throbber
Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 1-16 Filed 11/23/20 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: 543
`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 1-16 Filed 11/23/20 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: 543
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 16
`
`EXHIBIT 16
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`1p
`
`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 1-16 Filed 11/23/20 Page 2 of 18 PageID #: 544
`U.S. Patent No. 10,704,085
`
`Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 10,704,085 by Foundation Medicine Inc.’s (FMI’s) Liquid Biopsy Platform12
`
`Infringement Support
`Exhibit 14 (“FDA Label”) is an FDA label indication for the FoundationONE® Liquid CDx
`product, which is the latest version of the Foundation Platform. This label explains that the
`Foundation Platform is a method for generating genetic profiles of a tumor from cell free DNA
`of a subject having cancer or suspected of having cancer.
`
`
`’085 Claim Language
`A method for generating
`a genetic profile of a
`tumor from a blood
`sample of double-
`stranded cell-free
`deoxyribonucleic acids
`(cfDNA) molecules from
`a subject having cancer
`or suspected of having a
`cancer, the method
`comprising:
`
`FDA Label at 1.
`
`Ex. 10 (the “Clark Paper”) is entitled “Analytical Validation of a Hybrid Capture Based Next-
`Generation Sequencing Clinical Assay for Genomic Profiling of Cell-Free Circulating Tumor
`DNA.” To the extent the preamble is considered limiting, the Clark Paper shows that FMI’s
`
`
`
`
`1 The figures in this chart have been modified to include highlighting and red annotations that more clearly identify the individual
`claim elements.
`
`2 As used herein, “Foundation Platform” refers to all processes, procedures and activities performed in utilizing FMI’s liquid biopsy
`assay for identifying genetic sequences of ctDNA fragments isolated from body samples, including but not limited to each version of
`“FoundationACT,” “FoundationONE® Liquid,” and “FoundationONE® Liquid CDx”
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 1-16 Filed 11/23/20 Page 3 of 18 PageID #: 545
`U.S. Patent No. 10,704,085
`
`
`
`’085 Claim Language
`
`Infringement Support
`Foundation Platform involves a method for detecting genetic variants in cell free DNA
`(cfDNA) extracted from the blood of a subject.
`
`The genetic variants fall into one or more of four classes of genomic alterations in ctDNA, base
`substitutions, short
`insertions/deletions, genomic rearrangements, and copy number
`amplifications.
`
`Clark Paper at Abstract
`
`Ex. 13 (the “Woodhouse Paper”) is entitled “Clinical and analytical validation of
`FoundationOne Liquid CDx, a novel 324-Gene cfDNA-based comprehensive genomic
`profiling assay for cancers of solid tumor origin.” The Woodhouse Paper provides further
`explanation of FMI’s methods for generating genetic profiles of tumors using the
`FoundationONE Liquid CDx assay.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 1-16 Filed 11/23/20 Page 4 of 18 PageID #: 546
`U.S. Patent No. 10,704,085
`
`
`
`’085 Claim Language
`
`Infringement Support
`
`
`
`Woodhouse Paper at Abstract
`
`
`The Clark paper provides a method for obtaining cell free DNA molecules from a blood sample.
`
`
`
`
`1a
`
`obtaining a population
`comprising the double-
`stranded cfDNA
`molecules from the blood
`sample from the subject;
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 1-16 Filed 11/23/20 Page 5 of 18 PageID #: 547
`U.S. Patent No. 10,704,085
`
`
`
`’085 Claim Language
`
`Infringement Support
`
`Clark Paper at 687.
`
`The FDA label indicates that FoundationONE® Liquid CDx uses cell-free DNA isolated from
`plasma from whole blood.
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 1-16 Filed 11/23/20 Page 6 of 18 PageID #: 548
`U.S. Patent No. 10,704,085
`
`
`
`’085 Claim Language
`
`Infringement Support
`
`
`
`FDA Label at 1.
`
`Accordingly, the Foundation Platform provides a population of cell free DNA ("cfDNA")
`molecules obtained from a bodily sample from a subject.
`The Clark Paper explains that the Foundation Platform converts cfDNA into a population of
`non-uniquely tagged parent polynucleotides, by ligating an identifier sequence, or barcode,
`onto the cfDNA molecule. The Clark Paper explains that a set of 12 adapters, comprising 6 bp
`sequences, are used in the ligation. Based upon the reported sensitivites, the Foundation
`Platform utilizes more than a 30× molar excess of molecular barcodes relative to the double-
`stranded cfDNA, yielding at least 20% barcoded cfDNA.
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`ligating a set of
`molecular barcodes to
`both ends of a plurality
`of the double-stranded
`cfDNA molecules using
`more than a 30× molar
`excess of molecular
`barcodes relative to the
`double-stranded cfDNA
`molecules to produce
`tagged parent
`polynucleotides, wherein
`a given molecular
`barcode is a member of a
`set of molecular barcodes
`comprising 2 to
`1,000,000 different
`molecular barcode
`sequences,
`
`1b
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 1-16 Filed 11/23/20 Page 7 of 18 PageID #: 549
`U.S. Patent No. 10,704,085
`
`Infringement Support
`
`’085 Claim Language
`
`wherein at least 20% of
`the double-stranded
`cfDNA molecules from
`the population of cfDNA
`molecules are attached to
`molecular barcodes
`
`
`Clark Paper at 687-688.
`
`Barcodes are used in the FoundationONE Liquid CDx product as indicated in the FDA Label.
`
`
`
`
`FDA Label at 30.
`
`The Clark Paper explains that cfDNA library products are PCR amplified.
`
`
`
`
`amplifying a plurality of
`the tagged parent
`polynucleotides to
`produce progeny
`polynucleotides with
`associated molecular
`barcodes;
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`1c
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 1-16 Filed 11/23/20 Page 8 of 18 PageID #: 550
`U.S. Patent No. 10,704,085
`
`
`
`1d
`
`’085 Claim Language
`
`selectively enriching a
`subset of the progeny
`polynucleotides for target
`regions associated with
`cancer, whereby enriched
`progeny polynucleotides
`are generated
`
`Infringement Support
`Clark Paper at 6688.
`
`The Foundation Platform selectively enriches progeny polynucleotides for target regions
`associated with cancer by utilizing hybridization-based capture of sequences associated with
`cancer-related genes.
`
`
`FDA Label at 2-3.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 1-16 Filed 11/23/20 Page 9 of 18 PageID #: 551
`U.S. Patent No. 10,704,085
`
`
`
`’085 Claim Language
`
`Infringement Support
`Clark Paper at 688.
`
`
`sequencing a portion of
`the enriched progeny
`polynucleotides to
`produce sequencing reads
`of the progeny
`polynucleotides with
`associated molecular
`barcodes;
`
`aligning a plurality of the
`sequencing reads to a
`reference sequence;
`
`1e
`
`1f
`
`
`
`Woodhouse Paper at 3
`
`The Clark Paper explains that the Foundation Platform sequences the population of amplified
`progeny polynucleotides to produce a set of sequence reads.
`
`
`
`
`Clark Paper at 688.
`
`Accordingly, the Foundation Platform sequences the population of amplified progeny
`polynucleotides to produce a set of sequence reads.
`The Clark Paper illustrates that the Foundation Platform aligns the sequence reads of the set of
`sequence reads to one or more reference sequences from a human genome.
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 1-16 Filed 11/23/20 Page 10 of 18 PageID #: 552
`U.S. Patent No. 10,704,085
`
`
`
`’085 Claim Language
`
`Infringement Support
`
`Clark Paper at 688.
`
`
`
`
`Clark Paper at 691.
`
`Accordingly, the Foundation Platform maps sequence reads of the set of sequence reads to one
`or more reference sequences from a human genome.
`
`The Clark Paper explains that “Fragment barcodes are used to identify multiple reads
`originating from the same unique input cfDNA fragment for subsequent error detection.”
`
`
`
`9
`
`grouping a plurality of
`the sequencing reads into
`
`1g
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 1-16 Filed 11/23/20 Page 11 of 18 PageID #: 553
`U.S. Patent No. 10,704,085
`
`’085 Claim Language
`a plurality of families
`based at least on
`sequence information of
`the molecular barcodes, a
`start base position of a
`given sequencing read
`from among the
`sequencing reads at
`which the given
`sequencing read is
`determined to start
`aligning to the reference
`sequence, and a stop base
`position of the given
`sequencing read at which
`the given sequencing
`read is determined to stop
`aligning to the reference
`sequence, wherein a
`family of the plurality of
`families is representative
`of a cell-free nucleic acid
`molecule in the sample;
`
`
`
`
`
`Infringement Support
`Figure 1 of the Clark Paper that each of the families includes sequence reads amplified from
`the same-tagged parent polynucleotide.
`
`
`
`
`Clark Paper at 691.
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 1-16 Filed 11/23/20 Page 12 of 18 PageID #: 554
`U.S. Patent No. 10,704,085
`
`
`
`’085 Claim Language
`
`Infringement Support
`
`
`
`Clark paper at 688.
`
`The Woodhouse Paper explains that the Foundation Platform groups sequence reads into
`families comprising sequence reads amplified from the same parent polynucleotide using
`“fragment barcodes (FBCs)”. In particular, the Woodhouse Paper notes that sequence reads
`that overlap are merged into single reads.
`
`
`
`
`
`11
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 1-16 Filed 11/23/20 Page 13 of 18 PageID #: 555
`U.S. Patent No. 10,704,085
`
`
`
`’085 Claim Language
`
`Infringement Support
`
`Woodhouse Paper at 3-4.
`
`
`Accordingly, the Foundation Platform groups the sequence reads into families, each of the
`families comprising sequence reads comprising the same identifier sequence and having the
`same start and stop positions, whereby each of the families comprises sequence reads amplified
`from the same tagged parent polynucleotide.
`
`The Clark Paper explains that “candidate variants was generated by parsing all alignments
`found in the consensus representation of the sequences determined for each fragment, avoiding
`sections marked as containing errors”.
`
`1h
`
`detecting, from among
`the families, the presence
`or absence of somatic
`genetic variants; and
`
`Clark Paper at 688.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`12
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 1-16 Filed 11/23/20 Page 14 of 18 PageID #: 556
`U.S. Patent No. 10,704,085
`
`
`
`’085 Claim Language
`
`Infringement Support
`
`
`
`Clark Paper at 691.
`
`To the extent FMI contends that the Foundation Platform does not directly infringe this
`limitation, because it does not yield a base call at every locus of a reference sequence, it
`nevertheless infringes through doctrine of equivalents. The purpose of making a base call is to
`determine whether a mutation exists at any particular loci. The Foundation Platform performs
`this same function in substantially the same way, to achieve the same result, because it makes
`a “variant call” at a genetic loci to determine whether a mutation exists. To the extent the
`Foundation Platform does not perform a base call at some loci, those loci are not used in the
`analysis nor do they affect the Foundation method for making other base calls.
`
`The Foundation Platform quantifies the plurality of genetic variants present to generate a
`genetic profile.
`
`The FDA label, for instance, presents validation data for the performance of the Foundation
`Platform in quantifying genetic variants. In one example, the FDA label describes the use of
`
`13
`
`quantifying a plurality of
`somatic genetic variants
`detected as present to
`generate the genetic
`profile of the tumor.
`
`1i
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 1-16 Filed 11/23/20 Page 15 of 18 PageID #: 557
`U.S. Patent No. 10,704,085
`
`
`
`’085 Claim Language
`
`Infringement Support
`FoundationONE Liquid CDx to quantify BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 mutations in patients with
`prostate cancer.
`
`
`FDA Label at 31.
`
`In another study cited by the FDA label, FoundationONE Liquid CDx was used to quantify
`EGFR Exon 19 deletion and EGFR Exon 21 L858R alteration.
`
`
`
`
`
`14
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 1-16 Filed 11/23/20 Page 16 of 18 PageID #: 558
`U.S. Patent No. 10,704,085
`
`
`
`’085 Claim Language
`
`Infringement Support
`
`FDA Label at 33.
`
`The Clark Paper further shows that the Foundation Platform quantifies genetic variants. It
`explains, “the number of error-containing fragments [were] identified” using “the probability
`of observing the obtained number of fragments supporting the variant.”
`
`
`
`
`
`15
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 1-16 Filed 11/23/20 Page 17 of 18 PageID #: 559
`U.S. Patent No. 10,704,085
`
`
`
`’085 Claim Language
`
`Infringement Support
`
`Clark paper at 688.
`
`The Woodhouse Paper explains how somatic genetic variants are quantified. For example, to
`detect copy number variations, it explains that the Foundation Platform normalizes the number
`of sequence reads across all regions examined, and compares that to a process matched control.
`
`
`
`
`Woodhouse Paper at 3.
`
`
`Likewise, to detect tumor mutational burden, it explains that the Foundation Platform counts
`synonymous and non-synonymous variants above a certain allele frequency, and processing to
`determine the number of actionable mutations over the total region counted.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`16
`
`

`

`Case 1:20-cv-01580-LPS Document 1-16 Filed 11/23/20 Page 18 of 18 PageID #: 560
`U.S. Patent No. 10,704,085
`
`’085 Claim Language
`
`Infringement Support
`
`
`
`Woodhouse Paper at 3-4.
`
`Accordingly, the Foundation Platform quantifies genetic variants to generate a genetic profile
`of a tumor.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`17
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket