throbber
Case 1:14-cv-22134-DMM Document 15-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/16/2014 Page 1 of 6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit B
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-22134-DMM Document 15-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/16/2014 Page 2 of 6
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
`MIAMI DIVISION
`
`CASE NO. 14-22134-CIV-MIDDLEBROOKS
`
`ROTHSCHILD DIGITAL MEDIA
`INNOVATIONS, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT
`AMERICA LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`_____________________________________
`
`
`DECLARATION OF JOHN KOLLER
`IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE
`
`
`
`
`
`I, John Koller, hereby declare under penalty of perjury that, to the best of my
`
`knowledge, the following statements are true and correct:
`
`1.
`
`I am employed as Vice President, Product Marketing, at Sony Computer
`
`Entertainment America LLC ("SCEA"), which is headquartered in San Mateo,
`
`California. I have been employed by SCEA since 1998. In this capacity, I have
`
`personal knowledge of the facts set forth herein.
`
`2.
`
`I understand
`
`that Plaintiff Rothschild Digital Media Innovations, LLC
`
`("Rothschild"), has filed the above-captioned patent infringement lawsuit against
`
`SCEA in the Southern District of Florida, asserting U.S. Patent No. 6,101,534,
`
`entitled "Interactive, Remote, Computer Interface System."
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-22134-DMM Document 15-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/16/2014 Page 3 of 6
`
`3.
`
`I understand that Rothschild's patent suit against SCEA has accused a system that
`
`allegedly includes the PlayStation Network, PlayStation consoles, and PlayStation
`
`game discs (collectively the "Accused System"). I further understand that the
`
`specific PlayStation consoles accused are the PlayStation 3, PlayStation 4,
`
`PlayStation Vita, and PlayStation Portable.
`
`4.
`
`I earned a B.S. from Saint Mary's College of California in 1995, and an MBA
`
`from Santa Clara University, located in Santa Clara, California, in 2005. I
`
`currently reside in Dublin, California, and work as SCEA's offices in San Mateo,
`
`California.
`
`5.
`
`In my work at SCEA, I have been responsible for the management of marketing
`
`in the United States of several PlayStation hardware devices, including the
`
`PlayStation 3, PlayStation 4, PlayStation Vita, and PlayStation Portable. In my
`
`current role, I am tasked with all aspects of PlayStation hardware platforms,
`
`including brand management, product features, strategic initiatives, licensing,
`
`peripheral launches, and more. I have more than 19 years of consumer product
`
`marketing experience, including 18 years directly in the video game industry.
`
`6.
`
`If this case advances to trial, I expect to testify live. Based on my understanding
`
`of the issues in this litigation, my expectation is that my testimony will be related
`
`to the marketing of the accused PlayStation consoles and PlayStation game discs.
`
`My expectation is that I will provide testimony related to the marketing, if any, of
`
`specific features of the accused PlayStation consoles and game discs that are
`
`relevant to this litigation.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-22134-DMM Document 15-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/16/2014 Page 4 of 6
`
`7.
`
`I am unaware of any employee of SCEA that would have a better understanding
`
`of the marketing of the PlayStation consoles, or would be able to provide more
`
`comprehensive testimony thereto.
`
`8.
`
`To the extent trial testimony from other members of my marketing team is
`
`necessary, I note that my entire team works in SCEA's San Mateo offices.
`
`Generally, other than SCEA’s various studios (located in California or on the
`
`West Coast), SCEA’s entire business is based in San Mateo, California, and
`
`therefore trial testimony from SCEA concerning any aspect of its business would
`
`likely need to come from various witnesses that work in SCEA’s San Mateo
`
`offices.
`
`9. Additionally, SCEA is the exclusive party in the United States responsible for the
`
`importation, distribution, and marketing of the PlayStation 3, PlayStation 4,
`
`PlayStation Vita, and PlayStation Portable consoles, and any research, design, or
`
`development of PlayStation products that occurs in the United States generally is
`
`performed in San Mateo, California. To the extent testimony is needed
`
`concerning these other areas, such as the operation of these game consoles, the
`
`SCEA employees who could give such testimony would work out of SCEA's
`
`headquarters in San Mateo, California.
`
`10. Further, I understand that Rothschild has identified PlayStation game discs as part
`
`of the Accused System. Many popular PlayStation games are developed by
`
`SCEA in its studios in Santa Monica, California and San Diego, California.
`
`There are other PlayStation games that are developed by SCEA in its studio in
`
`Bend, Oregon. To the extent testimony is needed concerning the games
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-22134-DMM Document 15-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/16/2014 Page 5 of 6
`
`developed by these studios, the SCEA employees who could give such testimony
`
`would work in Santa Monica, California, San Diego, California, or Bend, Oregon,
`
`or else would work in SCEA’s San Mateo, California headquarters. SCEA does
`
`not have any game studio located in Florida, since all of its studios are located in
`
`California or Oregon.
`
`11. Many other popular PlayStation games are developed in California outside of
`
`SCEA’s Santa Monica and San Diego studios. For example, the game
`
`“Uncharted 3 – Drake’s Deception” (like other games in the popular Uncharted
`
`franchise) was developed by Naughty Dog, Inc. in Santa Monica, California. To
`
`the extent testimony is needed concerning development of the Uncharted games,
`
`the Naughty Dog employees who could give such testimony would work in Santa
`
`Monica, California.
`
`12.
`
`In addition, there are many other companies that have developed popular
`
`PlayStation games, and a large number of such companies are based in California,
`
`including Activision (based in Santa Monica, California), Electronic Arts (based
`
`in Redwood Shores, California), Insomniac Games (based
`
`in Burbank,
`
`California), and many others.
`
`13.
`
`I understand that Rothschild has also identified the PlayStation Network as part of
`
`the Accused System. The PlayStation Network is part of the Sony Entertainment
`
`Network, which is operated by a third party, Sony Network Entertainment
`
`International LLC (“SNEI”). SNEI is headquartered in California, and it has
`
`several offices in California including San Mateo, California, Los Angeles,
`
`California, and San Francisco, California.
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-22134-DMM Document 15-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/16/2014 Page 6 of 6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket