throbber
Case 1:22-cv-00904-RGA-SRF Document 188 Filed 08/23/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 25095
`
`M O R R I S , N I C H O L S , A R S H T & T U N N E L L L L P
`
`1201 NO R TH M AR KE T S TR E ET
`P.O. B O X 1347
`W I L M IN G TO N, DE L AWARE 19899-1347
`
`
`
`(302) 658-9200
`
`(302) 658-3989 FAX
`
`JENNIFER YING
`
`(302) 351-9243
`
`(302) 225-2570 FAX
`
`jying@morrisnichols.com
`
`
`
`The Honorable Richard G. Andrews
`United States District Court
` for the District of Delaware
`J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building
`844 North King Street
`Room 6325, Unit 9
`Wilmington, DE 19801-3555
`
`
`August 23, 2024
`
`
`VIA ELECTRONIC FILING
`
`Re:
`
`Acceleration Bay, LLC v. Amazon Web Services, Inc.
`C.A. No. 22-904 (RGA) (SRF) (D. Del.)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dear Judge Andrews:
`
`
`I write on behalf of the Parties in response to the Court’s Oral Order from the August 21,
`2024 hearing.
`
`Below, Plaintiff Acceleration Bay, LLC (“Acceleration Bay”) identifies the remaining
`asserted patents claims:
`
`
`Patent
`
`’344 Patent
`’966 Patent
`’147 Patent
`’634 Patent
`’069 Patent
`
`Asserted
`Claims
`13, 21
`12, 19
`6
`10, 16, 25
`1
`
`
`
`Further, Defendant Amazon Web Services, Inc. (“AWS”) identifies its remaining
`invalidity defenses:
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00904-RGA-SRF Document 188 Filed 08/23/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 25096
`
`The Honorable Richard G. Andrews
`August 23, 2024
`Page 2
`
`
`’344 Patent
`Claim Prior Art Grounds
`1. Obviousness based on the combination of
`13
`’882 Maxemchuk, ATT Maxemchuk,
`Hughes, and InsideDirectX
`2. Obviousness based on the combination of
`Du, Hughes, Hwang, and Olson
`1. Obviousness based on the combination of
`’882 Maxemchuk, ATT Maxemchuk,
`Hughes, and InsideDirectX
`2. Obviousness based on the combination of
`Du, Hughes, Hwang, and Olson
`
`21
`
`
`’966 Patent
`Claim Prior Art Grounds
`1. Obviousness based on the combination of
`12
`’882 Maxemchuk, ATT Maxemchuk,
`Hughes, and InsideDirectX
`2. Obviousness based on the combination of
`Du, Hughes, Hwang, and Olson
`1. Obviousness based on the combination of
`’882 Maxemchuk, ATT Maxemchuk,
`Hughes, and InsideDirectX
`2. Obviousness based on the combination of
`Du, Hughes, Hwang, and Olson
`
`19
`
`
`’147 Patent
`Claim Prior Art Grounds
`1. Obviousness based on the combination of
`6
`’882 Maxemchuk, ATT Maxemchuk,
`Hughes, and Pekarske
`2. Obviousness based on the combination of
`Du, Hughes, and Pekarske
`
`
`’634 Patent
`Claim Prior Art Grounds
`1. Obviousness based on the combination of
`10
`’882 Maxemchuk, ATT Maxemchuk,
`Hughes, and InsideDirectX
`2. Obviousness based on the combination of
`Du, Hughes, Hwang, and Olson
`
`
`
`Non-Prior Art Grounds
`1. The claim is directed to
`unpatentable subject
`matter (35 U.S.C. § 101)
`
`
`
`1. The claim is directed to
`unpatentable subject
`matter (35 U.S.C. § 101)
`
`Non-Prior Art Grounds
`1. The claim is directed to
`unpatentable subject
`matter (35 U.S.C. § 101)
`
`
`
`1. The claim is directed to
`unpatentable subject
`matter (35 U.S.C. § 101)
`
`Non-Prior Art Grounds
`N/A
`
`Non-Prior Art Grounds
`1. The claim is directed to
`unpatentable subject
`matter (35 U.S.C. § 101)
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00904-RGA-SRF Document 188 Filed 08/23/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 25097
`
`The Honorable Richard G. Andrews
`August 23, 2024
`Page 3
`
`
`
`16
`
`25
`
`1. Obviousness based on the combination of
`’882 Maxemchuk, ATT Maxemchuk,
`Hughes, and InsideDirectX
`2. Obviousness based on the combination of
`Du, Hughes, Hwang, and Olson
`1. Obviousness based on the combination of
`’882 Maxemchuk, ATT Maxemchuk,
`Hughes, and InsideDirectX
`2. Obviousness based on the combination of
`Du, Hughes, Hwang, and Olson
`
`
`’069 Patent
`Claim Prior Art Grounds
`1. Obviousness based on the combination of
`1
`’882 Maxemchuk, ATT Maxemchuk,
`Hughes, and Pekarske
`2. Obviousness based on the combination of
`Du, Hughes, and Pekarske
`
`
`
`1. The claim is directed to
`unpatentable subject
`matter (35 U.S.C. § 101)
`
`1. The claim is directed to
`unpatentable subject
`matter (35 U.S.C. § 101)
`
`Non-Prior Art Grounds
`N/A
`
`The Parties also confirm that excerpts of Mr. Greene’s Opening Report and the complete
`appendices to his report related to these defenses were filed as Exhibits 14–24 of Acceleration
`Bay’s Motion for Summary Judgment and can be found at D.I. 152-1 and D.I. 152-2. Further
`excerpts of Mr. Greene’s Opening Report were filed as Exhibit I to AWS’s Opposition to
`Acceleration Bay’s Motion and can be found at D.I. 160-1.
`
`Counsel is available should the Court have any questions.
`
`
`Respectfully,
`
`/s/ Jennifer Ying
`
`Jennifer Ying (#5550)
`
`Clerk of the Court (via hand delivery)
`All Counsel of Record (via CM/ECF and e-mail)
`
`
`JY:lo
`cc:
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket