shall (a) file with the U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC”) a motion for
`termination of the Investigation as to Dragonfly with each Party to bear its own attorneys' fees,
`expenses, and costs. As needed, the Parties agree to submit to all appropriate motions and
`proposed orders for extensions of time for all due dates in the Litigation so that neither Party is
`required to incur unnecessary expenses in the Litigation until the motion for termination as to
`Dragonfly is granted.
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`COVENANTS
`4.
`4.1 LithiumHub Affiliates. “LithiumHub Affiliates” means: (i) any current, former,
`
`or future LithiumHub subsidiaries; (ii) all entities now or in the future controlling, controlled by,
`or under common control with LithiumHub for the period of time that such control exists; (iii) all
`entities in the past controlling, controlled by, or under common control with LithiumHub for the
`period of time that such control exists; and/or (iv) predecessors or successors, including all
`entities formed or acquired by LithiumHub. For purposes of this definition, the terms “control,”
`“controlled by,” and “under common control with” shall mean the possession, directly or
`indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management or policies of such
`person or entity and, shall include (a) in the case of a corporate entity, direct or indirect
`ownership of more than 50 percent of the securities having the right to vote for the election of
`directions, and (b) in the case of a non-corporate entity, direct or indirect ownership of more than
`50 percent of the equity interests and/or the power to direct the management and policies of such
`non-corporate entity.
`4.2 General Covenants. LithiumHub covenants, that as of the Effective Date,
`LithiumHub and LithiumHub Affiliates do not own or possess enforcement rights for any other
`United States Patent for which it is aware that Dragonfly is allegedly infringing.
`4.3
`Covenant Not to Assist. Dragonfly and Dragonfly Affiliates covenant not to file,
`participate in, or assist any third party with, any proceeding, action, or litigation of any nature
`whatsoever asserting that one or both of the Licensed Patents is invalid or unenforceable. In the
`event that LithiumHub revokes the license grants provided under Section 1.2, this Covenant 4.3
`will also be extinguished, and Dragonfly will no longer be restricted from challenging the
`validity of the Licensed Patents.
`4.4
`Covenant Not to Sue.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Covenant Not to Subpoena. LithiumHub agrees not to rely on Dragonfly or any
`4.5
`Dragonfly Affiliate to satisfy the domestic industry requirement of Section 337 in any future
`litigation at the International Trade Commission and further agrees not to request a subpoena
`against Dragonfly or any Dragonfly Affiliate relating to the satisfaction of the domestic industry
`requirement of Section 337.
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`5.
`
`CONFIDENTIALITY
`5.1
`Neither Party shall disclose the terms of this Agreement except: (a) with the prior
`written consent of the other Party; (b) to any governmental body having jurisdiction and
`specifically requiring such disclosure, including the ITC; (c) for the purposes of disclosure in
`connection with the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Securities Act of
`1933, as amended, and any other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or
`any other filings, reports, or disclosures that may be required under applicable laws or
`regulations; (d) to a Party’s accountants, legal counsel, tax advisors, and other financial and legal
`advisors, subject to obligations of confidentiality and/or privilege at least as stringent as those
`contained herein; and (e) if disclosure is demanded by a subpoena, order from a court or
`government agency, or as may otherwise be required by law or regulation, and subject to
`protective order or written agreement between counsel that such disclosure shall be limited to
`“Attorneys’ Eyes Only”; and, in the case disclosure is pursuant to a protective order, such
`protective order shall provide, to the extent practicable, that any production under a protective
`order would be protected under an "Attorneys' Eyes Only" or higher confidentiality designation.
`The existence of this Agreement is not confidential.
`5.2
`The Parties agree to move for limited service of this Agreement in the
`Investigation pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 210.21(b)(l).
`5.3
`Notwithstanding Section 5.1, either party may disclose that Dragonfly and
`Dragonfly Affiliates are licensed under the Licensed Patents.
`6.
`REPRESENTATION, WARRANTIES, AND DISCLAIMERS
`6.1
`
`LithiumHub represents and warrants that (a) it has not assigned to any person or
`entity any claim against Dragonfly; (b) it has all requisite corporate power and authority, on
`behalf of itself and its subsidiaries, to execute and deliver this Agreement and to carry out the
`provisions of this Agreement; (c) the individual signing this Agreement on its behalf has all
`requisite power and authority to do so; and (d) this Agreement does not violate any other
`agreement to which it is bound.
`6.2
`
`Dragonfly represents and warrants that (a) it has not assigned to any person or
`entity any claim against LithiumHub; (b) it has all requisite corporate power and authority, on
`behalf of itself and its subsidiaries, to execute and deliver this Agreement and to carry out the
`provisions of this Agreement; (c) the individuals signing this Agreement on its behalf has all
`requisite power and authority to do so; and (d) this Agreement does not violate any other
`agreement to which it is bound.
`6.3
`
`Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as requiring or imposing on
`LithiumHub the obligation, or as conferring upon Dragonfly (or any other person or entity) a
`right, to bring or prosecute actions of suits against third parties for infringement of any License
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`Patent, or upon LithiumHub to defend any suit or action that challenges or concerns the validity
`or enforceability of a Licensed Patent.
`6.4 Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as an admission by Dragonfly that
`
`any Dragonfly product or any Dragonfly Affiliates’ product infringes the Licensed Patents. In
`the Litigation, Dragonfly denied that any of its past, present, or future products infringe the
`Licensed Patents.
`6.5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6.6
`EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE EXPRESSLY SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT,
`
`LITHIUMHUB AND DRAGONFLY MAKE NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES
`OF ANY KIND, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, OR
`STATUTORY WARRANTIES, OR WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR
`A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, PATENT ENFORCEABILITY, OR PATENT VALIDITY.
`7.
`MISCELLANEOUS
`7.1
`LithiumHub shall have the right to immediately terminate all license grants in
`Section 1 of this Agreement if Dragonfly should institute, file, participate in, or assist any third
`party with, any proceeding, action, or litigation of any nature whatsoever asserting that one or
`both of the Licensed Patents is invalid or unenforceable.
`7.2
`Subject to the covenants and agreements above, nothing in this Agreement shall
`be construed to, of have the effect of impairing, or otherwise prevent LithiumHub from bringing
`an infringement action or recovering damages from any third-party manufacturer or importer that
`makes, sells, or imports products that infringe one or more of the Licensed Patents.
`7.3
`This Agreement shall be governed by, interpreted, and construed in accordance
`with the laws of the State of South Carolina without reference to conflicts of laws principles.
`7.4
`Any disputes arising under or regarding the interpretation of this Agreement will
`be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal courts of the State of South Carolina, the
`United States International Trade Commission, and the courts with jurisdiction over appeals from
`the foregoing. Each Party irrevocably consents to the jurisdiction thereof and venue therein.
`7.5
`The language of this Agreement has been approved by counsel for the Parties. The
`language of this Agreement shall be construed as a whole according to its fair meaning and none
`of the Parties (or the Parties' respective attorneys) shall be deemed to be the draftsman of this
`Agreement in any action which may hereafter arise amongst the Parties. The headings used
`herein shall not be used to interpret or construe this Agreement.
`7.6
`This is an enforceable agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire
`agreement amongst the Parties and supersede all previous communications, representations,
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`

`agreements, or understandings, either oral or written, between the Parties with respect to the
`subject matter hereof. This Agreement may be amended, supplemented, or modified only by a
`written instrument duly executed by or on behalf of each Party hereto which specifically refers to
`this Agreement.
`7.7
`No waiver of any breach of any provision of this Agreement shall constitute a
`waiver of any prior, concurrent, or subsequent breach of the same or any provisions hereof, and
`no waiver shall be effective unless made in writing and signed by an authorized representative of
`the waiving Party.
`7.8
`If any provision of this Agreement shall be determined to be invalid, illegal, or
`unenforceable under any controlling body of law, that provision shall be reformed, construed,
`and enforced to the maximum extent permissible; and the validity, legality, and enforceability of
`the remaining provisions shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby.
`7.9
`This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an
`original hereof, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. Delivery
`of signatures by means of facsimile or electronic mail shall be as effective as original signatures.
`7.10
`In the event of a conflict between Provision 1.3 or 1.4 and any other Provision in
`this Agreement, Provisions 1.3 and 1.4 shall govern.
`
`[THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`SIGNATURES
`
`AS FOR LITHIUMHUB:
`By: Aft bile
`NAME: Martin Apeble—
`TITLE:
`Qe esideut
`DATE: Haegn § 7025
`
`AS FOR DRAGONFLY:
`
`BY:
`
`- BB
`
`TITLE: CEO
`DATE: a/5/20rs
`
`9
`
`

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.

We are unable to display this document.

PTO Denying Access

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket