throbber
Case 8:22-cv-02693-CEH-TGW Document 22 Filed 01/19/23 Page 1 of 7 PageID 336
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
`TAMPA DIVISION
`
`Plaintiffs.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 8:22-cv-2693-CEH-TGW
`
`
`AGIOS MIXAEL, LLC and
`GOOD GREEK FRANCHISES, LLC
`
`
`
`v.
`
`ALL ABOUT MOVING TAMPA
`BAY, INC., a Florida corporation,
`PHILLIP DIAMOND, MELISIA
`DIAMOND, and DOES 1-10,
`
`Defendants.
`
`__________________________/
`
`
`Uniform Case Management Report
`The goal of this case management report is to “secure the just, speedy, and
`
`inexpensive determination of” the action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 1. Under Local Rule
`3.02(a)(2), this case management report should be used in all civil cases except those
`described in Local Rule 3.02(d). Individual judges may have additional case
`management preferences that can be found under each judge’s name on the Court’s
`website, flmd.uscourts.gov/judges/all.
`
`1. Date and Attendees
`
`The parties may conduct the planning conference “in person, by telephone, or by
`comparable means[.]” See Local Rule 3.02(a)(1).
`
`The parties conducted the planning conference on 1/3/2021. Paul J. Punzone,
`David Lisko, Michael J. Colitz, III and John Atkinson attended the conference.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 8:22-cv-02693-CEH-TGW Document 22 Filed 01/19/23 Page 2 of 7 PageID 337
`
`
`2. Deadlines and Dates
`
`The parties request these deadlines and dates:
`
`
`Action or Event
`Deadline for providing mandatory initial disclosures. See Fed. R.
`Civ. P. 26(a)(1).
`
`Date
`
` 1/20/2023
`
`Deadline for moving to join a party, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 14, 19,
`and 20, or amend the pleadings, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a).
`
`Plaintiff’s deadline for disclosing any expert report. See Fed. R.
`Civ. P. 26(a)(2).
`
`Defendant’s deadline for disclosing any expert report.
`
`Deadline for disclosing any rebuttal expert report.
`
`Deadline for completing discovery and filing any motion to
`compel discovery. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 37; Middle District
`Discovery (2021).
`
`2/16/2023
`
`7/28/2023
`
`8/30/2023
`
`9/29/2023
`
`12/20/2023
`
`Deadline for moving for class certification, if applicable. See
`Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(c).
`
`n/a
`
`Deadline for filing any dispositive and Daubert motion. See Fed.
`R. Civ. P. 56. (Must be at least five months before requested trial
`date.)
`
`1/31/2024
`
`Deadline for participating in mediation. See Local Rules, ch. 4.
`The Parties agree to stipulate to a mediator at a later date.
`
`Date of the final pretrial meeting. See Local Rule 3.06(a).
`
`Deadline for filing the joint final pretrial statement, any motion
`in limine, proposed jury instructions, and verdict form. See Local
`Rule 3.06(b). (Must be at least seven days before the final pretrial
`conference.)
`
`1/31/2024
`
`3/18/2024
`
`3/25/2024
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 8:22-cv-02693-CEH-TGW Document 22 Filed 01/19/23 Page 3 of 7 PageID 338
`
`Date of the final pretrial conference. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(e);
`Local Rule 3.06(b).
`
`Month and year of the trial term.
`
`4/1/2024
`
`7/10/2024
`
`
`The trial will last approximately 3 days and be
`
` ☒
`
` jury.
`☐ non-jury.
`
`3. Description of the Action
`
`This action is brought against All About Moving Tampa Bay, Inc., Phillip
`Diamond, and Melisia Diamond (“Defendants”), and Does 1-10 by Agios
`Mixael, LLC and
` Good Greek Franchises, LLC (“Plaintiffs”). Plaintiffs assert that Defendants are
`actively infringing on Plaintiffs’ registered trademarks and violating Plaintiffs’
`copyrights.
`
`Defendants deny the allegations against them.
`
`
`
`4. Disclosure Statement
`
` ☒
`
` The parties have filed their disclosure statement as required by Federal Rule
`of Civil Procedure 7.1 and Local Rule 3.03.
`
`5. Related Action
`
` ☒
`
` The parties acknowledge their continuing duty under Local Rule 1.07(c) to
`notify the judge of a related action pending in the Middle District or elsewhere
`by filing a “Notice of a Related Action.” No notice need be filed if there are no
`related actions as defined by the rule.
`
`6. Consent to a Magistrate Judge
`
`“A United States magistrate judge in the Middle District can exercise the
`maximum authority and perform any duty permitted by the Constitution and other
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 8:22-cv-02693-CEH-TGW Document 22 Filed 01/19/23 Page 4 of 7 PageID 339
`
`laws of the United States.” Local Rule 1.02(a). With the parties’ consent, a
`district judge can refer any civil matter to a magistrate judge for any or all
`proceedings, including a non-jury or jury trial. 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
`
`The Court asks the parties and counsel to consider the benefits to the parties and
`the Court of consenting to proceed before a magistrate judge. Consent can
`provide the parties certainty and flexibility in scheduling. Consent is voluntary,
`and a party for any reason can decide not to consent and continue before the
`district judge without adverse consequences. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(2).
`
` ☐
`
` ☒
`
` The parties do consent and file with this case management report a completed
`Form AO 85 “Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate
`Judge,” which is available on the Court’s website under “Forms.”
`☒ The parties do not consent.
`
`7. Preliminary Pretrial Conference
`
` The parties do not request a preliminary pretrial conference before the Court
`enters a scheduling order.
`☐ The parties do request a preliminary pretrial conference, and the parties want
`to discuss enter discussion points.
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 8:22-cv-02693-CEH-TGW Document 22 Filed 01/19/23 Page 5 of 7 PageID 340
`
`
`
`8. Discovery Practice
`
`The parties should read the Middle District Discovery Handbook, available on
`the Court’s website at
`flmd.uscourts.gov/civil-discovery-handbook,
`to
`understand discovery practice in this District.
`☒ The parties confirm they will comply with their duty to confer with the
`opposing party in a good faith effort to resolve any discovery dispute before filing
`a motion. See Local Rule 3.01(g); Middle District Discovery (2021) at § I.A.2.
`
`9. Discovery Plan
`
`The parties submit the following discovery plan under Rule 26(f)(2):
`
`
`
`
`
`A. The parties agree to the timing, form, or requirement for disclosures
`under Rule 26(a):
`☒ Yes.
`☐ No; instead, the parties agree to these changes: enter changes.
`
`B. Discovery may be needed on these subjects:
`• Defendants’ alleged use of the trademarks, copyrighted works, and
`confusingly similar marks;
`• Defendants’ marketing and advertising efforts;
`• Whether the asserted and accused trademarks are likely to be
`confused;
`• Whether the Plaintiffs are the senior or junior users of the asserted
`trademarks;
`• Whether the asserted copyrights are substantially similar to the work
`accused of infringement;
`• Whether Defendants had access to the copyrighted works;
`• What protection, if any, is to be afforded the asserted copyrights;
`• Any monetary damages alleged by the Plaintiffs;
`• Any sales or profit realized by Defendant due to its alleged use of the
`trademarks and copyrighted works;
`• The identity of Does 1-10;
`• The parties reserve the right to amend this list or seek additional
`discovery supporting their claims and defenses as needed.
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 8:22-cv-02693-CEH-TGW Document 22 Filed 01/19/23 Page 6 of 7 PageID 341
`
`C. Discovery should be conducted in phases:
`☒ No.
`☐ Yes; describe the suggested phases.
`D. Are there issues about disclosure, discovery, or preservation of
`electronically stored information?
`☐ No.
`☒ Yes; The parties wish to reserve their right to claim issues regarding
`ESI in case they believe there are issues once discovery begins. The
`parties will execute a mutually agreeable confidentiality agreement prior
`to the production of documents in this case.
`E. ☒ The parties have considered privilege and work-product issues,
`including whether to ask the Court to include any agreement in an order
`under Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`F. The parties stipulate to changes to the limitations on discovery imposed
`under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 3.04 or other
`limitations:
`☒ No.
`☐ Yes; describe the stipulation.
`
`10. Request for Special Handling
`
` ☒
`
` The parties do not request special handling.
`☐ The parties request special handling. Specifically, describe requested special
`handling.
`☐ Enter party’s name unilaterally requests special handling. Specifically,
`describe requested special handling.
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 8:22-cv-02693-CEH-TGW Document 22 Filed 01/19/23 Page 7 of 7 PageID 342
`
`11. Certification of familiarity with the Local Rules
`
` ☒
`
` The parties certify that they have read and are familiar with the Court’s Local
`Rules.
`
`12. Signatures
`
` /s/ Paul J. Punzone
`David J. Lisko
`Florida Bar No. 0092841
`david.lisko@hklaw.com
`Paul Punzone
`Florida Bar No. 1003511
`paul.punzone@hklaw.com
`HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP
`100 N. Tampa Street, Suite 4100
`Tampa, FL 33602
`(813) 227-8500
`(813) 229-0134 (fax)
`Counsel for Plaintiffs
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` /s/ Michael J. Colitz
`Michael J. Colitz, III
`Trial Counsel
`Florida Bar No. 164348
`michael.colitz@gray-robinson.com
`Emily M. Heim
`Florida Bar No. 1015867
`emily.heim@gray-robinson.com
`GRAYROBINSON, P.A.
`401 E. Jackson Street, Suite 2700
`Tampa, FL 33602
`Tel: (813) 273-5000
`Fax: (813) 273-5145
`Secondary email:
`shelia.fenimore@gray-robinson.com
`Counsel for Defendants
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket