Federal Register/Vol. 88, No. 133/Thursday, July 13, 2023 / Notices
`
`An agency may not conduct, or
`sponsoranda personis not required to
`respondto a collection of information
`unless it displays a currently valid OMB
`control number.
`The authority for this action is the
`Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
`U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
`Kirk Malstrom,
`Chief, Regulations and Standards Branch.
`[FR Doc. 2023-14812 Filed 7-12-23; 8:45 am]
`BILLING CODE 4310-VH-P
`
`
`INTERNATIONAL TRADE
`COMMISSION
`
`[Investigation No. 337-TA—1347]
`
`Certain Location-Sharing Systems,
`Related Software, Components
`Thereof, and Products Containing
`Same; Notice of Commission
`Determination Not To Review Three
`Initial Determinations Terminating the
`Investigation as to Certain
`Respondentsandin Its Entirety;
`Termination of the Investigation
`AGENCY:U.S. International Trade
`Commission.
`ACTION: Notice.
`
`SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
`the U.S. International Trade
`Commission has determined not to
`review three initial determinations
`(“IDs”) of the presiding administrative
`law judge (“ALJ”) that terminate the
`above-captioned investigation asto:(1}
`respondent OnePlus Technology
`(Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. based on
`settlement (Order No. 24); (2)
`respondents Xiaomi Corporation,
`Xiaomi H.K.Ltd., Xiaomi
`Communications Co., Ltd., and Xiaomi
`Inc. based on settlement (Order No. 25);
`and (3) the remaining respondents based
`on withdrawal of the complaint (Order
`No. 26). The investigation is terminated.
`FOR FURTHERINFORMATION CONTACT:
`Richard P. Hadorn,Esq., Office of the
`General Counsel, U.S. International
`Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
`Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
`205-3179. Copies of non-confidential
`documents filed in connection with this
`investigation may be viewed on the
`Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
`at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help
`accessing EDIS, please email
`EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General
`information concerning the Commission
`may also be obtained by accessingits
`internetserver at htips://www.usitc.gov.
`Hearing-impaired persons are advised
`that information on this matter can be
`obtained by contacting the
`
`Commission’s TDD terminal, telephone
`(202) 205-1810.
`SUPPLEMENTARYINFORMATION: The
`Commissioninstituted this investigation
`on December30, 2022, based on a
`complaint filed by Advanced Ground
`Information Systems,Inc.of Jupiter,
`Florida and AGIS Software
`Development LLC of Marshall, Texas
`(collectively, “AGIS”). 87 FR 80568-69
`(Dec. 30, 2022). The complaint,as
`supplemented,alleges violations of
`section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
`amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, based on the
`importation into the United States, the
`sale for importation, and the sale within
`the United States after importation of
`certain location-sharing systems,related
`software, components thereof, and
`products containing same by reason of
`the infringementof certain claims of
`U.S. Patent Nos. 8,213,970 (“the ’970
`patent’’); 9,445,251 (“the ’251 patent”’);
`9,467,838 (“the ’838 patent”); 9,749,829
`(‘the ’829 patent’’); and 9,820,123 (‘the
`123 patent”). Id. at 80568. The
`complaint further alleges that a
`domestic industry exists.Id.
`Thenotice of investigation named 26
`respondents: (1) Kyocera Corporation
`(“Kyocera”) of Kyoto, Japan;(2)
`OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co.,
`Ltd. (“OnePlus’’) of Shenzhen,
`Guangdong,China; (3) Xiaomi
`Corporation of Grand Cayman, Cayman
`Islands; Xiaomi H.K. Ltd. of Kowloon
`City, Hong Kong; Xiaomi
`Communications Co., Ltd. of Beijing,
`China; and XiaomiInc.of Beijing, China
`(collectively, ‘““Xiaomi”); and (4) Google
`LLC of Mountain View, California;
`SamsungElectronics, Co., Ltd. of
`Suwon, Republic of Korea; Samsung
`Electronics America,Inc. of Ridgefield
`Park, New Jersey; TCL Technology
`Group Corporation of Huizhou,
`Guangdong, China; TCL Electronics
`Holdings Limited of Hong Kong Science
`Park, Hong Kong; TCL Communication
`Technology Holdings Limited of Hong
`Kong Science Park, Hong Kong; TCT
`Mobile (US) Inc. of Irvine, California;
`Lenovo GroupLtd. of Beijing, China;
`Lenovo (United States) Inc. of
`Morrisville, North Carolina; Motorola
`Mobility LLC of Chicago,Illinois; HMD
`Global of Espoo, Finland; HMD Global
`OY of Espoo, Finland; HMD America,
`Inc. of Miami, Florida; Sony
`Corporation of Tokyo, Japan; Sony
`Mobile Communications,Inc. of Tokyo,
`Japan; ASUSTek ComputerInc. of
`Taipei, Taiwan; ASUS Computer
`International of Fremont, California;
`BLU Products of Doral, Florida;
`Panasonic Corporation of Osaka, Japan;
`Panasonic Corporation of North
`America of Secaucus, New Jersey
`
`(collectively, the ‘Remaining
`Respondents”). Id. at 80569. The Office
`of Unfair Import Investigations (‘OUI’)
`is also namedas a party.Id.
`On February 17, 2023, the
`Commission amended the complaint
`and notice of investigation to substitute
`Panasonic Holdings Corporation of
`Osaka, Japan, in place of named
`respondent Panasonic Corporation.
`OrderNo. 7 (Feb. 1, 2023), unreviewed
`by 88 FR 11477 (Feb. 23, 2023).
`On June6, 2023, the Commission
`terminated the investigation as to the
`following asserted claims based on
`withdrawal: (i) claim 2 of the ’970
`patent; (ii) claims 1-2, 7-8, 23, 25, 29-
`30, and 35 of the ’251 patent; (iii) claims
`3, 5-8, 10, 16, 19, 38, 40, 55-56, 61-64,
`68, 71—72, 80 and 84 of the ’838 patent;
`(iv) claims 1, 8, 34, and 41 of the ’829
`patent; and (v) claim 14 of the 7123
`patent. Order No. 16 (May 17, 2023),
`unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (June6,
`2023).
`On June 27, 2023, the Commission
`terminated the investigation as to
`Kyocera based on settlement. Order No.
`19, unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (June
`27, 2023).
`On June 14, 2023, AGIS and OnePlus
`filed a joint motion to terminate the
`investigation as to OnePlus based on a
`settlement agreement. On June 16, 2023,
`OUIIfiled a response supporting the
`motion. No other responsesto the
`motion werefiled.
`On June 15, 2023, AGIS and Xiaomi
`filed a joint motion to terminate the
`investigation as to Xiaomi based on a
`settlement agreement. On June 16, 2023,
`OUITIfiled a response supporting the
`motion. No other responsesto the
`motion werefiled.
`On June 15, 2023, AGISfiled a motion
`to terminate the investigation as to the
`Remaining Respondents based on
`withdrawal of the complaint. On June
`16, 2023, OUTfiled a response
`supporting the motion. On June20,
`2023, the Remaining Respondentsfiled
`a responsestating that they do not
`oppose the motion. No other responses
`to the motion werefiled.
`On June 20, 2023, the ALJ issuedall
`three subject IDs (Order Nos. 24, 25, and
`26). Order Nos. 24 and 25 grant the
`unopposed joint motions to terminate
`the investigation as to OnePlus and
`Xiaomi, respectively, finding that the
`motions comply with the requirements
`of Commission Rule 210.21(b)(1) (19
`CFR 210.21(b)(1)), and that the proposed
`settlements do not adversely affect the
`public interest in accordance with
`Commission Rule 210.50(b)(2) (19 CFR
`210.50(b)(2)). Order No. 24 at 2-3; Order
`No. 25 at 2-3. Order No. 26 grants the
`unopposed motion to terminate the
`
`

`

`44841
`Federal Register/Vol. 88, No. 133/Thursday, July 13, 2023 / Notices
`
`investigation as to the Remaining
`Respondents and thusin its entirety,
`finding that the motion complies with
`the requirements of Commission Rule
`210.21(a)(1) (19 CFR 210.21(a)(1)), and
`that ‘‘no extraordinary circumstances
`exist that would prevent the requested
`termination of this Investigation.”’ Order
`No.26 at 2-3. No petitions for review
`of the subject IDs werefiled.
`The Commission has determined not
`to review the subject IDs. The
`investigation is terminated as to
`OnePlus, Xiaomi, and the Remaining
`Respondents and,thus,in its entirety.
`The Commission votefor this
`determination took place on July 7,
`2023.
`The authority for the Commission’s
`determination is contained in section
`337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
`amended(19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
`210 of the Commission’s Rules of
`Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
`210).
`By order of the Commission.
`Issued: July 10, 2023.
`Lisa Barton,
`Secretary to the Commission.
`[FR Doc. 2023-14840 Filed 7-12-23; 8:45 am]
`BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
`
`INTERNATIONAL TRADE
`COMMISSION
`
`[Investigation No. 731-TA-893 (Fourth
`Review)]
`
`Honey From China; Scheduling of an
`Expedited Five-Year Review
`AGENCY: United States International
`Trade Commission.
`ACTION: Notice.
`
`SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives
`notice of the scheduling of an expedited
`review pursuantto the Tariff Act of
`1930 (‘‘the Act”) to determine whether
`revocation of the antidumping duty
`order on honey from China would be
`likely to lead to continuation or
`recurrence of material injury within a
`reasonably foreseeable time.
`DATES: June 5, 2023.
`FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
`Alejandro Orozco (202-205-3177),
`Office of Investigations, U.S.
`International Trade Commission, 500 E
`Street SW, Washington, DC 20436.
`Hearing-impaired persons can obtain
`information on this matter by contacting
`the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202—
`205-1810. Persons with mobility
`impairments who will need special
`assistance in gaining access to the
`Commission should contact the Office
`of the Secretary at 202-205-2000.
`
`General information concerning the
`Commission may also be obtained by
`accessingits internet server (https://
`www.usitc.gov). The public record for
`this proceeding may be viewed on the
`Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
`at https://edis.usitc.gov.
`SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
`Background.—OnJune5, 2023, the
`Commission determined that the
`domestic interested party group
`responseto its notice of institution (88
`FR 12992, March 1, 2023) of the subject
`five-year review was adequate and that
`the respondentinterested party group
`response was inadequate. The
`Commission did not find any other
`circumstances that would warrant
`conducting a full review. Accordingly,
`the Commission determinedthatit
`would conduct an expedited review
`pursuantto section 751(c)(3) of the
`Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
`1675(c)(3)).?
`For further information concerning
`the conductof this review and rules of
`general application, consult the
`Commission’s Rules of Practice and
`Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B
`(19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
`subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part
`207).
`Staff report.—Astaff report
`containing information concerning the
`subject matter of the review has been
`placed in the nonpublic record, and will
`be madeavailable to persons on the
`Administrative Protective Order service
`list for this review on August23, 2023.
`A public version will be issued
`thereafter, pursuant to § 207.62(d)(4) of
`the Commission’s rules.
`Written submissions.—Asprovided in
`§ 207.62(d) of the Commission’s rules,
`interested parties that are parties to the
`review and that have provided
`individually adequate responsesto the
`notice of institution,? and any party
`other than an interested party to the
`review mayfile written comments with
`the Secretary on what determination the
`Commission should reach in the review.
`Comments are due on or before August
`31, 2023 and may not contain new
`factual information. Any personthatis
`neither a party to the five-year review
`nor an interested party may submit a
`
`1A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the
`Commission's statement on adequacy, and any
`individual Commissioner’s statements will be
`available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
`Commission's website.
`2 Chairman David S. Johanson voted to conduct
`a full review.
`3 The Commission has found the responses
`submitted on behalf of the American Honey
`Producers Association and the Sioux Honey
`Association to be individually adequate. Comments
`from other interested parties will not be accepted
`(see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)).
`
`brief written statement (which shall not
`contain any new factual information)
`pertinent to the review by August 31,
`2023. However, should the Department
`of Commerce(‘“‘Commerce”’) extend the
`time limit for its completion ofthe final
`results of its review, the deadline for
`comments (which may not contain new
`factual information) on Commerce’s
`final results is three business days after
`the issuance of Commerce’s results. If
`comments contain business proprietary
`information (BPI), they must conform
`with the requirements of §§ 201.6,
`207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s
`rules. The Commission’s Handbook on
`Filing Procedures, available on the
`Commission’s website at https://
`www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_
`onfilingprocedures.pdf, elaborates
`upon the Commission’s procedures with
`respectto filings.
`In accordance with §§ 201.16(c) and
`207.3 of the rules, each documentfiled
`by a party to the review must be served
`on all other parties to the review (as
`identified by either the public or BPI
`service list), and a certificate of service
`mustbe timely filed. The Secretary will
`not accept a documentfor filing without
`a certificate of service.
`Determination.—The Commission has
`determinedthis review is
`extraordinarily complicated and
`therefore has determinedto exerciseits
`authority to extend the review period by
`up to 90 days pursuantto 19 U.S.C.
`1675(c)(5)(B).
`Authority: This review is being
`conducted under authority of title VII of
`the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is
`published pursuant to § 207.62 of the
`Commission’s rules.
`
`By order of the Commission.
`Issued: July 10, 2023.
`Lisa Barton,
`Secretary to the Commission.
`[FR Doc. 2023-14874 Filed 7-12-23; 8:45 am]
`BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
`
`INTERNATIONAL TRADE
`COMMISSION
`
`[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-576—577 and
`731-TA—1362-1367 (Review)]
`
`Cold-Drawn Mechanical Tubing From
`China, Germany,India, Italy, South
`Korea, and Switzerland; Scheduling of
`Full Five-Year Reviews
`
`AGENCY: United States International
`Trade Commission.
`ACTION: Notice.
`
`SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives
`notice of the schedulingoffull reviews
`pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the
`
`