`Case 1:22-cv-00252-MSG Document 316-1 Filed 05/13/24 Page 1 of 7 PagelD #: 17920
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT A
`EXHIBIT A
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-00252-MSG Document 316-1 Filed 05/13/24 Page 2 of 7 PagelD #: 17921
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`C.A. No, 22-252 (MSG)
`
`ARBUTUS BIOPHARMA CORPORATION
`and GENEVANT SCIENCES GmbH,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`\
`
`MODERNA,INC, and MODERNATX,INC.
`
`Defendants.
`
`Counterclaim-Plaintiffs,
`
`Y.
`
`ARBUTUS BIOPHARMA CORPORATION
`and GENEVANT SCIENCES GmbH,
`
`Counterclaim-Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Nie”ie”Met”Snel”centage”“nce”“acpeet”Sage”“aera!”inset”Mine”Sine!”eeenee!nee”Seat”eet”
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`“MODERNA,INC.andMODERNATX,INC.,
`
`DECLARATION OF DON PARSONS
`IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO SEAL
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-00252-MSG Document 316-1 Filed 05/13/24 Page 3 of 7 PagelD #: 17922
`
`I, Don Parsons, hereby declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`Iam Vice President of Delivery Science and Development at ModernaTX, Inc.
`
`(hereinafter, “Moderna”), In this role, I am familiar with Moderna’s technical research and
`
`development information. I am familiar with the fact that Moderna maintains this information as
`
`confidential,' and I am familiar with the extensive efforts Moderna takes to protectits confidential
`
`information, I have personal knowledgeofthe facts stated in this declaration or have become aware
`
`of such facts through my role at Moderna.If called uponto testify, I could and would competently
`
`testify thereto.
`
`2,
`
`I write this declaration in support of Moderna’s request to avoid disclosure of
`
`sensitive and confidential information on the public record. I discuss below how and why Moderna
`
`keeps certain technical information confidential, and the serious harm that would result to Moderna
`
`from disclosure of this information to Moderna’s competitors.
`
`3.
`
`I understand this case relates to Moderna’s COVID-19 Vaccine, known as mMRNA-
`
`1273 or “SpikeVax.” SpikeVax is comprised of messenger RNA (mRNA) which is encased in
`
`lipid nanoparticles (LNPs). Moderna’s proprietary LNP is comprised of four lipid components
`
`including SM-102, cholesterol, phospholipid, and PEGDMG-2000.
`
`4,
`
`I have been provided and have reviewed the information that Moderna proposesto
`
`redact from Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement (D.1. 301) (“Amended
`
`Complaint’), Specifically, paragraphs 56-58, 77-78, 98-99, 119-120, 143-144, 169-170, and
`
`Tunderstand that the Protective Order in this case (D.L 91) includes two categories ofProtected
`Material: “Confidential” and “Highly Confidential — Outside Counsel’s Eyes Only.” I
`understand that Plaintiffs’ amended complaint
`includes “Highly Confidential — Outside
`Counsel’s Eyes Only” information. For the purposes ofthis declaration, I have used the term
`“confidential” to cover this category, which should not be disclosed to the public for the
`reasons explained herein.
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-00252-MSG Document 316-1 Filed 05/13/24 Page 4 of 7 PagelD #: 17923
`
`190-191 contain Moderna confidential
`
`information. These paragraphs
`
`reflect Moderna
`
`confidential technical and business information regarding Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine.
`
`5,
`
`It is critical to Moderna that the Court maintain under seal Moderna’s confidential
`
`information, Moderna has always taken extensive measures to maintain the confidentiality ofits
`
`technical information, including by implementing procedures that restrict access to sensitive
`
`information even within Moderna. Employees have confidentiality obligations as part of their
`
`employment and are provided guidance regarding howtotreat sensitive information. Specifically,
`
`confidential Moderna information is not to be disclosed outside of Moderna except under
`
`confidentiality agreement and when necessary. Documents containing such information may be
`
`marked as confidential or otherwise indicate they contain restricted or sensitive information.
`
`Internal to Moderna, employee access to commercially sensitive and trade secret information is
`
`often restricted on a need-to-know basis, as determined by a person’s group or role on a project.
`
`Moderna has been extremely concerned aboutthe protectionofits confidential information during
`
`this litigation and has been very careful to always protect this information.
`
`6.
`
`Moderna’s proposed redactions seek to seal portions of the Amended Complaint
`
`which refer to, quote, summarize, or otherwise disclose Moderna’s sensitive and confidential
`
`technical information. Specifically, the information in paragraphs 56-58, 78, 79, 97, 98, 119, 120,
`
`143, 144, 169, 170, 190, and 191 discloses specific information concerning the composition of
`
`Moderna’s COVID-19 Vaccine and Moderna’s proprietary and trade secret manufacturing
`
`methods for its COVID-19 Vaccine including steps in the manufacturing process and parameters
`
`for those steps.
`
`7.
`
`The information within paragraphs 56—58, 77-78, 98-99, 119-120, 143-144, 169-
`
`170, and 190-191 that Moderna proposes redacting is confidential and sensitive information that
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-00252-MSG Document 316-1 Filed 05/13/24 Page 5 of 7 PagelD #: 17924
`
`Moderna does not disclose publicly, which it wishes to remain confidential. There is significant
`
`competition between established vaccine suppliers,
`
`including suppliers with mRNA-based
`
`vaccines. Additionally,
`
`there are companies considering entering the vaccine market and
`
`companies developing mRNA-based vaccines and therapeutics for other diseases or developing
`
`LNPs for mRNA-based products. Because there are so few competitors in these markets, the
`
`markets are highly competitive, and any information about one ofthe competitors, even seemingly
`
`minor information, may prove competitively advantageous. Moderna has spent significant
`
`resources to develop its formulation and manufacturing methods, and the release of such
`
`information to the public, including Moderna’s competitors, would significantly harm Moderna.
`
`8.
`
`With respect to Moderna’s formulation, Modernaconsidersits precise formulation,
`
`including the quantities of ingredients, a trade secret, which is not public knowledge.
`
`9.
`
`With respect
`
`to Moderna’s proprietary manufacturing process for SpikeVax,
`
`Moderna considers its process-as-a-whole a trade secret, including the steps in the process, the
`
`records of each step, and the parameters or specification for each step (such as timing, sequence,
`
`amount and kind of raw materials, temperatures, measurements, equipment used, etc.), Moderna
`
`has notpublicly disclosed its proprietary manufacturing process.
`
`10.
`
`Based on my personal knowledge and experience in the pharmaceutical business,I
`
`believe that disclosure of this information would significantly harm Moderna by revealing
`
`confidential data to its direct competitors and the public generally. If the confidential information
`
`were made public, Moderna’s competitors would be able to potentially replicate Moderna’s
`
`products, features within Moderna’s products, and methods of making Moderna’s products, or
`
`make decisions about where, when, and how to offer directly competitive goods with full
`
`knowledge of Moderna’s technology. Moderna’s competitors would gain a significant advantage
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-00252-MSG Document 316-1 Filed 05/13/24 Page 6 of 7 PagelD #: 17925
`
`in creating their own business strategies, which would put Modernaat a significant competitive
`
`disadvantage, causing it real and serious harm. Moderna’s competitors may also seek patent claims
`
`to cover Moderna’s technology.
`
`T declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the
`
`foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
`
`Executed on this May 8, 2024
`
`Res
`
`lly
`
`itted,
`
`Don Parsons
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-00252-MSG Document 316-1 Filed 05/13/24 Page 7 of 7 PagelD #: 17926
`
`