`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`
`ROBOCAST, INC.
`a Delaware corporation,
`
`
`
`
`
`YOUTUBE, LLC, a Delaware limited
`liability company; and GOOGLE LLC,
`a Delaware limited liability company,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`C.A. No. 22-304 (RGA)
`
`
`
`DEFENDANTS’ RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS
`FOR OBVIOUSNESS-TYPE DOUBLE PATENTING
`
`Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and this Court’s Order denying in
`
`part Defendants YouTube, LLC and Google LLC’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to
`
`Dismiss Claims of Indirect and Willful Infringement and for Obviousness-Type Double
`
`Patenting with leave to refile after the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
`
`decided In re: Cellect (D.I. 29 ¶ 2), Defendants hereby move to dismiss with prejudice all of
`
`Plaintiff Robocast, Inc.’s (“Plaintiff”) claims for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,155,451. The
`
`grounds for this motion are set forth in Defendants’ Opening Brief in Support of Their Renewed
`
`Motion to Dismiss for Obviousness-Type Double Patenting, filed contemporaneously herewith.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-00304-RGA-JLH Document 109 Filed 09/22/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 5760
`
`
`
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`Jordan R. Jaffe
`Amy H. Candido
`Catherine Lacey
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, P.C.
`One Market Plaza
`Spear Tower, Suite 3300
`San Francisco, CA 94105
`
`Dated: September 22, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Frederick L. Cottrell, III
`Frederick L. Cottrell, III (#2555)
`Griffin A. Schoenbaum (#6915)
`RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A.
`One Rodney Square
`920 North King Street
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`(302) 651-7700
`cottrell@rlf.com
`schoenbaum@rlf.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants YouTube, LLC and
`Google LLC
`
`2
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
