`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
`
`Case No. 1:22-cv-22706-RNS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BELL NORTHERN RESEARCH, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`v.
`
`HMD AMERICA, INC.; HMD GLOBAL OY;
`SHENZHEN CHINO-E COMMUNICATION
`CO., LTD.; HON HAI PRECISION
`INDUSTRY CO., LTD; TINNO MOBILE
`TECHNOLOGY CORP.; SHENZHEN
`TINNO MOBILE CO., LTD.; TINNO USA,
`INC.; UNISOC TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.;
`SPREADTRUM COMMUNICATIONS USA,
`INC.; WINGTECH TECHNOLOGY CO.;
`LTD.; WINGTECH INTERNATIONAL,
`INC.; BEST BUY CO., INC.; BEST BUY
`STORES L.P.; TARGET CORP.; WALMART
`INC.
`
`Defendants.
`_______________________________________/
`
`
`
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`
`
`ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE
`
`In consideration of Plaintiff Bell Northern Research, LLC’s Unopposed Motion to
`
`Dismiss Without Prejudice Defendants Tinno Mobile Technology Corp., Shenzhen Tinno
`
`Mobile Co., Ltd., and Tinno USA, Inc., filed in this case by Plaintiff Bell Northern Research,
`
`LLC, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. 41(a)(2), as ordered by this Court’s Order Entering Partial Stay
`
`upon Notice of Settlement (Dkt. 147), and the Court being of the opinion that the requested relief
`
`should be GRANTED, the Court hereby:
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-22706-RNS Document 159-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/24/2023 Page 2 of 2
`
`ORDERS that all claims in this action asserted against Defendants Tinno Mobile
`
`Technology Corp., Shenzhen Tinno Mobile Co., Ltd., and Tinno USA, Inc. are dismissed
`
`without prejudice. Each Party shall bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`____________________________________
`ROBERT N. SCOLA, JR.
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`
`
`2
`
`