throbber
Case 1:08-cv-03602-TCB Document 3 Filed 01/22/09 Page 1 of 8
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
`ATLANTA DIVISION
`
`FILED IN CLERK'S OFFICE
`U 5 D C -Atlanta
`
`JAN 2 2 2009
`
`~
`
`, CS k
`1'T
`sr- urn Gee
`
`CheapTruckParts .com, LLC
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`V .
`
`Godfather Vans, Inc .
`Harold C . Johnson, Jr ., and
`Brian Christmas
`
`Defendants.
`
`Civil Action Case No . :
`
`I 08-CV-3602 T
`
`)Defendant Brian Christmas answer to
`)CheapTruckParts .com LLC's Complaint
`
`Jury Trail Demanded
`
`}
`
`ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
`
`Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, 12, Defendant Brian Christman (Defendant)
`answers Plaintiff s. Complaint as follows :
`
`PART IES
`
`1 . Defendant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`truth of the allegation set forth in paragraph 1, and therefore deny such allegations .
`
`2. Defendant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`truth of the allegation set forth in paragraph 2, and therefore deny such allegations .
`
`3 . Defendant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`truth of the allegation set forth in paragraph 3, and therefore deny such allegations
`
`4 . Defendant admits the allegations set forth in paragraph 4 .
`
`5 . Defendant denies all of the allegations of paragraph 5 .
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`6. Defendant denies all of the allegations of paragraph 6.
`
`7 Defendant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`truth of the allegation set forth in paragraph 7, and therefore deny such allegations.
`
`

`

`Case 1:08-cv-03602-TCB Document 3 Filed 01/22/09 Page 2 of 8
`
`8. Defendant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`truth of the allegation set forth in paragraph 8, and therefore deny such allegations .
`
`9. Defendant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`truth of the allegation set forth in paragraph 9, and therefore deny such allegations .
`
`10. Defendant admits that he regularly does business with residents of the Northern
`District of Georgia, and derives substantial revenue from services rendered in the
`Northern District of Georgia, but otherwise denies every allegation of paragraph 1 0.
`Defendant further denies that he has committed tortious Acts within the state .
`
`11 . Defendant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`truth of the al legation set forth in paragraph 11, and therefore deny such allegations .
`
`FACTS OF COMMON TO ALL COUNTS
`
`12. Defendant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`truth of the allegation set forth in paragraph 12, and therefore deny such allegations .
`
`13 . Defendant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`truth of the allegation set forth in paragraph 13, and therefore deny such allegations .
`
`14. Defendant admits the allegations set forth in paragraph 14 .
`
`15 . Defendant admits CTP used, and continues to use the Subject Work to operation its
`business of selling aftermarket automobile and truck parts via the Internet, but otherwise
`denies that CDP developed subject work set forth in paragraph 15 .
`
`16. Defendant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`truth of the allegation set forth in paragraph 16, and therefore deny such allegations .
`
`17. Defendant denies the allegations set forth in paragraph 17 .
`
`18. Defendant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`truth of the allegation set forth in paragraph 18, and therefore deny such allegations .
`
`19. Defendant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`truth of the allegation set forth in paragraph 19, and therefore deny such allegations .
`
`20. Defendant denies all of the allegations of paragraph 20 .
`
`21 . Defendant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`truth of the allegation set forth in paragraph 21, and therefore deny such allegations .
`
`

`

`Case 1:08-cv-03602-TCB Document 3 Filed 01/22/09 Page 3 of 8
`
`22 . Defendant admits the allegations set forth in paragraph 22 .
`
`23 . Defendant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`truth of the allegation set forth in paragraph 23, and therefore deny such allegations .
`
`24 . Defendant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`truth of the allegation set forth in paragraph 24, and therefore deny such allegations .
`
`25 . Defendant denies all of the allegations of paragraph 25 .
`
`26 . Defendant denies all of the allegations of paragraph 26 and defendant further alleges
`the custom software referenced in paragraph 26 was authored by defendant .
`
`27 . Defendant admits The CTP Website represents thousands of man-hours spent
`populating the year, make, and model look-up system, the customer database, and the
`accounting features of the system but otherwise denies every allegation of paragraph 27 .
`
`28 . Defendant admits the allegations set forth in paragraph 28 .
`
`29 . Defendant admits the allegations set forth in paragraph 29 .
`
`30 . Defendant admits the allegations set forth in paragraph 30 .
`
`31 . Defendant denies all of the allegations of paragraph 31 .
`
`32 . Defendant denies the allegations set forth in paragraph 32 .
`
`33 . Defendant denies the allegations set forth in paragraph 33 .
`
`34 . Defendant denies the allegations set forth in paragraph 34 .
`
`35 . Defendant denies the allegations set forth in paragraph 35 .
`
`36 . Defendant denies all of the allegations of paragraph 36 .
`
`37. Defendant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`truth of the allegation set forth in paragraph 37, and therefore deny such allegations .
`
`38. Defendant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`truth of the allegation set forth in paragraph 38, and therefore deny such allegations .
`
`39 Defendant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`truth of the allegation set forth in paragraph 39, and therefore deny such allegations .
`
`

`

`Case 1:08-cv-03602-TCB Document 3 Filed 01/22/09 Page 4 of 8
`
`40. Defendant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`truth of the allegation set forth in paragraph 40, and therefore deny such allegations .
`
`41 . Defendant denies all of the allegations of paragraph 41 .
`
`42 . Defendant denies all of the allegations of paragraph 42 .
`
`43 . Defendant denies all of the allegations of paragraph 43 .
`
`44 . Defendant denies all of the allegations of paragraph 44 .
`
`45. Defendant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`truth of the allegation set forth in paragraph 45, and therefore deny such allegations .
`
`46. Defendant denies all of the allegations of paragraph 46 .
`
`47. Defendant denies all of the allegations of paragraph 47 .
`
`48 . Defendant denies all of the allegations of paragraph 48 .
`
`49 . Defendant denies all of the allegations of paragraph 49 .
`
`50. Defendant admits the CTP Website includes trade secrets of CTP including at least
`the customer list with contact information, customer transaction history, but otherwise
`denies all of the allegations of paragraph 50 .
`
`51 . Defendant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`truth of the allegation set forth in paragraph 51, and therefore deny such allegations .
`
`52. Defendant denies all of the allegations of paragraph 52 .
`
`53. Defendant denies all of the allegations of paragraph 53 .
`
`54. Defendant denies all of the allegations of paragraph 54.
`
`55. Defendant denies all of the allegations of paragraph 55 .
`
`56. Defendant denies all of the allegations of paragraph 56 .
`
`57. Defendant denies all of the allegations of paragraph 57 .
`
`58. Defendant denies all of the allegations of paragraph 58 .
`
`59. Defendant denies all of the allegations of paragraph 59 .
`
`60. Defendant denies all of the allegations of paragraph 60 .
`
`

`

`Case 1:08-cv-03602-TCB Document 3 Filed 01/22/09 Page 5 of 8
`
`61 . Defendant denies all of the allegations of paragraph 61 .
`
`COUNT I
`COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
`
`62 . Defendant alleges that the Complaint in paragraph 62 fails to state a claim upon
`which relief may be granted and denies all of the allegations of paragraph 62 .
`
`63. Defendant alleges that CTP's copyright infringement claim of paragraph 63 is barred
`in whole or in part because upon information and belief, CTP engaged in inequitable
`conduct before, and/or committed a fraud upon the United States Copyright Office .
`Specifically, on information and belief, CTP filed the copyright registration for the
`copyright at issue in this case with full knowledge and awareness that the software was
`based on Open Source Licensing and modifications were created and authored and owned
`by Defendant in this case, and not CTP . Upon information and belief, in claiming that
`CTP was the lawful owner of the modifications, CTP misrepresented facts to the United
`States Copyright Office .
`
`64. Defendant denies all of the allegations of paragraph 64 .
`
`65. Defendant denies all of the allegations of paragraph 65 .
`
`66. Defendant denies any copyright infringement occurred, and alleges CTP is not
`entitled to recover for any loss of paragraph 66 in whole or in part .
`
`COUNT II
`TRADE SECRET MISAPPROPRIATION
`
`67. Defendant alleges that the Complaint in paragraph 67 fails to state a claim upon
`which relief may be granted and denies all allegations of paragraph 67 .
`
`68. Defendant alleges that no trade secret misappropriations occurred at any time . Only
`modifications authored and owned by Defendant were transferred and that allegations in
`paragraph 68 are without basis .
`
`64. Defendant denies all of the allegations of paragraph 69 .
`
`70. Defendant denies all of the allegations of paragraph 70 .
`
`71 . Defendant denies any trade secret misappropriations occurred, and alleges CTP is not
`entitled to recover for any loss of paragraph 71 in whole or in part .
`
`COUNT III
`COMPUTER THEFT
`
`

`

`Case 1:08-cv-03602-TCB Document 3 Filed 01/22/09 Page 6 of 8
`
`72. Defendant alleges that the Complaint in paragraph 72 fails to state a claim upon
`which relief may be granted and denies all of the allegations of paragraph 72 .
`
`73 . Defendant denies all of the allegations of paragraph 73
`
`74. Defendant alleges that no unauthorized copying of the content of the CTP website
`occurred, and no unauthorized property was appropriated and denies all allegations in
`paragraph 74 .
`
`75 . Defendant denies all of the allegations of paragraph 75 .
`
`76 . Defendant alleges that no theft occurred and no remedy of relief is due to CTP,
`whether preliminary or permanent as listed in paragraph 76.
`
`77 . Defendant alleges that CTP is not entitled to damages in paragraph 77 in whole or in
`part .
`
`COUNT IV
`TORTIOUS MISAPPROPRIATION
`
`78. Defendant alleges that the Complaint in paragraph 78 fails to state a claim upon
`which relief may be granted and denies all allegations of paragraph 78 .
`
`79. Defendant alleges that CTP claim of tortious misappropriation of personality in
`paragraph 79 did not occur . Defendant alleges that CTP and Godfather websites were
`advertised and marketed separately with no claim of common ownership .
`
`80. Defendant denies all of the allegations of paragraph 80.
`
`81 . Defendant alleges that no tortuous misappropriation occurred and no remedy of relief
`is due to CTP, whether preliminary or permanent as listed in paragraph 8l .
`
`82 . Defendant alleges CTP is not entitled to recover from defendant damages listed in
`paragraph 82 in whole or in part because no act of tortious misappropriation occurred .
`
`COUNT V
`FALSE DESIGNATIONS OF ORIGIN AND FALSE DESCRIPTIONS
`
`83 . Defendant denies allegation of false designations of origin and false descriptions as
`listed in paragraph 83 .
`
`84. Defendant denies all of the allegations of paragraph 84 .
`
`

`

`Case 1:08-cv-03602-TCB Document 3 Filed 01/22/09 Page 7 of 8
`
`85 . Defendant alleges no act of false designations of origin and false descriptions has
`occurred and no remedy of relief is due to CTP, whether preliminary or permanent as
`listed in paragraph 85 .
`
`86. Defendant alleges CTP is not entitled to recover from defendant damages listed in
`paragraph 86 in whole or in part because no acts of false designations of origin and false
`descriptions occurred .
`
`COUNT VI
`UNFAIR AND D ECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICES
`
`87. Defendant alleges that the Complaint in paragraph 87 fails to state a claim upon
`which relief may be granted and denies all of the allegations of paragraph 87 .
`
`88 . Defendant alleges that CTP's claim of unfair and deceptive trade practices under the
`Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act is barred in whole or in part because CTP's claim
`in paragraph 88 is without merit .
`
`89. Defendant alleges that no act of unfair and deceptive trade practice was done by
`defendant as alleged in paragraph 89 .
`
`90. Defendant alleges no acts of unfair and deceptive trade practices has occurred and no
`remedy of relief is due to CTP, whether preliminary or permanent as listed in paragraph
`90.
`
`9 1 . Defendant alleges CTP is not entitled to recover from defendant damages listed in
`paragraph 91 in whole or in part .
`
`COUNT VII
`EXPENSES OF THE LITIGATION
`
`92. Defendant alleges that the Complaint in paragraph 92 fails to state a claim upon
`which relief may be granted and denies all of the allegations of paragraph 92
`
`93 . Defendant alleges that CTP's claim of bad faith is barred in whole or in part because
`Defendant has not caused unnecessary trouble and expense .
`
`94 . Defendant alleges that CTP's claim to recover from Defendant, jointly and severally,
`the expenses of the litigation including, without limitation, costs and attorneys' fees is
`barred because CTP's copyright infringement claim, trade secret misappropriations
`claim, computer theft claim, tortious misappropriation claim, false designations of origin
`and false descriptions claim and unfair and deceptive trade practices claim is barred in
`whole or in part because CTP does not have a standing to bring such a claim .
`
`

`

`Case 1:08-cv-03602-TCB Document 3 Filed 01/22/09 Page 8 of 8
`
`PRAYER FO R RELIEF
`
`WHEREFORE, Defendant prays that:
`
`I . That the Complaints he dismissed with prejudice and that Plaintiff take
`nothing thereby;
`2. That the Court den) any requested injunctive relief, whether preliminary or
`permanent;
`3. That the Court make a finding that the alleged copyright identified in
`Paragraph t fi of the Complaint is null and void ;
`4. That the Court directs CTP to transfer immediately to Defendant all copies of
`software modifications not authored by CTP ;
`5 . 'That the Court award Defendant attorney fees, lost wages, travel expenses,
`and his costs of suit as authorized by law ; and
`6. For such other and further relief as this Court deems just and equitable .
`
`Dated : January 22, 2009
`
`Brian Christman
`1 025 Daytona Dr .
`Lebanon, MO 65536
`brianCwicweb.cnm
`417 532 3855 (phone)
`
`Brian Christman, Defendant
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket