throbber
Case 1:16-cv-02690-AT Document 138 Filed 08/12/16 Page 1 of 2
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
`ATLANTA DIVISION
`1:15-cv-00319-AT
`Emerson Electric Co. et al v. SIPCO LLC et al
`&
`1:16-cv-02690-AT
`Sipco, LLC et al v. Emerson Electric Co. et al
`
`Honorable Amy Totenberg
`
`Minute Sheet for proceedings held In Open Court on 08/10/2016.
`
`
`
` COURT REPORTER: Shannon Welch
` DEPUTY CLERK: Amy McConochie
`
` TIME COURT COMMENCED: 2:49 P.M.
` TIME COURT CONCLUDED: 4:32 P.M.
` TIME IN COURT: 1:43
` OFFICE LOCATION: Atlanta
`ATTORNEY(S)
`James Berquist representing Emerson Electric Co.
`PRESENT:
`James Berquist representing Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc.
`James Berquist representing Rosemount Inc.
`Paul Cronin representing IP Co., LLC
`Paul Cronin representing SIPCO LLC
`William Custer representing Emerson Electric Co.
`William Custer representing Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc.
`William Custer representing Rosemount Inc.
`James Fox representing IP Co., LLC
`James Fox representing SIPCO LLC
`James Hall representing IP Co., LLC
`James Hall representing SIPCO LLC
`Donald Jackson representing Emerson Electric Co.
`Donald Jackson representing Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc.
`Donald Jackson representing Rosemount Inc.
`Ryan Pumpian representing BP p.l.c.
`Ryan Pumpian representing BP America, Inc.
`Ryan Pumpian representing BP America Production Company
`Damon Whitaker representing Emerson Electric Co.
`Damon Whitaker representing Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc.
`Damon Whitaker representing Rosemount Inc.
`Motion Hearing(Motion Hearing Non-evidentiary);
`
`PROCEEDING
`CATEGORY:
`MOTIONS RULED
`ON:
`
`[51]Motion for Order DISMISSED AS MOOT
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-02690-AT Document 138 Filed 08/12/16 Page 2 of 2
`
`MINUTE TEXT:
`
`
`
`The Court heard from the parties on SIPCO's motion to transfer.
`Discussion was had regarding the joinder of BP and whether BP
`is a necessary party. Plaintiffs are to provide the interrogatory
`answers. Discussion was had concerning the motion to sever,
`mediation, scheduling, and possible appointment of a special
`master. The Court dismissed the [51] Motion for Order
`Enjoining Defendants From Prosecuting The Second-Filed
`Action as moot (1:15-cv-0319-AT). Re the [50] Motion to De-
`Designate Defendants' Infringement Contentions, the parties are
`to let the Court know by August 31 how their discussions go and
`if they can resolve this issue (1:15-cv-0319-AT). The Court
`stayed the current briefing schedule through Monday, August 15,
`2016. The Court will hold a telephone conference at 3:30 PM on
`Monday, August 15, 2016.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket