`
`Exhibit F
`
`
`
`Case 1:16-cv-02690-AT Document 139-7 Filed 08/16/16 Page 2 of 2
`Case 1:16—cv-02690-AT Document 139-7 Filed 08/16/16 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`
`Groves, John [CORP/HK]
`Wednesday, July 31, 2013 4:02 PM
`'Candida Petite'
`
`Subject:
`Attachments:
`
`RE: Meeting
`Complaintpdf
`
`Candida,
`
`Emerson has just filed the attached Complaint for Declaratory Judgment of Patent Non-
`Infringement and Invalidity in the Northern District of Georgia.
`I want to assure you that
`it is still our intent to reach an amicable conclusion to the patent licensing discussions
`you initiated, but our research shows that you have filed multiple lawsuits in the Eastern
`District of Texas, and the references to Rule 498 on previous correspondence clearly show you
`are anticipating litigation. Emerson's impression of the Eastern District of Texas is that
`it may unduly favor patent owners, and we would prefer to be in another jurisdiction in the
`event that we are unable to reach an amicable solution. We are of course prepared to delay
`or stay this law suit whilst we are discussing possible license terms.
`
`I appreciate you may be unhappy with this step Emerson has taken, but we would still very
`much like to go ahead with our planned meeting on Monday.
`I am looking forward to meeting
`you and Bob in person to explore how we can move forward.
`
`With regard to the meeting agenda, I suggest you start by walking us through your claim
`charts. We can then discuss those and cover any questions Emerson has.
`I would also like to
`discuss your expectations on possible commercial licensing terms.
`
`john
`
`
`
`————— Original Messagen
`From: Candida Petite H
`
`
`Sent: Wednesday, July 3 ,
`To: Groves, John [CORP/HK]
`Subject: Meeting
`
`Hi John - I wanted to check your thoughts on an agenda for next week.
`
`Do you want us to do a presentation or would you rather do a Q&A session regarding the IE5
`and contract?
`
`Please let me know so that we can plan appropriately.
`
`Thanks
`
`Candida
`
`Candida Petite
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL
`
`EMR-SIP-00365088
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
