throbber
Case 1:22-cv-00252-MSG Document 366 Filed 06/27/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 22094
`
`M O R R I S , N I C H O L S , A R S H T & T U N N E L L L L P
`1201 NORTH MARKET STREET
`P.O. BOX 1347
`WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19899-1347
`
`(302) 658-9200
`(302) 658-3989 FAX
`
`BRIAN P. EGAN
`(302) 351-9454
`began@morrisnichols.com
`
`June 27, 2024
`
`
`
`
`
`
`VIA ELECTRONIC FILING
`
`
`
`The Honorable Mitchell S. Goldberg
`United States District Court
` Eastern District of Pennsylvania
`601 Market Street
`Philadelphia, PA 19106-1797
`
`
`Re:
`
`
`Arbutus Biopharma Corporation., et al. v. Moderna, Inc., et al.
`C.A. No. 22-252 (MSG)
`
`
`Dear Judge Goldberg:
`
`We write on behalf of Moderna to respectfully seek clarification of Your Honor’s
`June 20, 2024 Order (D.I. 355). In response to Moderna’s motion to compel lobbying documents
`(D.I. 341), the Court ordered the parties to proceed with their agreed-upon collection and
`production of lobbying materials, and also ordered Moderna to produce “non-lobbying
`documents” that Plaintiffs sought in their opposition (D.I. 348) to Moderna’s motion to compel.
`D.I. 355 at 10 (ordering production of “Defendant’s communications with the Government
`regarding the vaccine, the Government contracts, and the Statement of Interest”). In connection
`with those non-lobbying documents, the Court also made a finding that Moderna’s
`communications with the U.S. Government regarding the application of Section 1498, including
`those relating to the Statement of Interest, are not subject to the common interest privilege
`exception.
`
`Since the Order issued, Plaintiffs have taken the position that Moderna must produce all
`communications between Moderna and the U.S. Government concerning this lawsuit more
`generally (i.e., not just communications relating to the application of Section 1498 or on the
`Statement of Interest) and that the Court’s finding of no common interest applies to all
`communications between Moderna and the U.S. Government. Moderna believes this goes beyond
`the Court’s Order, which was premised on what Plaintiffs sought in their opposition letter to
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00252-MSG Document 366 Filed 06/27/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 22095
`
`The Honorable Mitchell S. Goldberg
`June 27, 2024
`Page 2
`
`Moderna’s motion, i.e., “communications with the U.S. Government regarding § 1498 and the
`Government’s Statement of Interest.” D.I. 348 at 1, 3.1
`
`Moderna thus respectfully seeks the Court’s clarification of its Order, including
`confirmation of whether the Court’s Order and finding regarding common interest are limited to
`communications discussing the application of Section 1498 and the Statement of Interest. If, as
`Moderna believes, the Court’s Order found that there is no common interest as to “communications
`with the U.S. Government regarding § 1498 and the Government’s Statement of Interest,”
`Moderna will proceed in producing this limited scope of communications.2 If the Court’s Order is
`interpreted more broadly, however, there is a broader common interest agreement in place between
`Moderna and the U.S. Government that would be implicated by any such reading. By way of
`example, as discussed at the hearing, because there remains a possibility in light of Section 1498
`that Moderna and the U.S. Government may be facing parallel lawsuits, Moderna has relied and
`will continue to rely on the common interest exception to coordinate with the U.S. Government in
`the defense of Plaintiffs’ patent infringement allegations concerning the accused product that was
`developed, manufactured, and procured pursuant to contracts between the Moderna and the U.S.
`Government. Notwithstanding Moderna’s disagreement that no common interest can exist with
`respect to Section 1498 and the Government’s Statement of Interest,3 expanding the Court’s Order
`beyond these categories implicates other issues that would be protected by the common interest
`exception and the common interest agreement between Moderna and the U.S. government, which
`Moderna is willing to make available to the Court for in camera review if requested.
`
`Ultimately, because Plaintiffs’ arguments regarding common interest were raised primarily
`in their opposition letter to Moderna’s motion to compel, neither Moderna nor the U.S.
`Government had the opportunity to fully brief this issue. Accordingly, should the Court find that
`its Order is not limited to communications with the U.S. Government regarding Section 1498 and
`the Government’s Statement of Interest, Moderna requests to be heard on a more fulsome record
`on the common interest exception and its application to the facts of this case before the Court
`determines whether any further production is appropriate.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 Moderna completed its production months ago of communications between Moderna and the
`U.S. Government regarding the vaccine and the negotiation of the U.S. Government supply
`contracts—including negotiations relating to FAR 52-227 clause that Moderna relies upon—and
`does not claim those documents were privileged and subject to a common interest exception.
`2 To be clear, because the Court found that the common interest exception is not applicable to these
`categories of documents, Moderna understands that production of these documents does not
`constitute a waiver (limited or otherwise) of any privilege.
`3 Moderna disagrees with Plaintiffs’ (admittedly speculative) suggestion that there has been any
`“disagreement” between Moderna and the U.S. government as to the application of § 1498.
`D.I. 354 at 33–35. Moderna also disagrees with Plaintiffs’ inaccurate characterization that there
`was any “shift” in liability with the filing of the Statement of Interest (D.I. 348 at 1)—that
`Statement merely confirmed what the parties agreed in the C-0100 contract years earlier. D.I. 49.
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00252-MSG Document 366 Filed 06/27/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 22096
`
`The Honorable Mitchell S. Goldberg
`June 27, 2024
`Page 3
`
`
`Respectfully,
`
`/s/ Brian P. Egan
`
`Brian P. Egan (#6227)
`
`
`BPE/bac
`
`cc:
`
`All Counsel of Record (via CM/ECF and electronic mail)
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket