AUTHENTICATED
`US. GOVERNMENT,
`INFORMATION,
`GPO,
`
`80568
`Federal Register/Vol. 87, No. 250/Friday, December 30, 2022 / Notices
`
`respondents responses
`
`Total
`estimated
`annual
`
`Completion
`time per
`response
`(hours)
`
`Estimated
`total annual
`burden hours *
`
`
`
`Activity/requirement
`
`Estimated
`numberof
`annual
`
`Estimated
`numberof
`annual
`responses
`
`FWSForms 3-200—44, “Permit Application Form: Registration of an Agent/Tannery under the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA)”
`(Hardcopy)
`
`
`
`FWSForms 3-200—44, “Permit Application Form: Registration of an Agent/Tannery under the Marine MammalProtection Act (MMPA)”
`(ePermiis)
`
`
`
`
`
`*Rounded to Match ROCIS.
`
`An agency may not conduct or
`sponsoranda personis not required to
`respondto a collection of information
`unless it displays a currently valid OMB
`control number.
`The authority for this action is the
`Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
`U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
`Madonna Baucum,
`Information Collection Clearance Officer, U.S.
`Fish and Wildlife Service.
`[FR Doc. 2022-28426 Filed 12-29-22; 8:45 am]
`BILLING CODE 4333-15-P
`
`
`INTERNATIONAL TRADE
`COMMISSION
`
`[Inv. No. 387-TA-1347]
`
`Institution of Investigation; Certain
`Location-Sharing Systems, Related
`Software, Components Thereof, and
`Products Containing Same
`AGENCY:U.S. International Trade
`Commission.
`ACTION: Notice.
`
`SUMMARY:Notice is hereby given that a
`complaint wasfiled with the U.S.
`International Trade Commission on
`November16, 2022, under section 337
`of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
`on behalf of Advanced Ground
`Information Systems,Inc. of Jupiter,
`Florida and AGIS Software
`Development LLC of Marshall, Texas.
`The complaint was supplemented on
`December13, 2022. The complaint, as
`supplemented,alleges violations of
`section 337 based upon the importation
`into the United States, the sale for
`importation, and the sale within the
`United States after importation of
`
`certain location-sharing systems, related
`software, components thereof, and
`products containing same by reason of
`the infringementof certain claims of
`U.S. Patent No. 8,213,970 (“‘the 970
`patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 9,467,838 (‘the
`’838 patent”); U.S. Patent No. 9,445,251
`(“the ’251 patent’’); U.S. Patent No.
`9,749,829 (“the ’829 patent”); and U.S.
`Patent No. 9,820,123 (“the 123 patent”).
`The complaints further allege that an
`industry in the United States exists as
`required by the applicable Federal
`Statute. The complainants request that
`the Commission institute an
`investigation and,after the
`investigation, issue a limited exclusion
`order and cease and desist orders.
`
`ADDRESSES:The complaint, except for
`any confidential information contained
`therein, may be viewed on the
`Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
`at hitps://edis.usitc.gov. For help
`accessing EDIS, please email
`EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. Hearing impaired
`individuals are advised that information
`on this matter can be obtained by
`contacting the Commission’s TDD
`terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons
`with mobility impairments whowill
`need special assistance in gaining access
`to the Commission should contact the
`Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
`2000. General information concerning
`the Commission may also be obtained
`by accessingits internet serverat
`hitps://www.usitc.gov.
`FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
`Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of
`Unfair Import Investigations, U.S.
`International Trade Commission,
`telephone (202) 205-2560.
`SUPPLEMENTARYINFORMATION:
`
`Authority: The authority for
`institution of this investigation is
`contained in section 337 of the Tariff
`Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
`1337, and in section 210.10 of the
`Commission’s Rules of Practice and
`Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2021).
`Scopeof Investigation: Having
`considered the complaint, the U.S.
`International Trade Commission, on
`December 22, 2022, ordered that—
`(1) Pursuantto subsection (b) of
`section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
`amended,an investigation be instituted
`to determine whetherthere is a
`violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
`section 337 in the importation into the
`United States, the sale for importation,
`or the sale within the United States after
`importation of certain products
`identified in paragraph (2) by reason of
`infringementof one or moreof claims 2
`and 10-13 of the ’970 patent; claims 1,
`3, 5-10, 16, 19, 25, 38, 40, 54-56, 61-
`64, 68, 71, 72, 80 and 84 of the ’838
`patent; claims 1, 2, 5, 7, 8, 23-25, 28—
`31, and 35 of the ’251 patent; claims1,
`8, 34, 35, 41, and 68 of the ’829 patent;
`claims 14 and 36—38ofthe ’123 patent,
`and whetheran industry in the United
`States exists as required by subsection
`(a)(2) of section 337;
`(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of
`the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
`Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the
`plain language description of the
`accused products or category of accused
`products, which defines the scope of the
`investigation, is ‘mobile devices
`containing location-sharing software,
`mobile phones andtablets containing
`location-sharing software, notebook and
`laptop computers containing location-
`
`

`

`80569
`Federal Register/Vol. 87, No. 250/Friday, December 30, 2022 / Notices
`
`sharing software, and associated
`components thereof”;
`(3) Pursuant to Commission Rule
`210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), the
`presiding administrative law judge shall
`take evidence or other information and
`hear arguments from the parties or other
`interested persons with respect to the
`public interest in this investigation, as
`appropriate, and provide the
`Commission with findings of fact and a
`recommendeddetermination on this
`issue, which shall be limited to the
`statutory public interest factors set forth
`in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(0), ()(1), (g)(1);
`(4) For the purposeof the
`investigation so instituted, the following
`are hereby named as parties upon which
`this notice of investigation shall be
`served:
`(a) The complainantsare:
`Advanced GroundInformation Systems,
`Inc., 92 LighthouseDr., Jupiter, FL
`33469
`AGIS Software Development LLC, 100
`West Houston Street, Marshall, TX
`75671
`
`(b) The respondentsare the following
`entities alleged to be in violation of
`section 337, and are the parties upon
`which the complaintis to be served:
`Google LLC, 1600 Amphitheatre
`Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043
`Samsung Electronics, Co., Ltd., 12
`Samsung-Ro, Maetan-3dong,
`Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, 443-742,
`Republic of Korea
`Samsung Electronics America,Inc., 85
`Challenger Rd., Ridgefield Park, New
`Jersey 07660
`OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co.,
`Ltd., 18F, Tairan Building, Block C,
`Tairan 8th Road, Chgongmiao, Futian
`District, Shenzhen, Guangdong
`518040, China
`TCL Technology Group Corporation,
`22/F, TCL Technology, Building, No.
`17, Huifeng 3rd Road, Zhongkai High-
`Tech Development District, Huizhou,
`Guangdong, China 516006
`TCL Electronics Holdings Limited, 7th
`Floor, Building 22E, 22 Science Park
`East Avenue, Hong Kong Science
`Park, Hong Kong
`TCL Communication Technology
`Holdings, Limited, 5/F, Building 22E,
`22 Science Park East Avenue, Hong
`Kong Science Park, Shatin, New
`Territories, Hong Kong
`TCT Mobile (US) Inc., 25 Edelman,
`Suite 200, Irvine, CA 92618
`Lenovo Group Ltd., 6 Chuang ye Road,
`HaidianDistrict, Beijing 100085,
`China
`Lenovo (United States) Inc., 1009 Think
`Place, Building One, Morrisville, NC
`27560
`
`Motorola Mobility LLC, 222 W
`Merchandise Mart Plaza, Suite 1800,
`Chicago, IL 60654
`HMDGlobal, Karaportti 2, FIN-02610,
`Espoo, Finland
`HMDGlobal OY,Bertel Jungin aukio 9,
`02600, Espoo,Finland
`HMDAmerica, Inc., 1200 Brickell Ave.,
`Suite 510, Miami, FL 33131
`Sony Corporation, 1-7-1 Konan Minato-
`ku, Tokyo, 108-0075, Japan
`Sony Mobile Communications, Inc., 4—
`12-3 Higashi-Shinagawa, Shinagawa-
`ku, Tokyo, 140-0002, Japan
`ASUSTek ComputerInc., No. 15, Li-Te
`Rd., Beitou Dist., Taipei 112, Taiwan
`ASUSComputerInternational, 48720
`Kato Rd., Fremont, CA 94538
`BLU Products, 10814 NW 33rd Street,
`Doral, FL 33172
`Panasonic Corporation, 1006 Oaza
`Kadoma-shi, Kadoma 571-8501,
`Osaka, Japan
`Panasonic Corporation of North
`America, 1 Panasonic Way, Secaucus,
`NewJersey 07094
`Kyocera Corporation, 6 Takeda
`Tobadono-cho, Fushmi-ku, Kyoto,
`Japan 612-8501
`Xiaomi Corporation, Maples Corporate
`Services Limited, P.O. Box 309,
`Ugland House, Grand Cayman, KY1-
`1104, Cayman Islands
`Xiaomi H.K. Ltd., Unit 806, Tower2 8/
`F, Cheung Sha Wan Plaza, 833
`Cheung Sha Wan Road, Kowloon City,
`Hong Kong
`Xiaomi CommunicationsCo., Ltd.,
`XiaomiOffice Building, 68 Qinghe
`Middle Street, Haidian District,
`Beijing, China 100085
`Xiaomi Inc., Xiaomi Office Building, 68
`Qinghe Middle Street, Haidian
`District, Beijing, China 100085
`(c) The Office of Unfair Import
`Investigations, U.S. International Trade
`Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite
`401, Washington, DC 20436; and
`(5) For the investigation so instituted,
`the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
`U.S. International Trade Commission,
`shall designate the presiding
`Administrative Law Judge.
`Responsesto the complaint, as
`supplemented, andthe notice of
`institution of investigation must be
`submitted by the named respondents in
`accordance with section 210.13 of the
`Commission’s Rules of Practice and
`Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
`19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as
`amendedin 85 FR 15798 (March 19,
`2020), such responseswill be
`considered by the Commissionif
`received notlater than 20 days after the
`date of service by the complainants of
`the complaint and the notice of
`investigation. Extensionsof timefor
`
`submitting responses to the complaint
`and the notice of investigation will not
`be granted unless good cause therefor is
`shown.
`Failure of a respondenttofile a timely
`responseto each allegation in the
`complaint and in this notice may be
`deemedto constitute a waiver of the
`tight to appear and contest the
`allegations of the complaint andthis
`notice, and to authorize the
`administrative law judge and the
`Commission, without further notice to
`the respondent,to find the facts to be as
`alleged in the complaint and this notice
`andto enter an initial determination
`and a final determination containing
`such findings, and mayresult in the
`issuanceof an exclusion orderor a cease
`and desist order or both directed against
`the respondent.
`By order of the Commission.
`Issued: December 22, 2022.
`Katherine Hiner,
`Acting Secretary to the Commission.
`[FR Doc. 2022-28408 Filed 12-29-22; 8:45 am]
`BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
`
`INTERNATIONAL TRADE
`COMMISSION
`
`[Investigation No. 337-TA—1266]
`
`Certain Wearable Electronic Devices
`With ECG Functionality and
`Components Thereof; Notice of the
`Commission’s Final Determination
`Finding a Violation of Section 337;
`Issuance and Suspensionof a Limited
`Exclusion Order and a Cease and
`Desist Order; Termination of the
`Investigation
`AGENCY:U.S. International Trade
`Commission.
`ACTION: Notice.
`
`SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
`the U.S. International Trade
`Commission (“Commission’’) has
`determinedthat there is a violation of
`section 337 in the above-captioned
`investigation. The Commission has
`further determined to issue a limited
`exclusion order anda cease anddesist
`order andto set a bond in the amount
`of $2 per unit of covered articles
`importedor sold during the period of
`Presidential review. The enforcement of
`these orders, including the bond
`provision, is suspended pendingfinal
`resolution of the U.S. Patent and
`Trademark Office, Patent Trial and
`Appeal Board’s (“PTAB”) Final Written
`Decisions finding the asserted patent
`claims unpatentable.
`FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
`Panyin A. Hughes, Office of the General
`
`