throbber
Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 11 Filed 12/11/23 Page 1 of 83 PageID #: 1835
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`NOKIA TECHNOLOGIES OY,
`
`Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant,
`
`v.
`
`HP, INC.,
`
`Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff.
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`C.A. No. 23-cv-1237-GBW
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFF HP INC.’S
`ORIGINAL ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT, AND ORIGINAL
`COUNTERCLAIMS
`
`Defendant HP Inc. (“HP”), by and through its attorneys, hereby submits its Answer,
`
`Defenses, and Counterclaims to the Complaint filed by Plaintiff Nokia Technologies Oy
`
`(“Nokia”). The paragraph numbers in this Answer correspond to the paragraph numbers in the
`
`Complaint. For convenience and clarity, HP will also use the same headings as set forth in the
`
`Complaint. In doing so, HP does not admit any of the allegations contained in Nokia’s headings.
`
`All allegations of the Complaint not expressly admitted in this Answer are denied.
`
`NATURE OF THE ACTION
`
`1.
`
`HP admits that the H.264 and H.265 Standards are promulgated by the
`
`International Telecommunications Union (“ITU”). HP admits that Nokia has submitted
`
`declarations that its patent portfolio includes claims essential to decoding video according to the
`
`H.264 and/or H.265 Standards. HP denies that Nokia has established that any claims of the
`
`Asserted Patents are, in fact, essential for compliance with the H.264 and H.265 Standards. HP
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 11 Filed 12/11/23 Page 2 of 83 PageID #: 1836
`
`lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the remaining
`
`allegations in Paragraph 1, and therefore denies them.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`Denied.
`
`HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of
`
`the allegations in Paragraph 3, and therefore denies them.
`
`4.
`
`HP denies that Nokia has established that claims of the Asserted Patents are
`
`essential for compliance with the H.264 and H.265 Standards. HP admits that Nokia has
`
`submitted declarations that its patent portfolio includes claims essential to decoding video
`
`according to the H.264 and/or H.265 Standards. HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to
`
`form a belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 4, and therefore denies
`
`them.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`Denied.
`
`HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of
`
`the first sentence of Paragraph 6, and therefore denies the allegations therein. The remaining
`
`allegations in Paragraph 6 are denied.
`
`PARTIES
`
`7.
`
`HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of
`
`the allegations in Paragraph 7, and therefore denies them.
`
`8.
`
`HP admits that it is a Delaware corporation with a principal place of business
`
`located at 1501 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`9.
`
`The allegations in Paragraph 9 are conclusions of law to which no response is
`
`required, and they are therefore deemed denied.
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 11 Filed 12/11/23 Page 3 of 83 PageID #: 1837
`
`10.
`
`HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of
`
`the second sentence of Paragraph 10, and therefore denies it. HP admits that it is a Delaware
`
`corporation with a principal place of business in California. The remaining allegations in
`
`Paragraph 10 state a conclusion of law to which no response is required, and they are therefore
`
`deemed denied. To the extent that a response may be required, HP does not contest, for purposes
`
`of this case only, that this Court has federal jurisdiction over the case.
`
`11.
`
`HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of
`
`the allegations in Paragraph 11, and therefore denies them.
`
`12.
`
`The allegations of Paragraph 12 are conclusions of law to which no response is
`
`required, and they are therefore deemed denied.
`
`13.
`
`HP denies that it “has committed acts of infringement in this District.” The
`
`remaining allegations in Paragraph 13 state a conclusion of law to which no response is required.
`
`To the extent that a response may be required, HP does not contest, for purposes of this case
`
`only, that this Court has personal jurisdiction over HP.
`
`14.
`
`HP admits that it has appointed The Corporation Trust Company, Corporation
`
`Trust Center, 1209 Orange St., Wilmington, DE 19801 as a registered agent for service of
`
`process. The remaining allegations in Paragraph 14 state a conclusion of law to which no
`
`response is required, and they are deemed denied. To the extent that a response may be required,
`
`HP does not contest, for purposes of this case only, that this Court has personal jurisdiction over
`
`HP.
`
`15.
`
`The allegations of Paragraph 15 set forth conclusions of law to which no response
`
`is required, and they are deemed denied. To the extent that a response may be required, HP does
`
`not contest, for purposes of this case only, that venue is proper in this District.
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 11 Filed 12/11/23 Page 4 of 83 PageID #: 1838
`
`NOKIA’S INVESTMENT IN VIDEO CODING STANDARDS AND RESULTING
`PATENTS
`HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of
`
`16.
`
`the allegations in Paragraph 16, and therefore denies them.
`
`17.
`
`HP admits that, in early 1998, the ITU’s Telecommunication Standardization
`
`Sector (ITU-T) Video Coding Experts Group (VCEG) issued a call for proposals on a project it
`
`called H.26L. HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`remaining allegations in Paragraph 17, and therefore denies them.
`
`18.
`
`HP admits that the ITU has published “ITU-T Recommendation H.264” and
`
`“ITU-T Recommendation H.265.” HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
`
`as to the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 18, and therefore denies them.
`
`19.
`
`HP admits that internet traffic has evolved in recent decades, and video use has
`
`increased. HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`remaining allegations in Paragraph 19, and therefore denies them.
`
`20.
`
`HP states that “ITU-T Recommendation H.264” and “ITU-T Recommendation
`
`H.265” speak for themselves and denies the allegations in Paragraph 20 to the extent inconsistent
`
`therewith. HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the
`
`remaining allegations in Paragraph 20, and therefore denies them.
`
`21.
`
`HP states that “ITU-T Recommendation H.264” speaks for itself and denies the
`
`allegations in Paragraph 21 to the extent inconsistent therewith. HP lacks knowledge or
`
`information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph
`
`21, and therefore denies them.
`
`22.
`
`HP states that “ITU-T Recommendation H.265” speaks for itself and denies the
`
`allegations in Paragraph 22 to the extent inconsistent therewith. HP lacks knowledge or
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 11 Filed 12/11/23 Page 5 of 83 PageID #: 1839
`
`information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph
`
`22, and therefore denies them.
`
`23.
`
`HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of
`
`the allegations in Paragraph 23, and therefore denies them.
`
`24.
`
`HP denies that Nokia has established that the Asserted Patents are patents with
`
`standard essential claims relating to the H.264 and H265 Standards. HP lacks knowledge or
`
`information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph
`
`24, and therefore denies them.
`
`NOKIA’S COMPLIANCE WITH THE ITU COMMON PATENT POLICY AND
`NOKIA’S RELEVANT DECLARATIONS
`
`A.
`
`25.
`
`The ITU and the H.264 and H.265 Standardization Process
`
`HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of
`
`the allegations in Paragraph 25, and therefore denies them.
`
`26.
`
`HP admits that the ITU has published “ITU-T Recommendation H.264” and that
`
`“the H.264 Standard” exists. HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to
`
`the truth of the allegations in Paragraph 26, and therefore denies them.
`
`27.
`
`HP admits that the H.265 Standard was developed after development of the H.264
`
`Standard and is titled “High efficiency video coding.” HP otherwise lacks knowledge or
`
`information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations in Paragraph 27, and
`
`therefore denies them.
`
`28.
`
`HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of
`
`the allegations in Paragraph 28, and therefore denies them.
`
`29.
`
`HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of
`
`the allegations in Paragraph 29, and therefore denies them.
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 11 Filed 12/11/23 Page 6 of 83 PageID #: 1840
`
`30.
`
`HP admits that the ITU has a “Common Patent Policy.” The terms of the
`
`Common Patent Policy and the obligations resulting therefrom speak for themselves. HP lacks
`
`knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations
`
`in Paragraph 30, and therefore denies them.
`
`31.
`
`HP admits that the ITU, International Organization for Standardization, and the
`
`International Electrotechnical Commission published “Guidelines for Implementation of the
`
`Common Patent Policy for ITU-T/ITU-R/ISO/IEC” in December 2022. The Guidelines speak for
`
`themselves and HP denies the allegations in Paragraph 31 to the extent inconsistent therewith.
`
`HP denies that a document entitled “Guidelines for Implementation of the Common Patent
`
`Policy for ITUT/ITURIISOIIEC” is available at
`
`https://www.itu.int/itudoc/itut/patents/policy/guide.pdf. HP lacks knowledge or information
`
`sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 31, and
`
`therefore denies them.
`
`32.
`
`HP states that “Guidelines for Implementation of the Common Patent Policy for
`
`ITU-T/ITU-R/ISO/IEC” speaks for itself and denies the allegations in Paragraph 32 to the extent
`
`inconsistent therewith. HP denies that a document entitled is available at “Common Patent Policy
`
`for ITU-TIITU-RIISOIIEC” https://www.itu.int/en/ITUT/ipr/Pages/policy.aspx.
`
`33.
`
`HP states that “Guidelines for Implementation of the Common Patent Policy for
`
`ITU-T/ITU-R/ISO/IEC” and the “Patent Statement and Licensing Declaration Form” speak for
`
`themselves and denies the allegations in Paragraph 33 to the extent inconsistent therewith. HP
`
`lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the remaining
`
`allegations in Paragraph 33, and therefore denies them.
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 11 Filed 12/11/23 Page 7 of 83 PageID #: 1841
`
`34.
`
`HP states that “ITU-T Recommendation H.264” (“the H.264 Standard”) speaks
`
`for itself and denies the allegations in Paragraph 34 to the extent inconsistent therewith.
`
`35.
`
`HP states that “ITU-T Recommendation H.265” (“the H.265 Standard”) speaks
`
`for itself and denies the allegations in Paragraph 35 to the extent inconsistent therewith.
`
`B.
`
`36.
`
`Nokia’s Compliance with the ITU Common Patent Policy and Nokia’s
`Relevant Declarations
`HP denies that Nokia has established that claims of the Asserted Patents are
`
`essential for compliance with the H.264 and H.265 Standards. HP admits that Nokia has
`
`submitted declarations that its patent portfolio includes claims essential to decoding video
`
`according to the H.264 and/or H.265 Standards. HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to
`
`form a belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 36, and therefore denies
`
`them.
`
`37.
`
`HP admits that Nokia has filed declarations in which it committed that it is
`
`prepared to grant a license to an unrestricted number of applicants on a worldwide, non-
`
`discriminatory basis and on reasonable terms and conditions to make, use and sell
`
`implementations of the H.264 and/or H.265 Standard, subject to reciprocity. HP otherwise lacks
`
`knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations
`
`in Paragraph 37, and therefore denies them.
`
`38.
`
`HP admits that Nokia Corporation submitted Patent Statement and Licensing
`
`Declarations to the ITU, which speak for themselves. HP denies that these declarations were
`
`timely submitted and denies that Nokia complied with the ITU Common Patent Policy. HP lacks
`
`knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations
`
`in Paragraph 38, and therefore denies them.
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 11 Filed 12/11/23 Page 8 of 83 PageID #: 1842
`
`C.
`
`39.
`
`Nokia’s Negotiations with HP
`
`HP admits Nokia has been negotiating with HP since 2019 regarding patents that
`
`Nokia contends are essential to the H.264 and H.265 Standards, and that the parties have not
`
`reached an agreement. HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the
`
`truth of the allegation in Paragraph 39 that “Nokia made offers to HP consistent with licenses
`
`agreed to by over 50 companies,” and therefore denies it. The remaining allegations of Paragraph
`
`39 are denied.
`
`40.
`
`HP admits that Nokia contacted HP in November 2019 regarding patents that
`
`Nokia contends are related to the H.264 standard. HP admits that Nokia proposed that the parties
`
`enter into a non-disclosure agreement. HP admits that Nokia delivered a presentation to HP on
`
`March 12, 2020, which speaks for itself. HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a
`
`belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 40, and therefore denies them.
`
`41.
`
`HP admits that on July 22, 2020, Nokia sent documentation to HP. The
`
`documents speak for themselves, and HP denies the allegations in Paragraph 41 to the extent
`
`inconsistent therewith. HP denies that any of its products are infringing products. The remaining
`
`allegations in Paragraph 41 are denied.
`
`42.
`
`HP admits that it executed an NDA with Nokia on December 8, 2020. HP admits
`
`that after the execution of the NDA, Nokia sent HP a license offer, terms and conditions, and
`
`requested a call. Those documents speak for themselves, and HP denies the allegations in
`
`Paragraph 42 to the extent inconsistent therewith. HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient
`
`to form a belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 42, and therefore denies
`
`them.
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 11 Filed 12/11/23 Page 9 of 83 PageID #: 1843
`
`43.
`
`HP admits that representatives of the parties spoke by phone on January 15, 2021.
`
`HP admits that, thereafter, Nokia provided additional documentation to HP. Those documents
`
`speak for themselves, and HP denies the allegations in Paragraph 43 to the extent inconsistent
`
`therewith. Otherwise, denied.
`
`44.
`
`HP admits that on May 13, 2021, Nokia sent additional documentation and license
`
`offers to HP. Those documents speak for themselves, and HP denies the allegations in Paragraph
`
`44 to the extent inconsistent therewith. Otherwise, denied.
`
`45.
`
`HP admits that on July 9, 2021, Nokia sent additional documentation to HP.
`
`Those documents speak for themselves, and HP denies the allegations in Paragraph 45 to the
`
`extent inconsistent therewith. Otherwise, denied.
`
`46.
`
`HP admits that on August 13, 2021, Nokia extended offers to HP for patents that
`
`Nokia contends relate to encoding video into H.265-compliant formats and decoding
`
`H.265-compliant video at different rates. HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a
`
`belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 46, and therefore denies them.
`
`47.
`
`HP denies that it infringes or has infringed Nokia’s Asserted Patents. HP admits
`
`that on August 27, September 28 and October 1, 2021, Nokia sent additional documentation to
`
`HP. Those documents speak for themselves, and HP denies the allegations in Paragraph 47 to the
`
`extent inconsistent therewith.
`
`48.
`
`HP admits that between January and March 2022, the parties met seven times and
`
`engaged in discussions about Nokia’s patents. HP admits that, thereafter, Nokia sent HP a lump
`
`sum offer for Nokia patent claims. HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
`
`as to the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 48, and therefore denies them.
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 11 Filed 12/11/23 Page 10 of 83 PageID #: 1844
`
`49.
`
`HP admits that it has not accepted Nokia’s offers. HP also admits it has not paid
`
`Nokia a royalty. Otherwise, denied.
`
`50.
`
`Denied.
`
`THE NOKIA ASSERTED PATENTS
`
`51.
`
`HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of
`
`the allegations in Paragraph 51, and therefore denies them. To the extent the allegations in
`
`Paragraph 51 are conclusions of law, no response is required, and they are therefore deemed
`
`denied.
`
`A.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,532,808 (“the ’808 Patent”)
`
`52.
`
`53.
`
`Admitted.
`
`The ’808 Patent speaks for itself, and HP denies the allegations in Paragraph 53 to
`
`the extent inconsistent therewith. Otherwise, denied.
`
`54.
`
`The ’808 Patent speaks for itself, and HP denies the allegations in Paragraph 54 to
`
`the extent inconsistent therewith. HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
`
`as to the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 54, and therefore denies them.
`
`55.
`
`The ’808 Patent speaks for itself, and HP denies the allegations in Paragraph 55 to
`
`the extent inconsistent therewith.
`
`56.
`
`The ’808 Patent speaks for itself, and HP denies the allegations in Paragraph 56 to
`
`the extent inconsistent therewith. HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
`
`as to the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 56, and therefore denies them.
`
`57.
`
`The ’808 Patent speaks for itself, and HP denies the allegations in Paragraph 57 to
`
`the extent inconsistent therewith. HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
`
`as to the truth of the allegations in Paragraph 57, and therefore denies them.
`
`10
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 11 Filed 12/11/23 Page 11 of 83 PageID #: 1845
`
`58.
`
`The ’808 Patent speaks for itself, and HP denies the allegations in Paragraph 58 to
`
`the extent inconsistent therewith. HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
`
`as to the truth of the allegations in Paragraph 58, and therefore denies them.
`
`59.
`
`The ’808 Patent speaks for itself, and HP denies the allegations in Paragraph 59 to
`
`the extent inconsistent therewith. HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
`
`as to the truth of the allegations in Paragraph 59, and therefore denies them.
`
`60.
`
`The ’808 Patent speaks for itself, and HP denies the allegations in Paragraph 60 to
`
`the extent inconsistent therewith. HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
`
`as to the truth of the allegations in Paragraph 60, and therefore denies them.
`
`61.
`
`The ’808 Patent speaks for itself, and HP denies the allegations in Paragraph 61 to
`
`the extent inconsistent therewith. HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
`
`as to the truth of the allegations in Paragraph 61, and therefore denies them.
`
`62.
`
`The ’808 Patent speaks for itself, and HP denies the allegations in Paragraph 62 to
`
`the extent inconsistent therewith. HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
`
`as to the truth of the allegations in Paragraph 62, and therefore denies them.
`
`63.
`
`64.
`
`65.
`
`66.
`
`Denied.
`
`Denied.
`
`Denied.
`
`HP admits that it sells laptops with graphics processing units that decode
`
`H.264-compliant video, including the HP Spectre X360 laptop series, which includes an Intel Iris
`
`XE Graphics Processor. HP admits that certain information regarding these products can be
`
`found on the www.hp.com and www.intel.com websites. Otherwise, denied.
`
`67.
`
`Denied.
`
`11
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 11 Filed 12/11/23 Page 12 of 83 PageID #: 1846
`
`68.
`
`HP admits that it publishes reviews of some of its products on the www.hp.com
`
`website. The contents of those reviews speak for themselves, and HP denies the allegations in
`
`Paragraph 68 to the extent inconsistent therewith.
`
`69.
`
`HP admits that it sells desktop computers with graphics processing units that
`
`decode H.264-compliant video, including the HP Pavilion Series of Desktop PC, which includes
`
`either an Intel UHD Graphics 770 or an AMD Radeon Graphics processor. HP admits that
`
`certain information regarding these products can be found on the www.hp.com, www.intel.com,
`
`and www.amd.com websites. Otherwise, denied.
`
`70.
`
`HP admits that it publishes reviews of some of its products on the www.hp.com
`
`website. The contents of those reviews speak for themselves, and HP denies the allegations in
`
`Paragraph 70 to the extent inconsistent therewith.
`
`71.
`
`72.
`
`Denied.
`
`HP admits that it advertises some of its Accused Products on its website for
`
`consumer purchase. Otherwise, denied.
`
`73.
`
`HP admits that it was aware of the ’808 Patent as of the filing of the Complaint in
`
`this action. HP admits that Nokia provided a claim chart in July 2020 that included the ’808
`
`Patent. Otherwise, denied.
`
`74.
`
`75.
`
`Denied.
`
`HP admits that the H.264 Standard can be found in Exhibit 1 to the Complaint.
`
`HP admits that the Complaint attaches a claim chart as Exhibit 12. HP otherwise denies the
`
`allegations of Paragraph 75, including any allegations of infringement.
`
`B.
`
`76.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,204,134 (“the ’134 Patent”)
`
`Admitted.
`
`12
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 11 Filed 12/11/23 Page 13 of 83 PageID #: 1847
`
`77.
`
`The ’134 Patent speaks for itself, and HP denies the allegations in Paragraph 77 to
`
`the extent inconsistent therewith. HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
`
`as to the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 77, and therefore denies them.
`
`78.
`
`The ’134 Patent speaks for itself, and HP denies the allegations in Paragraph 78 to
`
`the extent inconsistent therewith. HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
`
`as to the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 78, and therefore denies them.
`
`79.
`
`The ’134 Patent speaks for itself, and HP denies the allegations in Paragraph 79 to
`
`the extent inconsistent therewith. HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
`
`as to the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 79, and therefore denies them.
`
`80.
`
`The ’134 Patent speaks for itself, and HP denies the allegations in Paragraph 80 to
`
`the extent inconsistent therewith. HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
`
`as to the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 80, and therefore denies them.
`
`81.
`
`The ’134 Patent speaks for itself, and HP denies the allegations in Paragraph 81 to
`
`the extent inconsistent therewith. HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
`
`as to the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 81, and therefore denies them.
`
`82.
`
`83.
`
`84.
`
`Denied.
`
`Denied.
`
`HP admits that it sells laptops with graphics processing units that decode
`
`H.264-compliant video, including the HP Spectre X360 laptop series, which includes an Intel Iris
`
`XE Graphics Processor. HP admits that certain information regarding these products can be
`
`found on the www.hp.com and www.intel.com websites. Otherwise, denied.
`
`85.
`
`Denied.
`
`13
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 11 Filed 12/11/23 Page 14 of 83 PageID #: 1848
`
`86.
`
`HP admits that it publishes reviews of some of its products on the www.hp.com
`
`website. The contents of those reviews speak for themselves, and HP denies the allegations in
`
`Paragraph 86 to the extent inconsistent therewith.
`
`87.
`
`HP admits that it sells desktop computers with graphics processing units that
`
`decode H.264-compliant video, including the HP Pavilion Series of Desktop PC, which includes
`
`either an Intel UHD Graphics 770 or an AMD Radeon Graphics processor. HP admits that
`
`certain information regarding these products can be found on the www.hp.com, www.intel.com,
`
`and www.amd.com websites. Otherwise, denied.
`
`88.
`
`HP admits that it publishes reviews of some of its products on the www.hp.com
`
`website. The contents of those reviews speak for themselves, and HP denies the allegations in
`
`Paragraph 88 to the extent inconsistent therewith.
`
`89.
`
`90.
`
`Denied.
`
`HP admits that it advertises some of its Accused Products on its website for
`
`consumer purchase. Otherwise, denied.
`
`91.
`
`HP admits that it was aware of the ’134 Patent as of the filing of the Complaint in
`
`this action. HP admits that Nokia provided claim charts in July 2020 and May 2021 that included
`
`the ’134 Patent. Otherwise, denied.
`
`92.
`
`93.
`
`Denied.
`
`HP admits that the H.264 Standard can be found in Exhibit 1 to the Complaint.
`
`HP admits that the Complaint attaches a claim chart as Exhibit 13. HP otherwise denies the
`
`allegations of Paragraph 93, including any allegations of infringement.
`
`C.
`
`94.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,724,818 (“the ’818 Patent”)
`
`Admitted.
`
`14
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 11 Filed 12/11/23 Page 15 of 83 PageID #: 1849
`
`95.
`
`The ’818 Patent speaks for itself, and HP denies the allegations in Paragraph 95 to
`
`the extent inconsistent therewith. HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
`
`as to the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 95, and therefore denies them.
`
`96.
`
`The ’818 Patent speaks for itself, and HP denies the allegations in Paragraph 96 to
`
`the extent inconsistent therewith. HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
`
`as to the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 96, and therefore denies them.
`
`97.
`
`The ’818 Patent speaks for itself, and HP denies the allegations in Paragraph 97 to
`
`the extent inconsistent therewith. HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
`
`as to the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 97, and therefore denies them.
`
`98.
`
`The ’818 Patent speaks for itself, and HP denies the allegations in Paragraph 98 to
`
`the extent inconsistent therewith. HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
`
`as to the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 98, and therefore denies them.
`
`99.
`
`The ’818 Patent speaks for itself, and HP denies the allegations in Paragraph 99 to
`
`the extent inconsistent therewith. HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
`
`as to the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 99, and therefore denies them.
`
`100.
`
`The ’818 Patent speaks for itself, and HP denies the allegations in Paragraph 100
`
`to the extent inconsistent therewith. HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a
`
`belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 100, and therefore denies them.
`
`101.
`
`The ’818 Patent speaks for itself, and HP denies the allegations in Paragraph 101
`
`to the extent inconsistent therewith. HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a
`
`belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 101, and therefore denies them.
`
`102. Denied.
`
`103. Denied.
`
`15
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 11 Filed 12/11/23 Page 16 of 83 PageID #: 1850
`
`104. Denied.
`
`105. HP admits that it sells laptops with graphics processing units that decode
`
`H.264- and H.265-compliant video, including the HP Spectre X360 laptop series, which includes
`
`an Intel Iris XE Graphics Processor. HP admits that certain information regarding these products
`
`can be found on the www.hp.com and www.intel.com websites. Otherwise, denied.
`
`106. Denied.
`
`107. HP admits that it publishes reviews of some of its products on the www.hp.com
`
`website. The contents of those reviews speak for themselves, and HP denies the allegations in
`
`Paragraph 107 to the extent inconsistent therewith.
`
`108. HP admits that it sells desktop computers with graphics processing units that
`
`decode H.264- and H.265-compliant video, including the HP Pavilion Series of Desktop PC,
`
`which includes either an Intel UHD Graphics 770 or an AMD Radeon Graphics processor. HP
`
`admits that certain information regarding these products can be found on the www.hp.com,
`
`www.intel.com, and www.amd.com websites. Otherwise, denied.
`
`109. HP admits that it publishes reviews of some of its products on the www.hp.com
`
`website. The contents of those reviews speak for themselves, and HP denies the allegations in
`
`Paragraph 109 to the extent inconsistent therewith.
`
`110. Denied.
`
`111. HP admits that it advertises some of its Accused Products on its website for
`
`consumer purchase. Otherwise, denied.
`
`112. HP admits that it was aware of the ’818 Patent as of the filing of the Complaint in
`
`this action. Otherwise, denied.
`
`16
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 11 Filed 12/11/23 Page 17 of 83 PageID #: 1851
`
`113. HP admits that it was aware of the ’818 Patent as of the filing of the Complaint in
`
`this action. HP admits that Nokia provided claim charts in July 2020 and July 2021 that included
`
`the ’818 Patent. Otherwise, denied.
`
`114. Denied.
`
`115. HP admits that the H.264 and H.265 Standards can be found in Exhibits 1 and 2 to
`
`the Complaint. HP admits that the Complaint attaches claim charts as Exhibits 14A and 14B. HP
`
`otherwise denies the allegations of Paragraph 115, including any allegations of infringement.
`
`D.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 10,536,714 (“the ’714 Patent”)
`
`116. Admitted.
`
`117.
`
`The ’714 Patent speaks for itself, and HP denies the allegations in Paragraph 117
`
`to the extent inconsistent therewith. HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a
`
`belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 117, and therefore denies them.
`
`118.
`
`The ’714 Patent speaks for itself, and HP denies the allegations in Paragraph 118
`
`to the extent inconsistent therewith. HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a
`
`belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 118, and therefore denies them.
`
`119.
`
`The ’714 Patent speaks for itself, and HP denies the allegations in Paragraph 119
`
`to the extent inconsistent therewith. HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a
`
`belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 119, and therefore denies them.
`
`120.
`
`The ’714 Patent speaks for itself, and HP denies the allegations in Paragraph 120
`
`to the extent inconsistent therewith. HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a
`
`belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 120, and therefore denies them.
`
`17
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-01237-GBW Document 11 Filed 12/11/23 Page 18 of 83 PageID #: 1852
`
`121.
`
`The ’714 Patent speaks for itself, and HP denies the allegations in Paragraph 121
`
`to the extent inconsistent therewith. HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a
`
`belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 121, and therefore denies them.
`
`122.
`
`The ’714 Patent speaks for itself, and HP denies the allegations in Paragraph 122
`
`to the extent inconsistent therewith. HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a
`
`belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 122, and therefore denies them.
`
`123.
`
`The ’714 Patent speaks for itself, and HP denies the allegations in Paragraph 123
`
`to the extent inconsistent therewith. HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a
`
`belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 123, and therefore denies them.
`
`124.
`
`The ’714 Patent speaks for itself, and HP denies the allegations in Paragraph 124
`
`to the extent inconsistent therewith. HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a
`
`belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 124, and therefore denies them.
`
`125.
`
`The ’714 Patent speaks for itself, and HP denies the allegations in Paragraph 125
`
`to the extent inconsistent therewith. HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a
`
`belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 125, and therefore denies them.
`
`126.
`
`The ’714 Patent speaks for itself, and HP denies the allegations in Paragraph 126
`
`to the extent inconsistent therewith. HP lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a
`
`belief as to the truth of the remaining allegations in Paragraph 126, and therefore denies them.
`
`127. Denied.
`
`128. Denied.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket