`
`Washington, D.C.
`
`
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN LOCATION-SHARING
`SYSTEMS, RELATED SOFTWARE,
`COMPONENTS THEREOF, AND
`PRODUCTS CONTAINING SAME
`
`
`ORDER NO. 18:
`
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1347
`
`
`DENYING AS MOOT COMPLAINANTS’ AND KYOCERA’S
`REQUEST TO STAY PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE PENDING
`RESOLUTION OF JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE KYOCERA
`ON THE BASIS OF A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
`
`(May 25, 2023)
`
`
`
`
`
`On May 22, 2023, Complainants AGIS Software Development LLC and Advanced Ground
`
`Information Systems, Inc. (collectively, “AGIS”) and Respondent Kyocera Corporation
`
`(“Kyocera”) jointly moved (1347-007) for termination of the investigation as to Kyocera based on
`
`a settlement agreement attached to the motion, to limit service, and to suspend the procedural
`
`schedule as to Kyocera pending resolution of the motion.
`
`The portion of AGIS and Kyocera’s joint motion seeking a stay of the procedural schedule
`
`is denied as moot. Under Ground Rule 5.5, “[u]pon the filing of an unopposed motion to terminate
`
`the investigation under Commission Rule 210.21, all deadlines are automatically stayed as to the
`
`party or parties seeking termination from the investigation until otherwise ordered by the
`
`Administrative Law Judge or the Commission. No separate motion to stay is necessary.” Order
`
`No. 12. This Ground Rule is intended to conserve the parties’ and Commission’s resources in
`
`resolving routine, unopposed motions to stay a procedural schedule while a joint or unopposed
`
`motion to terminate is pending.
`
`
`
`
`
`SO ORDERED.
`
`Administrative Law Judge
`
`eyEE
`
`tyan F. Moore
`
`OS
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
