`Case 1:22-cv-00252-MSG Document 211-1 Filed 02/02/24 Page 1 of 6 PagelD #: 14402
`
`EXHIBIT 1
`EXHIBIT1
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-00252-MSG Document 211-1 Filed 02/02/24 Page 2 of 6 PageID #: 14403
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 22-252 (MSG)
`
`
`
`
`
`ARBUTUS BIOPHARMA CORPORATION
`and GENEVANT SCIENCES GmbH,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`MODERNA, INC. and MODERNATX, INC.
`
`Defendants.
`
`MODERNA, INC. and MODERNATX, INC.,
`
`Counterclaim-Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`ARBUTUS BIOPHARMA CORPORATION
`and GENEVANT SCIENCES GmbH,
`
`Counterclaim-Defendants.
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF PETER WOJCIECHOWSKI
`IN SUPPORT OF THE PARTIES’ JOINT MOTION TO SEAL
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-00252-MSG Document 211-1 Filed 02/02/24 Page 3 of 6 PageID #: 14404
`
`
`
`I, Peter Wojciechowski, hereby declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am CMC Knowledge Management Lead at ModernaTX, Inc. (hereinafter,
`
`“Moderna”). In this role, I am familiar with Moderna’s technical research and development
`
`information. I am familiar with the fact that Moderna maintains this information as confidential,1
`
`and I am familiar with the extensive efforts Moderna takes to protect its confidential information.
`
`I have personal knowledge of the facts stated in this declaration or have become aware of such
`
`facts through my role at Moderna. If called upon to testify, I could and would competently testify
`
`thereto.
`
`2.
`
`I write this declaration in support of Moderna’s request to avoid disclosure of
`
`sensitive and confidential information on the public record. I discuss below how and why
`
`Moderna keeps certain technical information confidential, and the serious harm that would result
`
`to Moderna from disclosure of this information to Moderna’s competitors.
`
`3.
`
`I understand this case relates to Moderna’s COVID-19 Vaccine, known as
`
`mRNA-1273 or “SpikeVax.” SpikeVax is comprised of messenger RNA (mRNA) which is
`
`encased in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs). Moderna’s proprietary LNP is comprised of four lipid
`
`components including SM-102, cholesterol, phospholipid, and PEGDMG-2000.
`
`4.
`
`I have been provided and have reviewed the information that Moderna proposes
`
`to redact from supporting documents submitted with Moderna’s Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion
`
`to Compel (D.I. 196) (“Moderna’s Opposition”). Specifically, Exhibits C and G contain Moderna
`
`
`1 I understand that the Protective Order in this case (D.I. 91) includes two categories of
`Protected Material: “Confidential” and “Highly Confidential – Outside Counsel’s Eyes
`Only.” I understand that Exhibits C and G to Moderna’s Opposition include both categories
`of Protected Material. For the purposes of this declaration, I have used the term
`“confidential” to cover both categories, neither of which should be disclosed to the public for
`the reasons explained herein.
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-00252-MSG Document 211-1 Filed 02/02/24 Page 4 of 6 PageID #: 14405
`
`
`
`confidential information. These documents reflect Moderna confidential technical and business
`
`information regarding Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine.
`
`5.
`
`It is critical to Moderna that the Court maintain under seal Moderna’s confidential
`
`information. Moderna has always taken extensive measures to maintain the confidentiality of its
`
`technical information, including by implementing procedures that restrict access to sensitive
`
`information even within Moderna. Employees have confidentiality obligations as part of their
`
`employment and are provided guidance regarding how to treat sensitive information.
`
`Specifically, confidential Moderna information is not to be disclosed outside of Moderna except
`
`under confidentiality agreement and when necessary. Documents containing such information
`
`may be marked as confidential or otherwise indicate they contain restricted or sensitive
`
`information. Internal to Moderna, employee access to commercially sensitive and trade secret
`
`information is often restricted on a need-to-know basis, as determined by a person’s group or
`
`role on a project. Moderna has been extremely concerned about the protection of its confidential
`
`information during this litigation and has been very careful to always protect this information.
`
`6.
`
`Moderna’s proposed redactions seek to seal portions of Exhibits C and G to
`
`Moderna’s Opposition which refer to, quote, summarize, or otherwise disclose Moderna’s
`
`sensitive and confidential technical information. Specifically, the information on the following
`
`pages of the Exhibits disclose specific information concerning the composition of Moderna’s
`
`COVID-19 Vaccine and Moderna’s proprietary and trade secret manufacturing methods for its
`
`COVID-19 Vaccine including steps in the manufacturing process and parameters for those steps:
`
`• Exhibit C at page 2, line 37;
`
`• Exhibit G at page 3, lines 11, 18-19; page 4, lines 1-2.
`
`7.
`
`The information within Exhibits C and G that Moderna proposes redacting is
`
`confidential and sensitive information that Moderna does not disclose publicly, which it wishes
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-00252-MSG Document 211-1 Filed 02/02/24 Page 5 of 6 PageID #: 14406
`
`
`
`to remain confidential. There is significant competition between established vaccine suppliers,
`
`including suppliers with mRNA-based vaccines. Additionally, there are companies considering
`
`entering the vaccine market and companies developing mRNA-based vaccines and therapeutics
`
`for other diseases or developing LNPs for mRNA-based products. Because there are so few
`
`competitors in these markets, the markets are highly competitive, and any information about one
`
`of the competitors, even seemingly minor information, may prove competitively advantageous.
`
`Moderna has spent significant resources to develop its formulation and manufacturing methods,
`
`and the release of such information to the public, including Moderna’s competitors, would
`
`significantly harm Moderna.
`
`8.
`
`With respect
`
`to Moderna’s formulation, Moderna considers
`
`its precise
`
`formulation, including the quantities of ingredients, a trade secret, which is not public
`
`knowledge.
`
`9.
`
`With respect to Moderna’s proprietary manufacturing process for SpikeVax,
`
`Moderna considers its process-as-a-whole a trade secret, including the steps in the process, the
`
`records of each step, and the parameters or specification for each step (such as timing, sequence,
`
`amount and kind of raw materials, temperatures, measurements, equipment used etc.). Moderna
`
`has not publicly disclosed its proprietary manufacturing process.
`
`10.
`
`Exhibits C and G disclose many of these details, which are referenced in portions
`
`of Moderna’s Opposition that Moderna proposes to redact.
`
`11.
`
`Based on my personal knowledge and experience in the pharmaceutical business,
`
`I believe that disclosure of this information would significantly harm Moderna by revealing
`
`confidential data to its direct competitors and the public generally. If the confidential information
`
`were made public, Moderna’s competitors would be able to potentially replicate Moderna’s
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 1:22-cv-00252-MSG Document 211-1 Filed 02/02/24 Page 6 of 6 PageID #: 14407
`
`
`
`products, features within Moderna’s products, and methods of making Moderna’s products, or
`
`make decisions about where, when, and how to offer directly competitive goods with full
`
`knowledge of Moderna’s technology. Moderna’s competitors would gain a significant advantage
`
`in creating their own business strategies, which would put Moderna at a significant competitive
`
`disadvantage, causing it real and serious harm. Moderna’s competitors may also seek patent
`
`claims to cover Moderna’s technology.
`
` I
`
` declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the
`
`
`
`foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
`
`Executed on this January 24, 2024
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Peter Wojciechowski
`Peter Wojciechowski
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`