throbber
Case 1:22-cv-00252-MSG Document 325-2 Filed 05/20/24 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 19505
`Case 1:22-cv-00252-MSG Document 325-2 Filed 05/20/24 Page 1 of 7 PagelD #: 19505
`
`EXHIBIT B
`EXHIBIT B
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00252-MSG Document 325-2 Filed 05/20/24 Page 2 of 7 PageID #: 19506
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`C.A. No. 22-252 (MSG)
`
`))
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`))))
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`ARBUTUS BIOPHARMA CORPORATION
`and GENEVANT SCIENCES GmbH,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`MODERNA, INC. and MODERNATX, INC.
`
`Defendants.
`
`MODERNA, INC. and MODERNATX, INC.,
`
`Counterclaim-Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`ARBUTUS BIOPHARMA CORPORATION
`and GENEVANT SCIENCES GmbH,
`
`Counterclaim-Defendants.
`
`DECLARATION OF HAMILTON BENNETT
`IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO SEAL
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00252-MSG Document 325-2 Filed 05/20/24 Page 3 of 7 PageID #: 19507
`
`I, Hamilton Bennett, hereby declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am Senior Director, Vaccine Access and Partnerships, at ModernaTX, Inc.
`
`(hereinafter, “Moderna”). In this role, I am familiar with Moderna’s negotiations and
`
`communications with the United States Government regarding Moderna’s COVID-19 Vaccine, as
`
`well as third-party licensing negotiations and agreements. Specifically, I am familiar with the fact
`
`that Moderna maintains this sensitive information as confidential, 1 and I am familiar with the
`
`extensive efforts Moderna takes to protect its confidential information. I have personal knowledge
`
`of the facts stated in this declaration or have become aware of such facts through my role at
`
`Moderna. If called upon to testify, I could and would competently testify thereto.
`
`2.
`
`I write this declaration in support of Moderna’s request to avoid disclosure of
`
`sensitive and confidential information on the public record. I discuss below how and why Moderna
`
`keeps certain business information confidential, and the serious harm that would result to Moderna
`
`from disclosure of this information to Moderna’s competitors.
`
`3.
`
`I understand this case relates to Moderna’s COVID-19 Vaccine, known as mRNA-
`
`1273 or “SpikeVax.”
`
`4.
`
`I have been provided and have reviewed the information that Moderna proposes to
`
`redact from Plaintiffs’ Letter Brief in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel and the exhibits
`
`thereto (collectively, “Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Bancel Documents”) (D.I. 285) and
`
`Moderna’s Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Bancel Documents and the exhibits thereto
`
`1
`
`
`I understand that the Protective Order in this case (D.I. 91) includes two categories of Protected
`Material: “Confidential” and “Highly Confidential – Outside Counsel’s Eyes Only.” I
`understand that the documents implicated by Moderna’s motion to seal include “Confidential”
`and “Highly Confidential – Outside Counsel’s Eyes Only” information. For the purposes of
`this declaration, I have used the term “confidential” to cover both categories, both of which
`should not be disclosed to the public for the reasons explained herein.
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00252-MSG Document 325-2 Filed 05/20/24 Page 4 of 7 PageID #: 19508
`
`(collectively, “Moderna’s Bancel Opposition”) (D.I. 294). Specifically, Plaintiffs’ Motion to
`
`Compel Bancel Documents and Exhibits C–F and K–P and Exhibit T to Moderna’s Bancel
`
`Opposition contain Moderna confidential information. These documents reflect Moderna
`
`confidential business information regarding Moderna’s negotiations with the U.S. government, the
`
`development of SpikeVax, and licensing with third-parties.
`
`5.
`
`It is critical to Moderna that the Court maintain under seal Moderna’s confidential
`
`information. Moderna has always taken extensive measures to maintain the confidentiality of its
`
`business information, including by implementing procedures that restrict access to sensitive
`
`information even within Moderna. Employees have confidentiality obligations as part of their
`
`employment and are provided guidance regarding how to treat sensitive information. Specifically,
`
`confidential Moderna information is not to be disclosed outside of Moderna except under
`
`confidentiality agreement and when necessary. Documents containing such information may be
`
`marked as confidential or otherwise indicate they contain restricted or sensitive information.
`
`Internal to Moderna, employee access to commercially sensitive and trade secret information is
`
`often restricted on a need-to-know basis, as determined by a person’s group or role on a project.
`
`Moderna has been extremely concerned about the protection of its confidential information during
`
`this litigation and has been very careful to always protect this information.
`
`6.
`
`Moderna’s proposed redactions seek to seal portions of Plaintiffs’ Motion to
`
`Compel Bancel Documents and Exhibits C–F and K–P and Exhibit T to Moderna’s Bancel
`
`Opposition which refer to, quote, summarize, or otherwise disclose Moderna’s sensitive and
`
`confidential business information. Specifically, the following pages of the Motion and Exhibits
`
`disclose specific information concerning Moderna’s negotiations and communications with the
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00252-MSG Document 325-2 Filed 05/20/24 Page 5 of 7 PageID #: 19509
`
`United States Government regarding Moderna’s COVID-19 Vaccine and third-party licensing
`
`negotiations and agreements:
`
` Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Bancel Documents, page 1;
`
` Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Bancel Documents, Ex. C;
`
` Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Bancel Documents, Ex. D;
`
` Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Bancel Documents, Ex. E;
`
` Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Bancel Documents, Ex. F;
`
`Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Bancel Documents, Ex. K;
`
`Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Bancel Documents, Ex. L;
`
`Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Bancel Documents, Ex. M;
`
` Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Bancel Documents, Ex. N;
`
` Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Bancel Documents, Ex. O;
`
` Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Bancel Documents, Ex. P; and
`
` Moderna’s Bancel Opposition, Exhibit T, pages 4, 6, 9, 12–14, 16.
`
`7.
`
`The information within these documents that Moderna proposes redacting is
`
`confidential and sensitive information that Moderna does not disclose publicly, which it wishes to
`
`remain confidential. There is significant competition between established vaccine suppliers,
`
`including suppliers of mRNA-based vaccines. Additionally, there are companies considering
`
`entering the vaccine market and companies developing mRNA-based vaccines and therapeutics
`
`for other diseases or developing LNPs for mRNA-based products. Because there are so few
`
`competitors in these markets, the markets are highly competitive, and any information about one
`
`of the competitors, even seemingly minor information, may prove competitively advantageous.
`
`The release of such information to the public, including Moderna’s competitors, would
`
`significantly harm Moderna.
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00252-MSG Document 325-2 Filed 05/20/24 Page 6 of 7 PageID #: 19510
`
`8.
`
`With respect to Moderna’s negotiations and communications with the United States
`
`Government regarding Moderna’s COVID-19 Vaccine, these documents contain sensitive non-
`
`public details regarding Moderna’s relationship with the Government during development of the
`
`COVID-19 Vaccine. Additionally, several documents reflect internal strategy regarding
`
`Moderna’s negotiations with the Government, including highly sensitive pricing information and
`
`information relevant to the timing of development, none of which is public and could cause
`
`Moderna competitive harm.
`
`9.
`
`With respect to Moderna’s contracts and negotiations with third parties, Moderna
`
`owes a duty of confidentiality to these third parties which would require notice to each third party
`
`prior to public disclosure. Publicly revealing Moderna’s contracts with third parties could harm
`
`Moderna’s relationship with these third parties and give an unfair advantage to competitors.
`
`10.
`
`Based on my personal knowledge and experience in the pharmaceutical industry, I
`
`believe that disclosure of this information would significantly harm Moderna by revealing
`
`confidential data to its direct competitors and the public generally. If the confidential information
`
`were made public, Moderna’s competitors would be able to use this information to decide where,
`
`when, and how to offer directly competitive goods with full knowledge of Moderna’s business
`
`relationships and pricing strategies. Moderna’s competitors would gain a significant advantage in
`
`creating their own business strategies, which would put Moderna at a significant competitive
`
`disadvantage, causing it real and serious harm.
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the
`
`foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00252-MSG Document 325-2 Filed 05/20/24 Page 7 of 7 PageID #: 19511
`
`Executed on this May 16, 2024
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/
`Hamilton Bennett
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket