throbber
Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 33 Filed 06/17/24 Page 1 of 21 PagelD #: 2157
`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 33 Filed 06/17/24 Page 1 of 21 PageID #: 2157
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`NOKIA TECHNOLOGIESOY,
`
`Plaintiff / Counterclaim Defendant,
`
`V.
`
`HP,Inc.,
`
`Defendant / Counterclaim Plaintiff
`
`
`C.A. No. 23-cv-1237-GBW
`
`This
`
`SCHEDULING ORDER [PATENT, NON-ANDA|
`
`__\ say of JyNe 202 the Court having conducted an
`
`initial Rule 16(b) scheduling conference pursuant to Local Rule 16.1(b), and the
`
`parties having determined after discussion that the matter cannot be resolved at
`
`this juncture by settlement, voluntary mediation, or binding arbitration;
`
`IT IS HEREBY ORDEREDthat:
`
`1.
`
`Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures and E-Discovery Default Standard.
`
`Unless otherwise agreed to by the parties, the parties shall make their
`
`initial disclosures pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1) within
`
`five (5) days of the date the Court enters this Order. If they have not already
`
`done so, the parties are to review the Court's Default Standard for Discovery,
`
`Including Discovery of Electronically Stored Information ("ESI"), which is
`
`posted at http://www.ded.uscourts.gov (see Other Resources, Default Standard
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 33 Filed 06/17/24 Page 2 of 21 PagelD #: 2158
`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 33 Filed 06/17/24 Page 2 of 21 PageID #: 2158
`
`for Discovery) and is incorporated herein by reference.
`
`2.
`
` Joinder of Other Parties and Amendmentof Pleadings. All motions
`
`to.join other parties, and to amend or supplement the pleadings, shall be filed on
`
`or before December 2, 2024. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, any
`
`motion to join a party or motion to amend the pleadings shall be made pursuant
`
`to the procedures set forth in Paragraphs 4(g) and 5.
`
`3.
`
`Disclosures. Absent agreement amongthe parties, and approval of
`
`the Court:
`
`(a)
`
`By July 26, 2024,Plaintiff shall identify the accused
`
`product(s), including accused methods and systems, and its damages model, as
`
`well as the asserted patent(s) that the accused product(s) allegedly infringe(s).
`
`Plaintiff shall also produce the file history for each asserted patent.
`
`(b) By September 6, 2024, Defendant shall produce core
`
`technical documentsrelated to the accused product(s), sufficient to show how
`
`the accused product(s) work(s), including but not limited to non-publicly
`
`available operation manuals, productliterature, schematics, and specifications.
`
`Defendant shall also producesales figures for the accused product(s).
`
`(c)
`
`By October 15, 2024, Plaintiff shall produce an initial claim
`
`chart relating each known accused productto the asserted claims each such
`
`product allegedly infringes.
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 33 Filed 06/17/24 Page 3 of 21 PagelD #: 2159
`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 33 Filed 06/17/24 Page 3 of 21 PageID #: 2159
`
`(d)
`
`By December 2, 2024, Defendant shall produce its initial
`
`invalidity contentions for each asserted claim, as well as the known related
`
`.
`
`invalidating references.
`
`(e)
`
`By June 5, 2025, Plaintiff shall provide final infringement
`
`contentions.
`
`contentions.
`
`(f)
`
`By June 26, 2025, Defendant shall provide final invalidity
`
`4.
`
`Discovery. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or agreed to by
`
`parties, the limitations on discovery set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil
`
`Procedure shall be strictly observed.
`
`(a)
`
`Fact Discovery: Cut Off. All fact discovery in this case shall
`
`be initiated so that it will be completed on or before July 25, 2025.
`
`(b) Document Production, Document production shall be
`
`substantially complete by April 25, 2025.
`
`(c)
`
`Requests for Admission. A maximum of 50 requests for
`
`admission are permitted for eachside.
`
`(d)
`
` Interrogatories.
`
`1.
`
`A maximum of30 interrogatories, including
`
`contention interrogatories, are permitted for each side.
`
`ii.
`
`The Court encourages the parties to serve and respond
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 33 Filed 06/17/24 Page 4 of 21 PagelD #: 2160
`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 33 Filed 06/17/24 Page 4 of 21 PageID #: 2160
`
`to contention interrogatories early in the case. In the absence of agreement
`
`among the parties, contention interrogatories, if filed, shall first be addressed by
`
`the party with the burden ofproof. The adequacy ofall interrogatory answers
`
`shall be judged by the level of detail each party provides(i.e., the more detail a
`
`party provides, the more detail a party shall receive).
`
`(e) Depositions.
`
`i.
`
`Limitation on Hours for Deposition Discovery. Each .
`
`side is limited to a total of 70 hours of taking testimony of fact witnesses by
`
`deposition upon oral examination.
`
`il.
`
`Location of Depositions. Any party or representative
`
`(officer, director, or managing agent) of a party filing a civil action in this
`
`district court must ordinarily be required, upon request, to submit to a
`
`deposition at a place designated within this district. Exceptions to this general
`
`rule may be madeby order of the Court. A defendant who becomes a
`
`counterclaimant, cross-claimant, or third-party plaintiff shall be considered as
`
`having filed an action in this Court for the purpose of this provision.
`
`(f)
`
`Disclosure of Expert Testimony.
`
`i.
`
`Expert Reports. For the party who hastheinitial
`
`burden ofproof on the subject matter, the initial Federal Rule of Civil
`
`Procedure 26(a)(2) disclosure of expert testimony is due on or before August
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 33 Filed 06/17/24 Page 5 of 21 PagelD #: 2161
`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 33 Filed 06/17/24 Page 5 of 21 PageID #: 2161
`
`26, 2025. The supplemental disclosure to contradict or rebut evidence on the
`
`same matter identified by another party is due on or before September 26, 2025.
`
`Reply expert reports from the party with the initial burden ofproof are due on
`
`or before October 15, 2025. No other expert reports will be permitted without
`
`either the consentofall parties or leave of the Court. Along with the
`
`submissions of the expert reports, the parties shall advise of the dates and times
`
`of their experts’ availability for deposition.
`
`ii.
`
`Objections to Expert Testimony. To the extent any
`
`objection to expert testimony is made pursuant to the principles announcedin
`
`Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), as
`
`incorporated in Federal Rule of Evidence 702,it shall be made by motion no
`
`later than the deadline for dispositive motions set forth herein, unless otherwise
`
`ordered by the Court. Briefing on such motions is subject to the page limits set
`
`out in connection with briefing of case dispositive motions.
`
`iil.
`
`Expert Discovery Cut-Off, All expert discovery in this
`
`case shall be initiated so that it will be completed on or before November14,
`
`2025.
`
`(g) Discovery Matters and Disputes Relating to Protective Orders.
`
`i.
`
`Any discovery motion filed without first complying
`
`with the following procedures will be denied without prejudice to renew
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 33 Filed 06/17/24 Page 6 of 21 PagelD #: 2162
`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 33 Filed 06/17/24 Page 6 of 21 PageID #: 2162
`
`pursuant to these procedures.
`
`Should counselfind, after good faith efforts -
`
`including verbal communications among Delaware and Lead Counselforall.
`
`parties to the dispute - that they are unable to resolve a discovery matter or a
`
`disputerelating to a protective order, the parties involved in the discovery
`
`matter or protective order dispute shall submit a joint letter in substantially the
`
`following form:
`
`Dear Judge Williams:
`
`The parties in the above-referenced
`matter write to request the scheduling of a
`discovery teleconference.
`
`The following attorneys, including at
`least one Delaware Counsel andat least one
`Lead Counsel per party, participated in a verbal
`meet- and-confer (in person and/or by
`telephone) on the following date(s):
`
`Delaware Counsel:
`Lead Counsel:
`
`The disputes requiring judicial attention
`are listed below:
`
`[provide here a non-argumentativelist of
`disputes requiring judicial attention]
`
`On a date to be set by separate order, generally not
`
`less than forty-eight (48) hours prior to the conference, the party seeking relief
`
`shall file with the Courtaletter, not to exceed three (3) pages, outlining the
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 33 Filed 06/17/24 Page 7 of 21 PagelD #: 2163
`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 33 Filed 06/17/24 Page 7 of 21 PageID #: 2163
`
`issues in dispute and its position on those issues. On a date to be set by separate
`
`order, but generally not less than twenty-four (24) hours prior to the conference,
`
`any. party opposing the application for relief may file a letter, not to exceed
`
`three (3) pages, outlining that party's reasons forits opposition.
`
`iv.
`
`Eachparty shall submit two (2) courtesy copiesofits
`
`discovery letter and any attachments.
`
`v.
`
`Should the Court find further briefing necessary upon
`
`conclusion of the telephone conference, the Court will order it. Alternatively,
`
`the Court may chooseto resolve the dispute prior to the telephone conference
`
`and will, in that event, cancel the conference.
`
`
`
`5.MotionstoAmend.
`
`(a) Any motion to amend (including a motion for leave to
`
`amend)a pleading shall NOT be accompanied by an openingbrief butshall,
`
`instead, be accompaniedbya letter, not to exceed three (3) pages, describing
`
`the basis for the requested relief, and shall attach the proposed amended
`
`pleading as well as a "blackline" comparison to the prior pleading.
`
`(b) Within seven (7) days after the filing of a motion in
`
`compliance with this Order, any party opposing such a motion shall file a
`
`responsiveletter, not to exceed five (5) pages.
`
`(c) Within three (3) days thereafter, the moving party mayfile a
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 33 Filed 06/17/24 Page 8 of 21 PagelD #: 2164
`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 33 Filed 06/17/24 Page 8 of 21 PageID #: 2164
`
`reply letter, not to exceed two (2) pages, and, by this same date, the parties shall
`
`file a letter requesting a teleconference to address the motion to amend.
`
`6.
`
`Motions to Strike.
`
`(a) Any motiontostrike any pleading or other documentshall
`
`NOTbe accompanied by an opening brief butshall, instead, be accompanied by
`
`a letter, not to exceed three (3) pages, describing the basis for the requested
`
`relief, and shall attach the documentto be stricken.
`
`(b) Within seven (7) days after the filing of a motion in
`
`compliance with this Order, any party opposing such a motion shall file a
`
`responsiveletter, not to exceed five (5) pages.
`
`(c) Within three (3) days thereafter, the moving party may file a
`
`reply letter, not to exceed two (2) pages, and, by this same date, the parties shall
`
`file a letter requesting a teleconference to address the motiontostrike.
`
`7.
`
`Technology Tutorials. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, the
`
`parties jointly shall provide the Court, no later than the date on which the Joint
`
`Claim Construction Chart is due, a tutorial on the technology at issue. In that
`
`regard, the parties shall jointly submit to the Court an electronic tutorial ofnot
`
`more than thirty (30) minutes. The tutorial should focus on the technology in
`
`issue and educate the Court about the same and should not be used for
`
`argument. As to the format selected, the parties should confirm the Court's
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 33 Filed 06/17/24 Page 9 of 21 PagelD #: 2165
`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 33 Filed 06/17/24 Page 9 of 21 PageID #: 2165
`
`technical abilities to access the information containedin the tutorial ("mpeg",
`
`"quicktime", etc.). The parties may choose to file their tutorial under seal,
`
`subject to any protective orderin effect..
`
`8.
`
`Claim Construction Issue Identification. On or before December
`
`16, 2024, the parties shall exchangea list of those claim term(s)/phrase(s) that
`
`they believe need construction and their proposed claim construction of those
`
`term(s)/phrase(s). On or before December 23, 2024, the parties shall respond to .
`
`and provide their proposed construction for any term(s)/phrase(s) presented by
`
`the other side for which the party did not initially provide a construction. These
`
`documents will not be filed with the Court. Subsequent to exchangingthatlist,
`
`the parties will meet and confer to prepare a Joint Claim Construction Chart to
`
`be filed no later than January 7, 2025. The Joint Claim Construction Chart, in
`
`Word format, shall be e-mailed simultaneously with filing to
`
`gbw_civil@ded.uscourts.gov. The parties' Joint Claim Construction Chart
`
`should identify for the Court the term(s)/phrase(s) ofthe claim(s) in issue, and
`
`should include each party's proposed construction of the disputed claim
`
`language with citation(s) only to the intrinsic evidence in support oftheir
`
`respective proposed constructions. A copy of the patent(s) in issue as well as
`
`those portions ofthe intrinsic record relied upon shall be submitted with this
`
`Joint Claim Construction Chart. In this joint submission, the parties shall not
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 33 Filed 06/17/24 Page 10 of 21 PagelD #: 2166
`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 33 Filed 06/17/24 Page 10 of 21 PageID #: 2166
`
`provide argument.
`
`9.
`
`Claim Construction Briefing. Plaintiff shall serve, but not file, its
`
`openingbrief, not to exceed 5,000 words, on January 17, 2025. Defendant shall
`
`serve, but notfile, its answering brief not to exceed 7,500 words, on February
`
`22, 2025. Plaintiff shall serve, but notfile, its reply brief, not to exceed 5,000
`
`words, on March 7, 2025. Defendantshall serve, butnotfile its sur-reply brief,
`
`not to exceed 2,500 words, on March 21, 2025. No later than March 28, 2025
`
`the parties shall file a Joint Claim Construction Brief. The parties shall copy and
`
`paste their untiled briefs into one brief, with their positions on each claim term
`
`in sequential order, in substantially the form below.
`
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEF
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`Agreed-Upon Constructions
`
`Disputed Constructions
`
`[TERM 1]
`
`(a)
`
`Plaintiffs Opening Position
`
`(b) Defendant's Answering Position
`
`(c)
`
`Plaintiffs Reply Position
`
`(d) Defendant's Sur-Reply Position
`
`[TERM 2]
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiffs Opening Position
`
`10
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 33 Filed 06/17/24 Page 11 of 21 PagelD #: 2167
`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 33 Filed 06/17/24 Page 11 of 21 PageID #: 2167
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`Defendant's Answering Position
`
`Plaintiffs Reply Position
`
`Defendant's.Sur-Reply Position
`
`If there are any materials that would be submitted in an index,the parties
`
`shall submit them in a Joint Appendix.
`
`10. Hearing on Claim Construction, Beginning at 1:00 p.m. on April
`
`21, 2025, the Court will hear argument on claim construction. Theparties shall
`
`notify the Court, by joint letter submission, no later than the date on whichtheir
`
`answering claim construction briefs are due: (i) whether they request leaveto
`
`present testimony at the hearing; and(ii) the amount of time they are requesting
`
`be allocated to them for the hearing.
`
`Provided that the parties comply with all portions of this Scheduling
`
`Order, and any other orders of the Court, the parties should anticipate that the
`
`Court will issue its claim construction order within sixty (60) days of the
`
`conclusion of the claim construction hearing. If the Court is unable to meetthis
`
`goal, it will advise the parties no later than sixty (60) days after the conclusion
`
`of the claim construction hearing.
`
`11.
`
`Interim Status Report, On June 18, 2025, counsel shall submit a
`
`joint letter to the Court with an interim report of the matters in issue and the
`
`progress of discovery to date. Thereafter, if the Court deems it necessary,it will
`
`11
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 33 Filed 06/17/24 Page 12 of 21 PagelD #: 2168
`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 33 Filed 06/17/24 Page 12 of 21 PageID #: 2168
`
`schedule a status conference.
`
`12.
`
`Supplementation. Absent agreement amongthe parties, and
`
`approval of the Court,
`
`(a)
`
`nolater than June 5, 2025 the patentee mustfinally
`
`supplementthe identification of all accused products and servefinal
`
`infringement contentions; and
`
`(b)
`
`nolater than June 26, 2025 the accused infringers must
`
`finally supplement the identification ofall invalidity references andservefinal
`
`invalidity contentions.
`
`13.
`
`Case Dispositive Motions.
`
`(a) All case dispositive motions, an opening brief, and
`
`affidavits, if any, in support ofthe motion shall be served and filed on or before
`
`December 15, 2025. Briefing will be presented pursuantto the Court's Local
`
`Rules. No case dispositive motion under Rule 56 maybefiled more than ten
`
`(10) days before the above date without leave of the Court.
`
`(b)
`
`Concise Statement of Facts Requirement. Any motion for
`
`summary judgmentshall be accompanied by a separate concise statement, not
`
`to exceed six (6) pages, which details each material fact which the moving party
`
`contendsis essential for the Court's resolution of the summary judgment motion
`
`(not the entire case) and as to which the moving party contendsthere is no
`
`12
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 33 Filed 06/17/24 Page 13 of 21 PagelD #: 2169
`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 33 Filed 06/17/24 Page 13 of 21 PageID #: 2169
`
`genuine issue to be tried. Each fact shall be set forth in a separate numbered
`
`paragraph and shall be supported by specific citation(s) to the record.
`
`Anyparty opposing the motion shall include with its opposing
`
`papers a response to the movingparty's concise statement, not to exceed six (6)
`
`pages, which admits or disputes the facts set forth in the movingparty's concise
`
`statement on a paragraph-by-paragraphbasis. To the extent a fact is disputed,
`
`the basis of the dispute shall be supported by specific citation(s).to the record.
`
`Failure to respondto a fact presented in the moving party's concise statement of
`
`facts shall indicate that fact is not in dispute for purposes of summary judgment.
`
`The party opposing the motion mayalso include with its opposing papers a
`
`separate concise statement, not to exceed four (4) pages, which sets forth
`
`material facts as to which the opposing party contendsthere is a genuine issue
`
`to be tried. Each fact asserted by the opposing party shall also be set forth in a
`
`separate numbered paragraph andshall be supported by specific citation(s) to
`
`the record.
`
`The movingparty shall include with its reply papers a response to
`
`the opposing party's concise statementof facts, not to exceed four (4) pages, on
`
`a paragraph-by-paragraphbasis. Failure to respondto a fact presentedin the
`
`opposing party's concise statement of facts shall indicate that fact remains in
`
`dispute for purposes of summary judgment.
`
`13
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 33 Filed 06/17/24 Page 14 of 21 PagelD #: 2170
`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 33 Filed 06/17/24 Page 14 of 21 PageID #: 2170
`
`(c)
`Page limits combined with Daubert motion page limits. Each
`party is permitted to file as many case dispositive motions as desired provided,
`
`however, that each SIDE will be limited to a combinedtotal of 40 pages for all
`
`opening briefs, a combinedtotal of 40 pages for all answering briefs, and a
`
`combinedtotal of 20 pages for all reply briefs regardless of the number of case
`
`dispositive motionsthatare filed. In the eventthat a party files, in addition to a
`
`case dispositive motion, a Daubert motion to exclude or precludeall or any
`
`portion of an expert's testimony, the total amount of pages permitted for all case
`
`dispositive and Daubert motionsshall be increased to 50 pagesfor all opening
`
`briefs, 50 pages for all answering briefs, and 25 pages for all reply briefs for
`
`each SIDE.!
`
`(d)
`
`Ranking of Summary Judgment Motions. Any party that
`
`files more than one summary judgment motion shall number each motion to
`
`indicate the order in which the party wishes the Court to review its pending
`
`motions. The first motion the party wishes the Court to consider shall be
`
`designated #1, the second motion shall be designated #2, and so on. The Court
`
`' The parties must work together to ensure that the Court receives no more than
`a total of 250 pages(i.e., 50 + 50 + 25 regarding oneside's motions, and 50 +
`50 + 25 regarding the other side's motions) of briefing on all case dispositive
`motions and Daubert motions that are covered by this scheduling order and any
`other scheduling order entered in any related case that is proceeding on a
`consolidated or coordinated pretrial schedule.
`
`14
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 33 Filed 06/17/24 Page 15 of 21 PagelD #: 2171
`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 33 Filed 06/17/24 Page 15 of 21 PageID #: 2171
`
`will review the party's summary judgment motions in the order designated by
`
`the party. If the Court decides to deny a motionfiled by theparty, barring
`
`exceptional reasons determined sua sponte by the Court, the Court will not
`
`review any lower ranked summary judgment motionsfiled by the party.
`
`14. Applications by Motion. Except as otherwise specified herein, any
`
`application to the Court shall be by written motion. Any non-dispositive motion
`
`should contain the statement required by Local Rule 7.1.1.
`
`15. Application to Court for Protective Order, Should counsel find it
`
`will be necessary to apply to the Court for a protective order specifying terms
`
`and conditions for the disclosure of confidential information, counsel should
`
`confer and attempt to reach an agreement on a proposed form of order and
`
`submit it to the Court within ten (10) days from the date the Court enters this
`
`Order. Should counsel be unable to reach an agreement on a proposed form of
`
`order, counsel must follow the provisions of Paragraph 4(g) above.
`
`Any proposedprotective order must include the following paragraph:
`
`Other Proceedings. By entering this order and
`limiting the disclosure of informationin this case,
`the Court does not intend to preclude another court
`from finding that information may be relevant and
`subject to disclosure in another case. Any person or
`party subject to this order who becomessubject to a
`motion to disclose another party's information
`designated "confidential" [the parties shouldlist any
`other level of designation, such as "highly
`
`15
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 33 Filed 06/17/24 Page 16 of 21 PagelD #: 2172
`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 33 Filed 06/17/24 Page 16 of 21 PageID #: 2172
`
`confidential," which may be providedfor in the
`protective order] pursuant to this order shall
`promptly notify that party of the motion so that the
`party may have an opportunity to appear and be
`heard on whetherthat information should be
`disclosed.
`
`16.
`
`Papers Filed Under Seal. In accordance with section G ofthe
`
`Revised Administrative Procedures Governing Filing and Service by Electronic
`
`Means, a redacted version of any sealed document shall be filed electronically
`
`within seven (7) daysofthefiling of the sealed document.
`
`17.
`
`Courtesy Copies. The parties shall provide to the Court two (2)
`
`courtesy copies offilings(i.e., briefs, appendices, exhibits, declarations,
`
`affidavits etc.). Courtesy copies of appendices and exhibits should include hard
`
`tabs. This provision also applies to papers filed underseal.
`
`18. Motions in Limine, Motionsin limine shall not be separately filed.
`
`All in limine requests and responsesthereto shall be set forth in the proposed
`
`pretrial order. Each SIDE shall be limited to three (3) in limine requests, unless
`
`otherwise permitted by the Court. The in /imine request and any response shall
`
`contain the authorities relied upon; each in limine request may be supported by
`
`a maximum ofthree (3) pages of argument, may be opposed by a maximum of
`
`three (3) pages of argument, and the side making the in limine request may add
`
`a maximum of one (1) additional page in reply in support ofits request. If more
`
`16
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 33 Filed 06/17/24 Page 17 of 21 PagelD #: 2173
`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 33 Filed 06/17/24 Page 17 of 21 PageID #: 2173
`
`than one party is supporting or opposing an in limine request, such support or
`
`opposition shall be combined in a single three (3) page submission (and,if the
`
`moving party, a single one (1) page reply), unless otherwise ordered by the.
`
`Court. No separate briefing shall be submitted on in limine requests, unless
`
`otherwise permitted by the Court.
`
`
`
`19. Pretrial Conference. On June 2, 2026, the Court will holdapretrial
`
`conference in Court with counsel beginning at 3:00 p.m. Unless otherwise
`
`ordered by the Court, the parties should assumethatfiling the pretrial order
`
`satisfies the pretrial disclosure requirement of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
`
`26(a)(3). The parties shall file with the Court the joint proposed final pretrial
`
`order in compliance with Local Rule 16.3(c) and the Court's Preferences and
`
`Procedures for Civil Cases not later than seven (7) days before the pretrial
`
`conference. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, the parties shall comply
`with the timeframesset forth in Local Rule 16.3(d)(1)-(3) for the preparation of |
`
`the joint proposedfinal pretrial order.
`
`The parties shall provide the Court two (2) courtesy copies of the joint
`
`proposedfinal pretrial order and all attachments. The proposedfinal pretrial
`
`order shall contain a table of contents and the paragraphs shall be numbered.
`
`20.
`
`Jury Instructions, Voir Dire, and Special Verdict Forms. Where a
`
`caseis to betried to a jury, pursuant to Local Rules 47.l(a)(2) and 51.1 the
`
`17
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 33 Filed 06/17/24 Page 18 of 21 PagelD #: 2174
`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 33 Filed 06/17/24 Page 18 of 21 PageID #: 2174
`
`parties should file (i) proposedvoir dire,(ii) preliminary jury instructions,(iii)
`
`final jury instructions, and (iv) special verdict forms seven (7) business days
`
`before the final pretrial conference. This submission shall be accompanied by a
`
`courtesy copy containing electronic files of these documents,in Microsoft
`
`Word format, which may be submitted by e-mail to
`
`gbw_civil@ded.uscourts.gov.
`
`21.
`
`Trial. This matter is scheduled for a five day jury trial beginningat
`
`
`9:30 a.m. on June 8, 2026 with the subsequenttrial days beginning at 9:30
`
`a.m. Until the case is submitted to the jury for deliberations, the jury will be
`
`excused each day at 5:30 p.m. Thetrial will be timed, as counsel will be
`
`allocated a total number of hours in which to present their respective cases.
`
`22.
`
`Judgment on Verdict and Post-Trial Status Report. Within seven
`
`(7) days after a jury returns a verdict in any portion of a jury trial, the parties
`
`shall jointly submit a form of order to enter judgment on the verdict. At the
`
`same time, the parties shall submit a joint status report, indicating among other
`
`things how the case should proceed andlisting any post-trial motions each party
`
`intendsto file.
`
`23.
`
` Post-Trial Motions. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, all
`
`SIDESare limited to a maximum of 20 pages of opening briefs, 20 pages of
`
`answering briefs, and 10 pages ofreply briefs relating to any post-trial motions
`
`18
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 33 Filed 06/17/24 Page 19 of 21 PagelD #: 2175
`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 33 Filed 06/17/24 Page 19 of 21 PageID #: 2175
`
`filed by that side, no matter how many such motionsarefiled.
`
`24.
`
`ADRProcess. This matteris referred to a magistrate judge to
`
`
`
`The Honorable Gregory B. Williams
`United States District Judge
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 33 Filed 06/17/24 Page 20 of 21 PagelD #: 2176
`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 33 Filed 06/17/24 Page 20 of 21 PageID #: 2176
`
`Counsel Shall Provide a Chart of All Relevant Deadlines
`
`
` Plaintiff shall identify asserted patent(s), the accused
`product(s), and damages model. Plaintiff shall also
`
`producethe file history for each asserted patent
`
`
`
`Defendant shall produce core technical documents and|September 6, 2024
`sales figures for the accused product(s).
`
`
`
`
`October 15, 2024
`Initial Infringement Contentions
`Joinder of Other Parties and Amendment of Pleadings|December 2, 2024
`
`
`Initial Invalidity Contentions -|December2, 2024 --
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`December 16, 2024,
`Theparties shall exchangea list of those claim
`term(s)/phrase(s) that they believe need construction
`
`
`and their proposed claim construction of those
`term(s)/phrase(s).
`
`
`
`
`Theparties shall respond to and provide their proposed|December 23, 2024
`construction for any term(s)/phrase(s) presented by the
`
`
`other side for which the party did notinitially provide a
`
`
`construction.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`July 26, 2024
`
`csit|
`
`Tutorials
`
`January 7, 2025
`
`February 22, 2025
`March 7, 2025
`
`March 21, 2025
`
`April 28, 2025
`June 5, 2025
`
`June 18, 2025
`
`June 26, 2025
`
`July 25, 2025
`August 26, 2025
`September 26, 2025
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 33 Filed 06/17/24 Page 21 of 21 PagelD #: 2177
`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 33 Filed 06/17/24 Page 21 of 21 PageID #: 2177
`
`Responsesto Case Dispositive Motions and Daubert ~|January 21,2026 -
`
`October 15, 2025
`
`November 14, 2025
`
`Reply Expert Reports
`
`Expert Discovery Cut-Off
`
`
`December 15, 2025
`Case Dispositive Motions and Daubert Motions
`
`
`Motions
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Replies in Support of Case Dispositive Motions and
`Daubert Motions
`Final Pretrial Conference
`Jury Selection/Trial
`
`February 3, 2026
`
`June 2, 2026,at 3:00 p.m.
`June 8, 2026, at 9:30 a.m.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket