Case 1:15-cv-04219-TWT Document 64-1 Filed 11/22/16 Page 1 of 16
`Case 1:15—cv—O4219—TWT Document 64-1 Filed 11/22/16 Page 1 of 16
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:15—cv—O4219—TWT Document 64-1 Filed 11/22/16 Page 1 of 16
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:15-cv-04219-TWT Document 64-1 Filed 11/22/16 Page 2 of 16
`
`No. Term/Phrase/Clause
`
`1.
`
`Patent
`Claim(s)
`
`PROPOSED CONSTRUCTIONS AND SUPPORT FOR
`DISPUTED CLAIM TERMS, PHRASES, AND CLAUSES
`
`Ironburg’s Proposed
`Construction and Support
`“[D]irectional references … do
`not limit the respective features
`to such orientation, but merely
`serve to distinguish these
`features from one another.”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`‘525 Patent: Fig. 1; Fig. 2; Fig.
`3; 2:30-35; 2:63-68; 4:28-32;
`Claim 1, Claim 20; Oct. 29,
`2012 Response to Office Action
`at 6-9; Feb. 4, 2013 Office
`Action; Jun. 28, 2012 Office
`Action.
`
`‘770 Patent: Fig. 1; Fig. 2; Fig.
`3; 2:30-35; 2:63-68; 4:26-31.
`
`‘688 Patent: Fig. 1; Fig. 2; Fig.
`4; 4:19-27; 9:21-25
`
`‘229 Patent: Fig. 1; Fig. 2; Fig.
`3; Fig. 4; 23:65-24:2
`
`Valve’s Proposed
`Construction and Support
`As used in the claims, these
`directional references do not
`limit the respective features to
`any particular orientation.
`Instead, they merely serve to
`distinguish these features from
`one another and define positions
`relative to each other. For
`example, the “front” is opposite
`the “back,” and the “top” is
`opposite the “bottom.”
`
`Support:
`Expert declaration and
`testimony;
`IPR2016-00948, Paper 10, at 8-
`9;
`IPR2016-00949, Paper 10, at 8-
`9;
`‘525 Patent 4:27-31;
`‘770 Patent 4:27-31;
`‘688 Patent 9:21-25;
`‘229 Patent 23:65-24:2
`
`directional references
`such as “top,”
`“bottom,” “front,”
`“back,” “end,”
`“side,” “inner,”
`“outer,” “upper,” and
`“lower”
`
`
`Ubiquitous in
`all four
`patents-in-
`suit
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:15-cv-04219-TWT Document 64-1 Filed 11/22/16 Page 3 of 16
`
`No. Term/Phrase/Clause
`
`Patent
`Claim(s)
`
`2.
`
`“elongate member”
`
`‘525 Patent,
`Claims 1, 20
`‘770 Patent,
`Claim 1
`
`Ironburg’s Proposed
`Construction and Support
`
`
`Extrinsic Evidence:
`Witness and expert declaration
`and testimony
`
`Ironburg objects to the Expert
`Declaration of Mr. Dezmelyk as
`untimely and outside of the
`scope of the rules. Mr.
`Dezmelyk goes far beyond the
`brief summary contemplated by
`the rules and Ironburg has no
`time to provide a corresponding
`report.
`
`Not indefinite.
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`‘525 Patent, Fig. 2; Fig. 3; 1:59-
`61; 3:33-38; 4:15-19; Claim 1,
`Claim 20; Oct. 29, 2012
`Response to Office Action at 2,
`5, 8-9.
`
`Extrinsic Evidence:
`‘229 Patent, Fig. 2; Fig. 3; Fig.
`
`Valve’s Proposed
`Construction and Support
`
`Indefinite
`
`Support:
`Expert declaration and
`testimony;
`IPR2016-00948, Paper 10, at
`11-13;
`IPR2016-00949, Paper 10, at
`11-13;
`‘525 Patent/’770 Patent
`1:9-14; 1:56-2:13; 2:47-49; 3:7-
`
`
`
`Case 1:15-cv-04219-TWT Document 64-1 Filed 11/22/16 Page 4 of 16
`
`No. Term/Phrase/Clause
`
`Patent
`Claim(s)
`
`3.
`
`“elongate member”
`…“is inherently
`resilient and flexible”
`
`‘525 Patent,
`Claim 1
`
`
`Ironburg’s Proposed
`Construction and Support
`4; Fig. 6; Fig. 9; Fig. 13; Fig.
`17; Fig. 21; Fig. 25; Fig. 26; Fig.
`27; Fig. 30A; Fig. 31A; Fig.
`32A; Fig. 33; Fig. 34A; Fig.
`35A; Fig. 36A; Fig. 37A; Fig.
`39A; Fig. 41A; Fig. 44; 2:4-11;
`2:17-21; 2:46-49; 2:50-54; 2:55-
`62; 2:63- 3:4; Claims 1-5, 9-12,
`15-18.
`
`Witness and expert declaration
`and testimony
`
`“a member that may be bent or
`flexed by a load, such as a
`finger, and will return to its
`unbiased position when not
`under load.”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`‘525 Patent, Fig. 3; 1:59-61;
`3:33-38; 4:15-19; Claim 1,
`Claim 20; Oct. 29, 2012
`Response to Office Action at 2,
`5, 8-9.
`
`
`Valve’s Proposed
`Construction and Support
`12; 3:34-38; 3:51-61; 4:4-9;
`4:16-23; Fig. 2; Fig. 3;
`10/29/12 Response.
`
`Valve objects to Ironburg’s
`proposed construction of this
`phrase as untimely and
`prejudicial because it was first
`disclosed to Valve as a disputed
`term for construction on the
`November 22 filing
`deadline. As indicated above
`with respect to phrase 2, Valve
`submits that “elongate member”
`is indefinite. Valve contends
`that “inherently resilient and
`flexible” should be given its
`
`
`
`Case 1:15-cv-04219-TWT Document 64-1 Filed 11/22/16 Page 5 of 16
`
`No. Term/Phrase/Clause
`
`Patent
`Claim(s)
`
`4.
`
`“substantially the full
`distance between the
`top edge and the
`bottom edge”
`
`‘525 Patent,
`Claims 1, 20
`
`Valve’s Proposed
`Construction and Support
`plain and ordinary meaning.
`
`
`Indefinite
`
`Support:
`Expert declaration and
`testimony;
`IPR2016-00948, Paper 10, at
`11-13;
`‘525 Patent
`1:16-17; 1:27-29;
`2:15-19; 2:50-52; 2:61-67; 3:51-
`56; 4:53-54; 6:25-26; Figs. 2, 3;
`6/17/11 Application;
`10/29/12 Amendment;
`5/16/13 Amendment.
`
`Ironburg’s Proposed
`Construction and Support
`Extrinsic Evidence:
`Witness and expert declaration
`and testimony
`
`Not indefinite.
`
`The top and bottom edges are
`shown in the figures and the
`controls extend substantially the
`full distance.
`
`In the alternative:
`“substantially” – “largely but
`not wholly what is specified.”
`
`“top edge” – “the top
`(uppermost) surfa6ce of the
`controller.”
`
`“bottom edge” – “the bottom
`(lowest) surface of the
`controller”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`‘525 Patent, 1:15-16; 1:26-28;
`1:49-51; 2:15-19; 3:47-50; 3:51-
`
`
`
`Case 1:15-cv-04219-TWT Document 64-1 Filed 11/22/16 Page 6 of 16
`
`Valve’s Proposed
`Construction and Support
`
`Indefinite
`
`Support:
`Expert declaration and
`testimony;
`IPR2016-00948, Paper 10, at 9;
`‘525 Patent
`2:4-7;
`2:63-64;
`3:1-4:38;
`Fig. 2
`
`Indefinite
`
`Support:
`Expert declaration and
`
`Ironburg’s Proposed
`Construction and Support
`53; Claim 1, Claim 20; May 6,
`2013 Response to Office Action.
`
`Extrinsic Evidence:
`Witness and expert declaration
`and testimony
`
`
`
`Not indefinite.
`
`In the alternative, “top edge.”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`‘525 patent, Fig. 1; Fig. 2; Fig.
`3; 2:5-7; 3:54-56; Oct. 29, 2012
`Response to Office Action at 6-
`9.
`
`Extrinsic Evidence:
`Witness and expert declaration
`and testimony
`
`Not indefinite.
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`‘770 Patent, Fig. 3; 1:59-61;
`
`No. Term/Phrase/Clause
`
`Patent
`Claim(s)
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`“the front end”
`
`‘525 Patent,
`Claim 13
`
`“elongate member”
`
`‘770 Patent,
`Claim 1
`
`
`
`Case 1:15-cv-04219-TWT Document 64-1 Filed 11/22/16 Page 7 of 16
`
`Valve’s Proposed
`Construction and Support
`testimony;
`IPR2016-00948, Paper 10, at
`11-13;
`IPR2016-00949, Paper 10, at
`11-13;
`‘525 Patent
`1:9-14; 1:56-2:13; 2:47-49; 3:7-
`12; 3:34-38; 3:51-61; 4:4-9;
`4:16-23; Fig. 2; Fig. 3;
`10/29/12 Response
`Indefinite
`
`Support:
`Expert declaration and
`testimony;
`IPR2016-00949, Paper 10, at
`11-13;
`‘770 Patent
`1:16-17; 1:27-29;
`2:15-19; 2:50-52; 2:61-67; 3:51-
`56; 4:53-54; 6:25-26; Figs. 2, 3;
`6/17/11 Application; 10/29/12
`Amendment; 5/16/13
`Amendment.
`Indefinite
`
`
`Ironburg’s Proposed
`Construction and Support
`1:62-63; 1:64-67, Claim 1.
`
`Extrinsic Evidence:
`Witness and expert declaration
`and testimony
`
`
`
`Not indefinite.
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`‘770 Patent, Fig. 2; Fig. 3; 3: 51-
`56; Claim 1; Claim 3; Claim 15.
`
`Extrinsic Evidence:
`Witness and expert declaration
`and testimony
`
`
`No. Term/Phrase/Clause
`
`Patent
`Claim(s)
`
`7.
`
`“a first/second
`distance between the
`top edge and the
`bottom edge”
`
`‘770 Patent,
`Claim 1
`
`8. “substantially all” of
`the first/second
`
`‘770 Patent,
`Claim 2
`
`Not indefinite.
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:15-cv-04219-TWT Document 64-1 Filed 11/22/16 Page 8 of 16
`
`Valve’s Proposed
`Construction and Support
`Support:
`Expert declaration and
`testimony;
`IPR2016-00949, Paper 10, at
`11-13;
`‘525 Patent File History
`6/17/11 Application;
`10/29/12 Amendment;
`5/16/13 Amendment;
`‘770 Patent
`1:16-17; 1:27-29;
`2:15-19; 2:50-52; 2:61-67; 3:51-
`56; 4:53-54; 6:25-26; Figs. 2, 3.
`“the medial portion is closer to
`the top edge of the controller
`than the medial portion is to a
`distal end of each of the first
`handle and the second handle”
`
`Support:
`‘770 Patent
`Claims 3-5; Figs. 1, 2.
`
`Ironburg’s Proposed
`Construction and Support
`In the alternative,
`“substantially” should be
`construed as “largely but not
`wholly what is specified.”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`‘770 Patent, Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Fig. 3
`
`Extrinsic Evidence:
`Witness and expert declaration
`and testimony
`
`
`
`“the medial portion is closer to
`the top edge than a distal end of
`each of the first handle and the
`second handle”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`‘770 Patent, Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Claim
`3, Claim 4, Claim 5.
`
`Extrinsic Evidence:
`Witness and expert declaration
`and testimony
`
`
`No. Term/Phrase/Clause
`
`distance
`
`Patent
`Claim(s)
`
`9.
`
`“the medial portion is
`closer to the top edge
`than a distal end of
`each of the first
`handle and the
`second handle”
`
`‘770 Patent,
`Claim 5
`
`
`
`Case 1:15-cv-04219-TWT Document 64-1 Filed 11/22/16 Page 9 of 16
`
`Ironburg’s Proposed
`Construction and Support
`
`Valve’s Proposed
`Construction and Support
`
`Indefinite
`
`Support:
`Expert declaration and
`testimony;
`IPR2016-00948, Paper 10, at
`11-13;
`IPR2016-00949, Paper 10, at
`11-13;
`‘525 Patent
`1:9-14; 1:56-2:13; 2:47-49; 3:7-
`12; 3:34-38; 3:51-61; 4:4-9;
`4:16-23; Fig. 2; Fig. 3; 10/29/12
`Response;
`‘688 Patent 2:61-62; Claim 8.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Not indefinite.
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`‘688 Patent, Fig. 3; Fig. 4; Fig.
`5; Fig. 6; Fig. 9A; Fig. 9B; Fig.
`9C; 2:18-30; 2:49-3:3; 3:19-23;
`4:19-47; Claim 1, Claim 30.
`
`Extrinsic Evidence:
`Witness and expert declaration
`and testimony
`
`No. Term/Phrase/Clause
`
`Patent
`Claim(s)
`
`10.
`
`“elongate member”
`
`‘688 Patent,
`Claim 1, 30
`
`Indefinite
`
`Support:
`Expert declaration and
`testimony;
`IPR2016-00948, Paper 10, at 8-
`9;
`IPR2016-00949, Paper 10, at 8-
`
`Not indefinite.
`
`In the alternative, a “front end”
`here refers to the “top edge.”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`‘688 Patent, Abstract; Fig. 3;
`1:27-28; 2:13-20; Claim 1,
`
`‘688 Patent,
`Claim 1
`
`
`
`11. “the case being
`shaped to be held in
`both hands of a user
`such that the user's
`thumbs are
`positioned to operate
`controls located on
`the top of the case
`
`
`
`Case 1:15-cv-04219-TWT Document 64-1 Filed 11/22/16 Page 10 of 16
`
`Valve’s Proposed
`Construction and Support
`9;
`‘688 Patent Abstract;
`1:39-57; 1:64-2:2;
`2:13-30
`2:67-3:7;
`3:44-46;
`4:19-35;
`5:12-17;
`5:20-30;
`5:48-50;
`7:5-11;
`7:23-25;
`9:11-17;
`9:21-25;
`Fig. 7.
`“the mounted portion”
`
`Support:
`‘688 Patent 8:51-63.
`
`Ironburg’s Proposed
`Construction and Support
`Claim 30.
`
`Extrinsic Evidence:
`Witness and expert declaration
`and testimony
`
`
`
`Patent
`Claim(s)
`
`No. Term/Phrase/Clause
`
`and the user's index
`fingers are positioned
`to operate controls
`located on the front
`end of the case;
`wherein the games
`controller further
`comprises at least
`one first additional
`control located on a
`back of the case in a
`position operable by
`a middle, ring or little
`finger of the user.”
`
`
`12.
`
`“a portion”
`
`‘688 Patent,
`Claim 1
`
`“a portion”
`
`In the alternative, “a portion of
`the outer surface of the back of
`the case.”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`‘688 Patent, Fig. 3; Fig. 4; Fig.
`5; Fig. 6; Fig. 7; Fig. 8; 2: 27-
`30; 2:67-3:3; 5:48-58; 6:8-11;
`Claim 1; Claim 30.
`
`
`
`Case 1:15-cv-04219-TWT Document 64-1 Filed 11/22/16 Page 11 of 16
`
`No. Term/Phrase/Clause
`
`Patent
`Claim(s)
`
`13.
`
`“conduit”
`
`‘688 Patent,
`Claims 11, 12
`
`Ironburg’s Proposed
`Construction and Support
`
`
`Extrinsic Evidence:
`Witness and expert declaration
`and testimony
`
`“conduit”
`
`No further elaboration is
`required.
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`‘688 Patent, Fig. 4; Fig. 5; Fig.
`6; 3:13-31; Claim 11; Claim 12.
`
`Extrinsic Evidence:
`Witness and expert declaration
`and testimony
`
`
`Valve’s Proposed
`Construction and Support
`
`“a pipe or tunnel”
`
`Support:
`‘229 Patent at Fig. 9, 10, 12; 21,
`22, 23, 24, 25; 11:50-58; 14:21-
`25;
`Academic Press Dictionary of
`Science and Technology (1992):
`conduit Engineering: a pipe
`through which materials may
`pass;
`McGraw Hill Dictionary of
`Scientific and Technical Terms,
`5th Ed. (1994): conduit [ENG]:
`any channel or pipe for
`conducting the flow of water or
`other fluid;
`Oxford Dictionary of
`Mechanical Engineering, 1st Ed.
`(2013): conduit: a pipe, duct, or
`open channel through which
`
`
`
`Case 1:15-cv-04219-TWT Document 64-1 Filed 11/22/16 Page 12 of 16
`
`No. Term/Phrase/Clause
`
`Patent
`Claim(s)
`
`Ironburg’s Proposed
`Construction and Support
`
`14.
`
`“formed from
`material having a
`thickness”
`
`‘688 Patent,
`Claims 18, 19
`
`Not indefinite.
`
`In the alternative, “formed
`from” should be construed as
`“made of.”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`‘688 Patent, Fig. 9D; Fig. 9E;
`Fig. 9F; Fig. 9G; 3:35-41; 4:44-
`47; Claim 18, Claim 19.
`
`Extrinsic Evidence:
`‘229 Patent, 3:25-30; 3:56-57;
`9:36-40; 13:39-44; 14:21-23;
`19:23-26; 20:19-21; 20:26-28;
`20:66-21:1; 21:4-8; 21:32-35;
`23:25-26; Claim 16, Claim 17.
`
`Witness and expert declaration
`and testimony
`
`
`Valve’s Proposed
`Construction and Support
`there can be fluid flow;
`‘688 Patent
`3:14-27;
`6:46-67;
`Claims 11-14, 16.
`
`Indefinite
`
`Support:
`Expert declaration and
`testimony;
`‘688 Patent
`3:36-41;
`5:59-63;
`2/4/16 Reasons for Allowance
`
`
`
`Case 1:15-cv-04219-TWT Document 64-1 Filed 11/22/16 Page 13 of 16
`
`Valve’s Proposed
`Construction and Support
`
`Indefinite
`
`Support:
`Expert declaration and
`testimony;
`IPR2016-00948, Paper
`10, at 8-9;
`IPR2016-00949, Paper
`10, at 8-9;
`‘688 Patent Abstract;
`1:39-57; 1:64-2:2;
`2:13-30
`2:67-3:7;
`3:44-46;
`4:19-35;
`5:12-17;
`5:20-30;
`5:48-50;
`7:5-11;
`7:23-25;
`9:11-17;
`9:21-25;
`Fig. 7
`Indefinite
`
`
`Ironburg’s Proposed
`Construction and Support
`
`
`Not indefinite.
`
`In the alternative, a “front end”
`should be construed as a “top
`edge.”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`‘688 Patent, Abstract; Fig. 3;
`1:27-28; 2:13-20; Claim 1,
`Claim 30.
`
`Extrinsic Evidence:
`Witness and expert declaration
`and testimony
`
`
`
`No. Term/Phrase/Clause
`
`Patent
`Claim(s)
`
`15.
`
`“the case being
`shaped to be held in
`both hands of a user
`such that the user's
`thumbs are
`positioned to operate
`controls located on
`the top of the case
`and the user's index
`fingers are positioned
`to operate controls
`located on the front
`end of the case, the
`control actuator being
`mountable on a base
`of the games
`controller in a
`position operable by
`a middle, ring or little
`finger of the user”
`
`‘688 Patent,
`Claim 30
`
`16. “elongate member”
`
`
`‘229 Patent,
`Claims 1-5,
`
`Not indefinite.
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:15-cv-04219-TWT Document 64-1 Filed 11/22/16 Page 14 of 16
`
`No. Term/Phrase/Clause
`
`Patent
`Claim(s)
`9-12, 15-18
`
`17.
`
`“conduit”
`
`‘229 Patent,
`Claims 3-4
`
`Ironburg’s Proposed
`Construction and Support
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`‘229 Patent, Fig. 2; Fig. 3; Fig.
`4; Fig. 6; Fig. 9; Fig. 13; Fig.
`17; Fig. 21; Fig. 25; Fig. 26; Fig.
`27; Fig. 30A; Fig. 31A; Fig.
`32A; Fig. 33; Fig. 34A; Fig.
`35A; Fig. 36A; Fig. 37A; Fig.
`39A; Fig. 41A; Fig. 44; 2:4-11;
`2:17-21; 2:46-49; 2:50-54; 2:55-
`62; 2:63- 3:4; Claims 1-5, 9-12,
`15-18.
`
`Extrinsic Evidence:
`Witness and expert declaration
`and testimony
`
`“conduit”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`‘229 Patent, Fig. 11, Fig. 12;
`2:17-26; 2:29-34; 4:43-46;
`11:50-58; 12:4-19; 14:23-27.
`
`Extrinsic Evidence:
`Jan. 18, 2016 Office Action
`Response.
`
`Valve’s Proposed
`Construction and Support
`Support:
`Expert declaration and
`testimony;
`IPR2016-00948, Paper 10, at
`11-13;
`IPR2016-00949, Paper 10, at
`11-13;
`‘525 Patent
`1:9-14; 1:56-2:13; 2:47-49; 3:7-
`12; 3:34-38; 3:51-61; 4:4-9;
`4:16-23; Fig. 2; Fig. 3; 10/29/12
`Response;
`‘229 Patent
`16:26-28;
`23:6-7
`Fig. 47.
`“a pipe or tunnel”
`
`Support:
`Academic Press Dictionary of
`Science and Technology (1992):
`conduit Engineering: a pipe
`through which materials may
`pass;
`McGraw Hill Dictionary of
`Scientific and Technical Terms,
`
`
`
`Case 1:15-cv-04219-TWT Document 64-1 Filed 11/22/16 Page 15 of 16
`
`No. Term/Phrase/Clause
`
`Patent
`Claim(s)
`
`Ironburg’s Proposed
`Construction and Support
`
`
`Witness and expert declaration
`and testimony
`
`
`18.
`
`“formed from
`material having a
`thickness”
`
`‘229 Patent,
`Claims 16-17
`
`Not indefinite.
`
`In the alternative, “formed
`from” should be construed as
`“made of” or “molded.”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`‘229 Patent, 3:25-30; 3:56-57;
`9:36-40; 13:39-44; 14:21-23;
`19:23-26; 20:19-21; 20:26-28;
`20:66-21:1; 21:4-8; 21:32-35;
`23:25-26; Claim 16, Claim 17.
`
`Extrinsic Evidence:
`
`Valve’s Proposed
`Construction and Support
`5th Ed. (1994): conduit [ENG]:
`any channel or pipe for
`conducting the flow of water or
`other fluid;
`Oxford Dictionary of
`Mechanical Engineering, 1st Ed.
`(2013): conduit: a pipe, duct, or
`open channel through which
`there can be fluid flow;
`‘229 Patent
`Fig. 9, 10, 12; 21, 22, 23, 24, 25;
`11:50-58; 14:21-25.
`Indefinite
`
`Support:
`Expert declaration and
`testimony;
`‘229 Patent
`3:25-30;
`9:36-40.
`
`
`
`Case 1:15-cv-04219-TWT Document 64-1 Filed 11/22/16 Page 16 of 16
`
`No. Term/Phrase/Clause
`
`Patent
`Claim(s)
`
`
`
`Valve’s Proposed
`Construction and Support
`
`Ironburg’s Proposed
`Construction and Support
`‘688 Patent, Fig. 9D; Fig. 9E;
`Fig. 9F; Fig. 9G; 3:35-41; 4:44-
`47; Claim 18, Claim 19.
`
`Witness and expert declaration
`and testimony
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
