throbber
Case 1:21-cv-01823-GBW Document 36 Filed 07/01/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 921
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`
`TIMES FIBER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`PPC BROADBAND, INC.,
`
` Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 21-1823-VAC-MPT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`STIPULATION TO STAY LITIGATION
`
`WHEREAS, Defendant PPC Broadband, Inc. (“Defendant”) filed petitions for inter partes
`
`review (“IPR”) of all asserted claims of the patents-in-suit in this litigation, the last of which was
`
`filed June 24, 2022;
`
`WHEREAS, the Patent Trial & Appeal Board (“PTAB”) has not yet decided whether to
`
`institute the IPR petitions;
`
`WHEREAS, Defendant has asked Plaintiff Times Fiber Communications, Inc. (“Plaintiff”)
`
`to stipulate to staying this litigation at least pending the PTAB’s institution decisions;
`
`WHEREAS, beginning on June 14, 2022, the parties met and conferred on the issue;
`
`WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that, due to judicial economy, they will file this joint
`
`stipulation seeking to stay the litigation pending at least the PTAB’s institution decisions; and
`
`WHEREAS, the parties have further agreed that if all of the IPR petitions are instituted by
`
`the PTAB, the stay should continue until the PTAB has issued a final written decision on each
`
`IPR, and that if not all of the IPR petitions are instituted Plaintiff may request that the Court lift
`
`the stay.
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-01823-GBW Document 36 Filed 07/01/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 922
`
`
`
`THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE, subject to the approval of the
`
`Court, that:
`
`1) the litigation is stayed pending at least a decision by the PTAB on institution of the IPR
`
`petitions;
`
`2) if any of the IPR petitions are not instituted by the PTAB, the parties shall file a joint
`
`status report within seven (7) calendar days setting forth their joint or competing proposal(s) for
`
`resuming this litigation; and
`
`3) if the stay continues past the institution decisions by the PTAB, and if any asserted
`
`claims survive the final written decisions issued by the PTAB in the IPRs, the parties shall file a
`
`joint status report within seven (7) calendar days setting forth their joint or competing proposal(s)
`
`for resuming this litigation.
`
`
`
`YOUNG CONAWAY STARGATT &
`TAYLOR, LLP
`
` /s/ Pilar G. Kraman
`Pilar G. Kraman (No. 5199)
`Robert M. Vrana (No. 5666)
`Rodney Square
`1000 North King Street
`Wilmington, Delaware 19801
`(302) 571-6600
`pkraman@ycst.com
`rvrana@ycst.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`
`Dated: July 1, 2022
`
` MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT &
`TUNNELL LLP
`
` /s/ Rodger D. Smith II
`Rodger D. Smith II (No. 3778)
`1201 North Market Street
`P.O. Box 1347
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`(302) 658-9200
`rsmith@morrisnichols.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`
`
`
`
`SO ORDERED this ___ day of __________, 2022.
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`___________________________________
` J.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket