`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
`MIAMI DIVISION
`
`CASE NO.: 21-cv-21698-GAYLES/TORRES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ATHOS OVERSEAS LIMITED CORP.,
` Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`YOUTUBE, INC., YOUTUBE, LLC,
`
`GOOGLE, LLC.,
`
`
`
`
` Defendants.
`
`
`___________________________________/
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`
`THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Defendants YouTube, Inc., YouTube LLC, and
`
`Google, LLC’s (“Defendants”) Motion for Bill of Costs (“Motion for Costs”), [ECF No. 191], and
`
`Motion for Attorneys’ Fees (“Motion for Fees”), [ECF No. 196]. The action was referred to Chief
`
`Magistrate Judge Edwin Torres, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), for a ruling on all pretrial,
`
`non-dispositive matters, and for a Report and Recommendation on any dispositive matters. [ECF No.
`
`155]. On May 2, 2024, Judge Torres issued his report recommending that the Motions for Fees and
`
`Motion for Costs be granted in part and denied in part. (the “Report”). [ECF No. 206].1 Although
`
`Judge Torres found that YouTube was entitled to fees related to Plaintiff’s FDUTPA claim
`
`(“FDUTPA fees”), he ordered YouTube to file a supplemental motion addressing the amount of
`
`fees sought. Id. Defendants timely filed their objections to the Report on May 16, 2024
`
`(“Objections”). [ECF No. 207]. Plaintiff did not file any objections to the Report, but it did file a
`
`
`1 In his Report, Judge Torres denied Plaintiff’s request that the Court defer ruling on the Motion pending its appeal
`to the Eleventh Circuit.
`
`
`
`Case 1:21-cv-21698-DPG Document 210 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/16/2024 Page 2 of 3
`
`response to Defendants’ Objections. [ECF No. 209]. On May 22, 2024, parties filed a Joint
`
`Stipulation wherein they resolved the amount of fees YouTube is entitled to in connection with
`
`Plaintiff’s FDUPTA claim. [ECF No. 202].2 Therefore the only portions of the Report that are
`
`objected to are those pertaining to YouTube’s fees under Section 505 of the Copyright Act
`
`(“Copyright Act Fees”).
`
`A district court may accept, reject, or modify a magistrate judge’s report and
`
`recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Those portions of the report and recommendation to which
`
`objection is made are accorded de novo review, if those objections “pinpoint the specific findings
`
`that the party disagrees with.” United States v. Schultz, 565 F.3d 1353, 1360 (11th Cir. 2009); see
`
`also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). Any portions of the report and recommendation to which no specific
`
`objection is made are reviewed only for clear error. Liberty Am. Ins. Grp., Inc. v. WestPoint
`
`Underwriters, L.L.C., 199 F. Supp. 2d 1271, 1276 (M.D. Fla. 2001); accord Macort v. Prem, Inc.,
`
`208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006).
`
`In his Report, Judge Torres recommends that the Court deny Plaintiff’s request to defer
`
`ruling on the Motions, grant the Motion for Fees as to YouTube’s FDUPTA fees, deny the Motion
`
`for Fees as to YouTube’s Copyright Act fees, and grant the Motion for Costs. Upon de novo
`
`review, the Court agrees with Judge Torres’s well-reasoned analysis and conclusion that the
`
`Motions should be granted in part and denied in part.
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`Accordingly, after careful consideration, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
`
`(1)
`
` Judge Torres’s Report and Recommendation, [ECF No. 206], is ADOPTED in
`
`full;
`
`
`2 Therefore, Judge Torres’s directive to the Parties to file supplemental briefing regarding the amount of FDUPTA
`fees YouTube is entitled to is now moot.
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 1:21-cv-21698-DPG Document 210 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/16/2024 Page 3 of 3
`
`(2)
`
`(3)
`
`(4)
`
` Defendants’ Motion for Costs [ECF No. 191] is GRANTED.
`
`Defendants shall be awarded $27,212.20 in costs.
`
`Defendants’ Motion for Fees [ECF No. 196] is GRANTED in part and DENIED
`
`in part:
`
`a. Defendants’ motion for fees under FDUPTA is GRANTED. YouTube shall be
`
`awarded $64,806 in attorneys’ fees under FDUPTA.
`
`b. Defendants’ motion for fees under the Copyright Act is DENIED.
`
`DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 16th day of July, 2024.
`
`
`
`
`________________________________
`DARRIN P. GAYLES
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`