throbber
Filing # 194252076 E-Filed 03/18/2024 03:13:37 PM
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`NOT A CERTIFIED COPY
`
`FILED: PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CLERK, 03/18/2024 03:13:37 PM
`
`

`

`BETH COKE
`
`EMPLOYMENT LAW
`February 8, 2023
`Via Electronic Mail
`
`NOT A CERTIFIED COPY
`
`Rachelle McBride, Esq.
`Cheney Brothers, Inc.
`One Cheney Way
`Riviera Beach, FL 33404
`RachelleM@CheneyBrothers.com
`Re: Wesley Richards
`Dear Ms. McBride:
`I am in receipt of your February 3, 2023 letter to Mr. Richards. Please direct
`all future correspondence concerning this matter to me and not to my client directly.
`At the outset, there are additional facts of which you need to be aware. Mr.
`Richards has been discussing with Byron Russell leaving Cheney Bros, for over a
`year. Until recently there were two issues that caused Mr. Richards to want to leave.
`The first is that Mr. Richards was significantly underpaid from the standard, which
`can be determined by organizations such as the National Business Aviation
`Association (“NBAA”), based on experience and type of aircraft. The second issue
`was the micromanagement and demeaning, disrespectful manner in which the Chief
`Pilot treats pilots, including Mr. Richards.
`In January 2022, Mr. Russell gave Mr. Richards a raise and promised that he
`would work to resolve the issues with the ChiefPilot to convince him to stay another
`year. Prior to going to the training, Mr. Richards approached the Chief Pilot about
`getting a raise to bring him to the minimum standard. The response was to wait until
`after the training. Mr. Richards was originally scheduled to go to the training at issue
`in the middle of the year, but five days prior to going was advised that he would be
`, the Chief Pilot
`going. Regardless, after the training was completed by
`REDACTED
`indicated that he would not be receiving a raise. At that point, Mr. Richards applied
`for a job at another company. A week or so before he gave notice, Mr. Richards was
`I 3 I NORTH SECOND STREET. SUITE 204 • FORT PIERCE. FL 34950
`TELEPHONE: (772) 252-4230 • beth@cokeemploymentlaw.com • FAX: (772) 252-4575
`
`

`

`Rachelle McBride, Esq.
`February 8, 2023
`Page 2
`open about seeking another opportunity with the ChiefPilot who indicated that there
`was nothing that could be done if he wanted to leave because there are no contracts.
`In addition, prior to leaving, after repeatedly speaking with the Chief Pilot
`about the raise, he set a meeting for Mr. Richards to meet directly with Mr. Russell
`about the pay issue as well as a significant safety issue offlying the new plane, which
`is much larger than their other aircrafts, out of a small airfield. When they met, Mr.
`Richards told Mr. Russell that he needed a raise as he had recently been offered an
`opportunity to make significantly more money, to which Mr. Russell responded that
`was something he should consider. At no time did
`indicate that Mr.
`REDACTED
`Richards was under any obligation to repay the training costs. That only occurred
`after Mr. Richards gave his notice and Mr. Russell was angry that he was leaving.
`Having litigated these types of cases, I am keenly aware that the standard in
`the industry is to have pilots sign contracts agreeing to pay back training costs before
`the training is provided. That was not done here. Instead, you are seeking to rely on
`tort claims that simply do not apply. First, none of the claims will be successful
`because Mr. Richards did not promise to stay in Cheney Brothers’ employ. Rather
`that is contrary to the facts. However, had Mr. Richards been given a suitable raise
`and removal of the safety issue by flying the new plane out of a larger field such as
`Palm Beach or Stuart, he may not have left.
`There is no legal basis for Cheney Brothers to pursue training costs against
`my client so if legal proceedings are initiated, we will defend vigorously and seek
`fees and costs for having to do so. Further, if your client takes any action that
`jeopardizes his new employment, we will be filing suit for tortious interference. If
`you have case law that supports your threatened actions, please immediately provide
`it for my review. Otherwise I will consider the matter closed.
`
`NOT A CERTIFIED COPY
`
`Sincerely,
`
`cc: Wesley Richards
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket