Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Document 222 Filed 12/16/24 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:
`5814
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`
`ORCA SECURITY LTD.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 23-758 (JLH)
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`Plaintiff and
` Counterclaim-Defendant,
`
`
`
`WIZ, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`Defendant and
` Counterclaim-Plaintiff.
`
`
`
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`
`Pursuant to the Court’s Scheduling Orders (D.I. 33, 90), Plaintiff and Counterclaim-
`
`
`
`Defendant Orca Security Ltd. (“Orca”) and Defendant and Counterclaim-Plaintiff Wiz, Inc.
`
`(“Wiz”) hereby provide the following Joint Claim Construction Chart for the agreed and disputed
`
`claim terms, phrases, or clauses from Orca’s six asserted patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 11,663,031 (the
`
`“’031 Patent”), 11,663,032 (the “’032 Patent”), 11,693,685 (the “’685 Patent”), 11,726,809 (the
`
`“’809 Patent”), 11,740,926 (the “’926 Patent”), and 11,775,326 (the “’326 Patent”), and Wiz’s five
`
`asserted patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 11,722,554 (the “’554 Patent”), 11,929,896 (the “’896 Patent”),
`
`11,936,693 (the “’693 Patent”), 12,001,549 (the “’549 Patent”), and 12,003,529 (the “’529
`
`Patent”).
`
`The parties reserve the right to rely on intrinsic evidence identified by either party, and to
`
`amend and/or supplement their positions in this Joint Claim Construction Chart with additional
`
`intrinsic evidence and/or modified proposed constructions, in response to positions taken by the
`
`opposing party (including by any expert witnesses), and in response to any request or order by the
`
`Court.
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Document 222 Filed 12/16/24 Page 2 of 16 PageID #:
`5815
`
`Copies of the asserted patents are attached as Exhibits A-K to this Joint Claim Construction
`
`Chart.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Document 222 Filed 12/16/24 Page 3 of 16 PageID #:
`5816
`
`I.
`
`AGREED CONSTRUCTIONS
`
`A.
`
`Orca Asserted Patents (Dkt. 202)
`
`None.
`
`B. Wiz Asserted Patents (Dkt. 200)
`
`Term/Phrase
`“imputed entity”
`
`’896 Patent, claims 1, 5, 7, 9, 14, 15, 21, 23
`
`Agreed Construction
`“generic entity representing a network entity that is integrated into one or more host
`platforms, or a network entity that is shielded from, or not otherwise exposed to, a
`system configured to execute network analysis processes and methods”
`
`
`
`II.
`
`DISPUTED CONSTRUCTIONS
`
`A.
`
`Orca’s Asserted Patents (Dkt. 202)
`
`Party
`Arguing First
`Orca
`
`Term
`No.
`1
`
`Disputed Term/Phrase
`
`“(i) taking at least one
`snapshot, and (ii)
`requesting taking at least
`one snapshot of the
`virtual machine at rest,”
`
`
`’031 Patent, claims 1, 9,
`16
`
`Orca’s Proposed Construction
`
`Wiz’s Proposed Construction
`
`the clause “of the virtual machine at
`rest” applies to “(i) taking at least
`one snapshot” and “(ii) requesting
`taking at least one snapshot”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`See, e.g., ’031 patent at Title; 2:56-
`67; 3:1-14; 3:45-59; 6:26-27; 8:42-
`44; Fig. 2; claims 1, 9, 16.
`
`See also ’031 File History (June 30,
`2022 Applicant
`Arguments/Remarks) at 8-11; id.
`(June 30, 2022 Amendments to the
`
`Plain reading of the term as written.
`
`The clause “of the virtual machine at rest”
`applies only to “(ii) requesting taking at least
`one snapshot”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`See, e.g., ’031 Fig. 1B; Fig. 2; 4:5-29; 6:1-9;
`6:35-50; 8:19-9:14; Claims 1, 9 16;
`
`See, e.g., ’031 File History: 12/3/21 Non-
`Final Rejection; 3/1/22 Applicant
`Arguments/Remarks Made in an
`Amendment; 3/14/22 Final Rejection;
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Document 222 Filed 12/16/24 Page 4 of 16 PageID #:
`5817
`
`Term
`No.
`
`Disputed Term/Phrase
`
`Party
`Arguing First
`
`Wiz
`
`2
`
`“snapshot”
`
`’031 Patent, claims 1, 5-
`9, 13-16
`
`’032 Patent, claims 1, 7-
`10, 13-25
`
`’685 Patent, claims 1, 2,
`4, 8-14, 16
`
`
`
`
`Orca’s Proposed Construction
`
`Wiz’s Proposed Construction
`
`Claims) at 2, 4-6; id. (Aug. 1, 2022
`RCE) at 1-3; id. (Nov. 29, 2022
`Applicant Arguments/Remarks) at
`7-9; id. (Nov. 29, 2022
`Amendments to the Claims) at 2, 4-
`6; id. (Jan. 5, 2023 Notice of
`Allowability) at 1-4; id. (Mar. 22,
`2023 Amendments to the Claims) at
`2, 4-6; id. (Apr. 17, 2023
`Supplemental Notice of
`Allowability) at 1.
`
`See also U.S. Patent App. No.
`2020/0244692 at [0015]; [0016];
`[0022]; [0039]; [0057]; Fig. 2.
`
`See also IPR2024-00863, Paper 6 at
`9-11, 14-16, 43; id., Ex. 2001 at ¶¶
`31-33, 109.
` Plain and ordinary meaning, “a
`copy of data on a virtual disk (or
`disk file) at a given point in time”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`See, e.g., ’031 patent at 5:31-44;
`5:56-6:22 ‘032 patent at 4:57-5:25;
`’685 patent at 4:55-5:24; ’809
`patent at 4:57-5:2; ’926 patent at
`4:57-5:25; ’326 patent at 4:57-5:25
`
`
`4
`
`8/31/22 Non-Final Rejection.
`
`
`“an offline backup file or delta file of the
`machine’s virtual disk (or disk file) at a given
`point in time that includes a change log for
`the virtual disk”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`
`See, e.g., ’031 5:31-56; 6:35-50; 8:31-56
`
`See, e.g., ’032 Abstract; FIG. 2; 2:23-3:6;
`4:57-5:30; 6:5-20; 6:56-60; 7:14-29; 7:30-52;
`and corresponding citations to the ’685, ’809,
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Document 222 Filed 12/16/24 Page 5 of 16 PageID #:
`5818
`
`Party
`Arguing First
`
`Term
`No.
`
`Disputed Term/Phrase
`
`’809 Patent, claims 1, 6-
`9, 12-23
`
`’926 Patent, claims 1, 5,
`8, 12-15
`
`’326 Patent, claims 1, 2,
`4, 5, 9, 10, 13, 14
`
`Orca’s Proposed Construction
`
`Wiz’s Proposed Construction
`
`See, e.g., ’031 patent, claims 1, 5-9,
`13-16;
`’032 patent, claims 1, 7-10, 13-25;
`’685 patent, claims 1, 2, 4, 8-14,
`16; ’809 patent, claims 1, 6-9, 12-
`23; ’926 patent, claims 1, 5, 8, 12-
`15; ’326 patent, claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 9,
`10, 13, 14
`
`See also U.S. Patent App. No.
`2020/0244692 at [0034]-[0039]
`
`See, e.g., ‘031 File History (Mar.
`14, 2022 Final Rejection) at 6-7.
`
`See also IPR2024-00863, Ex. 1002
`at ¶¶ 32-39.
`
`See also IPR2024-00864, Ex. 1002
`at ¶¶ 32-39.
`
`See also IPR2024-00865, Ex. 1002
`at ¶¶ 32-39.
`
`See also IPR2024-01109, Ex. 1002
`at ¶¶ 32-39.
`
`See also IPR2024-01190, Ex. 1002
`at ¶¶ 32-39.
`
`
`’926 and ’326 specifications (e.g., ’685 2:20-
`3:3, 4:55-5:29, etc.).
`
`See, e.g., ’031 claims 1, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 13, 14,
`15, 16.
`
`See, e.g., ’032 claims 1, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 14,
`15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25.
`
`See, e.g., ’685 claims 1, 2, 4, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12,
`13, 14, 16.
`
`See, e.g., ’809 claims 1, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, 14,
`15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23.
`
`See, e.g., ’926 claims 1, 5, 8, 12, 13, 14, 15.
`
`See, e.g., ’326 claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 9, 10, 13, 14,
`15, 16, 17, 18, 19.
`
`See, e.g., ’031 File History: 12/3/21 Non-
`Final Rejection; 3/1/22 Applicant
`Arguments/Remarks Made in an
`Amendment; 3/14/22 Final Rejection;
`6/30/22 Applicant Arguments/Remarks
`Made in an Amendment; 8/31/22 Non-Final
`Rejection.
`
`See, e.g., ’032 File History: 2/24/23 Non-
`Final Rejection
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Document 222 Filed 12/16/24 Page 6 of 16 PageID #:
`5819
`
`Term
`No.
`
`3
`
`Disputed Term/Phrase
`
`Party
`Arguing First
`
`Orca
`
`“analyz[e/ing] the (at
`least one) snapshot”
`
`All asserted claims of
`the Orca Asserted
`Patents
`
`Orca’s Proposed Construction
`
`Wiz’s Proposed Construction
`
`See also IPR2024-01191, Ex. 1002
`at ¶¶ 32-39.
`
`No construction necessary; see
`“snapshot” above
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`See, e.g., ’031 patent at 6:17-22;
`6:30-7:39; 7:48-60; 8:57-59; claims
`1, 6, 9, 14, 16; ’032 patent at
`Abstract; 2:37-3:6; 3:16-19; 5:20-
`6:39; 6:48-6:60; 7:13-17; 7:37-52;
`7:59-67; Fig. 2; claims 1-5, 7-10,
`17-19, 21, 22, 25; ’685 patent at
`Abstract; 2:34-3:3; 3:13-16; 5:19-
`6:37; 6:46-58; 7:11-15; 7:34-49;
`7:54-64; Fig. 2; claims 1-4, 8, 11-
`16, 22; ’809 patent at Abstract;
`2:37-3:6; 3:16-19; 5:20-6:39; 6:48-
`60; 7:13-17; 7:37-52; 7:59-7:67;
`Fig. 2; claims 1, 5-9, 16-19, 23;
`’926 patent at Abstract; 2:37-3:6;
`3:16-19; 5:20-6:39; 6:48-60; 7:13-
`17; 7:37-52; 7:59-67; Fig. 2; claims
`1-4, 8, 9, 14, 15; ’326 patent at
`Abstract; 2:37-3:6; 3:16-19; 5:20-
`6:39; 6:48-60; 7:13-17; 7:36-52;
`7:59-67; Fig. 2; claims 1, 4, 5, 8-10,
`15-18, 22, 27.
`
`
`See, e.g., ’685 File History: 10/25/21 Non-
`Final Rejection; 3/8/22 Final Rejection;
`12/22/22 Final Rejection.
`
`“analyz[e/ing] the snapshot itself”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`See, e.g., POPR to IPR Petition Nos.
`IPR2024-00863, IPR2024-00864, and
`IPR2024-00865.
`
`See, e.g.,’031 Fig. 2; 6:17-7:20; 8:19-9:14;
`
`See, e.g.,’032 Abstract; Fig. 2; 5:20-6:13;
`7:13-8:6;
`
`See, e.g., all asserted claims of the ’031,
`’032, ’685, ’809, ’926, and ’326 patents.
`
`See, e.g.,’031 File History: 12/03/21 Non-
`Final Rejection; 3/1/22 Applicant
`Arguments/Remarks Made in an
`Amendment; 3/14/22 Final Rejection;
`8/31/22 Non-Final Rejection.
`
`See, e.g.,’032 File History: 2/24/23 Non-
`Final Rejection
`See, e.g.,’685 File History: 10/25/21 Non-
`Final Rejection; 1/25/22 Applicant
`Arguments / Remarks Made in an
`Amendment; 3/8/22 Final Rejection; 5/04/22
`Applicant Arguments / Remarks Made in an
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Document 222 Filed 12/16/24 Page 7 of 16 PageID #:
`5820
`
`Term
`No.
`
`Disputed Term/Phrase
`
`Party
`Arguing First
`
`
`
`Orca’s Proposed Construction
`
`Wiz’s Proposed Construction
`
`Amendment.
`
`
`See also U.S. Patent No.
`11,516,231 at Abstract; 2:35-3:4;
`3:14-17; 5:20-6:39; 6:48-60; 7:13-
`17; 7:37-52; 7:59-67; Fig. 2; claims
`1, 5-8, 10, 11, 15-18.
`
`See also U.S. Patent No.
`11,431,735 at Abstract; 2:32-3:3;
`3:13-17; 5:19-6:37; 6:46-58; 7:11-
`15; 7:34-49; 7:56-64; Fig. 2; claims
`1, 5-8, 10, 11, 15-18.
`
`See also U.S. Patent App. No.
`2020/0244692 at [0039]-[0041],
`[0044]-[0048], [0050], [0051],
`[0059], [0060].
`
`See also IPR2024-00863, Paper 6 at
`1, 8, 10-14, 45, 46; id., Ex. 1002 at
`¶ 82.
`
`See also IPR2024-00864, Paper 6 at
`6, 7, 9-11, 25-26; id., Ex. 1002 at ¶
`81.
`
`See also IPR2024-00865, Paper 6 at
`1, 7-8, 10-11, 26-27, 46-48; id., Ex.
`1002 at ¶ 82.
`
`See also IPR2024-01109, Ex. 1002
`at ¶ 81.
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Document 222 Filed 12/16/24 Page 8 of 16 PageID #:
`5821
`
`Term
`No.
`
`Disputed Term/Phrase
`
`Party
`Arguing First
`
`Wiz
`
`4
`
`“alert(s)”
`
`’031 Patent, claims 1, 2,
`9, 10, 16
`
`’032 Patent, claims 1,
`18, 22
`
`’685 Patent, claims 1, 5,
`13, 17, 22
`
`’809 Patent, claims 1, 2,
`3, 16, 19
`
`’926 Patent, claims 1,
`14, 15
`
`
`
`Orca’s Proposed Construction
`
`Wiz’s Proposed Construction
`
`
`See also IPR2024-01190, Ex. 1002
`at ¶ 81.
`
`See also IPR2024-01191, Ex. 1002
`at ¶ 81.
`
` Plain and ordinary meaning,
`“notification(s).”
`
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`See, e.g.,
`031 patent at Abstract, 2:56-67,
`3:1-15, 7:21-32, 7:33-39, 7:40-47,
`8:60-9:66, 9:57-60;
`032 patent at Abstract, 2:37-47,
`2:48-59, 2:60-3:6, 6:21-32, 6:33-39,
`6:40-47, 7:53-67, 8:49-53, cl. 6;
`685 patent at Abstract, 2:34-44,
`2:45-56, 2:57-3:3, 6:19-30, 6:31-37,
`6:38-45, 7:50-64, 8:46-49;
`809 patent at Abstract, 2:37-48,
`2:49-59, 2:60-3:6, 6:21-32, 6:33-39,
`6:40-47, 7:53-67, 8:49-52;
`926 patent at Abstract, 2:37-47,
`2:48-59, 2:60-3:6, 6:21-32, 6:33-39,
`6:40-47, 7:53-67, 8:49-52.
`
`See, e.g., ’031 patent claims 1, 2, 9,
`10, 16; ’032 patent claims 1, 18, 22;
`
`8
`
`“an affirmative message sent to a user to
`notify them regarding a detected threat or
`vulnerability”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`See, e.g., ’031 Abstract; Fig.2; 2:56-67; 3:1-
`14; 7:21-39; 7:40-47; 8:60-9:7.
`
`See, e.g., ’032 Abstract; FIG. 2; 2:23-3:6;
`6:21-8:6; and corresponding citations to the
`’685, ’809, ’926 and ’326 specifications
`(e.g., ’685 2:20-3:3; 4:55-5:29, etc.).
`
`See, e.g., ’031 claims 1, 2, 9, 10, 16.
`
`See, e.g., ’032 claims 1, 18, 22.
`
`See, e.g., ’685 claims 1, 5, 13, 17, 22.
`
`See, e.g., ’809 claims 1, 2, 3, 16, 19.
`
`See, e.g., ’926 claims 1, 14, 15.
`
`See, e.g., ’031 File History: 12/3/21 Non-
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Document 222 Filed 12/16/24 Page 9 of 16 PageID #:
`5822
`
`Term
`No.
`
`Disputed Term/Phrase
`
`Party
`Arguing First
`
`Orca
`
`5
`
`“virtual machine”
`
`’031 Patent, claims 1, 4-
`6, 9, 12-14, 16
`
`’685 Patent, claims 1-4,
`7, 8, 13-16, 19, 20, 22
`
`
`
`Orca’s Proposed Construction
`
`Wiz’s Proposed Construction
`
`’685 patent claims 1, 5, 13, 17, 22;
`’809 patent claims 1, 2, 3, 16, 19;
`’926 patent claims 1, 14, 15.
`
`See also U.S. Patent No.
`10,812,521 (cited on face of
`Asserted Patents) at 25:29-25,
`25:63-26:11.
`
`685 File History (May 4 2022
`Applicant Remarks) at 3-5; id.
`(November 29, 2022 Applicant
`Remarks) at 4-8; id. (April 20, 2023
`Applicant Remarks) at 8-9; id.
`(May 10, 2023 Notice of
`Allowance) at 1-2;
`U.S. Provisional App. No.
`62/797,718 at [0032-0034], [0044];
`U.S. Pat. App. No. 2020/0244692
`at Abstract, [0015-0016], [0047-
`0049], [0060], [0067], claims 1, 10,
`11.
`Plain and ordinary meaning,
`“emulation of one or more
`computers”
`
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`See, e.g., ’031 patent at 1:28-35;
`’685 patent at 1:28-35; ’031 File
`History (Dec. 3, 2021 Non-Final
`
`9
`
`Final Rejection; 3/1/22 Applicant
`Arguments/Remarks Made in an
`Amendment; 3/14/22 Final Rejection;
`8/31/22 Non-Final Rejection.
`
`See, e.g.,’032 File History: 2/24/23 Non-
`Final Rejection.
`
`See, e.g.,’685 File History: 10/25/21 Non-
`Final Rejection; 1/25/22 Applicant
`Arguments / Remarks Made in an
`Amendment; 3/8/22 Final Rejection; 5/04/22
`Applicant Arguments / Remarks Made in an
`Amendment;
`
`
`“software emulation of compute, memory
`and storage hardware, distinct from software
`containers”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`See, e.g.,’031 Abstract; Fig. 1B; Fig. 2; 1:14-
`16; 1:29-52; 3:24-29; 4:5-19; 8:7-24; and
`corresponding citations to the ’685
`specification (e.g., 1:14-16; 1:29-52; 3:11-
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Document 222 Filed 12/16/24 Page 10 of 16 PageID
`#: 5823
`
`Term
`No.
`
`Disputed Term/Phrase
`
`Party
`Arguing First
`
`
`
`Orca’s Proposed Construction
`
`Wiz’s Proposed Construction
`
`16; 3:44-51; 6:66-7:10)
`
`See, e.g., ’031 claims 1, 4, 5, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14,
`16.
`
`See, e.g., ’685 claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 13, 14,
`15, 16, 19, 20, 22.
`
`See, e.g., ’031 File History: 12/3/21 Non-
`Final Rejection; 3/1/22 Applicant
`Arguments/Remarks Made in an
`Amendment; 3/14/22 Final Rejection;
`8/31/22 Non-Final Rejection.
`
`See, e.g., ’685 File History: 10/25/21 Non-
`Final Rejection; 1/25/22 Applicant
`Arguments / Remarks Made in an
`Amendment; 3/8/22 Final Rejection; 5/04/22
`Applicant Arguments / Remarks Made in an
`Amendment;
`
`
`Rejection at 4; id. (Mar. 14, 2022
`Final Rejection) at 6.
`
`
`See also, e.g., ’031 patent at 1:39-
`49; 3:24-29; 3:60-4:2; 4:5-11; 4:20-
`29; 4:40-50; 6:62-7:2; 8:7-22; 9:66-
`10:1; Figs. 1B, 2; claims 1, 4-6, 9,
`12-14, 16;
`
`’685 patent at 1:39-49; 3:11-16;
`3:32-41; 3:44-48; 3:52-60; 4:4-14;
`5:54-61; 6:66-7:14; 8:55-57; Figs.
`1B, 2; claims 1-4, 7, 8, 13-16, 19,
`20, 22.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 11,431,735 at 1:25-
`32; 1:36-46; 3:11-16; 3:32-41;
`3:44-48; 3:52-60; 4:4-14; 4:44-48;
`6:66-7:15; 8:55-57; Figs. 1B, 2;
`claims 9, 19.
`
`See also U.S. Patent App. No.
`2020/0244692 at [0005]-[0007];
`[0018]; [0019]; [0023]-[0025];
`[0027]; [0045]; [0054]; [0069];
`Figs. 1B, 2; claims 9, 19.
`
`See also U.S. Provisional App. No.
`62/797,718 at [0004]-[0006];
`[0011]; [0012]; [0015]; [0016];
`
`10
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Document 222 Filed 12/16/24 Page 11 of 16 PageID
`#: 5824
`
`Term
`No.
`
`Disputed Term/Phrase
`
`Party
`Arguing First
`
`6
`
`“remedial action”
`
`’031 Patent, claims 3, 11
`
`’685 Patent, claims 6, 18
`
`Wiz
`
`
`
`Orca’s Proposed Construction
`
`Wiz’s Proposed Construction
`
`[0018]; [0029]; [0038]; [0053];
`Figs. 1B, 2.
`
`See also IPR2024-00863, Paper 6 at
`4, 7
`
`See also IPR2024-00865, Paper 6 at
`4-7
`
`See also IPR2024-00863, Paper 2 at
`12-13.
`
`See also IPR2024-00865, Paper 2 at
`11-12.
`
`“an action toward mitigating a
`detected threat or vulnerability”
`
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`See, e.g., ’031 patent at 9:8-14;
`7:61-65; 8:1-6; 9:57-60; 5:3-5; Fig.
`2; claims 3, 11; ’685 patent at 7:65-
`8:3; 6:59-65; 8:46-49; 4:34-36; Fig.
`2; claims 6, 18.
`
`See also U.S. Patent No.
`11,431,735 at 4:34-36; 6:59-65;
`7:65-8:3; 8:46-49; Fig. 2; claims 2,
`12.
`
`U.S. Patent App. No.
`2020/0244692 at [0030]; [0052];
`
`11
`
`“an action taken that eliminates the detected
`threat or vulnerability”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`See, e.g., ’031 Abstract; Fig.2; 2:56-67; 3:1-
`14; 7:21-39; 7:40-47; 8:60-9:7; 9:8-14; and
`corresponding citations to the ’685
`specification (e.g.,’685 Fig.2; 6:59-65; etc.).
`
`See, e.g., ’031 claims 3, 11.
`
`See, e.g., ’685 claims 6, 18.
`
`See, e.g., ’031 File History: 12/03/21 Non-
`Final Rejection; 3/1/22 Applicant
`Arguments/Remarks Made in an
`Amendment; 3/14/22 Final Rejection;
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Document 222 Filed 12/16/24 Page 12 of 16 PageID
`#: 5825
`
`Term
`No.
`
`Disputed Term/Phrase
`
`Party
`Arguing First
`
`Wiz
`
`7
`
`“determining whether
`the matching installed
`applications are used by
`the protected virtual
`cloud asset”
`
`’032 Patent, claims 1-5,
`18, 22
`
`’326 Patent, claim 8
`
`
`
`Orca’s Proposed Construction
`
`Wiz’s Proposed Construction
`
`8/31/22 Non-Final Rejection.
`
`See, e.g.,’685 File History: 10/25/21 Non-
`Final Rejection; 1/25/22 Applicant
`Arguments / Remarks Made in an
`Amendment; 3/8/22 Final Rejection; 5/04/22
`Applicant Arguments / Remarks Made in an
`Amendment.
`
`
`Indefinite.
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`See, e.g., ’032 Abstract; 4:45-7:12.
`
`See, e.g., ’362 Abstract; 4:45-7:12.
`
`See, e.g., ’032 File History: 2/24/23 Non-
`Final Rejection.
`
`See, e.g., ’032 claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 18, 22.
`
`See, e.g., ’326 claim 4.
`
`[0053]; [0061]; [0067]; Fig. 2;
`claims 2, 12.
`
`
`U.S. Provisional App. No.
`62/797,718 at [0021]; [0037];
`[0045]; [0051]; Fig. 2.
`
`IPR2024-00865, Paper 2 at 52.
`Not indefinite. No construction
`required.
`
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`See, e.g., ’032 patent at 5:49-54,
`6:10-12, claims 1-5, 18, 22; ’326
`patent at 5:50-55, 6:11-13, claim 8
`
`See also U.S. Patent No.
`11,431,735 at 6:12-18; U.S.
`Provisional App. No. 62/797,718 at
`[0028], [0030], [0031]
`
`IPR2024-00864 Paper 2 (Petition)
`at 37-38, 44; IPR2024-01191 Paper
`2 (Petition) at 46-47
`
`See also ’032 File History (Feb. 24,
`2023 Non-Final Rejection) at 5-6;
`Id. (Apr. 14, 2023 Notice of
`Allowance) at 4-5.
`
`12
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Document 222 Filed 12/16/24 Page 13 of 16 PageID
`#: 5826
`
`Term
`No.
`8
`
`Disputed Term/Phrase
`
`“sensitive data”
`
`’685 Patent, claims 1, 5,
`6, 13, 17, 18, 22
`
`Party
`Arguing First
`Wiz
`
`Orca’s Proposed Construction
`
`Wiz’s Proposed Construction
`
`Not indefinite. No construction
`required.
`
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`See, e.g., ’685 patent at 6:19-30,
`6:46-53, claims 1, 5, 6, 13, 17, 18,
`22
`
`
`See also U.S. Patent 9,069,983
`(cited on face of ’685 patent) at
`1:14-26; U.S. Patent No.
`12,061,719 (cited on face of ’685
`patent) at 1:46-56
`
`IPR2024-00865 Paper 2 (Petition)
`at 13, 19, 23-25, 39-40, 43, 59-64
`
`See also ’685 File History (Dec. 22,
`2022 Final Rejection) at 12-13; Id.
`(Mar. 7, 2023 Applicant
`Arguments) at 8
`
`Indefinite.
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`See, e.g., ’685 Abstract; Fig. 2; 5:25-7:10;
`7:11-8:3.
`
`See, e.g., ’685 claims 1, 5, 6, 13, 17, 18, 22.
`
`See, e.g., ’685 File History 10/25/21 Non-
`Final Rejection; 1/25/22 Applicant
`Arguments/Remarks Made in Amendment;
`3/8/22 Final Rejection; 5/4/22 Applicant
`Arguments/Remarks Made in Amendment;
`8/29/22 Non-Final Rejection;11/29/22
`Applicant Arguments/Remarks Made in
`Amendment. 12/22/22 Final Rejection;
`3/7/23 Applicant Arguments/Remarks Made
`in Amendment; 4/20/23 Applicant
`Arguments/Remarks Made in Amendment.
`
`
`
`
`Term
`No.
`9
`
`
`
`B. Wiz Asserted Patents (Dkt. 200)
`
`Party
`Arguing First
`Orca
`
`Disputed Term/Phrase
`
`“actively inspect[ing]
`the network path” /
`“initiat[e/ing] active
`inspection”
`
`
`Orca’s Proposed Construction
`
`Wiz’s Proposed Construction
`
`“sending a data packet over the
`network path”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`
`No construction necessary.
`“gathering information regarding the network
`path” not limited to sending a data packet.
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`
`13
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Document 222 Filed 12/16/24 Page 14 of 16 PageID
`#: 5827
`
`Term
`No.
`
`Disputed Term/Phrase
`
`’693 Patent, claims 1, 2,
`3, 5, 9, 11-14, 16, 20
`
`Party
`Arguing First
`
`10
`
`“valid path”
`
`’693 Patent, claims 1, 2,
`4, 11-13, 15
`
`Wiz
`
`11
`
`“wherein each scenario
`is associated with an
`incidence response”
`
`Orca
`
`
`
`Orca’s Proposed Construction
`
`Wiz’s Proposed Construction
`
`See, e.g., ’693 patent at 1:52-58,
`5:40-51, 5:64-6:5, 7:48-64, 7:65-
`8:2, 8:2-13, 9:24-26, 9:32-40, 9:62-
`10:58, 10:64-11:14, 11:6-14, 11:16-
`22, 11:31-37, 11:45-56, 12:3-8,
`19:56-20:22, 20:44-56, 21:30-40,
`21:49-61, 22:1-16, 22:17-26, 22:27-
`28, Figs. 3, 7, 8, 9
`
`See, e.g., ’693 Patent, claims 1, 2,
`3, 5, 9, 11-14, 16, 20
`
`See, e.g., ’693 File History (Dec. 7,
`2023 Applicant Arguments) at 3-12
`“network path through which a
`resource is really reachable”
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`See, e.g., ’693 patent at 5:40-51;
`20:44-21:55; see also, e.g., id. at
`5:64-6:12, 10:44-11:56, 12:15-23,
`16:45-67; 18:55-19:10; 19:55-
`20:12, 22:56-61
`See, e.g., ’693 Patent, claims 1, 2,
`4, 11-13, 15
`
`See, e.g., ’693 File History (Dec. 7,
`2023 Applicant Arguments) at 3-12
`Indefinite
`
`
`14
`
`See, e.g., ’693 Abstract; Fig. 1; Fig. 3; Fig. 6;
`Fig. 7; Fig. 9; 1:21-23; 2:44-62;2:63-3:23;
`4:65-67; 5:3-5; 5:40-51; 6:36-8:29; 9:24-
`12:23; 15:54-18:36; 20:34-22:57; Claims 1,
`2, 3, 5, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 20.
`
`No construction necessary.
`Alternatively, “network path through which a
`resource is reachable”.
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`See, e.g.,’693 Fig. 3; Fig. 4A; Fig. 4B; Fig. 7;
`Fig. 8; Fig. 9; 2:63-3:23; 4:12-55; 5:3-23;
`9:24- 15:37; 16:45-22:57; Claims 1, 2, 4, 11,
`12, 13, 15.
`
`
`“incidence” should read “incident”.
`Otherwise, no construction necessary.
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Document 222 Filed 12/16/24 Page 15 of 16 PageID
`#: 5828
`
`Term
`No.
`
`Disputed Term/Phrase
`
`
`’549 Patent, claims 1,
`11, 12
`
`Party
`Arguing First
`
`12
`
`“based on”
`
`’549 Patent, claims 1, 4,
`11, 12, 15
`
`Wiz
`
`Orca’s Proposed Construction
`
`Wiz’s Proposed Construction
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`See, e.g.,’549 Abstract; Fig. 2; Fig. 3; Fig 4;
`Fig. 5; 1:62-2:67; 3:16-5:15; 5:16-
`6:45;7:8:38; 13:17-32; 14:26-15:4; 15:12-67;
`16:1-5.
`
`
` No construction necessary.
`
`Alternatively, “influenced by”; the
`limitations of a method claim are not
`required to be performed in order.
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`See, e.g., ’549 2:18-67; 3:32-4:13; 5:35-6:45;
`13:17-32; 14:26-15:4; 15:12-34; 15:63-67;
`16:1-5; Claims 1, 4, 11, 12, 15.
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`See, e.g., ’549 patent at Abstract,
`1:15-20, 7:38-44, 7:45-8:2, 8:7-27,
`8:31-38, 14:21-25, 14:44-58, 14:59-
`15:4, 15:5-11, 15:41-48, 15:56-67,
`16:1-5, 16:20-31, 16:41-48, claims
`1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15,
`17, 18, 20, Figs. 5, 6
`“dependent on”; the limitations of
`claims 1, 11 and 12 must be
`performed in order
`
`Intrinsic Evidence
`See, e.g., ’549 patent at Abstract,
`Figs. 3, 4, 6, 6:61-67, 8:3-6, 8:8-30,
`9:47-10:2, 10:8-13, 10:41-45,
`10:64-11:7, 11:14-29, 11:40-54,
`12:3-8, 12:13-17, 12:25-35, 12:46-
`52, 13:11-16, 13:20-24, 13:28-30,
`13:42-44, 13:49-54, 14:1-3, 14:44-
`58, 14:60-67, 15:1-4, 15:17-20,
`15:57-65, 16:1-5, 16:8-15, 16:20-
`24, 16:27-40, 16:52-54, 17:35-52,
`claims 1, 4, 6, 7, 11, 12, 15, 17, 18
`
`See also, e.g., ’549 patent at 2:18-
`65, 3:1-11, 3:16-28, 3:32-4:11,
`4:23-37, 4:43-5:13, 5:15-30, 5:36-
`51, 5:57-6:43
`
`
`
`15
`
`

`

`Case 1:23-cv-00758-JLH-SRF Document 222 Filed 12/16/24 Page 16 of 16 PageID
`#: 5829
`
`MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT &TUNNELL LLP
`
`RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A.
`
`/s/ Cameron P. Clark
`
`/s/ Frederick L. Cottrell, III
`
`Jack B. Blumenfeld (#1014)
`Rodger D. Smith II (#3778)
`Cameron P. Clark (#6647)
`1201 North Market Street
`P.O. Box 1347
`Wilmington, DE 19899-1347
`(302) 658-9200
`jblumenfeld@morrisnichols.com
`rsmith@morrisnichols.com
`cclark@morrisnichols.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`
`December 16, 2024
`
`Frederick L. Cottrell, III (#2555)
`Kelly E. Farnan (#4395)
`Christine D. Haynes (#4697)
`One Rodney Square
`920 North King Street
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`(302) 651-7700
`cottrell@rlf.com
`farnan@rlf.com
`haynes@rlf.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`
`16
`
`