`
`Joint Status Report Pursuant to Rule 26(f)
`
`Caption:
` Civil Action No:
`Basis of Jurisdiction:
`Arbitration:
`Jury Trial:
`Non-Jury Trial:
`Plaintiff’s counsel participating in the Rule 16 Conference:
`Brian Egan, James Hurst, Patricia Carson, Mark McLennan
`Defendant’s counsel participating in the Rule 16 Conference:
`Do counsel have full authority to settle at Rule 16 Conference?
`If not, client with such authority who will attend conference:
`When did the parties hold the Rule 26 Conference?
`When did the parties comply with Rule 26(a)’s duty of self-executing disclosure?
`Does either side expect to file a case-dispositive motion?
` (yes/no)
`If yes, under what Rule
`If yes, specify the issue
`Proposed deadline for filing dispositive motions:
`Does either side anticipate the use of experts?
`
`If yes, what is the proposed deadline for expert discovery?
`Approximate date case should be trial-ready:
`Time for Plaintiff’s case:
`Time for Defendant’s case:
`Is a settlement conference likely to be helpful?
`If so, when:
`Early (yes/no)
`After Discovery
` (yes/no)
`What is the outcome of your discussions with your clients about proceeding before a
`Magistrate Judge for final disposition?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`22-252
`
`28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1338(a)
`
`See Proposed Scheduling Order ¶ 14
`
`Yes
`
`N/A
`
`December 20, 2022
`
`See Proposed Scheduling Order ¶ 14
`
`See Proposed Scheduling Order ¶ 14
`
`Yes
`
`See Proposed Scheduling Order ¶ 19, Ex. A
`
`Magistrate Judge for final disposition.
`
`The parties do not consent to proceeding before a
`
`No
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`Arbutus Biopharma Corporation and Genevant Sciences GmbH v. Moderna, Inc. and ModernaTX, Inc.
`
`See Proposed
`Scheduling Order ¶ 1
`
`See Proposed
`Scheduling Order ¶ 14
`
`See Proposed Scheduling
`Order ¶ 7(f), Ex. A
`
`See Proposed Scheduling
`Order ¶ 19, Ex. A
`
`See Proposed Scheduling
`Order ¶ 19, Ex. A
`
`Karen Keller, Daralyn J. Durie, David I. Berl, Shaun P. Mahaffy
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-00252-MSG Document 47 Filed 02/13/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 881
`
`Plan for Discovery:
`
`1.
`
`The parties anticipate that discovery should be completed within
`days.
`
`
`2.
`
`
`3.
`
`
`4.
`
`
`5.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`What is the minimum amount of time necessary to complete discovery prior to an
`ADR session, should one be ordered or agreed to?
`
`Have the parties discussed issues relating to claims of privilege or of protection as
`trial-preparation material, as required by Rule 26(f)(3)(D)?
`
`Identify any other discovery issues which should be addressed at the Rule 16
`Conference, including limitations on discovery, protective Orders needed, or other
`elements which should be included in a particularized discovery plan.
`
`
`If you contend the discovery period should exceed 90 days, please state reason:
`
`
`This form should be faxed to Chambers at 267-299-5056 or
`Emailed to chambers at goldberg_chambers@paed.uscourts.gov
`
`
`433 to 554
`
`433 to 554 days.
`
`Yes
`
`The scope of document production, number of witnesses, and expert discovery necessitate a discovery period of more than 90 days.
`
`The parties have disputes
`
`regarding final contentions, expert supplementation, trial length, and the case schedule.
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
