`
` IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`GUARDANT HEALTH, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`FOUNDATION MEDICINE, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`C.A. No. 20-cv-1580-LPS
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`DECLARATION OF DANIEL SIMON
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 11 Filed 12/10/20 Page 2 of 18 PageID #: 2189
`
`1.
`
`I, Daniel Simon, have personal knowledge of the following facts or believe them
`
`to be true based on information provided to me by others and a reasonable investigation. I would
`
`testify that the facts in this declaration are true and correct, to the best of my knowledge, if given
`
`the opportunity to do so.
`
`2.
`
`This declaration includes facts known to me at the time I signed this declaration.
`
`I reserve the right to supplement or amend this declaration in the future, including through
`
`testimony in deposition or at trial.
`
`I.
`
`Background
`
`3.
`
`I am the Senior Vice President of Biopharmaceutical Business Development at
`
`Guardant Health, Inc. (“Guardant”). I have been with Guardant since January 2015 (consulting
`
`at first, full time since June 2015) and have been responsible for biopharma business
`
`development since I joined Guardant.
`
`4.
`
`Guardant is a precision oncology company entirely focused on helping conquer
`
`cancer through use of proprietary blood-based tests, large data sets and advanced analytics. For
`
`example, Guardant’s Guardant360® blood-based test is the first FDA-approved liquid biopsy
`
`for comprehensive tumor mutation profiling across all solid cancers.
`
`5.
`
`Guardant invests heavily in research in development. Since 2015, Guardant has
`
`spent more than $280 million on research and development, primarily focused on its blood-based
`
`liquid biopsy products.
`
`6.
`
`My responsibilities for biopharma business development require that I be
`
`knowledgeable about marketing and sales of the solutions that Guardant offers its customers. I
`
`am familiar with industry trends for liquid biopsy products for tumor genetic profiling, including
`
`demand for Guardant’s solutions, Guardant’s competitors, and purchasing customs and habits in
`
`the industry.
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 11 Filed 12/10/20 Page 3 of 18 PageID #: 2190
`
`7.
`
`I am aware that Guardant owns the rights to U.S. Patent No. 10,704,085 and U.S.
`
`Patent No. 10,704,086.
`
`8.
`
`Guardant relies on intellectual property to protect its investments in developing
`
`technology. Protection of our intellectual property is fundamental to the long-term success of
`
`our business.
`
`9.
`
`I earned an MA degree with First Class Honors in Biological Natural Sciences
`
`from Cambridge University in 2000.
`
`10.
`
`I earned an MBA degree with a major in health care from the Wharton School of
`
`the University of Pennsylvania in 2006.
`
`11.
`
`Before joining Guardant I held positions at McKinsey & Company and Onyx
`
`Pharmaceuticals and worked as a consultant for MyoKardia.
`
`II.
`
`Comprehensive Genetic Profiling For Oncology
`
`12.
`
`Traditional oncology categorizes cancer by the organ in which it is first located,
`
`and treats it independently of its genomic profile.
`
`13.
`
`In contrast, the goal of precision oncology is to match cancer patients with
`
`personalized, targeted therapies based on the genomic profiles of their tumors. Such therapies
`
`can provide better outcomes, and fewer side effects, than broad-based chemotherapy, but an
`
`individual’s response often depends on the genomic profile of their tumor.
`
`14.
`
`Precision oncology is an increasingly important approach to cancer treatment.
`
`Many important types of cancer, including lung, breast, colorectal and melanoma, for example,
`
`are often classified and treated on the basis of their genomic profile.
`
`15.
`
`Precision oncology is also an important focus for biopharmaceutical drug
`
`development. Many tumors have specific genomic profiles, and drug companies are working to
`
`develop therapies for patients with alterations in specific genes, which can not only significantly
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 11 Filed 12/10/20 Page 4 of 18 PageID #: 2191
`
`increase the likelihood that clinical trials of such candidate drugs will succeed, but also do so
`
`based on enrollment of fewer patients, thus shortening time to market and accelerating patient
`
`access.
`
`16.
`
`As new genomic biomarkers are discovered, cancer populations may be further
`
`divided into sub-classifications for treatment. This may lead to yet more optimal treatments, and
`
`outcomes, for patients, but it can also make the oncologist’s job of matching patients with the
`
`right treatments even more complicated.
`
`17.
`
`Previously, most genomic liquid biopsies were for single mutations in a gene, or
`
`a short selection of nucleotides within a gene (called a “hotspot”). These biopsies were usually
`
`targeted for a single type of cancer. Matching a patient with a targeted therapy using these tests
`
`often requires repeated testing as multiple genes should be tested. As the number of available
`
`therapies has increased, it has become more difficult to select an appropriate therapy using
`
`single-gene tests.
`
`18.
`
`Treatment guidelines published by the National Cancer Center Network (NCCN)
`
`now support multi-biomarker testing across many cancer types. For example, for non-small cell
`
`lung cancer (NSCLC), NCCN treatment guidelines now include recommendations for testing
`
`across nine genes as well as tumor mutational burden (TMB). Alterations in each gene are
`
`associated with one or more targeted therapies.
`
`19.
`
`Comprehensive Genetic Profiling (CGP) helps by providing more complete
`
`information about a tumor’s molecular characteristics than individual tests that focus on just one
`
`or a few biomarkers (e.g., hotspot testing). Guardant’s Guardant360® CGP liquid biopsy can
`
`deliver results from a single test that would have required repeated testing using hotspot tests.
`
`20.
`
`Traditionally, tissue biopsies were used to analyze tumors. Tissue biopsies are
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 11 Filed 12/10/20 Page 5 of 18 PageID #: 2192
`
`often expensive and time-consuming as well as invasive, requiring, for example, a needle to be
`
`inserted into a tumor to collect a sample. Medical imaging is typically required to locate a tumor
`
`for biopsy, a procedure is usually required to collect it, and a pathologist is required to analyze
`
`it, which all requires complex coordination among multiple doctors. This can require additional
`
`time, which advanced-stage cancer patients cannot always afford. Invasive tissue biopsy
`
`procedures, such as surgery, are also often associated with increased morbidity and mortality.
`
`21.
`
`Tissue biopsies typically sample just a small portion of the patient’s tumor, which
`
`may not be representative of the rest of the tumor, or tumor metastases, which have spread to
`
`other parts of the body, and may thus not include all relevant and actionable biomarkers. This
`
`can result in targetable mutations going undetected, something that has been seen in many types
`
`of tumors.
`
`III. Guardant’s Liquid CGP Biopsies
`
`22.
`
`Guardant360® was the first commercial comprehensive genetic profiling (CGP)
`
`liquid biopsy for clinical or research use when Guardant released it in 2014. Comprehensive
`
`genetic profiling liquid biopsies analyze a blood sample for multiple genetic targets and multiple
`
`solid tumors. Guardant360® is designed to identify clinically actionable mutations in a patient’s
`
`cancer and match them with FDA-approved therapies, or therapies under clinical study for FDA
`
`approval. Guardant360® covers all genes recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer
`
`Network, including the 55 genes most relevant to clinical care. Guardant360® is used for
`
`patients with metastatic, or recurring, cancers to avoid repeated tissue biopsies. Guardant360®
`
`is also used when tissue is not available, or a tissue biopsy is not possible.
`
`23.
`
`Since it was introduced, Guardant360® has become widely accepted for blood-
`
`based CGP with more than 190 peer-reviewed publications. It has been trusted by more than
`
`7,000 oncologists, with more than 150,000 tests performed to date, and is broadly covered by
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 11 Filed 12/10/20 Page 6 of 18 PageID #: 2193
`
`Medicare and many private payers, representing over 190 million lives. Guardant360® has been
`
`adopted by all 27 National Comprehensive Cancer Network Centers and 52 of 64 National
`
`Cancer Institute cancer centers. The most common uses for Guardant360® to date are for lung,
`
`breast, colorectal and gastric cancers.
`
`24.
`
`Guardant360® is currently covered by Cigna, Priority Health, multiple Blue
`
`Cross Blue Shield plans, as well as the health plans associated with eviCore, which have adopted
`
`policies that specifically cover Guardant360® test for non-small cell lung cancer, or NSCLC.
`
`25.
`
`Guardant360® also helps pharmaceutical companies accelerate clinical
`
`development programs through prospective patient screening to find patients with the
`
`appropriate alterations for enrollment, referral of patients from clinical testing who also have
`
`relevant alterations, and companion diagnostic development to support approval and
`
`commercialization of new drugs.
`
`26.
`
`In 2020 Guardant bifurcated Guardant360® into two separate products.
`
`Guardant360® CDx is the first CGP liquid biopsy to receive FDA approval, which was granted
`
`on August 7, 2020. Guardant360® CDx covers all genes recommended by the National
`
`Comprehensive Cancer Network, including the 55 genes most relevant to clinical care.
`
`Guardant360® LDT is a more comprehensive test for oncologists who want genomic profiling
`
`to guide treatment beyond the standard of care. It reports on alterations in more than 80 genes,
`
`allowing oncologists to explore treatment options for patients for whom standard of care
`
`treatments are failing, as well as tumor mutational burden.
`
`27.
`
`GuardantOMNI, which was launched in 2017, uses the same genetic profiling
`
`technology as Guardant360®, and is designed as a comprehensive genomic profiling tool for
`
`biopharmaceutical companies. GuardantOMNI can help accelerate clinical development in
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 11 Filed 12/10/20 Page 7 of 18 PageID #: 2194
`
`immuno-oncology and targeted therapy. GuardantOMNI provides a 500-gene panel that
`
`includes the vast majority of all genes being evaluated in cancer drug development pipelines and
`
`biomarkers
`
`for
`
`immuno-oncology applications,
`
`including
`
`tumor mutational burden.
`
`GuardantOMNI can help biopharmaceutical companies identify patients whose cancer has the
`
`right molecular profile for their clinical program. GuardantOMNI also helps monitor patient
`
`response to investigational drugs, and perform retrospective analyses on patient plasma samples.
`
`28.
`
`Guardant360® and GuardantOMNI have each been designated by the FDA as a
`
`breakthrough device for use as a companion diagnostic in connection with certain specified
`
`therapeutic products of our biopharmaceutical customers. Both tests are both being developed as
`
`companion diagnostics under collaborations with biopharmaceutical companies, including
`
`AstraZeneca, Amgen and Janssen.
`
`29.
`
`Compared to tissue biopsies, Guardant’s liquid biopsies are minimally invasive,
`
`quick and easy to administer, cost effective and readily available. Guardant’s liquid biopsy
`
`requires only a routine blood draw and typically takes seven days or less to provide a
`
`comprehensive genotype, allowing the oncologist to select an effective treatment or potential
`
`clinical trial enrollment, if any appropriate alterations are found. The genotype can reflect the
`
`entire molecular profile of the patient’s tumor or tumors and not just a portion of a single tumor,
`
`potentially identifying more targetable mutations than a tissue biopsy.
`
`30.
`
`Guardant’s liquid biopsies use cell-free DNA (“cfDNA”) from a patient’s blood
`
`to develop the comprehensive genetic profile. cfDNA from tumors circulating in blood plasma
`
`is called circulating tumor DNA (“ctDNA”). Analyzing ctDNA poses challenges in part because
`
`it is found at very low concentrations. Although the sensitivity and specificity of next generation
`
`DNA sequencing platforms is sufficient for genomic profiling of tumors from tissue biopsies, it
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 11 Filed 12/10/20 Page 8 of 18 PageID #: 2195
`
`is inadequate for liquid biopsies, without the technology Guardant has developed, because of the
`
`low concentration of ctDNA in blood. For example, Guardant’s testing has found that the median
`
`concentration of ctDNA genomic alterations in blood of advanced cancer patients is 0.46% of
`
`the total cell-free DNA present and can be at levels below 0.01% in early stage cancer patients.
`
`31.
`
`Comprehensive genetic profiling for precision oncology requires detection of all
`
`four classes of genetic alterations: single nucleotide variants, copy number variants,
`
`insertions/deletions and fusions, across multiple genes. This is particularly challenging with
`
`ctDNA, due to its low concentration.
`
`32.
`
`Guardant’s CGP liquid biopsy technology combines biochemistry, next-
`
`generation sequencing, signal processing, bioinformatics, machine learning and process
`
`engineering to enable the world’s market-leading comprehensive liquid biopsy test, with a
`
`typical turnaround time of less than seven days after Guardant receives the sample.
`
`33.
`
`I understand that the ’085 and ’086 Patents are directed to methods of detecting
`
`genetic mutations in cell-free DNA. I am informed that the ’085 and ’086 Patents cover
`
`important aspects of Guardant’s liquid biopsy technology that enables Guardant to provide
`
`comprehensive genetic profiles from ctDNA despite the very low concentrations found in
`
`patients’ blood. I have also been informed that Guardant has asserted the ’085 and ’086 Patents
`
`against FMI’s CGP liquid biopsy products.
`
`IV.
`
`FMI and FMI liquid biopsies
`
`34.
`
`FMI is Guardant’s biggest competitor for CGP liquid biopsy for therapy selection
`
`in late-stage cancer patients.
`
` FMI competes with Guardant for both clinical and
`
`biopharmaceutical sales.
`
`35.
`
`FMI is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Roche Pharmaceuticals, a division of
`
`Hoffman-LaRoche, a large multinational company based in Switzerland.
`
`7
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 11 Filed 12/10/20 Page 9 of 18 PageID #: 2196
`
`36.
`
`FMI offers two main CGP biopsy products, FoundationOne® CDx and
`
`FoundationOne® Liquid CDx. FoundationOne® CDx is a tissue biopsy product, not a liquid
`
`biopsy product, and I understand that Guardant does not accuse FoundationOne® CDx of
`
`infringing the ’085 and ’086 Patents. FoundationOne® CDx is FDA-approved and analytically
`
`validated for CGP tissue biopsy of solid tumors. FMI markets FoundationOne® CDx as the
`
`“gold standard” CGP test for therapy selection and describes it as its “flagship product.”
`
`37.
`
`FMI launched FoundationOne® Liquid CDx as a successor to FoundationOne®
`
`Liquid, in 2018. FoundationOne® Liquid was a rebranding of its original FoundationACT liquid
`
`biopsy, which was launched in 2016. FoundationOne® Liquid CDx received FDA approval as
`
`a companion diagnostic on August 26, 2020.
`
`V.
`
`Overview of the market for liquid CGP biopsies
`
`38.
`
`The market for liquid CGP biopsies is at an early stage. Guardant360® was the
`
`first commercial comprehensive genetic profiling (CGP) liquid biopsy for clinical or research
`
`use when Guardant released it in 2014. The first FDA approval for any CGP liquid biopsy was
`
`granted to Guardant360® CDx on August 7, 2020. The FDA’s announcement said that the
`
`approval “marks a new era for mutation testing”:
`
` “Approval of a companion diagnostic that uses a liquid biopsy and leverages next-
`generation sequencing marks a new era for mutation testing,” said Tim Stenzel,
`M.D., Ph.D., director of the Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health
`in the FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health. “In addition to
`benefitting from less invasive testing, patients are provided with a simultaneous
`mapping of multiple biomarkers of genomic alterations, rather than one biomarker
`at a time, which can translate to decreased wait times for starting treatment and
`provide insight into possible resistance mechanisms.”
`
`https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-liquid-biopsy-next-
`generation-sequencing-companion-diagnostic-test
`
`39.
`
`Today, there are only two FDA-approved liquid CGP biopsies on the market,
`
`Guardant360® CDx, and FoundationOne® Liquid CDx.
`
`8
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 11 Filed 12/10/20 Page 10 of 18 PageID #: 2197
`
`40.
`
`The growing importance of liquid CGP biopsies is reflected in Guardant’s sales.
`
`Guardant’s revenue from its liquid CGP biopsies has approximately doubled every year since
`
`2016, from $25.2 million in 2016 to $214.4 million in 2019.
`
`VI.
`
`FMI’s FoundationOne® Liquid CDx poses a threat of irreparable harm to
`Guardant
`
`41.
`
`Guardant’s success, and its ability to deliver leading diagnostic solutions,
`
`depends on a number of critical factors that are irreparably harmed and threatened by FMI’s
`
`FoundationOne® Liquid CDx.
`
`42.
`
`Guardant’s market-leading technology allowed Guardant to earn the first FDA
`
`approval for any CGP liquid biopsy for Guardant360® CDx on August 7, 2020. If not for FMI’s
`
`unauthorized use of Guardant’s patented technology, Guardant would have the only FDA-
`
`approved CGP liquid biopsy in the market today. FoundationOne® Liquid CDx competes
`
`directly with all of Guardant’s current products including Guardant360® CDx.
`
`43.
`
`The FDA approval of Guardant360® CDx was an important milestone for liquid
`
`CGP cancer diagnostic testing. FDA approval is a signal of diagnostic utility and quality that
`
`many oncologists rely on. Before Guardant360® CDx received FDA approval, many
`
`oncologists preferred tissue biopsy to liquid biopsy for CGP testing. In fact, FMI still touts its
`
`tissue biopsy as the “gold standard” for cancer diagnosis, implying that tissue biopsy is superior
`
`to liquid biopsy. FDA approval assures oncologists that they can rely on Guardant360® CDx
`
`and FoundationOne® Liquid CDx for treating patients. As a result, it is much easier to sell an
`
`FDA-approved diagnostic test to oncologists, than the same test without FDA approval.
`
`44.
`
`Guardant expended a great deal of effort and resources to obtain FDA approval
`
`for Guardant360® CDx, and it required a great deal of interaction between Guardant and the
`
`FDA, in part because the FDA had never approved a CGP liquid biopsy for cancer therapy
`
`9
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 11 Filed 12/10/20 Page 11 of 18 PageID #: 2198
`
`selection before. By using Guardant’s patented technology in its FoundationOne® Liquid CDx,
`
`FMI may have had an easier time gaining FDA approval for FoundationOne® Liquid CDx
`
`because the FDA had already learned about the technology during the Guardant360® CDx
`
`approval process.
`
`45.
`
`The “CDx” in Guardant360® CDx and FoundationOne® Liquid CDx signify that
`
`they are companion diagnostic tests. The FDA approval for these companion diagnostic tests
`
`means that they are approved to identify patients who may benefit from specific targeted
`
`therapies. The therapies for which these tests are approved are not made or sold by Guardant or
`
`FMI. For example, Guardant360® CDx is FDA approved to identify patients with NSCLC who
`
`may benefit from Tagrisso®, a therapeutic drug made and sold by AstraZeneca, for patients with
`
`alterations in their EGFR gene.
`
`46.
`
`Demonstrating the diagnostic utility of a companion diagnostic test requires
`
`extensive collaboration with the biopharmaceutical company that makes and sells the targeted
`
`therapy, for which the test will be used. Developing such a collaborative relationship with a
`
`biopharmaceutical company requires a great deal of effort and resources. Simply negotiating a
`
`collaboration agreement for a companion diagnostic test often requires months, even after the
`
`parties have tentatively agreed to pursue the collaboration. It is much easier to enter additional
`
`collaborations (e.g., for different drugs or indications) with an existing biopharmaceutical
`
`collaborator than it is to recruit new collaborators. It is also very difficult to persuade a
`
`biopharmaceutical company to switch diagnostic test providers after they have agreed to
`
`collaborate.
`
`47.
`
`FMI has acknowledged the importance of relationships with biopharmaceutical
`
`companies:
`
`10
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 11 Filed 12/10/20 Page 12 of 18 PageID #: 2199
`
`Our success in the future depends in part on our ability to maintain relationships
`and to enter into new relationships with biopharmaceutical partners. This can be
`difficult due to several factors, including internal and external constraints placed on
`these organizations that can limit the number and type of relationships with
`companies like us they can consider and consummate….If we fail to maintain these
`relationships, or enter into new ones, our business could suffer.
`
`FMI 2017 Form 10-K at 46.
`
`48.
`
`Guardant and FMI compete to collaborate with biopharmaceutical partners to
`
`develop liquid biopsies as companion diagnostic tests. FMI’s participation in such relationships
`
`restricts Guardant’s ability to cultivate and maintain such relationships. It also means that
`
`Guardant may be required to offer less favorable terms to its biopharmaceutical partners.
`
`49.
`
`Despite its later entry into the field of liquid biopsies, FMI has used its position
`
`as a trusted tissue biopsy provider, and Guardant’s patented liquid biopsy technology, to develop
`
`collaborations with a number biopharmaceutical companies for use of FoundationOne® Liquid
`
`CDx as a companion diagnostic test. The FDA Label for FoundationOne® Liquid CDx includes
`
`indications for six different therapeutic drugs: gefitinib, osimertinib, erlotinib, alectinib,
`
`rucaparib and alpelisib.
`
`50.
`
`FoundationOne® Liquid CDx
`
`is also substantially
`
`less sensitive
`
`than
`
`Guardant360® CDx, meaning that the FoundationOne® Liquid CDx will identify fewer patients
`
`with actionable alterations than if those same patients were tested using Guardant360® CDx,
`
`resulting in some patients being denied access to the appropriate therapy for their cancer. For
`
`example, for the L858R mutation of the EGFR gene, a biomarker for non-small cell lung cancer,
`
`the FoundationOne® Liquid CDx FDA Label claims a Limit of Detection – a measure of a test’s
`
`sensitivity – of 0.34% Variant Allele Frequency (VAF). (FoundationOne® Liquid CDx FDA
`
`Label, p.13). This means that FoundationOne® Liquid CDx will not reliably detect this
`
`biomarker unless at least 0.34% of the cfDNA from the patient’s blood that encodes the EGFR
`
`11
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 11 Filed 12/10/20 Page 13 of 18 PageID #: 2200
`
`gene has the L858R mutation. In contrast, Guardant360® CDx has a Limit of Detection for the
`
`same mutation of 0.2% VAF, meaning that it will reliably detect the biomarker even when it is
`
`present at a much lower level. This has meaningful consequences for patients, as Guardant360®
`
`CDx will provide a test result for the L858R mutations for 34% more patients than
`
`FoundationOne® Liquid CDx. However, because FoundationOne® Liquid CDx now has FDA
`
`approval, and given FMI’s position as a trusted tissue biopsy provider, some oncologists will
`
`likely select FoundationOne® Liquid CDx even though Guardant360® CDx would perform
`
`better for their patients.
`
`51.
`
`FMI also competes with Guardant to have its liquid biopsy products used in
`
`clinical trials and studies, and included in publications and conferences that discuss their results.
`
`FMI has acknowledged the important role that clinical trials, studies, publications and
`
`presentations play in gaining acceptance for new diagnostic services:
`
`We believe that the successful completion of clinical trials, publication of scientific
`and medical results in peer-reviewed journals, and presentations at leading
`conferences are critical to the broad adoption of our services. Publication in leading
`medical journals is subject to a peer-review process, and peer reviewers may not
`consider the results of studies involving our services sufficiently novel or worthy
`of publication.
`
`FMI 2017 Form 10-K at 42.
`
`52.
`
`Successful clinical trials and studies, and publications and presentations that
`
`discuss their results increase awareness of Guardant’s tests and make it more likely that others
`
`will use the same tests in future clinical trials, studies, publications and presentations at leading
`
`conferences. On the other hand, once results of a clinical study using an FMI liquid biopsy are
`
`published, a second study establishing equivalent results using a Guardant liquid biopsy are
`
`typically of less interest to clinical researchers, peer-reviewed journals and leading conferences.
`
`Competition with FMI’s FoundationOne® CDx deprives Guardant of critical opportunities to
`
`12
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 11 Filed 12/10/20 Page 14 of 18 PageID #: 2201
`
`foster broader adoption of Guardant’s liquid biopsies.
`
`53.
`
`Clinical trials and studies that use CGP liquid biopsies generally select one vendor
`
`and do not change once the trial study starts. Therefore, each clinical trial or study that uses an
`
`FMI liquid biopsy does not use a Guardant liquid biopsy, depriving Guardant of important
`
`opportunities to gain market acceptance, and valuable clinical data for its liquid biopsies.
`
`54.
`
`Guardant has lost numerous opportunities to FMI to provide liquid biopsies for
`
`clinical trials and studies, many of which have involved publications in prestigious journals.
`
`These include TRITON3, a prostate cancer study published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology;
`
`a study of metastatic bladder cancer by Rainier Therapeutics; a study and trial concerning non-
`
`small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by Genentech published in the Annals of Oncology; a joint
`
`study and trial by the University of California and Genentech concerning NSCLC published in
`
`Nature Medicine; a study by Aix Marseilles University of NSCLC published in Therapeutic
`
`Advances in Respiratory Disease; and a study of bile duct cancer (cholangiocarcinoma) by
`
`Incyte. These studies and trials have collectively involved thousands of test subjects.
`
`55.
`
`Guardant and FMI also compete for the support of Key Opinion Leaders, such as
`
`prestigious cancer institutions and oncology networks, for its liquid biopsies. FMI has
`
`acknowledged that Key Opinion Leaders are important in “validating [a company’s] testing
`
`platform, driving adoption, or establishing [a company’s] molecular information platform and
`
`tests as a standard of care….” FMI 2017 Form 10-K at 46.
`
`56.
`
`FMI has claimed to have relationships with a number of Key Opinion Leaders,
`
`including the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Cancer Center, the Sylvester Comprehensive
`
`Cancer Center at the University of Miami, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer
`
`Center - Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, and the
`
`13
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 11 Filed 12/10/20 Page 15 of 18 PageID #: 2202
`
`Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University. FMI 2017 Form
`
`10-K at 46.
`
`57.
`
`FMI’s engagement with key opinion leaders restricts Guardant’s opportunities to
`
`engage with Key Opinion Leaders to validate its liquid biopsies, drive adoption of them, and
`
`establish them as a standard of care.
`
`58.
`
`Since FoundationOne® Liquid CDx received FDA approval, it has attracted
`
`attention from Key Opinion Leaders that would otherwise have been focused on Guardant360®
`
`CDx, and FMI’s sales and marketing team has focused attention on Guardant’s leading
`
`customers, especially those in an academic setting.
`
`59.
`
`Guardant’s ability to collect revenue for performing its liquid biopsies depends
`
`importantly on its ability to persuade public and commercial payers to provide coverage for those
`
`tests. Coverage is primarily influenced by clinical evidence, endorsements by Key Opinion
`
`Leaders, and treatment guidelines. The analytical and clinical data that Guardant has generated
`
`in its efforts to establish clinical utility, combined with the support Guardant has developed with
`
`Key Opinion Leaders in the oncology space has led to positive coverage decisions by a number
`
`of commercial payers. FMI’s competition with Guardant for clinical trials and studies and
`
`endorsements by Key Opinion Leaders restricts Guardant’s ability to gain coverage for its
`
`products. Coverage decisions have broad and lasting effects, as many patients and their
`
`oncologists are reluctant to order a Guardant CGP liquid biopsy, if it is not covered by the
`
`patient’s insurance.
`
`60.
`
`The harmful effects I have described are self-reinforcing. Positive coverage
`
`decisions result in wider adoption, which makes it easier for Guardant to recruit Key Opinion
`
`Leaders, biopharmaceutical partners, clinical trials and studies and peer-reviewed publications
`
`14
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 11 Filed 12/10/20 Page 16 of 18 PageID #: 2203
`
`and presentations at prestigious conferences. All of these factors are important to the success of
`
`Guardant’s CGP liquid biopsies.
`
`61.
`
`The data generated by Guardant’s tests is also critical to Guardant’s long term
`
`success. CGP liquid biopsies generate large amounts of data concerning the genomic profiles of
`
`patients and their associated disease states. This information has great potential to enable
`
`progress in cancer diagnostics and therapies and to enhance the value of the CGP liquid biopsies
`
`to patients and doctors. As Dr. Phil Frebbo, Chief Medical Officer of Illumina, the leading maker
`
`of next generation DNA sequencers explained in August of 2019, we are only beginning to
`
`understand how to use the information from liquid biopsies, but they are already proving very
`
`useful in managing cancer:
`
`Even with our incredible tissue biopsy analysis advances, accessibility challenges
`and tumor heterogeneity demand complementary solutions to evaluate tumors more
`frequently and comprehensively.
`
`That’s why many, including myself, are enthusiastic about liquid biopsies, which
`can provide crucial molecular information with simple blood draws. As cancers
`grow, they slough off cells, cell fragments, and DNA from apoptotic or necrotic
`cancer cells, which enter the blood stream and offer tremendous opportunities to
`better assess cancer.
`
`Though we’re only beginning to understand how to use this information to optimize
`patient outcomes, blood samples are already outlining cancer aggressiveness,
`identifying treatment options, tracking efficacy, and precisely managing each
`patient’s unique disease….
`
`Because liquid biopsies interrogate cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from an entire tumor
`(or tumors), rather than a single tissue sample, they can provide more
`comprehensive information about their makeup to more fully capture mutational
`complexity.
`
`https://www.illumina.com/company/news-center/feature-articles/Febbo-Liquid-Biopsy.html
`
`62.
`
`Guardant incorporates the data generated from its liquid biopsies into Guardant’s
`
`machine learning facilities, which is used to improve performance of subsequent tests, and to
`
`develop new applications of Guardant’s liquid biopsy technology. As a result, every Guardant
`
`15
`
`
`
`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 11 Filed 12/10/20 Page 17 of 18 PageID #: 2204
`
`CGP biopsy performed provides additional data that potentially enhances the value of every
`
`subsequent CGP biopsy. And every FoundationOne® liquid CDx biopsy that is performed
`
`instead of a Guardant liquid biopsy deprives Guardant of the long-term benefits that flow from
`
`that test.
`
`63.
`
`For the reasons I have discussed above, FMI’s FoundationOne® CDx is causing,
`
`and threatens to continue to cause, serious and irreparable harm to Guardant’s Guardant360®
`
`and GuardantOMNI liquid biopsy business.
`
`VII. Guardant can meet the public’s need for CGP liquid biopsies
`
`64.
`
`Guardant360® LDT reports all of the genetic biomarkers currently suitable for
`
`selecting FDA-approved therapies. Genes reported by FoundationOne® Liquid CDx that are
`
`not rep