`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`
`EXPRESS MOBILE, INC.,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`
`GODADDY.COM, LLC,
`
`
` Defendant.
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`JUDGMENT AFTER VERDICT
`
`Civil Action No.1:19-cv-01937-MFK
`
`
`
`
`
`On August 8, 2022, the Court granted Defendant GoDaddy.com, LLC’s
`
`(“GoDaddy’s”) motion for summary judgment of non-infringement of the asserted claims of U.S.
`
`Patent No. 6,546,397, and U.S. Patent No. 7,594,168, and hereby enters judgment that GoDaddy
`
`does not infringe claims 1, 2, 3, 11 and 37 of U.S. Patent No. 6,546,397 or claims 1, 2, and 3 of
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,594,168.
`
`On February 27, 2023, the Court held a jury trial, and the jury returned its verdict
`
`on March 3, 2023. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58(b), the Court hereby enters
`
`judgment that:
`
`1. GoDaddy does not infringe claims 1, 3, 12, 16, and 22 of U.S. Patent No.
`
`9,063,755; claims 1 and 13 of U.S. Patent No. 9,471,287; and claims 1, 11, 13, 17, and 19 of
`
`U.S. Patent No. 9,928,044; and
`
`2. Claims 1, 3, 12, 16, and 22 of U.S. Patent No. 9,063,755; claims 1 and 13 of
`
`U.S. Patent No. 9,471,287; and claims 1, 11, 13, 17, and 19 of U.S. Patent No. 9,928,044 are not
`
`invalid.
`
`The parties agree to the form of judgment set forth above and reserve all rights
`
`with respect to costs, post-trial motions, and appeal.
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-01937-MFK-JLH Document 331 Filed 03/06/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 42543
`
`Dated: March 6, 2023
`
`
`/s/ Timothy Devlin
`Timothy Devlin (No. 4241)
`tdevlin@devlinlawfirm.com
`DEVLIN LAW FIRM LLC
`1526 Gilpin Avenue
`Wilmington, Delaware 19806
`Telephone: (302) 449-9010
`Facsimile: (302) 353-4251
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`James R. Nuttall (pro hac vice)
`John L. Abramic (pro hac vice)
`Michael Dockterman (pro hac vice)
`Katherine H. Tellez (pro hac vice)
`Robert F. Kappers (pro hac vice)
`Tron Fu (pro hac vice)
`Daniel F. Gelwicks (pro hac vice)
`jnuttall@steptoe.com
`jabramic@steptoe.com
`mdocketerman@steptoe.com
`ktellez@steptoe.com
`rkappers@steptoe.com
`tfu@steptoe.com
`dgelwicks@steptoe.com
`
`
`STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP
`227 West Monroe, Suite 4700
`Chicago, IL 60606
`(312) 577-1300
`
`Christopher A. Suarez (pro hac vice)
`csuarez@steptoe.com
`STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP
`1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20036
`(202) 429-8131
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Express Mobile, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED this 6th day of March, 2023:
`
`
`
`/s/ Brian S.S. Auerbach
`Beth Moskow-Schnoll (No. 2900)
`Brittany Giusini (No. 6034)
`Brian S.S. Auerbach (No. 6532)
`BALLARD SPAHR LLP
`919 N. Market Street, 11th Floor
`Wilmington, DE 19801-3034
`Telephone: (302) 252-4465
`moskowb@ballardspahr.com
`giusinib@ballardspahr.com
`auerbachb@ballardspahr.com
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`Brian W. LaCorte (pro hac vice)
`Jonathon A. Talcott (pro hac vice)
`Andrew H. Hensley (pro hac vice)
`1 East Washington Street, Suite 2300
`Phoenix, AZ 85004-2555
`Telephone: (602) 798-5400
`lacorteb@ballardspahr.com
`talcottj@ballardspahr.com
`hensleya@ballardspahr.com
`
`Lawrence Nodine (pro hac vice)
`Kyle Ceuninck (pro hac vice)
`999 Peachtree Street, NE, Suite 1600
`Atlanta, GA 30309-3915
`(678) 420-9362
`nodinel@ballardspahr.com
`ceuninckk@ballardspahr.com
`
`Caryn Borg-Breen (pro hac vice)
`1735 Market Street, 51st Floor
`Philadelphia, PA 19103
`(215) 864-8841
`borgbreenc@ballardspahr.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant GoDaddy.com, LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The Honorable Judge Matthew F. Kennelly
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
