AUTHENTICATED
`US, GOVERNMENT
`INFORMATION
`GPa,
`
`
`
` 64230 Federal Register/Vol. 86, No. 219/ Wednesday, November 17, 2021/ Notices
`
`INTERNATIONAL TRADE
`COMMISSION
`
`[Investigation No. 337-TA—1242]
`
`Certain IP Camera SystemsIncluding
`Video Doorbells and Components
`Thereof; Notice of a Commission
`Determination To Review anInitial
`Determination Terminating the
`Investigation in Its Entirety Due to the
`Invalidity of the Asserted Patents and
`on Review To Affirm; Termination of
`Investigation
`AGENCY:U.S. International Trade
`Commission.
`ACTION: Notice.
`
`SUMMARY:Notice is hereby given that
`the U.S. International Trade
`Commission (‘‘Commission’’) has
`determined to review an initial
`determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 16) of
`the presiding administrative law judge
`(“ALJ”), terminating the investigation in
`its entirety due to the invalidity of the
`asserted patents, and on review to affirm
`the ID. This investigation is hereby
`terminated.
`
`FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ron
`Traud, Office of the General Counsel,
`U.S. International Trade Commission,
`500 E Street SW, Washington, DC
`20436, telephone (202) 205-3427.
`Copies of non-confidential documents
`filed in connection with this
`investigation may be viewed on the
`Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
`at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help
`accessing EDIS, please email
`EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General
`information concerning the Commission
`may also be obtained by accessingits
`internetserver at htips://www.usitc.gov.
`Hearing-impaired persons are advised
`that information on this matter can be
`obtained by contacting the
`Commission’s TDD terminal on (202)
`205-1810.
`SUPPLEMENTARYINFORMATION: On
`January 28, 2021, the Commission
`instituted this investigation based on a
`complaintfiled by SkyBell
`Technologies, Inc. of Irvine, California;
`SB IP Holdings, LLC ofIrvine,
`California; and Eyetalk365, LLC of
`Cornelius, North Carolina (collectively,
`“Complainants”). 86 FR 7412 (Jan. 28,
`2021). The complaint, as supplemented,
`alleged violations of section 337 of the
`Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
`U.S.C. 1337, due to the importation into
`the United States, sale for importation,
`or sale in the United States after
`importation of certain IP camera
`systems including video doorbells and
`componentsthereof by reason of
`infringementof certain claimsof U.S.
`
`Patent Nos. 9,432,638; 9,485,478;
`10,097,796; 10,097,797; 10,200,660;
`10,523,906; and 10,674,120. Id. The
`complaint also alleged the existence of
`a domestic industry. Id. The notice of
`investigation named as respondents
`Vivint Smart Home,Inc. of Provo, Utah;
`SimpliSafe, Inc. of Boston,
`Massachusetts, and Arlo Technologies
`Inc. of San Jose, California (collectively,
`“Respondents”). Id. The Office of Unfair
`Import Investigations was not namedas
`a party.Id.
`On May 21, 2021, Respondents filed
`a motion for summarydetermination
`that all patent claims asserted in this
`investigation are invalid as anticipated.
`On June 3, 2021, Complainantsfiled a
`brief in opposition to the motion.
`On September15, 2021, the presiding
`ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 16)
`granting the motion. The ID found that
`there was no genuineissue of material
`fact as to whetherthe asserted patents
`are invalid and that Respondents were
`entitled to a finding of invalidity as a
`matter of law.
`On September27, 2021, Complainants
`filed a petition for review. On October
`4, 2021, Respondentsfiled a response
`thereto.
`The Commission has determined to
`review the subject ID. The Commission
`notes that the ID applied the current
`version of 35 U.S.C. 111, as amended by
`the America Invents Act (“‘AIA’’).
`Because the claims of United States
`Patent Application No. 14/338,525 (“the
`*525 application”) have an effective
`filing date before March 16, 2013, the
`pre-AlIAstatutory provision should have
`been applied, but that error is harmless
`and doesnot change the outcome. On
`review, the Commission affirms the ID’s
`findings under the pre-AIA version of
`35 U.S.C. 111. The Commission also
`notes that the relevant provision of 35
`U.S.C. 120 did not change with the AIA.
`Vice Chair Stayin joins the
`Commission’s determination to affirm
`the ID, based on his view that the ’525
`application was abandonednolater
`than the expiration of the deadline to
`request an extension under 37 CFR
`1.136(a), i.e., March 4, 2015. The
`investigation is hereby terminatedin its
`entirety.
`The Commission votefor this
`determination took place on November
`10, 2021.
`The authority for the Commission’s
`determination is contained in section
`337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
`amended(19 U.S.G. 1337), and in Part
`210 of the Commission’s Rules of
`Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
`210).
`Byorder of the Commission.
`
`Issued: November10, 2021.
`Lisa Barton,
`Secretary to the Commission.
`[FR Doc. 2021-25061 Filed 11-16-21; 8:45 am]
`BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
`
`
`INTERNATIONAL TRADE
`COMMISSION
`
`[Investigation No. 731—-TA-1071 (Third
`Review)]
`
`Alloy Magnesium From China
`Determination
`
`On thebasis of the record 1 developed
`in the subject five-year review, the
`United States International Trade
`Commission (‘“‘Commission’’)
`determines, pursuantto the Tariff Act of
`1930 (‘‘the Act’), that revocation of the
`antidumping duty order on alloy
`magnesium from China wouldbelikely
`to lead to continuation or recurrence of
`material injury to an industry in the
`United States within a reasonably
`foreseeable time.
`
`Background
`The Commission instituted this
`review on June 1, 2021 (86 FR 29280)
`and determined on September7, 2021
`that it would conduct an expedited
`review (86 FR 55636, October6, 2021).
`The Commission madethis
`determination pursuantto section
`751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It
`completed andfiled its determination in
`this review on November 10, 2021. The
`views of the Commission are contained
`in USITC Publication 5238 (November
`2021), entitled Alloy Magnesium from
`China: Investigation No. 731-TA-1071
`(Third Review).
`By orderof the Commission.
`Issued: November 10, 2021.
`Lisa Barton,
`Secretary to the Commission.
`[FR Doc. 2021-25063 Filed 11-16-21; 8:45 am]
`BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
`
`DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
`
`Employmentand Training
`Administration
`
`Investigations RegardingEligibility To
`Apply for Trade Adjustment
`Assistance
`
`In accordance with the Trade Act of
`1974 (19 U.S.C. 2271, et seq.) {(‘‘Act’’), as
`amended, the Departmentof Labor
`herein presents notice of investigations
`
`1Therecord is defined in § 207.2(f) of the
`Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
`CFR 207.2(f)).
`
`