throbber
Case 1:19-cv-01937-MFK-JLH Document 309 Filed 02/22/23 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 42363
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`
`EXPRESS MOBILE, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`GODADDY.COM, LLC,
`
`
`
` Defendant.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`Civil Action No.1:19-cv-01937-MFK
`
`
`
`
`
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
`TRIAL TESTIMONY OF MR. REMPELL
`
`WHEREAS, this case is currently set for trial on February 27, 2023 – March 3, 2023.
`
`(DI. 260, 270.)
`
`IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and AGREED by the undersigned counsel for Plaintiff
`
`Express Mobile, Inc. (“Express Mobile”) and Defendant GoDaddy.com, LLC (“GoDaddy”),
`
`that:
`
`Mr. Rempell recently became unavailable to testify at trial. In view of Mr. Rempell’s
`
`unavailability to testify at trial, the parties agree that:
`
`A) The parties have agreed to a designated portion of Mr. Rempell’s trial testimony from
`
`August 22, 2022 in Shopify Inc. et al., v. Express Mobile, Inc., 19-cv-00439-RGA (D.
`
`Del.) and the parties agree not to challenge the admissibility of this testimony (subject to
`
`redactions and changes agreed to by the parties);
`
`B) GoDaddy has designated Mr. Rempell’s testimony from various depositions and
`
`Express Mobile has provided objections and counter-designations to GoDaddy’s
`
`designated testimony. The admission of this designated testimony is subject to Express
`
`Mobile’s objections and the Court’s ruling on any such objections. Express Mobile
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01937-MFK-JLH Document 309 Filed 02/22/23 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 42364
`
`agrees not to affirmatively designate testimony from Mr. Rempell’s depositions, but may
`
`counter designate testimony in response to GoDaddy’s designations.
`
`C) Express Mobile and GoDaddy agree to the admission in evidence at trial of the
`
`exhibits listed in Exhibit A, and will work together in good faith to agree on logistics
`
`relating to the presentation of Mr. Rempell’s testimony, including his designated former
`
`trial testimony from Shopify, 19-cv-00439 with the understanding that (i) the parties will
`
`not describe the reason for Mr. Rempell’s unavailability, nor make negative reference to
`
`the fact that he is unavailable or absent from trial, and (ii) if the testimony is read to the
`
`jury through a reader on the stand, the reader will not dramatize the testimony.
`
`
`
`Dated: February 22, 2023
`
`/s/ Timothy Devlin
`
`
`
`Timothy Devlin (#4241)
`tdevlin@devlinlawfirm.com
`DEVLIN LAW FIRM LLC
`1526 Gilpin Avenue
`Wilmington, Delaware 19806
`Telephone: (302) 449-9010
`Facsimile: (302) 353-4251
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`James R. Nuttall (pro hac vice)
`John L. Abramic (pro hac vice)
`Michael Dockterman (pro hac vice)
`Katherine H. Tellez (pro hac vice)
`Robert F. Kappers (pro hac vice)
`Tron Fu (pro hac vice)
`Daniel F. Gelwicks (pro hac vice pending)
`jnuttall@steptoe.com
`jabramic@steptoe.com
`mdocketerman@steptoe.com
`ktellez@steptoe.com
`rkappers@steptoe.com
`tfu@steptoe.com
`dgelwicks@steptoe.com
`
`
`
`/s/ Beth Moskow-Schnoll
`
`
`
`Beth Moskow-Schnoll (No. 2900)
`Brittany Giusini (No. 6034)
`Brian S.S. Auerbach (No. 6532)
`Ballard Spahr LLP
`919 N. Market Street, 11th Floor
`Wilmington, DE 19801-3034
`Telephone: (302) 252-4465
`moskowb@ballardspahr.com
`giusinib@ballardspahr.com
`auerbachb@ballardspahr.com
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`Brian W. LaCorte
`Jonathon A. Talcott
`Andrew H. Hensley
`1 East Washington Street, Suite 2300
`Phoenix, AZ 85004-2555
`Telephone: (602) 798-5400
`lacorteb@ballardspahr.com
`talcottj@ballardspahr.com
`hensleya@ballardspahr.com
`
`Lawrence Nodine
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01937-MFK-JLH Document 309 Filed 02/22/23 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 42365
`
`Kyle Ceuninck
`999 Peachtree Street, NE, Suite 1600 Atlanta,
`GA 30309-3915
`(678) 420-9362
`nodinel@ballardspahr.com
`ceuninckk@ballardspahr.com
`
`Counsel for Defendant GoDaddy.com, LLC
`
`STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP
`227 West Monroe, Suite 4700
`Chicago, IL 60606
`(312) 577-1300
`
`Christopher A. Suarez (pro hac vice)
`csuarez@steptoe.com
`STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP
`1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW
`Washington, DC 20036
`(202) 429-8131
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Express Mobile, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED this
`
`
`
` day of
`
`
`
`
`
`, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01937-MFK-JLH Document 309 Filed 02/22/23 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 42366
`Case 1:19-cv-01937-MFK-JLH Document 309 Filed 02/22/23 Page 4 of 4 PagelD #: 42366
`
`EXHIBITS TO BE ADMITTED IN EVIDENCE BY STIPULATION
`EXHIBITS TO BE ADMITTED IN EVIDENCE BY STIPULATION
`
`EXHIBIT A
`EXHIBIT A
`
`e PTX-726
`• PTX-726
`
`e PTX-616
`• PTX-616
`
`e PTX-363
`• PTX-363
`
`e PTX-321
`• PTX-321
`
`e PTX-158
`• PTX-158
`
`e PTX-148
`• PTX-148
`
`e PTX-143
`• PTX-143
`
`e DTX-782
`• DTX-782
`
`e DTX-783
`• DTX-783
`
`e DTX-784
`• DTX-784
`
`e DTX-785
`• DTX-785
`
`e DTX-786
`• DTX-786
`
`e DTX-758
`• DTX-758
`
`e DTX-706 (WITH REDACTIONS)
`• DTX-706 (WITH REDACTIONS)
`
`e DTX-695
`• DTX-695
`
`e DTX-687 (WITH REDACTIONS)
`• DTX-687 (WITH REDACTIONS)
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket