throbber
Case 1:16-cv-02690-AT Document 68 Filed 03/15/16 Page 1 of 16
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TYLER DIVISION
`
`SIPCO, LLC, and IP CO, LLC
`(d/b/a INTUS IQ),
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
` v.
`
` Civil Action No. 6:15-cv-907
`
`EMERSON ELECTRIC CO., EMERSON
`PROCESS MANAGEMENT LLLP, FISHER-
`ROSEMOUNT SYSTEMS, INC.,
`ROSEMOUNT INC., BP, p.l.c., BP
`AMERICA, INC., and BP AMERICA
`PRODUCTION COMPANY,
`
`Defendants.
`
`PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`
`
`THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the parties' joint motion for entry of a
`
`protective order, and the Court having determined that there is good cause under Federal Rule of
`
`Civil Procedure 26(c) for entry of a protective order to limit disclosure of trade secrets and
`
`confidential research, development, and commercial information as those terms are used in
`
`Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c)(l)(G), and information that the party is under a legal duty
`
`to maintain in confidence,
`
`THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
`
`1.
`
`Scope. This Protective Order shall govern any information produced or disclosed in this
`
`action by any party or by any third party.
`
`2.
`
`Proprietary Information.
`
`“Proprietary Information” means any information,
`
`document, electronically stored information, or thing that contains or is a trade secret or other
`
`confidential research, development, or commercial information as those terms are used in
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-02690-AT Document 68 Filed 03/15/16 Page 2 of 16
`
`Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c)(1)(G), and information that the party is under a legal duty
`
`to maintain in confidence, provided that such information, document, electronically stored
`
`information, or thing is designated as set forth herein. Any Proprietary Information may be
`
`designated as CONFIDENTIAL. Proprietary Information relating to highly sensitive financial
`
`information, including but not limited to, customer identification, marketing, sales, pricing
`
`information, profit margins and business plans or strategies, and highly sensitive technical
`
`information, including but not limited to, product design and development materials, source
`
`code, or other highly sensitive, trade secret technical information, may be designated as
`
`ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY.
`
`Any party to this action and any third party may designate as CONFIDENTIAL or
`
`ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY all or part of the following material: (a) answers to interrogatories
`
`or requests for admission; (b) deposition testimony; (c) documents produced by it or made
`
`available for inspection; and (d) any other materials or information produced or disclosed during
`
`the course of this litigation. As used herein, “Designating Party” shall refer to any party or third
`
`party to this action that designates information that it or another party has produced or provided,
`
`and “Receiving Party” shall refer to any party or third party that receives such information.
`
`3.
`
`Designation of Documentary Material. Documentary material may be designated as
`
`CONFIDENTIAL or ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY by stamping or otherwise marking each page
`
`with the appropriate confidentiality designation and with the identity of the classifying party
`
`unless it is indicated as part of the production number (e.g., “Plaintiff P00001”) contained on the
`
`document. Except with respect to documents produced by any party prior to the execution by the
`
`parties of this Stipulated Protective Order, the identification and designation of Proprietary
`
`Information shall be made at the time when the answer to the interrogatory or the answer to the
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-02690-AT Document 68 Filed 03/15/16 Page 3 of 16
`
`request for admission is served and when a copy of the document is provided to the requesting
`
`party.
`
`Unless otherwise designated or agreed by the parties, all documents made available for
`
`inspection prior to copying and production shall be presumed to have been marked
`
`ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY. No documents of the party or third party producing documents
`
`shall be removed from the site of the inspection or copied until such producing party or third
`
`party has had an opportunity to review and designate such documents in the manner previously
`
`explained.
`
`With regard to non-written material, such as recordings, magnetic media, photographs
`
`and things, the designation of any information as CONFIDENTIAL or ATTORNEYS EYES
`
`ONLY for purposes of this Protective Order shall be made by affixing a CONFIDENTIAL or
`
`ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY designation to the material, or a container for the material, in any
`
`suitable manner at the time of copying (if any).
`
`4.
`
`Designation of Depositions. Deposition or other oral testimony given in this case may
`
`be designated as CONFIDENTIAL or ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY by any party or third party
`
`either (a) during the deposition or proceeding during which the testimony is given, or (b) by
`
`written notice to the court reporter and to all counsel of record, within five (5) days of receipt,
`
`either by mail or email, of the deposition transcript. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court,
`
`pending the expiration of this five (5) day period, all parties and persons shall treat the testimony
`
`as if it has been designated ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court,
`
`the designating party shall have the right to have all persons, except the witness, his or her
`
`counsel, the court reporter, and such other persons authorized to receive the designating party’s
`
`Proprietary Information pursuant to this Protective Order, excluded from a deposition or
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-02690-AT Document 68 Filed 03/15/16 Page 4 of 16
`
`proceeding, or any portion thereof, before the taking therein of testimony that has been so
`
`designated. The court reporter shall mark the cover of the original and all copies of the transcript
`
`or the portion of the transcript containing testimony designated as either CONFIDENTIAL or
`
`ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY with the appropriate legend.
`
`5.
`
`Belated Designation. Notwithstanding the obligations to timely designate Proprietary
`
`Information under the foregoing paragraphs 3 and 4, nothing contained herein shall preclude a
`
`party or a third party from later changing that designation and notifying the other parties in
`
`writing of that change; provided, however, that it shall not be deemed a breach of this Order for
`
`any action to have been taken by a party or its counsel with respect to such information
`
`consistent with the original designation of such information prior to receipt of such notice. A
`
`party receiving such written notice shall make every reasonable effort to retrieve any such
`
`materials from persons not authorized to receive them pursuant to this Protective Order and to
`
`avoid any further unauthorized disclosure. Any party that changes the designation of any
`
`materials under this Order shall timely provide the other parties to this action with new copies of
`
`the materials with the new designation(s).
`
`6.
`
`Non-use.
`
`All Proprietary Information shall be used only for purposes of this
`
`litigation.
`
`7.
`
`Access to CONFIDENTIAL and ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY Materials.
`
`Materials designated CONFIDENTIAL or ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY shall not be
`
`disclosed to any person except:
`
`a.
`
`the Court and its officers and staff;
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-02690-AT Document 68 Filed 03/15/16 Page 5 of 16
`
`b.
`
`outside counsel of record in this action for each party (i.e., counsel of record for a
`
`party who is not an employee of the party or its affiliates) and employees of such
`
`outside counsel;
`
`c.
`
`outside experts who are not regularly employed by a party and who have been
`
`expressly retained to assist a party’s counsel in the prosecution or defense of the
`
`litigation, and the secretarial, technical and clerical staff of such experts, provided
`
`that such experts have been approved pursuant to paragraph 8 hereof;
`
`current or former employees of the disclosing party during the deposition of such
`
`employees or during examination of such employees at trial;
`
`any party or non-party who authored, received, or reviewed the material prior to
`
`its production in the litigation;
`
`three representatives of each party that are identified to opposing counsel, and
`
`necessary support staff of those individuals, provided that each such
`
`representative has first signed a written statement under oath in the form attached
`
`as Exhibit A hereto, and a copy of that statement has been provided to opposing
`
`counsel;
`
`court reporters and videographers, solely for the purpose of transcribing and/or
`
`recording testimony in the litigation;
`
`independent litigation support services personnel, including copying services,
`
`imaging and coding services, trial exhibit preparation services, solely for the
`
`purpose of assisting a party with the litigation;
`
`d.
`
`e.
`
`f.
`
`g.
`
`h.
`
`i.
`
`trial consultants, jury consultants, and mock jurors, focus group members and the
`
`like selected by trial consultants, jury consultants or by counsel in preparation for
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-02690-AT Document 68 Filed 03/15/16 Page 6 of 16
`
`trial; provided that such persons have executed a confidentiality agreement in the
`
`form of Exhibit A and such agreement shall be kept by counsel for reference; and
`
`j.
`
`other persons as ordered by the Court or agreed to in writing or on the record by
`
`the parties, provided that each such person has first signed a written statement
`
`under oath in the form attached as Exhibit A hereto, and a copy of that statement
`
`has been provided to opposing counsel.
`
`This Protective Order has no effect upon and shall not apply to (1) any party’s use of its
`
`own Proprietary Information for any purpose, or (2) any party’s use of documents or other
`
`information developed or obtained independently of discovery in this action for any purpose.
`
`Nothing herein shall bar or otherwise restrict an attorney, who is a qualified recipient under the
`
`terms of paragraph 7(b) of this Protective Order, from rendering advice to his or her client with
`
`respect to this action, and in the course thereof, from generally relying upon his or her
`
`examination of Proprietary Information. In rendering such advice or in other communications
`
`with the client, the attorney shall not disclose any Proprietary Information of another party or
`
`third party where such disclosure would not otherwise be permitted under the terms of this
`
`Protective Order.
`
`8.
`
`Approval of Experts. A party seeking to disclose another party’s Proprietary Information
`
`to an outside expert shall serve such other party with a copy of the Undertaking attached hereto
`
`as “Exhibit A” signed by the expert, along with the expert’s current resume, identifying (by
`
`employer and position) all past and current employment relating to his or her field of expertise,
`
`including the last five years of employment as a consultant. The party receiving such
`
`Undertaking and resume shall have ten (10) calendar days after such service within which to
`
`object to such disclosure. Failure to object within this period shall be deemed approval. If the
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-02690-AT Document 68 Filed 03/15/16 Page 7 of 16
`
`parties are unable to reach agreement within ten (10) days after service of an objection, the party
`
`objecting to disclosure to an expert shall raise its objection with the Court within fifteen (15)
`
`calendar days of such service of the objection. Failure to raise such objection with the Court
`
`within this period shall be deemed approval. Any party objecting to disclosure to an expert under
`
`this Protective Order shall bear the burden of proving that it will be harmed by such disclosure
`
`and that the protections of this Order are insufficient to reasonably protect such parties’
`
`proprietary interests.
`
`9.
`
`Filing Proprietary Information. Any Proprietary Information that is filed with the
`
`Court shall be filed under seal and shall remain under seal until further order of the Court. The
`
`filing party shall be responsible for informing the Clerk of the Court that the filing should be
`
`sealed and for placing the legend “FILED UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE
`
`ORDER” above the caption and conspicuously on each page of the filing. Exhibits to a filing
`
`shall conform to the labeling requirements set forth in this Protective Order. If a pretrial pleading
`
`filed with the Court, or an exhibit thereto, discloses or relies on confidential documents,
`
`information or material, such confidential portions shall be redacted to the extent necessary and
`
`the pleading or exhibit filed publicly with the Court.
`
`This Protective Order applies to pretrial discovery. Nothing in this Protective Order shall
`
`be deemed to prevent the Parties from introducing any Proprietary Information into evidence at
`
`the trial of this Action, or from using any information contained in Proprietary Information at the
`
`trial of this Action, subject to any pretrial order issued by this Court.
`
`10.
`
`Inadvertent Disclosure of Privileged or Immune Materials.
`
`Federal Rule of Civil
`
`Procedure 26(b)(5)(B) governs the inadvertent or mistaken production of information that is
`
`subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial-preparation material. The inadvertent
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-02690-AT Document 68 Filed 03/15/16 Page 8 of 16
`
`disclosure of information that is privileged or otherwise immune from discovery shall not, by
`
`itself, constitute a waiver of the privilege or immunity.
`
`11.
`
`Disclosure of Proprietary Information to Unauthorized Person(s).
`
`If Proprietary
`
`Information is disclosed to any person other than those authorized to receive such information by
`
`this Order, the party responsible for the disclosure shall immediately inform the designating
`
`party of all pertinent facts relating to such disclosure and shall make every reasonable effort to
`
`prevent disclosure by each unauthorized person who received such information and to obtain the
`
`return of such information.
`
`12.
`
`Conclusion of the Litigation.
`
`Within ninety (90) days after entry of a final
`
`judgment or dismissal with prejudice in this litigation (including appeals or petitions for review)
`
`finally disposing of all issues raised in this litigation, counsel for the parties and all other persons
`
`having possession, custody or control of another party’s or third party’s Proprietary Information
`
`shall: (a) destroy all Proprietary Information and any copies thereof, or (b) if requested by the
`
`producing party, return all Proprietary Information and any copies thereof to the producing party.
`
`Notwithstanding paragraph 12(b), a receiving party shall destroy all Proprietary Information of
`
`another party or third party containing or contained in any notes, summaries, digest, synopses or
`
`other documents created by or on behalf of the receiving party. Counsel for each party shall give
`
`a written certification to counsel for all other parties that all of the producing party’s Proprietary
`
`Information has either been destroyed or returned pursuant to this paragraph. If requested,
`
`counsel shall also provide the opposing party with the originals of all Undertaking forms
`
`executed by experts pursuant to paragraph 8.
`
`Notwithstanding the foregoing paragraph, outside counsel may retain (a) copies of the
`
`pleadings and other Court filings, (b) copies of the deposition, hearing, and trial transcripts and
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-02690-AT Document 68 Filed 03/15/16 Page 9 of 16
`
`any related exhibits, and (c) one file copy of all materials produced in this litigation that are
`
`specifically referred to in an expert report, a motion, pleading or other paper filed with the Court.
`
`13.
`
`Contested Designations.
`
`The parties shall use reasonable care to avoid designating
`
`as CONFIDENTIAL or ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY any documents or information that has
`
`been published or otherwise entered the public domain. A party shall not be obligated to
`
`challenge the propriety of any other party’s designation of materials or information as
`
`Proprietary Information at the time such designation is made, and failure promptly to challenge
`
`the designation shall not preclude a subsequent challenge thereto. In the event that a party
`
`disagrees at any stage of these proceedings with the designation of any information as
`
`CONFIDENTIAL or ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY, the parties shall try first to resolve such
`
`dispute in good faith on an informal basis. If the dispute cannot be resolved, the objecting party
`
`may seek appropriate relief from this Court. The party asserting that the material is entitled to
`
`confidential treatment shall have the burden of proof. All Proprietary Information shall remain
`
`under the protection of this Order until otherwise ordered by the Court.
`
`14.
`
`Source Code Protocol.
`
`Source code, which refers to human-readable text files used
`
`as input to computer programs that generate machine-readable files, includes without limitation
`
`files containing program text in “C”, “C++”, assembler, VHDL, Verilog, Java and digital signal
`
`processor (DSP) programming languages. Source code further includes “make” files, link files
`
`and other human-readable text files used in the generation and/or building of software directly
`
`executed on a microprocessor, microcontroller or DSP. Source code does not include binary
`
`executable files and object code files. To the extent that any party seeks the production of source
`
`code, such source code shall be produced pursuant to the following protocol:
`
`a.
`
`Source code shall be designated “ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.”
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-02690-AT Document 68 Filed 03/15/16 Page 10 of 16
`
`b.
`
`The Designating Party shall make all agreed-upon and properly requested source
`
`code available electronically and in text searchable form at a single secure third-
`
`party escrow facility (e.g. Iron Mountain) paid for by the Receiving Party in or
`
`near one geographic location specified by the Receiving Party. The Designating
`
`Party shall make the source code available for inspection on a stand-alone, non-
`
`networked personal computer running a reasonably current version of the
`
`Microsoft Windows operating system (“Source Code Computer”). The Receiving
`
`Party may use appropriate tool software on the Source Code Computer, which
`
`shall be installed by the Designating Party, including text editors like Visual Slick
`
`Edit and multi-file text search tools such as “grep,” and/or an integrated
`
`development environment like Microsoft Visual C++. The Receiving Party and
`
`the Designating Party may agree upon the use of other tools as necessary.
`
`Licensed copies of agreed upon tool software shall be installed on the Source
`
`Code Computer by the Designating Party, with the Receiving Party covering the
`
`cost of the tool software.
`
`i.
`
`The Source Code Computer shall be equipped to print copies of the source
`
`code on watermarked pre-Bates numbered and pre-confidentiality
`
`designated (but otherwise blank) printing paper, which shall be provided
`
`by the Designating Party. Source code may be printed only on such paper
`
`and on the watermarked side of such paper using the printer provided by
`
`the Designating Party and located at the secure facility. Counsel for the
`
`Designating Party will keep the originals of any printed documents, and
`
`copies shall be made for counsel for the Receiving Party on watermarked
`
`10
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-02690-AT Document 68 Filed 03/15/16 Page 11 of 16
`
`paper either at the time they are requested (if less than 100 pages) or
`
`within 72 hours (if more than 100 pages). Counsel for the Receiving Party
`
`may request up to 10 copies of printed source code. No more than 3000
`
`pages of the total source code for any software release or any hardware
`
`product may be in printed form at any one time, and all printed source
`
`code shall be logged by the Receiving Party as noted in Paragraph 11.c.iii
`
`below. If necessary, the Receiving Party may request to print additional
`
`pages in excess of the 3000 pages of total source code for a software
`
`release, which request the Designating Party shall not unreasonably deny.
`
`In addition to other reasonable steps to maintain the security and
`
`confidentiality of the Designating Party’s source code, printed copies of
`
`the source code maintained by the Receiving Party must be kept in a
`
`locked storage container when not in use. Other than in connection with
`
`pleadings filed under seal and depositions designated “ATTORNEYS’
`
`EYES ONLY”, no subsequent copies shall be made of the printed copies
`
`provided by the Designating Party to the Receiving Party. Hard copies of
`
`the source code also may not be converted into an electronic document
`
`and may not be scanned using optical character recognition (“OCR")
`
`technology, except that non-OCR PDF or TIFF copies of watermarked,
`
`Bates-labeled source code printouts may be created solely if required for
`
`filing with the court or for use as a trial exhibit. No electronic copies of the
`
`source code printouts, or portions thereof, will be provided except upon
`
`agreement of the parties or by Court order.
`
`11
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-02690-AT Document 68 Filed 03/15/16 Page 12 of 16
`
`c.
`
`Before any individual who is permitted to receive “ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY
`
`INFORMATION” (excluding those individuals identified under Section 7.f)
`
`accesses source code for the first time and at least ten (10) business days before
`
`any such access, the Receiving Party’s outside counsel shall provide to outside
`
`counsel for the Designating Party the names of any individual seeking access to
`
`the Designating Party’s source code.
`
`i.
`
`Thereafter, individuals who have been previously identified according to
`
`this Paragraph may access the secure facility, consistent with the normal
`
`practice at the facility, without further approval, although the Designating
`
`Party shall be informed at least two (2) business days before any such
`
`person accesses the secure facility. Any person or party who fails to
`
`observe the notice requirement may be denied access.
`
`ii.
`
`No more than five (5) individuals for the Receiving Party who qualify
`
`under Paragraph 7 may have access to the Source Code Computer. In
`
`addition, no more than ten (10) additional individuals for the Receiving
`
`Party who qualify under Paragraph 7 may have access to printed copies of
`
`any portion of the Designating Party’s source code.
`
`iii.
`
`The Receiving Party’s counsel shall keep a log that records the identity of
`
`each individual to whom each hard copy of the source code is provided
`
`and when it was provided to that person. Such a log shall be provided to
`
`the Designating Party upon reasonable request during the pendency of this
`
`litigation and, in all events, at the conclusion of this litigation, including
`
`appeals.
`
`12
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-02690-AT Document 68 Filed 03/15/16 Page 13 of 16
`
`d.
`
`If any individual inspecting the Designating Party’s source code seeks to take
`
`notes, all such notes will be taken on bound (spiral or other type of permanently
`
`bound) notebooks. No loose paper or other paper that can be used in a printer may
`
`be brought into the secure facility.
`
`e.
`
`Except for the computer and printer specified in Paragraph 11.b, no computer
`
`component or peripheral that may be suitable for use with the Source Code
`
`Computer or printer in the room (including hard drives and floppy drives, tape
`
`drives, modems, modem cards, memory sticks, thumb drives, etc.) is permitted in
`
`the secure facility.
`
`f.
`
`At the end of each working day, all originally printed pages will be left at the
`
`secure facility for identified representatives of the Designating Party. Unless a
`
`request has been made pursuant to Paragraph 11.b.i, within 72 hours, such
`
`representative will provide one photocopy of the selected source code to an
`
`individual designated by the Receiving Party that selected that source code.
`
`No originally printed paper shall be removed from the facility other than by
`
`representatives of the Designating Party.
`
`The Designating Party shall not record, monitor, or otherwise attempt to obtain
`
`the work product of the Receiving Party during the inspection.
`
`Nothing in this Paragraph 14 is intended to waive or concede any party’s right to
`
`challenge the necessity of source code production or the scope of any such
`
`g.
`
`h.
`
`i.
`
`production.
`
`13
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-02690-AT Document 68 Filed 03/15/16 Page 14 of 16
`
`15.
`
`Trial Procedures. A party may request that the Court implement appropriate
`
`procedures to protect Proprietary Information that may be disclosed at the trial or any hearing in
`
`this matter consistent with the spirit and scope of this Order.
`
`16.
`
` Modification.Stipulations may be made between counsel for the respective parties as to
`
`the application of this Order to specific situations provided that such stipulations are recorded in
`
`writing or contained in the record of any oral proceeding. Nothing contained herein shall
`
`preclude any party from seeking an order of the Court modifying or supplementing this Order.
`
`17.
`
`Effect. This Protective Order shall continue in effect until further order of this Court.
`
`14
`
`So ORDERED and SIGNED this 15th day of March, 2016.
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-02690-AT Document 68 Filed 03/15/16 Page 15 of 16
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`TYLER DIVISION
`
`SIPCO, LLC, and IP CO, LLC
`(d/b/a INTUS IQ),
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
` v.
`
` Civil Action No. 6:15-cv-907
`
`EMERSON ELECTRIC CO., EMERSON
`PROCESS MANAGEMENT LLLP, FISHER-
`ROSEMOUNT SYSTEMS, INC.,
`ROSEMOUNT INC., BP, p.l.c., BP
`AMERICA, INC., and BP AMERICA
`PRODUCTION COMPANY,
`
`Defendants.
`
`UNDERTAKING AND CONSENT TO BE BOUND BY
`PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`I, ___________________________________, hereby declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`My address is ________________________________________________
`
`_____________________________________________. My current employer is
`
`_________________________________________. My current occupation is
`
`_________________________________________.
`
`2.
`
`I have received a copy of the Protective Order entered in the above-captioned
`
`action (the “Protective Order”). I have carefully read and understand the provisions of the
`
`Protective Order.
`
`3.
`
`I will comply with all the provisions of the Protective Order. I will hold in
`
`confidence, will not disclose to anyone not qualified under the Protective Order, and will use
`
`only for purposes of this action any Proprietary Information that is disclosed to me.
`
`15
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-02690-AT Document 68 Filed 03/15/16 Page 16 of 16
`
`4.
`
`Promptly upon termination of this action, I will return all Proprietary Information
`
`that came into my possession, and all documents and things that I have prepared relating thereto,
`
`to counsel for the party by whom I am employed or retained.
`
`5.
`
`I hereby submit to the jurisdiction of this Court for the purpose of enforcement of
`
`the Protective Order in this action.
`
`6.
`
`I understand that this Undertaking and the Protective Order are enforceable after
`
`the termination of this action.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`Dated: ____________________
`
`____________________________________
`(Signature)
`
`____________________________________
`(Printed Name)
`
`16
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket