throbber
Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 1-19 Filed 11/23/20 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 584
`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 1-19 Filed 11/23/20 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 584
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 19
`
`EXHIBIT 19
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 1-19 Filed 11/23/20 Page 2 of 15 PageID #: 585
`U.S. Patent No. 10,801,063
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1p
`
`Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 10,801,063 by Foundation Medicine Inc.’s (FMI’s) Liquid Biopsy Platform12
`
`Infringement Support
`Ex. 10 (the “Clark Paper”) is entitled “Analytical Validation of a Hybrid Capture Based Next-
`Generation Sequencing Clinical Assay for Genomic Profiling of Cell-Free Circulating Tumor
`DNA.” The Clark Paper explains the methods the FMI platform uses to detect and classify
`mutations in cell-free DNA. To the extent the preamble is considered limiting, the Clark Paper
`shows that FMI’s Foundation Platform involves a method for classifying consensus sequences
`generated from sequencing reads derived from double-stranded cell-free DNA (cfDNA)
`molecules from a sample of a human subject.
`
`’063 Claim Language
`A method for classifying
`consensus sequences
`generated from
`sequencing reads derived
`from double-stranded
`cell-free
`deoxyribonucleic acid
`(cfDNA) molecules from
`a sample of a human
`subject, the method
`comprising:
`
`
`1 The figures in this chart have been modified to include highlighting and red annotations that more clearly identify the individual
`claim elements.
`
`2 As used herein, “Foundation Platform” refers to all processes, procedures and activities performed in utilizing FMI’s liquid biopsy
`assay for identifying genetic sequences of ctDNA fragments isolated from body samples, including but not limited to each version of
`“FoundationACT,” “FoundationONE® Liquid,” and “FoundationONE® Liquid CDx”
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 1-19 Filed 11/23/20 Page 3 of 15 PageID #: 586
`U.S. Patent No. 10,801,063
`
`
`
`’063 Claim Language
`
`Infringement Support
`
`Clark Paper at Abstract
`
`Ex. 13 (the “Woodhouse Paper”) is entitled “Clinical and analytical validation of
`FoundationOne Liquid CDx, a novel 324-Gene cfDNA-based comprehensive genomic
`profiling assay for cancers of solid tumor origin.” The Woodhouse Paper provides further
`explanation of FMI’s methods for detecting tumor mutational burden and microsatellite
`instability using the FoundationONE Liquid CDx assay.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 1-19 Filed 11/23/20 Page 4 of 15 PageID #: 587
`U.S. Patent No. 10,801,063
`
`
`
`’063 Claim Language
`
`Infringement Support
`
`
`Woodhouse Paper at Abstract
`
`Exhibit 14 (“FDA Label”) is an FDA label indication for the FoundationONE® Liquid CDx
`product, which is the latest version of the Foundation Platform.
`
`
`
`
`FDA Label at 1.
`
`
`The Clark Paper explains that duplex (i.e. double-stranded) cell-free nucleic acid molecules are
`non-uniquely tagged with a population of 12 molecular barcodes, which is at least 2 and fewer
`than the number of double-stranded cfDNA molecules that map to a mappable base position in
`
`
`
`non-uniquely tagging a
`population of double-
`stranded cfDNA
`
`3
`
`1a
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 1-19 Filed 11/23/20 Page 5 of 15 PageID #: 588
`U.S. Patent No. 10,801,063
`
`’063 Claim Language
`molecules from the
`sample with more than a
`10× molar excess of
`adapters comprising
`molecular barcodes,
`relative to the double-
`stranded cfDNA
`molecules in the
`population, to generate
`non-uniquely tagged
`parent polynucleotides,
`
`wherein the double-
`stranded cfDNA
`molecules that map to a
`mappable base position
`of a reference sequence
`are tagged with a number
`of different molecular
`barcodes ranging from at
`least 2 to fewer than a
`number of double-
`stranded cfDNA
`molecules that map to the
`mappable base position,
`and
`
`wherein at least 20% of
`the double-stranded
`cfDNA molecules are
`non-uniquely tagged with
`
`
`
`
`
`Infringement Support
`the assay. Upon information and belief, the Foundation Platform utilizes at least a 10× molar
`excess of molecular barcodes relative to the population of cfDNA molecules.
`
`
`
`
`
`Clark Paper at 687-688.
`
`Barcodes are used in the FoundationONE Liquid CDx product as indicated in the FDA Label.
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 1-19 Filed 11/23/20 Page 6 of 15 PageID #: 589
`U.S. Patent No. 10,801,063
`
`Infringement Support
`
`’063 Claim Language
`the adapters comprising
`the molecular barcodes at
`both ends of a molecule
`of the double-stranded
`cfDNA molecules;
`
`FDA Label at 30.
`
`Based on the reported sensitivities, at least 20% of the double-stranded cfDNA molecules are
`non-uniquely tagged using a 10X molar excess of molecular barcodes in the Foundation
`Platform.
`
`The Clark Paper explains that cfDNA library products are PCR amplified.
`
`
`
`
`amplifying a plurality of
`the non-uniquely tagged
`parent polynucleotides to
`produce progeny
`polynucleotides;
`
`enriching a plurality of
`the progeny
`polynucleotides for target
`
`Clark Paper at 688.
`
`The Foundation Platform selectively enriches progeny polynucleotides for target regions
`associated with cancer by utilizing hybridization-based capture of sequences associated with
`cancer-related genes.
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`1b
`
`1c
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 1-19 Filed 11/23/20 Page 7 of 15 PageID #: 590
`U.S. Patent No. 10,801,063
`
`’063 Claim Language
`regions of interest to
`generate enriched
`progeny polynucleotides;
`
`Infringement Support
`
`
`FDA Label at 2-3.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Clark Paper at 688.
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 1-19 Filed 11/23/20 Page 8 of 15 PageID #: 591
`U.S. Patent No. 10,801,063
`
`
`
`’063 Claim Language
`
`Infringement Support
`
`Woodhouse Paper at 3
`The Clark Paper explains that the Foundation Platform sequences the population of amplified
`progeny polynucleotides to produce a set of sequence reads.
`
`
`
`
`sequencing a plurality of
`the enriched progeny
`polynucleotides to
`produce a set of
`sequencing reads;
`
`Clark Paper at 688.
`
`Accordingly, the Foundation Platform sequences the population of amplified progeny
`polynucleotides to produce a set of sequence reads.
`The Clark Paper illustrates that the Foundation Platform maps the sequence reads of the set of
`sequence reads to one or more reference sequences from a human genome.
`
`
`
`mapping a plurality of
`sequencing reads from
`the set of sequencing
`reads to the reference
`sequence;
`
`7
`
`1d
`
`1e
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 1-19 Filed 11/23/20 Page 9 of 15 PageID #: 592
`U.S. Patent No. 10,801,063
`
`
`
`’063 Claim Language
`
`Infringement Support
`
`Clark Paper at 688.
`
`
`
`
`Clark Paper at 691.
`
`Accordingly, the Foundation Platform maps sequence reads of the set of sequence reads to one
`or more reference sequences from a human genome.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 1-19 Filed 11/23/20 Page 10 of 15 PageID #: 593
`U.S. Patent No. 10,801,063
`
`
`1f
`
`’063 Claim Language
`grouping a plurality of
`the mapped sequencing
`reads into families of
`mapped sequencing reads
`based at least on (i)
`sequence information
`from the molecular
`barcodes and (ii) a
`beginning base position
`and an ending base
`position of the mapped
`sequencing reads;
`
`Infringement Support
`The Foundation Platform groups sequence reads into families based on the sequence
`information of the barcodes and the beginning and end base positions of the mapped portions
`of the progeny polynucleotides.
`
`The Clark Paper explains that “Fragment barcodes are used to identify multiple reads
`originating from the same unique input cfDNA fragment for subsequent error detection.”
`Figure 1 of the Clark Paper that each of the families includes sequence reads amplified from
`the same-tagged parent polynucleotide.
`
`
`
`Clark Paper at 691.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 1-19 Filed 11/23/20 Page 11 of 15 PageID #: 594
`U.S. Patent No. 10,801,063
`
`
`
`’063 Claim Language
`
`Infringement Support
`
`Clark paper at 688.
`
`The Woodhouse Paper explains that the Foundation Platform groups sequence reads into
`families comprising sequence reads amplified from the same parent polynucleotide using
`“fragment barcodes (FBCs)”. In particular, the Woodhouse Paper notes that sequence reads
`that overlap are merged into single reads.
`
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 1-19 Filed 11/23/20 Page 12 of 15 PageID #: 595
`U.S. Patent No. 10,801,063
`
`
`
`’063 Claim Language
`
`Infringement Support
`
`Woodhouse Paper at 3-4.
`
`
`As discussed for claim 1f, the Foundation Platform groups families of sequence reads according
`to fragment barcode information. After grouping families, the Foundation Platform generates
`a consensus sequence for each family.
`
`
`1g
`
`generating a consensus
`sequence for each family
`from among one or more
`of the families to produce
`a set of consensus
`sequences; and
`
`
`
`Woodhouse Paper at 3-4.
`
`The Clark paper explains that a consensus sequence is determined by comparing sequence reads
`from within families of read pairs as well as comparing sequence reads from different families
`to determine individual fragment sequences, i.e. the consensus sequence for each family.
`
`
`
`
`11
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 1-19 Filed 11/23/20 Page 13 of 15 PageID #: 596
`U.S. Patent No. 10,801,063
`
`
`
`’063 Claim Language
`
`Infringement Support
`
`classifying one or more
`consensus sequences
`from among the set of
`consensus sequences as
`(1) paired consensus
`sequences generated
`from sequencing reads
`
`
`
`Clark paper at 688.
`
`Upon information and belief, the Foundation Platform classifies consensus sequences as either
`paired consensus sequences or unpaired consensus sequences as a part of its read processing.
`Paired consensus sequences representing a Watson strand and a Crick strand have
`complementary sequence information. Likewise, barcodes binding to paired consensus
`sequences have complementary sequence information. To generate groups of sequence reads
`arising from the same fragment, the Foundation Platform matches the sequence of the fragment
`barcodes. Read pairs that have the same sequence start and stop but different (i.e.
`
`12
`
`1h
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 1-19 Filed 11/23/20 Page 14 of 15 PageID #: 597
`U.S. Patent No. 10,801,063
`
`Infringement Support
`complementary) barcode sequences are segregated as arising from different fragments and thus
`are classified as paired consensus sequences. Thus, the Foundation Platform identifies and
`classifies consensus sequences as either being paired consensus sequences or unpaired
`consensus sequences.
`
`
`
`’063 Claim Language
`representing a Watson
`strand and a Crick strand
`of a non-uniquely tagged
`parent polynucleotide or
`(2) unpaired consensus
`sequences generated
`from sequencing reads
`representing only one of
`either a Watson strand or
`a Crick strand of a non-
`uniquely tagged parent
`polynucleotide.
`
`Clark Paper at 688.
`
`13
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 1-19 Filed 11/23/20 Page 15 of 15 PageID #: 598
`U.S. Patent No. 10,801,063
`
`
`
`
`
`14
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket