throbber
Case 1:22-cv-00252-MSG Document 193-8 Filed 01/16/24 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 12612
`Case 1:22-cv-00252-MSG Document 193-8 Filed 01/16/24 Page 1 of 3 PagelD #: 12612
`
`EXHIBIT 8
`EXHIBIT 8
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00252-MSG Document 193-8 Filed 01/16/24 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 12613
`
`Sheh, Anthony
`Dean, Caitlin; Genevant Team; Arbutus MoFo
`#KEModernaSpikevaxService; Blumenfeld, Jack; Egan, Brian P.; Murray, Travis; "kkeller@shawkeller.com";
`"nhoeschen@shawkeller.com"; *jshaw@shawkeller.com
`RE: Arbutus v. Moderna, 1-22-cv 00252 - Moderna"s RFP No. 106
`Thursday, November 30, 2023 6:28:45 PM
`
`From:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`Date:
`
`Caitlin,
`
`We’ve repeatedly explained the challenge and burden on our end regarding INDs due to the lack of a
`centralized database of regulatory submissions. The burden of conducting a search among loose
`files is both undue and disproportionate relative to the minimal relevance that Moderna has
`identified to date.
`
`Nevertheless, Plaintiffs will agree to conduct a reasonable and proportionate search for IND
`documents that you requested in your November 29, 2023 email within the scope of the asserted
`patents—as we have flagged before, we can make no guarantees that we will be able to locate a
`complete set of responsive documents, the draft or final status of the documents, whether they
`were ever submitted to FDA, etc. We are unsure of exactly when we will be able make a production,
`but will work diligently to provide what we can responsive to Moderna’s request.
`
`We understand that it remains Moderna’s position that it refuses to search for its own INDs within
`the scope of the asserted patents responsive to Plaintiffs’ RFPs 164–167 despite (1) those
`documents being readily available in a regulatory document database, (2) Moderna’s repeated
`insistence that Plaintiffs produce equivalent documents, and (3) Plaintiffs’ previously expressed
`willingness to narrow these RFPs to remove Module 5. Plaintiffs intend to seek the Court’s
`assistance to obtain these highly relevant documents.
`
`Best,
`Tony
`
`Anthony Sheh | Associate | Williams & Connolly LLP | (202) 434-5436 | vcard
`
`From: Dean, Caitlin <caitlin.dean@kirkland.com>
`Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2023 5:27 PM
`To: Sheh, Anthony <ASheh@wc.com>; Genevant Team <GenevantTeam@wc.com>; Arbutus_MoFo
`<Arbutus_MoFo@mofo.com>
`Cc: #KEModernaSpikevaxService <KEModernaSpikevaxService@kirkland.com>; Blumenfeld, Jack
`<JBlumenfeld@morrisnichols.com>; Egan, Brian P. <began@morrisnichols.com>; Murray, Travis
`<tmurray@morrisnichols.com>; 'kkeller@shawkeller.com' <kkeller@shawkeller.com>;
`'nhoeschen@shawkeller.com' <nhoeschen@shawkeller.com>; *jshaw@shawkeller.com
`<jshaw@shawkeller.com>
`Subject: Arbutus v. Moderna, 1-22-cv 00252 - Moderna's RFP No. 106
`
`Counsel,
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00252-MSG Document 193-8 Filed 01/16/24 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 12614
`
`Pursuant to your offer to compromise on yesterday’s meet-and-confer regarding Moderna’s RFP No.
`106, will Plaintiffs agree to produce INDs sponsored by Plaintiffs or their predecessors for products
`within the scope of the Patents-in-Suit excluding Module 5? As you know, Moderna agreed to
`produce FDA filings for the Accused Product, including correspondence and all Modules except
`Module 5. Please let us know or confirm that the parties are at an impasse by Friday, December 1,
`2023.
`
`Best,
`Caitlin
`
`Caitlin Dean
`-----------------------------------------------------
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`601 Lexington Ave, New York, NY 10022
`T +1 212 909 3099 M +1 929 262 2212
`F +1 212 446 4900
`-----------------------------------------------------
`caitlin.dean@kirkland.com
`
`The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside
`information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis
`International LLP. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and
`may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return email or by email
`to postmaster@kirkland.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket