Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH Document 33 Filed 03/04/24 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1237
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`ORCA SECURITY LTD.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`WIZ, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`C.A. No. 23-758 (JLH)
`
`[PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`4th
`March
`This _____ day of ____________, 2024, the Court having reviewed the parties’ proposed
`
`scheduling order and letter (D.I. 30);
`
`IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
`
`1.
`
`Rule 26(a)(l) Initial Disclosures and E-Discovery Default Standard. Unless
`
`otherwise agreed to by the parties, the parties shall make their initial disclosures pursuant to
`
`Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(l) within five days of the date the Court enters this Order.
`
`If they have not already done so, the parties are to review the Court’s Default Standard for
`
`Discovery, Including Discovery of Electronically Stored Information (“ESI”), which is posted at
`
`https://www.ded.uscourts.gov/default-standard-discovery and is incorporated herein by reference.
`
`2.
`
`Joinder of Other Parties and Amendment of Pleadings. All motions to join other
`
`parties, and to amend or supplement the pleadings, shall be filed on or before November 22, 2024.
`
`Such motions must follow the provisions of Paragraphs 8(g) and 9.
`
`3.
`
`Application to Court for Protective Order. Should counsel find
`
`it will be
`
`necessary to apply to the Court for a protective order specifying terms and conditions for the
`
`disclosure of confidential information, counsel should confer and attempt to reach an agreement
`
`on a proposed form of order and submit it to the Court within ten days from the date the Court
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH Document 33 Filed 03/04/24 Page 2 of 16 PageID #: 1238
`
`
`
`enters this Order. Should counsel be unable to reach an agreement on a proposed form of order,
`
`counsel must follow the provisions of Paragraph 8(g) below.
`
`Any proposed protective order must include the following paragraph:
`
`Other Proceedings. By entering this order and limiting the
`disclosure of information in this case, the Court does not intend to
`preclude another court from finding that information may be
`relevant and subject to disclosure in another case. Any person or
`party subject to this order who becomes subject to a motion to
`disclose another party’s information designated “confidential” [the
`parties should list any other level of designations, such as “highly
`confidential,” which may be provided for in the protective order]
`pursuant to this order shall promptly notify that party of the motion
`so that the party may have an opportunity to appear and be heard on
`whether that information should be disclosed.
`
`4.
`
`Papers and Proceedings Under Seal. In accordance with section G of the Revised
`
`Administrative Procedures Governing Filing and Service by Electronic Means, a redacted version
`
`of any sealed document shall be filed electronically within seven days of the filing of the sealed
`
`document.
`
`Should any party intend to request to seal or redact all or any portion of a transcript of a
`
`court proceeding (including a teleconference), such party should expressly note that intent at the
`
`start of the court proceeding. Should any party subsequently choose to make a request for sealing
`
`or redaction, it must, promptly after the completion of the transcript, file with the Court a motion
`
`for sealing/redaction, and include as attachments (1) a copy of the complete transcript highlighted
`
`so the Court can easily identify and read the text proposed to be sealed/redacted, and (2) a copy of
`
`the proposed redacted/sealed transcript. With their request, the party seeking redactions must
`
`demonstrate why there is good cause for the redactions and why disclosure of the redacted material
`
`would work a clearly defined and serious injury to the party seeking redaction.
`
`5.
`
`Courtesy Copies. The parties shall provide to the Court two courtesy copies of all
`
`briefs and any other document filed in support of any briefs (i.e., appendices, exhibits, declarations,
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH Document 33 Filed 03/04/24 Page 3 of 16 PageID #: 1239
`
`
`
`affidavits, etc.). This provision also applies to papers filed under seal. All courtesy copies shall
`
`be double-sided.
`
`6.
`
`ADR Process. Magistrate Judges will no longer engage in alternative dispute
`
`resolution in patent cases. See District of Delaware Standing Order No. 2022-2, dated March 14,
`
`2022.
`
`7.
`
`Disclosures. Absent agreement among the parties and approval of the Court:
`
`(a)
`
`By March 8, 2024, Plaintiff1 shall identify the accused product(s),
`
`including accused methods and systems, and its damages model, as well as the asserted patent(s)
`
`that the accused product(s) allegedly infringe(s). Plaintiff shall also produce the file history for
`
`each asserted patent.
`
`(b)
`
`By April 5, 2024, Defendant shall produce core technical documents related
`
`to the accused product(s), sufficient to show how the accused product(s) work(s), including but
`
`not limited to non-publicly available operation manuals, product literature, schematics, and
`
`specifications. Defendant shall also produce sales figures for the accused product(s).
`
`(c)
`
`By May 10, 2024, Plaintiff shall produce an initial claim chart relating each
`
`known accused product to the asserted claims each such product allegedly infringes.
`
`(d)
`
`By June 7, 2024, Defendant shall produce its initial invalidity contentions
`
`for each asserted claim, as well as the known related invalidating references.
`
`(e)
`
`By 30 days after the Claim Construction Order, Plaintiff shall provide final
`
`infringement contentions.
`
`
`1
`For purposes of this Scheduling Order, Plaintiff and Defendant are defined as set forth in
`the Default Standard for Discovery, Including Discovery of Electronically Stored Information
`(“ESI”), ¶ 4.
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH Document 33 Filed 03/04/24 Page 4 of 16 PageID #: 1240
`
`
`
`(f)
`
`By 30 days after service of final infringement contentions, Defendant shall
`
`provide final invalidity contentions.
`
`8.
`
`Discovery. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or agreed to by the parties, the
`
`limitations on discovery set forth in the Federal Rules and Local Rule 26.1 shall be observed.
`
`(a)
`
`Discovery Cut Off. All fact discovery in this case shall be initiated so that
`
`it will be completed on or before March 7, 2025. All expert discovery in this case shall be initiated
`
`so that it will be completed on or before May 30, 2025.
`
`(b)
`
`Document Production. Document production shall be substantially
`
`complete by November 1, 2024.
`
`(c)
`
`Requests for Admission. A maximum of 50 requests for admission are
`
`permitted for each side, excluding document authenticating requests.
`
`(d)
`
`Interrogatories.
`
`i.
`
`A maximum of 25
`
`interrogatories,
`
`including contention
`
`interrogatories, are permitted for each side.
`
`ii.
`
`The Court encourages the parties to serve and respond to contention
`
`interrogatories early in the case. In the absence of agreement among the parties, contention
`
`interrogatories, if filed, shall first be addressed by the party with the burden of proof. The adequacy
`
`of all interrogatory answers shall be judged by the level of detail each party provides (i.e., the more
`
`detail a party provides, the more detail a party shall receive).
`
`(e)
`
`Depositions.
`
`i.
`
`Limitation on Hours for Deposition Discovery. Each side is limited
`
`to a total of 70 hours of taking testimony of fact witnesses by deposition upon oral examination.
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH Document 33 Filed 03/04/24 Page 5 of 16 PageID #: 1241
`
`
`
`If any deposition will require translation, the parties will meet and confer regarding how the
`
`translated time should be counted.
`
`ii.
`
`Location of Depositions. Any party or representative (officer,
`
`director, or managing agent) of a party filing a civil action in this Court must ordinarily be required,
`
`upon request, to submit to a deposition at a place designated within this district. Exceptions to this
`
`general rule may be made by order of the Court. A defendant who becomes a counterclaimant,
`
`cross-claimant, or third-party plaintiff shall be considered as having filed an action in this Court.
`
`(f)
`
`Disclosure of Expert Testimony.
`
`i.
`
`Expert Reports. For the party who has the initial burden of proof on
`
`the subject matter, the initial Federal Rule 26(a)(2) disclosure of expert testimony is due on or
`
`before April 4, 2025. The supplemental disclosure to contradict or rebut evidence on the same
`
`matter identified by another party is due on or before April 25, 2025. Reply expert reports from
`
`the party with the initial burden of proof are due on or before May 9, 2025. No other expert reports
`
`will be permitted without either the consent of all parties or leave of the Court. Along with the
`
`submissions of the expert reports, the parties shall advise of the dates and times of their experts’
`
`availability for deposition.
`
`ii.
`
`Expert Report Supplementation. The parties agree they will not
`
`permit expert declarations to be filed in connection with motions briefing (including case
`
`dispositive motions).
`
`iii.
`
`Objections to Expert Testimony. To the extent any objection to
`
`expert testimony is made pursuant to the principles announced in Daubert v. Merrell Dow
`
`Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), as incorporated in Federal Rule of Evidence 702, it
`
`shall be made by motion no later than the deadline for dispositive motions set forth herein, unless
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH Document 33 Filed 03/04/24 Page 6 of 16 PageID #: 1242
`
`
`
`otherwise ordered by the Court. Briefing on such motions is subject to the page limits set out in
`
`connection with briefing of case dispositive motions.
`
`(g)
`
`Discovery Matters and Disputes Relating to Protective Orders.
`
`i.
`
`The following procedures will apply to discovery matters and
`
`protective order disputes unless and until such matters are referred to a Magistrate Judge (who may
`
`specify their own procedures). Any discovery motion filed without first complying with the
`
`following procedures will be denied without prejudice to renew pursuant to these procedures.
`
`ii.
`
`Should counsel find, after good faith efforts—including verbal
`
`communications among Delaware and Lead Counsel for all parties to the dispute—that they are
`
`unable to resolve a discovery matter or a dispute regarding a protective order, the moving party
`
`(i.e., the party seeking relief from the Court) should file a “Motion for Teleconference To Resolve
`
`[Discovery/Protective Order] Disputes.” The suggested text for this motion can be found in Judge
`
`Hall’s section of the Court’s website, in the “Forms” tab.
`
`iii.
`
`The Court will thereafter order a discovery telephone conference
`
`and deadlines for submissions. On the date set by court order, generally not less than seventy-two
`
`hours prior to the conference (excluding weekends and holidays), the party seeking relief shall file
`
`with the Court a letter, not to exceed three pages, outlining the issues in dispute and its position on
`
`those issues. The submission shall include: (1) a proposed order, attached as an exhibit, setting
`
`out the nature of the relief requested; and (2) to the extent that the dispute relates to responses to
`
`certain discovery requests, an attached exhibit (or exhibits) containing the requests and the
`
`responses in dispute. On the date set by court order, generally not less than forty-eight hours prior
`
`to the conference (excluding weekends and holidays), any party opposing the application for relief
`
`may file a letter, not to exceed three pages, outlining that party’s reasons for its opposition.
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH Document 33 Filed 03/04/24 Page 7 of 16 PageID #: 1243
`
`
`
`iv.
`
`Each party shall submit two courtesy copies of its letter and any
`
`other document filed in support to the Clerk’s Office within one day of e-filing. All courtesy
`
`copies shall be double-sided.
`
`v.
`
`Should the Court find further briefing necessary upon conclusion of
`
`the conference, the Court will order it. Alternatively, the Court may choose to resolve the dispute
`
`prior to the conference and cancel the conference.
`
`9.
`
`Motions to Amend / Motions to Strike.
`
`(a)
`
`Any motion to amend (including a motion for leave to amend) a pleading
`
`or any motion to strike any pleading shall be made pursuant to the discovery dispute procedure set
`
`forth in Paragraph 8(g), above.
`
`(b)
`
`Any motion to amend shall attach the proposed amended pleading as well
`
`as a “blackline” comparison to the prior pleading. Any motion to strike shall attach the document
`
`sough to be stricken.
`
`10.
`
`Technology Tutorials. Although technology tutorials are not required by the Court,
`
`they are appreciated and, if any party chooses to file such a tutorial, it shall be submitted on or
`
`before the date that the Joint Claim Construction Brief is filed.
`
`11.
`
`Claim Construction Issue Identification. On or before June 21, 2024, the parties
`
`shall exchange a list of those claim term(s)/phrase(s) that they believe need construction and their
`
`proposed claim construction of those term(s)/phrase(s). This document will not be filed with the
`
`Court. Subsequent to exchanging that list, the parties will meet and confer to prepare a Joint Claim
`
`Construction Chart to be filed two weeks prior to service of the opening claim construction brief.
`
`The parties’ Joint Claim Construction Chart should identify for the Court the term(s)/phrase(s) of
`
`the claim(s) in issue, and should include each party’s proposed construction of the disputed claim
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH Document 33 Filed 03/04/24 Page 8 of 16 PageID #: 1244
`
`
`
`language with citation(s) only to the intrinsic evidence in support of their respective proposed
`
`constructions. If a party proposes a construction of a term to be its “plain and ordinary” meaning,
`
`the party must explain what that meaning is and how it differs from the other party’s proposed
`
`construction.
`
`12.
`
`Claim Construction Briefing. The Plaintiff shall serve, but not file, its opening
`
`brief, not to exceed 20 pages, on July 19, 2024. The Defendant shall serve, but not file, its
`
`answering brief not to exceed 30 pages, on August 9, 2024. The Plaintiff shall serve, but not file,
`
`its reply brief, not to exceed 20 pages, on August 23, 2024. The Defendant shall serve, but not
`
`file, its sur-reply brief, not to exceed 10 pages, on September 6, 2024. No later than
`
`September 13, 2024, the parties shall file a Joint Claim Construction Brief. The parties shall copy
`
`and paste their unfiled briefs into one brief, with their positions on each claim term in sequential
`
`order, in substantially the form below.
`
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEF
`
`I.
`
`II.
`
`Agreed-Upon Constructions
`
`Disputed Constructions
`
`[TERM 1]
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`Plaintiff’s Opening Position
`
`Defendant’s Answering Position
`
`Plaintiff’s Reply Position
`
`Defendant’s Sur-Reply Position
`
`[TERM 2]
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`Plaintiff’s Opening Position
`
`Defendant’s Answering Position
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH Document 33 Filed 03/04/24 Page 9 of 16 PageID #: 1245
`
`
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`Plaintiff’s Reply Position
`
`Defendant’s Sur-Reply Position
`
`For each term in dispute, there should be a table setting forth the term in dispute and the parties’
`
`competing constructions. If a party proposes a construction of a term to be its “plain and ordinary”
`
`meaning, the party must explain what that meaning is and how it differs from the other party’s
`
`proposed construction. The parties’ briefing must also explain how resolution of the dispute is
`
`relevant to an issue in the case. The parties need not include any general summaries of the law
`
`relating to claim construction. The parties shall include a joint appendix that contains a copy of
`
`the patent(s) at issue, all relevant intrinsic evidence, and any other evidence cited in the parties’
`
`briefing.
`
`No earlier than October 4, 2024 and no later than October 18, 2024, Delaware and Lead
`
`counsel (i.e., those attorneys that will be leading trial) for the parties shall meet and confer and file
`
`an amended Joint Claim Construction Chart that sets forth all agreed-upon constructions and all
`
`terms that remain in dispute. The meet and confer shall focus on an attempt to reach agreement
`
`on any remaining disputed terms where possible and to focus the dispute over the remaining terms
`
`in light of the Joint Claim Construction Brief. The amended Joint Claim Construction Chart shall
`
`be filed with a letter identifying by name each individual who participated in the meet and confer,
`
`when and how that meet and confer occurred, and how long it lasted. If no additional agreements
`
`on constructions were reached or if no dispute was narrowed, the letter shall so state. The parties
`
`shall e-mail a copy of the amended Joint Claim Construction Chart in Microsoft Word format to
`
`jlh_civil@ded.uscourts.gov.
`
`13.
`
`Hearing on Claim Construction. Beginning at 10:00 a.m. on October 25, 2024,
`
`the Court will hear argument on claim construction. The parties need not include any general
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH Document 33 Filed 03/04/24 Page 10 of 16 PageID #: 1246
`
`
`
`summaries of the law relating to claim construction in their presentations to the Court. The parties
`
`shall notify the Court, by joint letter submission, no later than the date on which their Joint Claim
`
`Construction brief is filed (i) whether they request leave to present testimony at the hearing; and
`
`(ii) the amount of time they are requesting be allocated to them for the hearing.
`
`Provided that the parties comply with all portions of this Scheduling Order, and any other
`
`orders of the Court, the parties should anticipate that the Court will issue its claim construction
`
`order within sixty days of the conclusion of the claim construction hearing. If the Court is unable
`
`to meet this goal, it will advise the parties no later than sixty days after the conclusion of the claim
`
`construction hearing.
`
`14.
`
`Supplementation. Absent agreement among the parties, and approval of the Court,
`
`no later than November 15, 2024, the patentee must finally supplement, inter alia, the
`
`identification of all accused products and of all invalidity references.
`
`15.
`
`Interim Status Report. On December 6, 2024, counsel shall submit a joint letter to
`
`the Court with an interim report on the nature of the matters in issue and the progress of discovery
`
`to date. Thereafter, if the Court deems it necessary, it will schedule a status conference.
`
`16.
`
`Case Dispositive Motions.
`
`(a)
`
`All case dispositive motions, an opening brief, and affidavits, if any, in
`
`support of the motion shall be served and filed on or before June 20, 2025. Briefing will be
`
`presented pursuant to the Court’s Local Rules. No case dispositive motion under Rule 56 may be
`
`filed more than ten days before the above date without leave of the Court.
`
`(b)
`
`Concise Statement of Facts Requirement. Any motion for summary
`
`judgment shall be accompanied by a separate concise statement, not to exceed six pages, which
`
`details each material fact which the moving party contends is essential for the Court’s resolution
`
`10
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH Document 33 Filed 03/04/24 Page 11 of 16 PageID #: 1247
`
`
`
`of the summary judgment motion (not the entire case) and as to which the moving party contends
`
`there is no genuine issue to be tried. Each fact shall be set forth in a separate numbered paragraph
`
`and shall be supported by specific citation(s) to the record.
`
`Any party opposing the motion shall include with its opposing papers a response to the
`
`moving party’s concise statement, not to exceed six pages, which admits or disputes the facts set
`
`forth in the moving party’s concise statement on a paragraph-by-paragraph basis. To the extent a
`
`fact is disputed, the basis of the dispute shall be supported by specific citation(s) to the record.
`
`Failure to respond to a fact presented in the moving party’s concise statement of facts shall indicate
`
`that fact is not in dispute for purposes of summary judgment. The party opposing the motion may
`
`also include with its opposing papers a separate concise statement, not to exceed four pages, which
`
`sets forth material facts as to which the opposing party contends there is a genuine issue to be tried.
`
`Each fact asserted by the opposing party shall also be set forth in a separate numbered paragraph
`
`and shall be supported by specific citation(s) to the record.
`
`(c)
`
`The moving party shall include with its reply papers a response to the
`
`opposing party’s concise statement of facts, not to exceed four pages, on a paragraph-by-paragraph
`
`basis.
`
`(d)
`
`Page limits combined with Daubert motion page limits. Each party is
`
`permitted to file as many case dispositive motions as desired provided, however, that each side
`
`will be limited to a combined total of 40 pages for all opening briefs, a combined total of 40 pages
`
`for all answering briefs, and a combined total of 20 pages for all reply briefs. In the event that a
`
`party files, in addition to a case dispositive motion, a Daubert motion to exclude or preclude all or
`
`any portion of an expert’s testimony, the total amount of pages permitted for all case dispositive
`
`11
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH Document 33 Filed 03/04/24 Page 12 of 16 PageID #: 1248
`
`
`
`and Daubert motions shall be increased to 50 pages for all opening briefs, 50 pages for all
`
`answering briefs, and 25 pages for all reply briefs for each side.2
`
`(e)
`
`Hearing. The Court will hear argument on all pending case dispositive and
`
`Daubert motions on September 10, 2025, beginning at 10:00 a.m. Unless otherwise ordered by
`
`the Court, each side will be allocated a total of forty-five minutes to present its argument on all
`
`pending motions.
`
`17.
`
`Applications by Motion. Except as otherwise specified herein, any application to
`
`the Court shall be by written motion. Any non-dispositive motion should contain the statement
`
`required by Local Rule 7.1.1.
`
`18.
`
`Amendments to the Scheduling Order. Any stipulation or other request to amend
`
`the scheduling order shall include a chart that lists each court-ordered event with a deadline/date
`
`(even if it is not being changed), the current deadline/date, and the new proposed deadline/date.
`
`19.
`
`IPRs/PGRs. Any party asserting a patent must file a “Notice of IPR/PGR Event”
`
`within seven days of any of the following actions taken on that patent: petition for inter partes
`
`review/post grant review (regardless of whether a party filed the petition), institution decision,
`
`final written decision, appeal to the Federal Circuit, Federal Circuit decision. The Notice must list
`
`the action taken, the affected claims, the dates of any expected further action by the PTAB, and
`
`the status of all other pending IPRs/PGRs.
`
`20. Motions in Limine. Motions in limine shall not be separately filed. All in limine
`
`requests and responses thereto shall be set forth in the proposed pretrial order. Each side shall be
`
`
`2
`The parties must work together to ensure that the Court receives no more than a total of
`250 pages (i.e., 50 + 50 + 25 regarding one side’s motions, and 50 + 50 + 25 regarding the other
`side’s motions) of briefing on all case dispositive motions and Daubert motions that are covered
`by this scheduling order and any other scheduling order entered in any related case that is
`proceeding on a consolidated or coordinated pretrial schedule.
`
`12
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH Document 33 Filed 03/04/24 Page 13 of 16 PageID #: 1249
`
`
`
`limited to three in limine requests, unless otherwise permitted by the Court. The in limine request
`
`and any response shall contain the authorities relied upon. Each in limine request may be supported
`
`by a maximum of three pages of argument, may be opposed by a maximum of three pages of
`
`argument, and the side making the in limine request may add a maximum of one additional page
`
`in reply in support of its request. If more than one party is supporting or opposing an in limine
`
`request, such support or opposition shall be combined in a single three page submission (and, if
`
`the moving party, a single one page reply), unless otherwise ordered by the Court. No separate
`
`briefing shall be submitted on in limine requests, unless otherwise permitted by the Court.
`
`21.
`
`Pretrial Conference. On November 18, 2025, the Court will hold a pretrial
`
`conference in Court with counsel beginning at 2:00 p.m. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court,
`
`the parties should assume that filing the pretrial order satisfies the pretrial disclosure requirement
`
`of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(3). The parties shall file with the Court the joint proposed
`
`final pretrial order in compliance with Local Rule 16.3(c) not later than seven days before the
`
`pretrial conference. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, the parties shall comply with the
`
`timeframes set forth in Local Rule 16.3(d)(1)-(3) for the preparation of the joint proposed final
`
`pretrial order.
`
`The proposed final pretrial order shall contain a table of contents. The parties shall provide
`
`the Court two double-sided courtesy copies of the joint proposed final pretrial order and all
`
`attachments.
`
`22.
`
`Jury Instructions, Voir Dire, and Special Verdict Forms. Where a case is to be tried
`
`to a jury, pursuant to Local Rules 47.l(a)(2) and 51.1 the parties should file (i) proposed voir dire,
`
`(ii) preliminary jury instructions, (iii) final jury instructions, and (iv) special verdict forms seven
`
`days before the final pretrial conference. This submission shall be accompanied by a courtesy
`
`13
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH Document 33 Filed 03/04/24 Page 14 of 16 PageID #: 1250
`
`
`
`copy containing electronic files of these documents in Microsoft Word format, which should be
`
`submitted by e-mail to jlh_civil@ded.uscourts.gov.
`
`23.
`
`Trial. This matter is scheduled for a five-day 3 jury trial beginning at 9:30 a.m. on
`
`December 8, 2025, with the subsequent trial days beginning at 9:00 a.m. Until the case is
`
`submitted to the jury for deliberations, the jury will be excused each day at 5:00 p.m. The trial will
`
`be timed, and counsel will be allocated a total number of hours in which to present their respective
`
`cases.
`
`24.
`
`Judgment on Verdict and Post-Trial Status Report. Within seven days after a jury
`
`returns a verdict in any portion of a jury trial, the parties shall jointly submit a form of order to
`
`enter judgment on the verdict. At the same time, the parties shall submit a joint status report,
`
`indicating among other things how the case should proceed and listing any post-trial motions each
`
`party intends to file.
`
`25.
`
`Post-Trial Motions. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, all sides are limited to
`
`a maximum of 20 pages of opening briefs, 20 pages of answering briefs, and 10 pages of reply
`
`briefs relating to any post-trial motions filed by that side, no matter how many such motions are
`
`filed.
`
`
`
`
`The Honorable Jennifer L. Hall
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`
`
`
`3
`Five days (i.e., about ten to thirteen hours per side) is the presumptive length of a patent
`jury trial. If the parties think it is obvious that this will not be enough, they may put in a different
`length and should be prepared to explain why at the Rule 16 conference. A final decision on the
`precise length of trial will not be made before the final pretrial conference.
`
`14
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH Document 33 Filed 03/04/24 Page 15 of 16 PageID #: 1251
`
`
`
`
`
`Event
`
`Date
`
`Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures
`
`Application to Court for Protective Order
`
`Five (5) days from the date of this
`Order
`
`Ten (10) days from the date of this
`Order
`
`Plaintiff shall (1) identify the accused product(s) and its
`damages model and (2) produce the file history for each
`asserted patent
`
`March 8, 2024
`
`Defendant shall produce core technical documents related
`to the accused product(s)
`
`April 5, 2024
`
`Plaintiff shall produce initial infringement claim charts
`
`May 10, 2024
`
`Defendant shall produce initial invalidity contentions
`
`June 7, 2024
`
`Parties shall exchange a list of those claim
`term(s)/phrase(s) that they believe need construction and
`their proposed claim construction of those
`term(s)/phrase(s)
`
`June 21, 2024
`
`Responses to proposed claim constructions
`
`Parties file Joint Claim Construction Chart
`
`June 28, 2024
`
`July 5, 2024
`
`Plaintiff serves Opening Claim Construction Brief
`
`July 19, 2024
`
`Defendant serves Answering Claim Construction Brief
`
`August 9, 2024
`
`Plaintiff serves Reply Claim Construction Brief
`
`August 23, 2024
`
`Defendant serves Sur-Reply Claim Construction Brief
`
`September 6, 2024
`
`Parties file Joint Claim Construction Brief
`
`September 13, 2024
`
`Delaware and Lead Counsel shall meet and confer, file an
`amended Joint Claim Construction Chart setting forth all
`agreed-upon constructions and all terms that remain in
`dispute, and email a copy of the amended chart in
`Microsoft Word format to the Court.
`
`No earlier than October 4, 2024
`and no later than October 18, 2024
`
`Claim Construction Hearing
`
`October 25, 2024 at 10:00 a.m.
`
`15
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH Document 33 Filed 03/04/24 Page 16 of 16 PageID #: 1252
`
`
`
`Event
`
`Date
`
`Document Production substantially complete
`
`November 1, 2024
`
`Parties shall finally supplement the identification of all
`accused products and all invalidity references
`
`November 15, 2024
`
`Joinder of Other Parties and Amendment of Pleadings
`
`November 22, 2024
`
`Interim Status Report
`
`Plaintiff shall provide final infringement contentions
`
`December 6, 2024
`
`30 days after the Claim
`Construction Order
`
`Defendant shall provide final invalidity contentions
`
`30 days after service of Plaintiff’s
`final infringement contentions
`
`Fact Discovery Cut-off
`
`Opening Expert Reports (for the party who has the initial
`burden of proof)
`
`March 7, 2025
`
`April 4, 2025
`
`Supplemental Disclosure to Contradict or Rebut Initial
`Expert Reports
`
`April 25, 2025
`
`Reply Expert Reports
`
`Expert Discovery Cut-off
`
`May 9, 2025
`
`May 30, 2025
`
`Case Dispositive and Daubert Motions Deadline
`
`June 20, 2025
`
`Hearing on all pending Case Dispositive and Daubert
`Motions
`
`September 10, 2025 at 10:00 a.m.
`
`Pretrial Conference
`
`November 18, 2025 at 2:00 p.m.
`
`Trial
`
`
`
`December 8-12, 2025
`
`16
`
`