throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`
`Washington, D.C.
`
`
`
`
`In the Matter of
`
`CERTAIN IP CAMERA SYSTEMS INCLUDING
`VIDEO DOORBELLS AND COMPONENTS
`THEREOF
`
`
`ORDER NO. 13: ORDERING DISCOVERY
`
`
`INV. NO. 337-TA-1242
`
`(July 22, 2021)
`
`On July 19, 2021, complainants SkyBell Technologies, Inc., SB IP Holdings, LLC, and
`
`Eyetalk365, LLC (collectively, “Complainants”) sent me a letter outlining alleged discovery
`
`deficiencies on the part of respondent Vivint Smart Home, Inc. (“Vivint”). Letter from Vishal H.
`
`Patel to ALJ Cheney (July 19, 2021). On July 20, 2021, Vivint sent me a letter responding to
`
`Complainants’ letter. Letter from Charles Barquist to ALJ Cheney (July 20, 2021). I convened a
`
`case management conference on July 20, 2021, to discuss the issues raised in the letters.1
`
`In view of the discussion during the case management conference, I hereby order the
`
`following actions, and Vivint is hereby given notice that failure to comply with this order may
`
`result in sanctions:
`
`
`1 The transcript of the July 20 case management conference will be made available on EDIS as
`Doc. IDs 747567 (confidential session) and 747568 (public session).
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1. Vivint shall provide a copy of this order to its joint development partner,
`
`
`
`.
`
`2. To the extent it has not done so, Vivint shall contact
`
` and identify any source
`
`code for the Ping accused device residing in the shared source code repository
`
`identified in the joint development agreement between Vivint and
`
` See Tr.
`
`21:3–7; VIVINT_SKY_ITC0058125, -38, and -43; cf. Tr. 24:11–16 (representing that
`
`an update will be provided July 21).
`
`3. To the extent it has not done so, Vivint shall contact
`
` and discuss the obligation
`
`to cooperate in litigation set forth in the joint development agreement. See Tr. 23:16–
`
`24:1; VIVINT_SKY_ITC0058127.
`
`4. To the extent it has not done so, Vivint shall investigate whether
`
` has a research
`
`and development operation in California that would be subject to the subpoena
`
`authority of the Commission. See Tr. 24:2–10; cf. Tr. 24:2–10 (representing that an
`
`update will be provided July 22).
`
`5. To the extent it has not done so, Vivint shall produce all source code for the Ping
`
`accused device in its custody or control by noon on July 23, 2021, with the exception
`
`that any Ping code from the shared source code repository described in item 2 above
`
`may be produced by July 30, 2021. See Tr. 11:13–17 (representing that production will
`
`be complete by July 21).
`
`6. To the extent it has not done so, Vivint shall produce relevant pricing information no
`
`later than noon on July 23, 2021. See Tr. 35:5-12 (representing that production will
`
`occur July 21).
`
`2
`
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7. By noon on July 23, 2021, Vivint shall file on EDIS a written submission under the
`
`signature of its counsel describing its compliance with items 1 through 6 above and the
`
`outcome of its actions.
`
`8. By noon on July 26, 2021, Vivint shall file on EDIS a sworn declaration from a person
`
`with knowledge, under penalty of perjury, (1) describing the joint source code
`
`repository, (2) describing in detail all Ping source code in possession of Vivint,
`
`including but not limited to all Ping code from the shared source code repository
`
`described in item 2 above, (3) describing the production of Ping source code in the
`
`“DBCP Source – Without STK” folder in June and July 2021, (4) attesting that all Ping
`
`source code in Vivint’s possession or control (and not in the shared source code
`
`repository described in item 2 above) has been produced. See Tr. 29:8–13; see also Tr.
`
`27:13–17 (representing that an update about the “DBCP Source – Without STK” folder
`
`would be provided July 21).
`
`9. Vivint shall make a corporate witness available for a further deposition on the issue of
`
`infringement of the accused products. The deposition shall conclude no later than
`
`August 4, 2021.
`
`In the event that all relevant source code for the Ping device is not produced by July 30,
`
`2021, Vivint and Complainants shall work towards a stipulation regarding the functionality of any
`
`missing source code. If a stipulation cannot be finalized, then the parties are advised that adverse
`
`inferences may be made regarding missing source code. See Tr. 25:16–25; see also 19 C.F.R.
`
`§ 210.33(b) (non-monetary sanctions for failure to comply with an order compelling discovery).
`
`The parties shall jointly submit within seven days a single proposed public version of this
`
`order with any proposed redactions indicated in red. To the extent possible, the proposed
`
`3
`
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`

`

`
`redactions should be made electronically, in a single pdf file using the “Redact Tool” within Adobe
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Acrobat. The proposed redactions should be submitted as “marked” but not yet “applied.” The
`
`proposed redactions or a statement of no redactions should be submitted via email to
`
`Cheney337@usitc.gov and not filed on EDIS.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`

`

`CERTAIN IP CAMERA SYSTEMS INCLUDING VIDEO
`DOORBELLS AND COMPONENTS THEREOF
`
`
`
`PUBLIC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I, Lisa R. Barton, hereby certify that the attached ORDER has been served upon the
`following parties as indicated, on July 30, 2021.
`
`
`
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1242
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`On Behalf of Complainants SkyBell Technologies, Inc., SB IP
`Holdings, LLC, and Eyetalk365, LLC:
`
`Rett Snotherly, Esq.
`LEVI & SNOTHERLY, PLLC
`1101 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 450
`Washington, DC 20036
`Email: rsnotherly@levisnotherly.com
`
`On Behalf of Respondent Arlo Technologies, Inc.:
`
`Sean C. Cunningham, Esq.
`MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
`401 B Street, Suite 1700
`San Diego, California 92101
`Email: sean.cunningham@us.dlapiper.com
`
`On Behalf of Respondent SimpliSafe, Inc.:
`
`Adam R. Alper, Esq.
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`555 California Street
`San Francisco, CA 94104
`Email: adam.alper@kirkland.com
`
`On Behalf of Respondent Vivint Smart Home, Inc.:
`
`Charles Barquist, Esq.
`MASCHOFF BRENNAN
`300 South Grand Ave., Suite 1400
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Lisa R. Barton, Secretary
`U.S. International Trade Commission
`500 E Street, SW, Room 112
`Washington, DC 20436
`
`
`
`
`☐ Via Hand Delivery
`☐ Via Express Delivery
`☐ Via First Class Mail
`☒ Other: Email Notification
`of Availability for Download
`
`
`
`☐ Via Hand Delivery
`☐ Via Express Delivery
`☐ Via First Class Mail
`☒ Other: Email Notification
`of Availability for Download
`
`
`
`☐ Via Hand Delivery
`☐ Via Express Delivery
`☐ Via First Class Mail
`☒ Other: Email Notification
`of Availability for Download
`
`
`
`☐ Via Hand Delivery
`☐ Via Express Delivery
`
`

`

`Inv. No. 337-TA-1242
`
`☐ Via First Class Mail
`☒ Other: Email Notification
`of Availability for Download
`
`CERTAIN IP CAMERA SYSTEMS INCLUDING VIDEO
`DOORBELLS AND COMPONENTS THEREOF
`
`Certificate of Service – Page 2
`Los Angeles, California 90071
`Email: cbarquist@mabr.com
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket