ElSeidy v. ElKasstawi

1:23-cv-03281 | Illinois Northern District Court

Interested in this case?

Request a Demo Track this case, and find millions of cases like it, let us show you how.
Division Chicago
Judge Honorable April M. Perry
Filed May 24, 2023
Case Flags CASREF and KIM
Magistrate Honorable Young B. Kim
Nature of Suit 190 Contract - Other
Cause 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Demand $75,000
Jury Demand Both
The docket is incomplete. Sign up for verified information.
Upcoming Events
4 Days
  • 3/28/2025
(2) confer about the adequacy of the discovery responses by March 28, 2025
Source
Add
11 Days
  • 4/4/2025
and (3) file a joint status report identifying each side's written discovery issues (must identify the specific interrogatories and requests to produce), along with the relevant discovery responses as exhibits, by April 4, 2025.
Source
Add
4 Months
  • 7/31/2025
fact discovery to be completed by 7/31/2025
Source
Add
8 Months
  • 11/28/2025
expert discovery to be completed by 11/28/2025.
Source
Add
Filing Date # Docket Text
3/4/2025Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim
3/3/2025Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim
2/10/2025 AMENDED complaint by Mohamed ElKasstawi against Mohammed ElSeidy, Imran Khan (Patterson, William) (Entered: 02/10/2025)
1/21/2025MINUTE entry before the Honorable April M. Perry: The Court has received Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss the Counterclaim 52 . Response to be filed by 2/11/2025; Reply by 2/21/2025. Mailed notice. (jcc,) (Entered: 01/21/2025)
1/20/2025First MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Counter Defendant Mohammed ElSeidy, Plaintiff Mohammed ElSeidy and Plaintiff-Counter Defendant Imran Khan

Presented before District Judge

(Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1-2)(Donnelly, Stephen) (Entered: 01/20/2025)
12/27/2024ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this LINK will provide additional information. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/27/2024: Mailed notice. (tg, ) (Entered: 12/27/2024)
12/17/2024MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: Parties are ordered to adhere to the following supplemental written discovery schedule: (1) serve answers to discovery requests (including production of responsive documents) by March 14, 2025; (2) confer about the adequacy of the discovery responses by March 28, 2025; and (3) file a joint status report identifying each side's written discovery issues (must identify the specific interrogatories and requests to produce), along with the relevant discovery responses as exhibits, by April 4, 2025. The court will review the status report and resolve written discovery issues identified in the status report. The court will not consider general objections to discovery requests when ruling on discovery issues. If the parties do not have any disputed written discovery issues, a status report is not required. Pursuant to Rule of Evidence 502(d), this court orders that "privilege or protection is not waived by disclosure connected with the litigation pending before the court---in which event the disclosure is also not a waiver in any other federal or state proceeding." The court further orders that upon written notification from the opposing side that a disclosure of privileged information has occurred, the party shall return and/or destroy the materials at issue or file a motion for a determination on the claimed privilege within seven calendar days of the written notification. Mailed notice (Kim, Young) (Entered: 12/17/2024)
12/17/2024MINUTE entry before the Honorable April M. Perry: Judge Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan no longer referred to the case. Docket 46 is vacated. Mailed notice. (jcc,) (Entered: 12/17/2024)
12/16/2024 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand and affirmative defenses, COUNTERCLAIM filed by Mohamed ElKasstawi against Mohammed ElSeidy . by Mohamed ElKasstawi(Patterson, William) (Entered: 12/16/2024)
12/13/2024MINUTE entry before the Honorable April M. Perry: Case referred to the Honorable Young B. Kim.Mailed notice (Attachments: # 1 Request for Referral) (gcy, ) (Entered: 12/17/2024)
12/13/2024Pursuant to Local Rule 72.1, this case is hereby referred to the calendar of Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan for the purpose of holding proceedings related to: discovery supervision, including the authority to adjust and extend all deadlines, and to conduct a settlement conference if requested by the parties.(jcc, )Mailed notice. (Entered: 12/13/2024)
12/13/2024MINUTE entry before the Honorable April M. Perry: The Court has received and appreciates the Joint Status Report submitted by the parties 44 . The Court adopts the proposed discovery schedule submitted by the parties: 26(f) disclosures to be filed by 1/10/2025; fact discovery to be completed by 7/31/2025; expert discovery to be completed by 11/28/2025. This case is referred to the Magistrate Judge for discovery supervision, including the authority to adjust and extend all deadlines, and to conduct a settlement conference if requested by the parties. The Court strikes the status hearing set for 12/18/2024. Mailed notice. (jcc,) (Entered: 12/13/2024)
12/12/2024STATUS Report (Joint) by Mohammed ElSeidy

(Donnelly, Stephen) (Entered: 12/12/2024)
12/6/2024MINUTE entry before the Honorable April M. Perry: Defendant's unopposed motion for extension of time 41 is granted. Defendant shall file answer to the complaint by 12/16/2024. This case having been recently reassigned to Judge April M. Perry, the parties are asked to file a Joint Initial Status Report for Reassigned Cases by 12/12/2024. The required contents of the report may be found on Judge Perry's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov, and should also include the proposed discovery schedule ordered 38 prior to reassignment. In-person status hearing to be held 12/18/2024 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 1725. There is no need for the parties to appear on 12/17/2024. Mailed notice. (jcc,) (Entered: 12/06/2024)
12/6/2024 NOTICE of Motion by William Daniel Patterson for presentment of (Patterson, William) (Entered: 12/06/2024)
12/6/2024MOTION by Defendant Mohamed ElKasstawi for extension of time to file answer Unopposed

(Patterson, William) (Entered: 12/06/2024)
12/2/2024MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: This case having been reassigned to another judge's calendar, the hearing before Judge Edmond E. Chang set for 12/20/2024 is vacated. Emailed notice (mw, ) (Entered: 12/02/2024)
11/26/2024EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: GENERAL ORDER 24-0032: IT APPEARING THAT, the civil cases on the attached list have been selected for reassignment to form the initial calendar of the Honorable April M. Perry; therefore IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the attached list of 290 cases be reassigned to the Honorable April M. Perry; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all parties affected by this Order must review the Honorable April M. Perry's webpage on the Court's website for the purpose of reviewing instructions regarding scheduling and case management procedures; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any civil case that has been reassigned pursuant to this Order will not be randomly reassigned to create the initial calendar of a new district judge for twelve months from the date of this Order; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to add the Honorable April M. Perry to the Court's civil case assignment system during the next business day, so that she shall receive a full share of such cases; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to add the Honorable April M. Perry to the Court's criminal case assignment system ninety (90) days so that Judge Perry shall thereafter receive a full share of such cases. Case reassigned to the Honorable April M. Perry for all further proceedings. Honorable Edmond E. Chang no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 11/26/2024.(td, ) (Entered: 11/26/2024)
11/25/2024MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. For the reasons stated in the Opinion, the Defendant's motion 21 to dismiss is denied. On or before 12/09/2024, the parties shall confer and file a joint status report with a proposed discovery schedule. Emailed notice (mw, ) (Entered: 11/25/2024)
11/14/2024MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Video status hearing held with counsel for the parties. This entry is posted in both ElSeidy v. ElKasstawi, 23-cv-03281, and Khan v. ElKasstawi, 23-cv-15554. Previously, at the Court's direction, the courtroom deputy jointly emailed counsel for the parties to ask whether the zKCapital state court settlement also resolved these federal cases, and the answer was no. To clarify the status report in 23-cv-15554, R. 36, the Court set this status hearing. Counsel for both sides clarified that the settlement does not resolve the federal claims. Defense counsel acknowledged that the Colorado River and stay arguments are no longer viable and thus are voluntarily withdrawn. A tracking status hearing is set for 12/20/2024 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Emailed notice (mw, ) (Entered: 11/14/2024)
11/14/2024NOTICE by Justin David Kaplan of Change of Address 150 S. Wacker Dr. Suite 2400 Chicago, IL 60606 (Kaplan, Justin) (Entered: 11/14/2024)
11/12/2024MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: This entry is posted in both ElSeidy v. ElKasstawi, 23-cv-03281, and Khan v. ElKasstawi, 23-cv-15554. On review of the status report filed in the latter case, R.36, a video status hearing is set for both cases to clarify the meaning of the report. The tracking status hearing of 12/20/2024 is vacated. A video status hearing is set for 11/14/2024 at 9:00 a.m. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to the hearing. The call-in number is (650) 479-3207 and the access code is 2312 693 5675##. Counsel of record will receive an email before the start of the hearing with instructions to log into the hearing. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Emailed notice (mw, ) (Entered: 11/12/2024)
10/3/2024MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: In 1:23-cv-3281, the motion to dismiss 21 on jurisdictional grounds remains under advisement; the same applies, in 1:23-cv-15554, to the motion 24 to dismiss pending there. The tracking status hearing of 10/04/2024 is reset to 12/20/2024 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Emailed notice (mw, ) (Entered: 10/03/2024)
8/29/2024MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: This order is posted in both 1:23-cv-03281 and 1:23-cv-15554. (1.) In 1:23-cv-15554, R. 24 is terminated because the motion to dismiss, R. 23, renders R. 24 unnecessary. (2.) In 1:23-cv-15554, no reply was filed on the motion 24 to dismiss, so it is fully briefed and under advisement. (3.) In 1:23-cv-3281, the motion to dismiss 21 on jurisdictional grounds remains under advisement. (4.) For now, the cases will remain separate. The tracking status hearing of 08/30/2024 for both cases is reset to 10/04/2024 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Emailed notice (mw, ) (Entered: 08/29/2024)
7/12/2024MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: (1.) The Plaintiff's unopposed motion to reassign and to consolidate 29 is granted: the Court recommends to the Executive Committee that Case No. 1:23-cv-15554, Khan v. ElKasstawi be reassigned to Judge Chang's calendar under Local Rule 40.4. After the reassignment, the Court will later take steps to consolidate the cases, but the parties in Khan first shall finish the briefing on the dismissal motion on that docket for now. The tracking status hearing of 07/19/2024 is reset to 08/30/2024 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called).(2.) The motion 31 to withdraw as counsel is granted. Mailed notice (ags) (Entered: 07/12/2024)
7/8/2024MOTION by Attorney Alexander N. Loftus and David A. Eisenberg to withdraw as attorney for Mohamed ElKasstawi. No party information provided

(Eisenberg, David) (Entered: 07/08/2024)
7/8/2024 NOTICE of Motion by Stephen Michael Donnelly for presentment of motion to consolidate cases 29 before Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 7/24/2024 at 08:30 AM. (Donnelly, Stephen) (Entered: 07/08/2024)
7/8/2024MOTION by Plaintiff Mohammed ElSeidy to consolidate cases , unopposed

(Donnelly, Stephen) (Entered: 07/08/2024)
7/1/2024ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Mohamed ElKasstawi by William Daniel Patterson (Patterson, William) (Entered: 07/01/2024)
5/9/2024MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: The motion to dismiss 21 is still under advisement. The tracking status hearing of 05/10/2024 is reset to 07/19/2024 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Emailed notice (mw, ) (Entered: 05/09/2024)
2/12/2024MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: The motion to dismiss 21 is under advisement. The tracking status hearing of 02/16/2024 is reset to 05/10/2024 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Emailed notice (mw, ) (Entered: 02/12/2024)
12/28/2023ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this LINK will provide additional information. Signed by the Executive Committee on 12/28/2023: Mailed notice. (tg, ) (Entered: 12/29/2023)
11/21/2023MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: In light of the fully briefed motion to dismiss, the tracking status hearing of 11/24/2023 is reset to 02/16/2024 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Emailed notice (mw, ) (Entered: 11/21/2023)
10/26/2023REPLY by Mohamed ElKasstawi to MOTION by Defendant Mohamed ElKasstawi to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction

21 , response to motion 22 (Eisenberg, David) (Entered: 10/26/2023)
10/19/2023RESPONSE by Mohammed ElSeidy to MOTION by Defendant Mohamed ElKasstawi to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction

21 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibits 1-3)(Donnelly, Stephen) (Entered: 10/19/2023)
9/27/2023MOTION by Defendant Mohamed ElKasstawi to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction

(Eisenberg, David) (Entered: 09/27/2023)
9/21/2023MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: On review of the Defendant's Jurisdictional Memorandum and exhibits, R. 18, and the Plaintiff's response, R. 19, the Court finds that diversity jurisdiction applies. The Defendant avers under oath that he obtained U.S. citizenship in 2019 and, much more importantly, he is domiciled in the State of Washington. R. 18, Declaration. That the Defendant subjectively believes that he is still a citizen of Egypt does not control the citizenship analysis (and it is worth noting that the proffered Egyptian passport expired last year). The case is properly here on diversity jurisdiction. The Defendant shall refile the motion to dismiss (the Defendant may copy the first one extensively, just double-checking the case law for no new developments is all that is needed) on 09/28/2023. The Plaintiff's response is due on 10/19/2023. The defense reply is due on 10/26/2023. The tracking status hearing of 09/22/2023 is reset to 11/24/2023 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Emailed notice (mw, ) (Entered: 09/21/2023)
9/13/2023RESPONSE by Plaintiff Mohammed ElSeidy to other 18 Defendant's Jurisdictional Memorandum (Donnelly, Stephen) (Entered: 09/13/2023)
9/6/2023 Jurisdictional Memorandum by Mohamed ElKasstawi (Eisenberg, David) (Entered: 09/06/2023)
8/24/2023MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: The Defendant initially filed a motion to dismiss, asserting that he is a citizen of Egypt. R. 10. There was no conferral, so the Court terminated the motion without prejudice, but set forth the potential lack of diversity jurisdiction, see R. 12, if the Defendant is indeed a citizen of Egypt. The parties then disappointingly filed separate status reports, instead of a joint one. R. 13, 16. The Plaintiff's version alleges that the Defendant is a citizen of the State of Washington. R. 13 at 1. The defense version says that he is a citizen of Egypt and "the United States." R. 16 at 1. At this point, the Court cannot just allow the citizenship issue, which goes to subject matter jurisdiction, sit unaddressed and unproven. On 09/06/2023, the Defendant shall file a Jurisdictional Memorandum setting forth his citizenship (including whether the governing law permits an individual to have more than one citizenship for purposes of diversity jurisdiction), and attaching an under-oath declaration and supporting exhibits establishing his citizenship. The current motion 14 to dismiss is terminated without prejudice until this issue is resolved. The Plaintiff may file a Response to the Jurisdictional Memorandum by 09/13/2023. The tracking status hearing of 08/25/2023 is reset to 09/22/2023 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Mailed notice (cn). (Entered: 08/24/2023)
8/22/2023STATUS Report of Defendant by Mohamed ElKasstawi

(Eisenberg, David) (Entered: 08/22/2023)
8/22/2023ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Mohamed ElKasstawi by David Alan Eisenberg (Eisenberg, David) (Entered: 08/22/2023)
8/21/2023MOTION by Defendant Mohamed ElKasstawi to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction

(Loftus, Alexander) (Entered: 08/21/2023)
8/18/2023STATUS Report on behalf of Plaintiff by Mohammed ElSeidy

(Donnelly, Stephen) (Entered: 08/18/2023)
7/31/2023MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: On review of the Defendant's motion 10 to dismiss for lack of diversity jurisdiction, the motion does not appear to address the Jurisdictional Memorandum filed by the Plaintiff, R. 7, which was filed pursuant to the jurisdictional inquiry posed by R. 6. Nor does the motion contain a statement of conferral with the other side (which might have prompted an examination of the Jurisdictional Memorandum), as required by the Court's Case Management Procedures. The motion is denied without prejudice for failing to confer. Having stated that, the parties appear to have a factual dispute over whether the Defendant is a citizen of Egypt or, instead, the State of Washington. This difference is important because diversity jurisdiction applies if one party is a citizen of a foreign nation and the other is a citizen of a State, 28 U.S.C. 1332(a)(2), but does not apply if both parties are citizens of foreign nations. The Defendant shall confer with the Plaintiff, and if the conferral is unsuccessful in resolving the issue, then the Defendant shall file a renewed motion to dismiss, this time addressing the evidence set forth in R. 7. The renewed motion to dismiss is due on 08/21/2023. The parties shall still file the joint initial status report on 08/18/2023. In the initial status report, the parties (having conferred already) shall state their positions on whether discovery is needed for the citizenship dispute, and if yes, propose a schedule. The tracking status hearing of 08/25/2023 remains in place, but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Mailed notice (cn). (Entered: 07/31/2023)
7/28/2023 NOTICE of Motion by Alexander Nicholas Loftus for presentment of motion to dismiss/lack of jurisdiction 10 before Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 8/2/2023 at 08:30 AM. (Loftus, Alexander) (Entered: 07/28/2023)
7/28/2023MOTION by Defendant Mohamed ElKasstawi to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction

(Loftus, Alexander) (Entered: 07/28/2023)
7/28/2023ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Mohamed ElKasstawi by Alexander Nicholas Loftus (Loftus, Alexander) (Entered: 07/28/2023)
7/24/2023MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: On review of the Jurisdictional Memorandum, R. 7, diversity jurisdiction is sufficiently established. Mailed notice (cn). (Entered: 07/24/2023)
7/19/2023 Plaintiff's Jurisdictional Memorandum by Mohammed ElSeidy (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibits 1-3)(Donnelly, Stephen) (Entered: 07/19/2023)
7/11/2023MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: (1.) On review of the complaint, the Court issues a jurisdictional inquiry. The complaint relies on diversity of citizenship, but alleges residency rather than citizenship (that is, domicile). On or before 07/19/2023, The Plaintiff shall file a Jurisdictional Memorandum that sets for the citizenship (not residency) of the parties. (2.) The Plaintiff has filed a return of service showing abode service on 06/27/2023. The answer deadline is 08/11/2023. The tracking status hearing of 07/14/2023 is reset to 08/25/2023 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the parties shall file the joint initial status report by 08/18/2023, or the Plaintiff shall file a status report if the Defendant has not entered an appearance. Emailed notice (mw, ) (Entered: 07/11/2023)
7/6/2023STATUS Report by Mohammed ElSeidy

(Donnelly, Stephen) (Entered: 07/06/2023)
7/6/2023AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Plaintiff Mohammed ElSeidy regarding Summons and Complaint at Law served on Mohamed Elkasstawi on 6/27/2023 (Donnelly, Stephen) (Entered: 07/06/2023)
5/31/2023MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: Initial tracking status hearing set for 07/14/2023 at 8:30 a.m. to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the Court will set the case schedule after reviewing the written status report. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the attached status report requirements by 07/06/2023. Plaintiff must still file the report even if Defendant has not responded to requests to craft a joint report. If the Defendant has not been served, then Plaintiff must complete the part of the report on the progress of service. Also, counsel (or the parties, if proceeding pro se) must carefully review Judge Chang's Case Management Procedures, available online at ilnd.uscourts.gov (navigate to Judges / District Judges / Judge Edmond E. Chang). Because the Procedures are occasionally revised, counsel (or the party, if proceeding pro se) must read them anew even if the counsel or the party has appeared before Judge Chang in other cases. Emailed notice (Attachments: # 1 Status Report Requirements) (mw, ) (Entered: 05/31/2023)
5/24/2023SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Mohamed ElKasstawi (jb, ) (Entered: 05/24/2023)
5/24/2023CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (lm, ) (Entered: 05/24/2023)
5/24/2023CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Edmond E. Chang. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan. Case assignment: Random assignment. (lm, ) (Entered: 05/24/2023)
5/24/2023CIVIL Cover Sheet (Donnelly, Stephen) (Entered: 05/24/2023)
5/24/2023COMPLAINT filed by Mohammed ElSeidy; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20669326. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 2)(Donnelly, Stephen) (Entered: 05/24/2023)