Case 1:24-cv-00264-JLH Document 13 Filed 04/05/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 665
`
`MEDTRONIC, INC., MEDTRONIC
`PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.,
`MEDTRONIC LOGISTICS, LLC, AND
`MEDTRONIC USA, INC.,
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 24-264-JLH
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`v.
`
`AXONICS, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`UNOPPOSED MOTION TO STAY PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1659
`
`Defendant Axonics, Inc. (“Axonics”), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1659, respectfully moves
`
`the Court to stay this action until the determination of International Trade Commission in
`
`Investigation No. 337-TA-1396, instituted on March 29, 2024, including appeals, becomes final.
`
`Section 1659 of Title 28 provides: “In a civil action involving parties that are also parties
`
`to a proceeding before the United States International Trade Commission under section 337 of the
`
`Tariff Act of 1930, at the request of a party to the civil action that is also a respondent in the
`
`proceeding before the Commission, the district court shall stay, until the determination of the
`
`Commission becomes final, proceedings in the civil action with respect to any claim that involves
`
`the same issues involved in the proceeding before the Commission.” 28 U.S.C. § 1659(a). A stay
`
`under this section is mandatory and must be granted if made within thirty days from the later of
`
`(1) the party being named a respondent in a proceeding before the ITC, or (2) the filing of the
`
`district court action. 28 U.S.C. § 1659(a)(1)–(2); see also In re Remy Cointreau USA, Inc., 541 F.
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 1:24-cv-00264-JLH Document 13 Filed 04/05/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 666
`
`App’x 985, 987 (Fed. Cir. 2013) (upholding the district court’s stay of all proceedings under 28
`
`U.S.C. § 1659(a) until the ITC proceedings became final).
`
`Plaintiffs Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co., Medtronic Logistics,
`
`LLC, and Medtronic USA, Inc. (collectively, “Plaintiffs” or “Medtronic”) filed this action on
`
`February 28, 2024, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,712,540 and 9,174,059. See D.I.
`
`1. Medtronic also filed a complaint with the ITC for the two same patents on February 28, 2024.
`
`On March 29, 2024, the ITC instituted the 1396 Investigation, after which a Notice of Investigation
`
`was published in the Federal Register on April 3, 2024. See 89 Fed. Reg. 65. The Notice of
`
`Investigation identifies Axonics as respondent in the 1396 Investigation.
`
`This action and the 1396 Investigation involve the same parties and same asserted patents.
`
`Thus, the conditions of 28 U.S.C. § 1659 are satisfied and this action must be stayed until the ITC
`
`issues a final determination in the 1396 Investigation. This motion is submitted within thirty days
`
`of Axonics being named as respondent in the ITC 1396 Investigation and is therefore timely
`
`filed. See 19 C.F.R. § 210.10(b). Counsel for Axonics communicated with counsel for Medtronic
`
`regarding this motion on April 3, 2024, and Medtronic advised that it does not oppose the motion.
`
`This motion is purely procedural and does not waive Axonics’ rights to petition this Court
`
`regarding jurisdiction, or any other relief due under the law. See Hideki Elecs. v. Lacrosse Tech.,
`
`2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42296 (D. Or. June 5, 2006) (after court lifted stay under 28 U.S.C. § 1659,
`
`defendants successfully moved for dismissal pursuant to FRCP 12(b) for lack of jurisdiction).
`
`For these reasons, Axonics respectfully requests that the Court stay this action until the
`
`determination of International Trade Commission in the 1396 Investigation, including appeals,
`
`becomes final.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:24-cv-00264-JLH Document 13 Filed 04/05/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 667
`
`/s/ Karen E. Keller
`Karen E. Keller (No. 4489)
`SHAW KELLER LLP
`I.M. Pei Building
`1105 North Market Street, 12th Floor
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`(302) 298-0700
`kkeller@shawkeller.com
`Attorney for Defendant Axonics, Inc.
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`Matthew Powers
`TENSEGRITY LAW GROUP LLP
`555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 650
`Redwood Shores, CA 94065
`(650) 802-6010
`
`Azra Hadzimehmedovic
`Aaron Nathan
`Samantha Jameson
`TENSEGRITY LAW GROUP LLP
`1676 International Drive, Suite 910
`McLean, VA 22102-3848
`(703) 940-5031
`
`Dated: April 5, 2024
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.