throbber
Case 1:19-cv-01937-MFK-JLH Document 329 Filed 03/03/23 Page 1 of 6 PagelD #: 42534
`Case 1:19-cv-01937-MFK-JLH Document 329 Filed 03/03/23 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 42534
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`
`
`
`
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`
`
`EXPRESS MOBILE,INC.,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`GODADDY.COM,LLC,
`
`
`Civil Action No.1:19-cv-01937-MFK
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`)
`
`VERDICT FORM
`
`
`INSTRUCTIONS:
`
`Whenanswering the following questions and filling out this Verdict Form, please follow
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the directions provided throughout this Verdict Form. Your answer to each question must be
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`unanimous. Some of the questions contain legal terms that are defined and explained in detail in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the Jury Instructions. Please refer to the Jury Instructions if you are unsure about the meaning or
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`usage of any legal term that appears in the questions below.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01937-MFK-JLH Document 329 Filed 03/03/23 Page 2 of 6 PagelD #: 42535
`Case 1:19-cv-01937-MFK-JLH Document 329 Filed 03/03/23 Page 2 of 6 PageID #: 42535
`
`We,the jury, unanimously agree to the answers to the following questions and return them under
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the instructions of this court as our verdict in this case.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`QUESTION1: Infringement
`
`
`Did Express Mobile prove by a preponderance of the evidence that GoDaddy infringes the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`identified claim of the Asserted Patents?
`
`
`
`
`Please check “Yes” or “No” for each claim. “Yes”is in favor of Express Mobile and “No”
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`is in favor of GoDaddy.
`
`
`
`
`
`:
`(for Express Mobile)
`
`
`:___ (for Express Mobile)
`
`
`
`:____ (for Express Mobile)
`
`
`
`:___ (for Express Mobile)
`
`
`
`:____ (for Express Mobile)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`°755 Patent
`
`
`287 Patent
`
`
`044 Patent
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Claim 17:
`
`
`
`Claim 19:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Please Proceed to Question 2.
`
`
`
`
`:
`:
`
`:
`
`:
`
`(for GoDaddy)
`
`:
`(for GoDaddy)
`Claim 1:
`
`
`: SL (for GoDaddy)
`Claim 3:
`
`
`: A (for GoDaddy)
`Claim 12:
`
`
`
`
`: vw (for GoDaddy)
`Claim 16:
`
`
`
`
`: VACor GoDaddy)
`Claim 22:
`/
`;
`:
`(for GoDaddy)
`(for Express Mobile)
`Claim 1:
`
`
`
`
`: Yo(for GoDaddy)
`(for Express Mobile)
`Claim 13:
`
`Y
`.
`.
`:
`(for GoDaddy)
`(for Express Mobile)
`:
`Claim 1:
`
`
`
`
`: 4(for GoDaddy)
`(for Express Mobile)
`:
`Claim 11:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Claim 13: :V(for GoDaddy)(for Express Mobile)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(forExpressMobile)
`
`
`
`(for Express Mobile)
`
`
`
`: vpGoDaddy)
`
`:
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01937-MFK-JLH Document 329 Filed 03/03/23 Page 3 of 6 PagelD #: 42536
`Case 1:19-cv-01937-MFK-JLH Document 329 Filed 03/03/23 Page 3 of 6 PageID #: 42536
`
`QUESTION2: Willfulness
`
`Did Express Mobile prove by a preponderance ofthe evidence that GoDaddy willfully infringes
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the identified claim of the Asserted Patents?
`
`
`
`
`
`Claim 1:
`
`Claim 3:
`
`Claim 12:
`
`Claim 16:
`
`Claim 22:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Claim 1:
`
`Claim 13:
`
`
`
`
`(forExpress Mobile)
`:
`
`
`:__ (for Express Mobile)
`
`
`:___ (for Express Mobile)
`
`
`:____ (for Express Mobile)
`
`
`:____ (for Express Mobile)
`
`
`
`
`
`: oy GoDaddy)
`
`: “(for GoDaddy)
`
`: ACor GoDaddy)
`
`: vo(for GoDaddy)
`
`: 4(for GoDaddy)
`
`
`
`:
`
`:
`
`
`
`(for Express Mobile) yGoDaddy)
`
`:
`
`
`(for GoDaddy)
`
`
`
`
`(for Express Mobile)
`
`
`
`: VMGor GoDaddy)
`
`: oeGoDaddy)
`(forExpress Mobile)
`:
`:__(forExpress Mobile) S- GoDaddy)
`
`
`:___ (for Express Mobile)
`
`
`:____ (for Express Mobile)
`
`755 Patent
`
`
`°287 Patent
`
`
`044 Patent
`
`
`
`Claim 11:
`
`
`Claim 1:
`Claim 13:
`
`Claim 17:
`
`Claim 19:
`
`
`
`.
`
`
`
`:__ (for Express Mobile)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`:_% (for GoDaddy)
`
`
`
`:_ “(for GoDaddy)
`
`
`
`
`Please Proceed to Question 3.
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01937-MFK-JLH Document 329 Filed 03/03/23 Page 4 of 6 PagelD #: 42537
`Case 1:19-cv-01937-MFK-JLH Document 329 Filed 03/03/23 Page 4 of 6 PageID #: 42537
`
`QUESTION3: Invalidity
`
`
`Did GoDaddy prove by clear and convincing evidence that the identified claim is invalid?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Please check “Yes” or “No”for each claim. “Yes”is in favor of GoDaddy and “No”is in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`favor of Express Mobile.
`
`
`
`J
`
`:
`
`
`
`
`
`.
`(for Express Mobile)
`
`
`: “(for Express Mobile)
`
`
`:a Express Mobile)
`: WY(or Express Mobile)
`
`
`:__“ (for Express Mobile)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`°755 Patent
`
`
`°287 Patent
`
`
`°044 Patent
`
`
`.
`Claim 1:
`
`Claim 3:
`
`Claim 12:
`Claim 16:
`
`Claim 22:
`
`
`
`
`Claim 1:
`
`Claim 13:
`
`
`.
`Claim 1:
`
`Claim 11:
`
`Claim 13:
`
`Claim 17:
`
`
`Claim 19:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`:
`
`(for GoDaddy)
`
`:__ (for GoDaddy)
`
`:__ (for GoDaddy)
`:___ (for GoDaddy)
`
`:__ (for GoDaddy)
`
`
`
`
`:
`
`:
`
`:
`:
`
`:
`:
`
`:
`
`(for GoDaddy)
`
`(for GoDaddy)
`
`
`(for GoDaddy)
`
`(for GoDaddy)
`
`(for GoDaddy)
`
`(for GoDaddy)
`
`
`(for GoDaddy)
`
`
`(for Express Mobile)
`
`:
`
`:
`
`(for Express Mobile)
`
`
`(for Express Mobile)
`
`
`
`.
`(for Express Mobile)
`:
`
`
`: i (for Express Mobile)
`
`
`
`:
`(for Express Mobile)
`
`
`: Achor Express Mobile)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`No:
`
`
`
`
`
`If you checked “Yes” for any claims in Question 1 and checked “No”for any such claimsin
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in Question 3,i.e., you determined thatat least one claim is infringed and not invalid,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`proceed to Question 4.
`
`
`Otherwise, skip and DO NOT answer Question 4, and instead please proceed directly to the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Final Page of the Jury Verdict and sign and date that page.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01937-MFK-JLH Document 329 Filed 03/03/23 Page 5 of 6 PagelD #: 42538
`Case 1:19-cv-01937-MFK-JLH Document 329 Filed 03/03/23 Page 5 of 6 PageID #: 42538
`
`QUESTION 4: Damages
`
`
`Whatsum of moneyin the form of a reasonable royalty do you find that Express Mobile proved
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`by a preponderance of the evidence would fairly and reasonably compensate Express Mobile for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`GoDaddy’s past infringement of Express Mobile’s Asserted Patents?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`$ I
`
`s that sum a (check one):
`
`
`
`
`
`fully paid-up lump sum;or
`
`
`
`
`
`running royalty through trial (February 27, 2023)?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Please proceed to the Final Page of the Verdict Form and sign and date that page.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`» Case 1:19-cv-01937-MFK-JLH Document 329 Filed 03/03/23 Page 6 of 6 PagelD #: 42539
`Case 1:19-cv-01937-MFK-JLH Document 329 Filed 03/03/23 Page 6 of 6 PageID #: 42539
`
`Final Page of the Jury Verdict
`
`You have now reached the end of the verdict form and should review it to ensure it accurately
`reflects your unanimousdeterminations. The foreperson should then sign and date the verdict form
`in the spaces below and notify the Court Security Officer that you have reacheda verdict.
`
`The foreperson should retain possession of the verdict form and bring it when the jury is brought
`back into the courtroom.
`
`a 2/2 [23
`
`Date
`
`
`
`Signature
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket