throbber
Case 1:21-cv-01445-JPM Document 79-2 Filed 11/10/22 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1849
`Case 1:21-cv-01445-JPM Document 79-2 Filed 11/10/22 Page 1 of 5 PagelD #: 1849
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT
`EXHIBIT
`A
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-01445-JPM Document 79-2 Filed 11/10/22 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 1850
`
`1
`
`· · · 1· · · · · · UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`· · · 2· · · · · · FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`· · · 3· ·--------------------------X
`
`· · · 4· ·GLOBUS MEDICAL, INC.· · ·:
`
`· · · 5· · · · · · · · · Plaintiff,:· ·Case No.
`
`· · · 6· · · · v.· · · · · · · · · :· ·21-1445 (JPM)
`
`· · · 7· ·LIFE SPINE, INC.· · · · · :
`
`· · · 8· · · · · · · · · Defendant.:
`
`· · · 9· ·--------------------------X
`
`· · ·10
`
`· · ·11· · REMOTE VIDEOTAPED STENOGRAPHIC DEPOSITION OF
`
`· · ·12· · · · · · · · CHRISTOPHER MCDONNELL
`
`· · ·13· · · · · · · Friday, October 14, 2022
`
`· · ·14· · · · · · · ·12:07 p.m. Eastern Time
`
`· · ·15
`
`· · ·16
`
`· · ·17
`
`· · ·18· ·Job No.:· 867406
`
`· · ·19· ·Pages:· 1 - 61
`
`· · ·20· ·STENOGRAPHICALLY REPORTED BY:
`
`· · ·21· ·GISELLE MITCHELL-MARGERUM, RPR, CRI, CCR, LCR, CSR,
`
`· · ·22· ·CALIFORNIA CSR 14424
`
`· · ·23
`
`· · ·24
`
`· · ·25
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-01445-JPM Document 79-2 Filed 11/10/22 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 1851
`
`43
`
`·1· · · · Q.· ·Is there anything else you want to
`
`·2· ·tell the Court about the construction of the
`
`·3· ·term, "elongate fin," beyond what's set forth
`
`·4· ·in your written report?
`
`·5· · · · A.· ·As mentioned previously, my -- my
`
`·6· ·opinion in this report is based on information
`
`·7· ·evaluated at the time the report was prepared.
`
`·8· ·I have not reviewed any additional information
`
`·9· ·to amend or modify my current opinion.
`
`10· · · · Q.· ·You do not opine in your report that
`
`11· ·the phrase, "elongate fin" was a technical
`
`12· ·term of art that had a particular meaning
`
`13· ·known to a person of skill at the time of this
`
`14· ·patent.
`
`15· · · · · · · · · Is that correct?
`
`16· · · · A.· ·Can you rephrase the question,
`
`17· ·please?
`
`18· · · · Q.· ·You do not opine in your written
`
`19· ·report that the term, "elongate fin," was a
`
`20· ·technical term of art with an established
`
`21· ·meaning, known to a person of art at the time
`
`22· ·of this patent.· Correct?
`
`23· · · · A.· ·My opinion for the term "elongate
`
`24· ·fin," is as it is used in the particular
`
`25· ·patent.· As it was used in the '128 Patent.
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-01445-JPM Document 79-2 Filed 11/10/22 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 1852
`
`44
`
`·1· · · · Q.· ·Your opinion about the meaning of
`
`·2· ·the term, "elongate fin," is based solely on
`
`·3· ·your reading of the text of the patent,
`
`·4· ·including the claims in the specification.
`
`·5· ·Correct?
`
`·6· · · · A.· ·My opinion on the meaning of the
`
`·7· ·term "elongate fin," was based on the reading
`
`·8· ·of the patent claims, as well as the
`
`·9· ·specification.
`
`10· · · · Q.· ·Anything else that your opinion's
`
`11· ·based on, beyond just the text of the patent?
`
`12· · · · A.· ·Nothing to add.
`
`13· · · · Q.· ·Your report next discusses the term
`
`14· ·"anchor backout prevention mechanism."· Do you
`
`15· ·see that?
`
`16· · · · A.· ·Yes.
`
`17· · · · Q.· ·And under the heading, "Life
`
`18· ·Spine -- Life Spine's Construction," your
`
`19· ·report states, "Governed by Section 112f."
`
`20· · · · · · · · · What does that mean?
`
`21· · · · A.· ·I don't know the specifics, or
`
`22· ·recall the specifics of that section of the
`
`23· ·statute.
`
`24· · · · Q.· ·Do you have any opinion about
`
`25· ·whether the term, "anchor backout prevention
`
`

`

`Case 1:21-cv-01445-JPM Document 79-2 Filed 11/10/22 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 1853
`
`59
`
`·1· · · · · · · · REPORTER'S· CERTIFICATE
`
`·2
`
`·3· · · · I, GISELLE MITCHELL-MARGERUM, the undersigned,
`· · ·a Registered Professional Reporter, Certified
`·4· ·Reporting Instructor, Licensed Court Reporter, and
`· · ·Certified Court Reporter, do hereby certify:
`·5
`· · · · · That the witness, CHRISTOPHER MCDONNELL,
`·6· ·before examination was remotely duly sworn to
`· · ·testify to the truth, the whole truth, and nothing
`·7· ·but the truth.
`
`·8· · · · That the foregoing deposition was taken
`· · ·remotely stenographically by me on Friday, October
`·9· ·14, 2022, and thereafter was transcribed by me, and
`· · ·that the deposition is a full, true, and complete
`10· ·transcript of the testimony, including questions
`· · ·and answers, and objections, motions and exceptions
`11· ·made by counsel.
`
`12· · · · That reading and signing was requested; and
`· · ·that I am neither attorney nor counsel for, nor
`13· ·related to or employed by, any of the parties to
`· · ·the action in which this deposition was taken; and
`14· ·that I have no interest, financial or otherwise, in
`· · ·this case.
`15
`
`16· · · · · · ·IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set
`· · ·my hand this 21st day of October· 2022
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21· ·GISELLE MITCHELL-MARGERUM, RPR, CRI, CCR, LCR, CSR
`
`22· ·CALIFORNIA CSR 14424
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket