`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`ROBOCAST, INC.,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`NETFLIX, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant,
`
`Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff.
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 22-305-JLH-CJB
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
`MEDIATION
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, Paragraph 16 of the Scheduling Order requires the parties to “engage in good
`
`faith in an in-person mediation” prior to the pretrial conference. D.I. 47 ¶ 16;
`
`WHEREAS, the parties are in the process of scheduling the mediation and are hoping to
`
`schedule in January;
`
`WHEREAS, due to the location of clients and counsel, the parties believe it will be more
`
`efficient to schedule a virtual mediation;
`
`IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, and
`
`subject to the approval of the Court, that the mediation required under Paragraph 16 of the
`
`Scheduling Order may be conducted virtually.
`
`
`
`/s/Stephen B. Brauerman
`Stephen B. Brauerman (#4952)
`Ronald P. Golden III (#6254)
`Bayard, P.A.
`600 North King Street, Suite 400
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`(302) 655-5000
`sbrauerman@bayardlaw.com
`rgolden@bayardlaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Robocast, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Kelly E. Farnan
`Kelly E. Farnan (#4395)
`Sara M. Metzler (#6509)
`Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.
`One Rodney Square
`920 North King Street
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`(302) 651-7700
`farnan@rlf.com
`
`Attorney for Defendant Netflix, Inc.
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-00305-JLH Document 445 Filed 12/23/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 28712
`
`Dated: December 12, 2024
`
`SO ORDERED this 23rd day of December, 2024.
`
`United States District Judge
`
`2
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
