throbber
Case 1:19-cv-01937-MFK-JLH Document 276-2 Filed 01/13/23 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 39362
`Case 1:19-cv-01937-MFK-JLH Document 276-2 Filed 01/13/23 Page 1 of 4 PagelD #: 39362
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 2
`EXHIBIT 2
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01937-MFK-JLH Document 276-2 Filed 01/13/23 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 39363
`
`
`EXPRESS MOBILE, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`GODADDY.COM, LLC,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
` Defendant.
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`
`Civil Action No.1:19-cv-01937-MFK
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFF EXPRESS MOBILE, INC.’S
`STATEMENT OF ISSUES OF FACT REMAINING TO BE LITIGATED
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01937-MFK-JLH Document 276-2 Filed 01/13/23 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 39364
`
`
`
`Express Mobile identifies the following issues of fact which remain to be litigated. This
`
`statement is based on the current status of the case and the Court’s rulings to date. Express Mobile
`
`reserves the right to modify or supplement this statement in response to subsequent rulings by the
`
`Court. Should the Court determine that any issue identified here is more appropriately considered
`
`an issue of law, Express Mobile incorporates such issues by reference into its Statement of Issues
`
`of Law That Remain to be Litigated. Express Mobile incorporates the disputed issues of law listed
`
`in Exhibit 4 to the extent that the issues involve disputed factual issues and/or mixed questions of
`
`law and fact.
`
`I.
`
`Infringement
`
`1.
`
`Whether GoDaddy infringes, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, claims
`
`1, 3, 12, 16, and 22 of the ʼ755 patent.
`
`2.
`
`Whether GoDaddy infringes, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, claims
`
`1 and 13 of the ʼ287 patent.
`
`3.
`
`Whether GoDaddy infringes, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, claims
`
`1, 11, 13, 17, and 19 of the ‘044 patent.
`
`4.
`
`Whether GoDaddy willfully infringes any of the asserted claims of the ʼ755
`
`patent, ʼ287 patent or ‘044 patent.
`
`II.
`
`
` Validity
`A.
`
`Obviousness
`
`5.
`
`Whether GoDaddy has met its burden, by clear and convincing evidence, that
`
`claims 1, 3, 12, 16, and 22 of the ʼ755 patent are obvious.
`
`6.
`
`Whether GoDaddy has met its burden, by clear and convincing evidence, that
`
`claims 1 and 13 of the ʼ287 patent are obvious.
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01937-MFK-JLH Document 276-2 Filed 01/13/23 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 39365
`
`
`
`7.
`
`Whether GoDaddy has met its burden, by clear and convincing evidence, that
`
`claims 1, 11, 13, 17, and 19 of the ‘044 patent are obvious.
`
`III. Damages
`
`8.
`
`The amount of compensation to which Express Mobile is entitled should the jury
`
`find GoDaddy infringed any valid Asserted Claim, including no less than a reasonable royalty.
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket