throbber
Case 1:22-cv-22706-RNS Document 176-9 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/06/2023 Page 1 of 3
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 9
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-22706-RNS Document 176-9 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/06/2023 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
`
`Case No. 1:22-cv-22706-RNS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BELL NORTHERN RESEARCH, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`v.
`
`HMD AMERICA, INC.; HMD GLOBAL OY;
`SHENZHEN CHINO-E COMMUNICATION
`CO., LTD.; HON HAI PRECISION
`INDUSTRY CO., LTD; TINNO MOBILE
`TECHNOLOGY CORP.; SHENZHEN
`TINNO MOBILE CO., LTD.; TINNO USA,
`INC.; UNISOC TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.;
`SPREADTRUM COMMUNICATIONS USA,
`INC.; WINGTECH TECHNOLOGY CO.;
`LTD.; WINGTECH INTERNATIONAL,
`INC.; BEST BUY CO., INC.; BEST BUY
`STORES L.P.; TARGET CORP.; WALMART
`INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`_______________________________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF JOSE I. ROJAS IN SUPPORT OF BELL NORTHERN RESEARCH
`LLC’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO.,
`LTD’S MOTION FOR EXCEPTIONAL CASE STATUS
`
`
`I, Jose I. Rojas, declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am an attorney licensed to practice law and a member of good standing of the
`
`Florida Bar. I am managing partner of ROJASLAW, and counsel of record for Plaintiff Bell
`
`Northern Research LLC (“BNR”) in the above-referenced action. I have personal knowledge of
`
`the matters set forth herein and if called, I could competently testify thereto.
`
`2.
`
`I make this declaration in support of Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant Hon Hai
`
`Precision Industry Co., Ltd’s (“Hon Hai”) Motion for Exceptional Case Status.
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-22706-RNS Document 176-9 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/06/2023 Page 3 of 3
`
`
`3.
`
`On October 3, 2022, I, along with co-counsel Christopher Clayton, participated in
`
`a meet and confer with counsel for Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd., Lisa K. Nguyen.
`
`4.
`
`At the outset of the meet and confer, Mr. Clayton conveyed that BNR was open to
`
`hearing Hon Hai’s position and receiving any information about Hon Hai’s intended motion to
`
`dismiss.
`
`5.
`
`Counsel for Hon Hai indicated that Hon Hai did not sell to Nokia, but did sell to
`
`Foxconn International Holdings Mobile.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`Counsel for Hon Hai conveyed that Hon Hai had an office in California.
`
`Mr. Clayton requested a draft of Hon Hai’s motion.
`
`Counsel for Hon Hai provided a non-committal response and that Hon Hai
`
`intended to file its motion on October 24, 2022.
`
`9.
`
`In response to Hon Hai’s counsel, Mr. Clayton indicated that we would see Hon
`
`Hai’s motion papers after filing.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States the foregoing is true
`
`and correct.
`
`
`
`Executed this 5th day of May, 2023,
`
`/s/ Jose I. Rojas
`Jose I. Rojas
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket