throbber
Case 1:22-cv-00252-MSG Document 28-2 Filed 08/01/22 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 700
`
`Exhibit B
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00252-MSG Document 28-2 Filed 08/01/22 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 701
`
`From:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`Date:
`
`McLennan, Mark C.
`Mahaffy, Shaun
`Hurst, James F.; Carson, Patricia A.; Berl, David; Fletcher, Thomas; Harber, Adam; Daralyn Durie ; Eric Wiener;
`Kira A. Davis; Wacker, Jeanna; Blumenfeld, Jack; Egan, Brian P.; #KEModernaSpikevaxService; Genevant Team;
`John Shaw; Karen Keller
`RE: Arbutus v. Moderna
`Monday, August 1, 2022 8:59:22 AM
`
`Shaun,

`Thank you for your email below and for providing “Plaintiffs' Initial Identification of Asserted Patents,
`Accused Products, and Damages Model.” As you are undoubtedly aware,  Plaintiffs cannot
`unilaterally circumvent the Default Standard for Discovery by serving those. Moderna will make its
`disclosures according to any schedule entered by the Court.  Further, nothing in the Default
`Standard or in Judge Goldberg’s Policies and Procedures requires Moderna to produce documents
`by August 16.

`We also see no need for a Rule 26(f) conference while Moderna’s motion is pending and before the
`Court has ordered a Rule 16 conference.

`Best regards,
`Mark

`Mark C. McLennan
`-----------------------------------------------------
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`601 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY 10022
`T +1 212 909 3451
`-----------------------------------------------------
`mark.mclennan@kirkland.com

`From: Mahaffy, Shaun <SMahaffy@wc.com> 
`Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2022 9:32 AM
`To: McLennan, Mark C. <mark.mclennan@kirkland.com>
`Cc: Hurst, James F. <james.hurst@kirkland.com>; Carson, Patricia A.
`<patricia.carson@kirkland.com>; Berl, David <DBerl@wc.com>; Fletcher, Thomas
`<TFletcher@wc.com>; Harber, Adam <AHarber@wc.com>; Daralyn Durie
`<DDurie@durietangri.com>; Eric Wiener <EWiener@durietangri.com>; Kira A. Davis
`<kdavis@durietangri.com>; Wacker, Jeanna <jeanna.wacker@kirkland.com>; Blumenfeld, Jack
`<JBlumenfeld@morrisnichols.com>; Egan, Brian P. <began@morrisnichols.com>;
`#KEModernaSpikevaxService <KEModernaSpikevaxService@kirkland.com>; Genevant Team
`<GenevantTeam@wc.com>; John Shaw <jshaw@shawkeller.com>; Karen Keller
`<kkeller@shawkeller.com>
`Subject: RE: Arbutus v. Moderna

`Mark,

`We disagree that it is appropriate for Moderna to refuse to begin the process of discussing a
`schedule.  We therefore request again that Moderna join us in the Rule 26(f) discovery planning
`
`Mark, We disagree that it is appropriate for Moderna to refuse to begin the process of discussing a schedule. We therefore request again that Moderna join us in the Rule 26(f) discovery planning conference so that the parties may begin preparing
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00252-MSG Document 28-2 Filed 08/01/22 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 702
`
`conference so that the parties may begin preparing the Rule 26(f) report.  Please let us know your
`availability this week for a Rule 26(f) conference.

`Thanks,
`Shaun

`Shaun P. Mahaffy
`Associate | Williams & Connolly LLP
`680 Maine Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20024
`202-434-5554 | smahaffy@wc.com

`From: McLennan, Mark C. <mark.mclennan@kirkland.com> 
`Sent: Monday, July 25, 2022 8:36 PM
`To: Mahaffy, Shaun <SMahaffy@wc.com>
`Cc: Hurst, James F. <james.hurst@kirkland.com>; Carson, Patricia A.
`<patricia.carson@kirkland.com>; Berl, David <DBerl@wc.com>; Fletcher, Thomas
`<TFletcher@wc.com>; Harber, Adam <AHarber@wc.com>; Daralyn Durie
`<DDurie@durietangri.com>; Eric Wiener <EWiener@durietangri.com>; Kira A. Davis
`<kdavis@durietangri.com>; Wacker, Jeanna <jeanna.wacker@kirkland.com>; Blumenfeld, Jack
`<JBlumenfeld@morrisnichols.com>; Egan, Brian P. <began@morrisnichols.com>;
`#KEModernaSpikevaxService <KEModernaSpikevaxService@kirkland.com>
`Subject: RE: Arbutus v. Moderna

`Counsel,

`We’re in receipt of your email below attaching a draft scheduling order.

`As you know, Moderna’s partial motion to dismiss remains pending before the Court. The parties’
`briefing on Moderna’s motion specifically addressed the extent to which the scope of the case,
`including discovery, would be narrowed should the motion be granted. Accordingly, Moderna does
`not agree to submit a proposed schedule at this early stage while the motion is pending.

`To the extent a schedule is submitted, it should be submitted in accordance with the Rule 16
`conference deadlines when those are set by the Court.

`For future correspondence, please be sure to copy Jack Blumenfeld, Brian Egan, and
`KEModernaSpikevaxService@kirkland.com.   

`Regards,
`Mark

`Mark C. McLennan
`-----------------------------------------------------
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`601 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY 10022
`T +1 212 909 3451
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00252-MSG Document 28-2 Filed 08/01/22 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 703
`
`Counsel, In view of paragraphs 2 and 4 of Judge Goldberg’s Policies and Procedures guidelines regarding civil matters, Plaintiffs intend to move forward with discovery in the above case. Accordingly, please find attached a draft Scheduling

`
`-----------------------------------------------------
`mark.mclennan@kirkland.com
`

`From: Mahaffy, Shaun <SMahaffy@wc.com> 
`Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2022 3:19 PM
`To: Wacker, Jeanna <jeanna.wacker@kirkland.com>
`Cc: Hurst, James F. <james.hurst@kirkland.com>; Carson, Patricia A.
`<patricia.carson@kirkland.com>; McLennan, Mark C. <mark.mclennan@kirkland.com>; Berl, David
`<DBerl@wc.com>; Fletcher, Thomas <TFletcher@wc.com>; Harber, Adam <AHarber@wc.com>;
`Daralyn Durie <DDurie@durietangri.com>; Eric Wiener <EWiener@durietangri.com>; Kira A. Davis
`<kdavis@durietangri.com>
`Subject: Arbutus v. Moderna

`Counsel,

`In view of paragraphs 2 and 4 of Judge Goldberg’s Policies and Procedures guidelines regarding civil
`matters, Plaintiffs intend to move forward with discovery in the above case.  Accordingly, please find
`attached a draft Scheduling Order.  Please let us know by July 27 whether Defendants have any
`proposed edits or would like to discuss.
`Thanks,
`Shaun

`Shaun P. Mahaffy
`Associate | Williams & Connolly LLP
`680 Maine Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20024
`202-434-5554 | smahaffy@wc.com


`
`This message and any attachments are intended only for the addressee and may contain information that is
`privileged and confidential. If you have received this message in error, please do not read, use, copy, distribute, or
`disclose the contents of the message and any attachments. Instead, please delete the message and any attachments
`and notify the sender immediately. Thank you.
`
`The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside
`information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis
`International LLP. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and
`may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return email or by email
`to postmaster@kirkland.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments.

`
`The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside
`information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis
`International LLP. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and
`may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return email or by email
`to postmaster@kirkland.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket