`Case 1:19-cv-01937-MFK-JLH Document 276-2 Filed 01/13/23 Page 1 of 4 PagelD #: 39362
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 2
`EXHIBIT 2
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-01937-MFK-JLH Document 276-2 Filed 01/13/23 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 39363
`
`
`EXPRESS MOBILE, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`GODADDY.COM, LLC,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
` Defendant.
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`
`Civil Action No.1:19-cv-01937-MFK
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFF EXPRESS MOBILE, INC.’S
`STATEMENT OF ISSUES OF FACT REMAINING TO BE LITIGATED
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-01937-MFK-JLH Document 276-2 Filed 01/13/23 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 39364
`
`
`
`Express Mobile identifies the following issues of fact which remain to be litigated. This
`
`statement is based on the current status of the case and the Court’s rulings to date. Express Mobile
`
`reserves the right to modify or supplement this statement in response to subsequent rulings by the
`
`Court. Should the Court determine that any issue identified here is more appropriately considered
`
`an issue of law, Express Mobile incorporates such issues by reference into its Statement of Issues
`
`of Law That Remain to be Litigated. Express Mobile incorporates the disputed issues of law listed
`
`in Exhibit 4 to the extent that the issues involve disputed factual issues and/or mixed questions of
`
`law and fact.
`
`I.
`
`Infringement
`
`1.
`
`Whether GoDaddy infringes, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, claims
`
`1, 3, 12, 16, and 22 of the ʼ755 patent.
`
`2.
`
`Whether GoDaddy infringes, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, claims
`
`1 and 13 of the ʼ287 patent.
`
`3.
`
`Whether GoDaddy infringes, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, claims
`
`1, 11, 13, 17, and 19 of the ‘044 patent.
`
`4.
`
`Whether GoDaddy willfully infringes any of the asserted claims of the ʼ755
`
`patent, ʼ287 patent or ‘044 patent.
`
`II.
`
`
` Validity
`A.
`
`Obviousness
`
`5.
`
`Whether GoDaddy has met its burden, by clear and convincing evidence, that
`
`claims 1, 3, 12, 16, and 22 of the ʼ755 patent are obvious.
`
`6.
`
`Whether GoDaddy has met its burden, by clear and convincing evidence, that
`
`claims 1 and 13 of the ʼ287 patent are obvious.
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-01937-MFK-JLH Document 276-2 Filed 01/13/23 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 39365
`
`
`
`7.
`
`Whether GoDaddy has met its burden, by clear and convincing evidence, that
`
`claims 1, 11, 13, 17, and 19 of the ‘044 patent are obvious.
`
`III. Damages
`
`8.
`
`The amount of compensation to which Express Mobile is entitled should the jury
`
`find GoDaddy infringed any valid Asserted Claim, including no less than a reasonable royalty.
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`