throbber
Case 1:22-cv-00252-MSG Document 299 Filed 05/01/24 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 16847
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`ARBUTUS BIOPHARMA CORPORATION
`and GENEVANT SCIENCES GMBH,
`
`
`
`
`
`MODERNA, INC. and MODERNATX, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 22-252 (MSG)
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`STIPULATION CONCERNING
`PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT
`
`WHEREAS, on April 17, 2024, Plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to amend the Complaint
`
`(D.I. 277);
`
`WHEREAS, pursuant to the stipulation between the parties, Defendants Moderna, Inc. and
`
`ModernaTX, Inc. (“Moderna”) have not yet responded to the motion to amend (D.I. 289 & 292);
`
`WHEREAS, the parties have continued to meet and confer on the motion in an effort to
`
`avoid burdening the Court with further briefing on the issue and have subsequently reached an
`
`agreement;
`
`NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and agree, subject to the approval of the
`
`court that:
`
`1.
`
`Although Moderna disagrees with the characterizations of the discovery record in
`
`Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend the complaint (D.I. 278), Moderna will not oppose the motion
`
`for leave based on the terms in this stipulation, but reserves all rights to answer, move to dismiss,
`
`or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ amended complaint if entered by the Court.
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00252-MSG Document 299 Filed 05/01/24 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 16848
`
`
`
`2.
`
`Based on presently known information, Plaintiffs will not seek to extend any
`
`current deadline in the scheduling order based on its amended complaint, including its new 271(f)
`
`claim.
`
`3.
`
`Plaintiffs will supplement their infringement contentions to address their new
`
`271(f) claim by May 6, 2024.
`
`4.
`
`The depositions of Moderna’s 30(b)(1) and 30(b)(6) witnesses will not be
`
`rescheduled or deferred as a result of Plaintiffs’ amended complaint asserting a new 271(f) claim.
`
`5.
`
`Based on Moderna’s current understanding, any follow-up discovery for additional
`
`batches potentially implicated by Plaintiffs’ new 271(f) claim will be of a similar nature to
`
`discovery Plaintiffs already have (additional rows in a spreadsheet, additional COAs,
`
`specifications, financial information, etc.). In addition, Moderna is investigating its ability to
`
`produce other discovery requested by Plaintiffs, including information sufficient to show for each
`
`batch of the specific components identified in Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint (Exhibit N to D.I.
`
`278) at ¶¶ 56–58, 77-78, 98-99, 119-120, 143-144, 169-170, 190-191 used in batches of the
`
`Accused Product, the exportation dates and shipping destination, as well as information enabling
`
`Plaintiffs to identify the number of doses sold that included such exported components, the price
`
`per dose, and revenue and profit associated with such dose(s).1 Moderna will aim to produce such
`
`follow-up discovery, including discovery specifically referenced in this paragraph, and any
`
`supplemental interrogatory responses (as supplementation of responses may be required under
`
`
`1 Moderna is still investigating the availability of this requested discovery. The parties agree to
`work in good faith to resolve any disputes concerning the information Moderna subsequently
`produces, and reserve the right to raise any disputes with respect to this requested discovery or the
`implication (including the preclusive effect, if any) of not producing this information (including
`because this information is not maintained in the ordinary course of business).
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00252-MSG Document 299 Filed 05/01/24 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 16849
`
`
`
`Rule 26(e)) or other document production relating to Plaintiffs’ 271(f) claim, by May 10, 2024 and
`
`will complete such productions by close of fact discovery.
`
`6.
`
`For any new mRNA-LNP part numbers placed at issue based on Plaintiffs’ 271(f)
`
`claim, the parties will treat the selection and production of samples for such part numbers in
`
`accordance with paragraphs 1–2 of Exhibit A of the parties’ February 26, 2024 stipulation (D.I.
`
`225). Based on Moderna’s representation that the genealogy (MRNA-GEN-01424942, MRNA-
`
`GEN-01711164) it has produced contains all of the part numbers that use components
`
`manufactured in the United States, Plaintiffs will inform Moderna what additional part numbers
`
`Plaintiffs seek samples of based on the genealogy information Moderna has produced to date.
`
`Because Plaintiffs’ new 271(f) claim implicates overseas drug product, if there are logistical issues
`
`with collecting and producing such samples within the time periods in the stipulation, the parties
`
`will work together in good faith on an appropriate schedule for production and any other schedule.
`
`7.
`
`Based on the discovery Plaintiffs have received to date and Moderna’s
`
`representations, Plaintiffs do not presently intend to take any additional depositions of Moderna’s
`
`witnesses or serve new written discovery requests related to Plaintiffs’ new 271(f) claim (although
`
`supplementation of existing responses may be required under Rule 26(e)). Because Plaintiffs have
`
`not yet seen the information Moderna intends to produce and do not know the precise timing,
`
`however, this stipulation does not preclude the taking of additional discovery or deposition
`
`testimony where there is a good-faith basis for doing so in light of the information Moderna
`
`produces and/or the timing of that production. The parties agree to work together in good faith to
`
`address any such additional discovery based on the information Moderna produces and will present
`
`any disputes to the Court about the scope of discovery at that time.
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00252-MSG Document 299 Filed 05/01/24 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 16850
`
`8.
`
`Upon approval of this Stipulation by the Court, and as set forth in the Stipulation
`
`and Order to Extend Time (D.I. 291), Plaintiffs have leave to file the Amended Complaint
`
`(attached as Exhibit N to their Motion for Leave to Amend, D.I. 278) under seal, and Moderna
`
`shall file any motion to seal within three (3) business days from the date it is docketed. If no motion
`
`to seal is required, Moderna shall notify the Court that the Amended Complaint can be unsealed.
`
`SHAW KELLER LLP
`
`/s/ Karen E. Keller
`
`John W. Shaw (#3362)
`Karen E. Keller (#4489)
`Nathan R. Hoeschen (#6232)
`Emily S. DiBenedetto (#6779)
`I.M. Pei Building
`1105 North Market Street, 12th Floor
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`(302) 298-0700
`jshaw@shawkeller.com
`kkeller@shawkeller.com
`nhoeschen@shawkeller.com
`edibenedetto@shawkeller.com
`
`Attorney for Plaintiffs
`
`April 29, 2024
`
`MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP
`
`/s/ Travis J. Murray
`
`Jack B. Blumenfeld (#1014)
`Brian P. Egan (#6227)
`Travis J. Murray (#6882)
`1201 North Market Street
`P.O. Box 1347
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`(302) 658-9200
`jblumenfeld@morrisnichols.com
`began@morrisnichols.com
`tmurray@morrisnichols.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants
`
`1st
`May
`SO ORDERED this ______ day of ___________________, 2024.
`
`/s/ Mitchell S. Goldberg
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket