Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 85 Filed 06/02/21 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 2252
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`C.A. No. 1:19-cv-01410-MN
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`))
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`VB Assets, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`Amazon.com, Inc.; Amazon.com LLC; Amazon
`Web Services, Inc.; A2Z Development Center,
`Inc. d/b/a Lab126; Rawles LLC; AMZN Mobile
`LLC; AMZN Mobile 2 LLC; Amazon.com
`Services, Inc. f/k/a Amazon Fulfillment Services,
`Inc.; and Amazon Digital Services LLC,
`
`Defendants.
`
`SECOND AMENDED JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CHART
`
`In accordance with Paragraph 11 of the Scheduling Order (D.I. 32) and the Court’s May
`
`19, 2021 Oral Order (D.I. 83), Plaintiff VB Assets, LLC (“VoiceBox” or “Plaintiff”) and
`
`Defendants Amazon.com, Inc.; Amazon.com LLC; Amazon Web Services, Inc.; A2Z
`
`Development Center, Inc. d/b/a Lab126; Rawles LLC; AMZN Mobile LLC; AMZN Mobile 2
`
`LLC; Amazon.com Services, Inc. f/k/a Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc.; and Amazon Digital
`
`Services LLC (collectively, “Amazon” or “Defendants”)1 submit the following Second Amended
`
`Joint Claim Construction Chart in advance of the claim construction hearing scheduled for June
`
`9, 2021 regarding U.S. Patent Nos. 8,073,681 (“the ’681 patent”); 9,015,049 (“the ’049 patent”);
`
`1 Defendants’ Footnote: On January 1, 2020, Amazon Digital Services, LLC merged into
`Amazon.com Services LLC. Rawles LLC and AMZN Mobile 2 LLC are not properly named
`defendants.
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 85 Filed 06/02/21 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 2253
`
`9,626,703 (“the ’703 patent”); 7,818,176 (“the ’176 patent”); 8,886,536 (“the ’536 patent”); and
`
`9,269,097 (“the ’097 patent”) (collectively, the “Patents-in-Suit”).
`
`This Second Amended Joint Claim Construction Chart, attached as Exhibit A, sets forth
`
`(i) agreed construction for certain claim terms; (ii) the disputed claim terms; (iii) the parties’
`
`respective proposed constructions for the disputed claim terms; and (iv) citations to the intrinsic
`
`evidence on which each party will rely to support its proposed construction for disputed claim
`
`terms. The parties have made good faith effort to include herein all support in intrinsic evidence,
`
`but reserve the right to rely on additional evidence, such as intrinsic and extrinsic evidence, in
`
`their claim construction briefs to provide additional context or to rebut arguments made by the
`
`other party during the claim construction briefing. The parties further reserve the right to rely on
`
`any intrinsic evidence identified by the other party. The parties further reserve the right to update
`
`and/or supplement their proposed claim constructions with the claim construction briefs.
`
`The parties intend to rely on the Patents-in-Suit, and patents and applications to which the
`
`Patents-in-Suit claim priority, including any related patents or patent applications related to the
`
`Patents-in-Suit. Any citation to intrinsic evidence provided by the parties in support of their
`
`proposed claim construction is intended as an example. The parties reserve the right to cite to
`
`claims in which the proposed terms for construction appear. The parties reserve the right to cite
`
`to analogous passages in other relevant patents or prosecution histories and agree that a citation
`
`to the specification of one Patent-in-Suit also incorporates by reference citations to duplicative
`
`portions of the specifications of the other Patent-in-Suit. Any additional evidence or reference
`
`within or encompassed by a particular citation is deemed incorporated by reference (e.g.,
`
`references to a figure or table or other patents and patent applications are incorporated by
`
`reference and specification descriptions of a cited figure or table are similarly incorporated by
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 85 Filed 06/02/21 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 2254
`
`reference). Cited passages are intended to include all figures and tables referenced therein,
`
`whether referenced or not.
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 85 Filed 06/02/21 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 2255
`
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`Professional Corporation
`/s/ Ian R. Liston
`Ian R. Liston (Delaware Bar I.D. #5507)
`Jennifer A. Ward (Delaware Bar I.D. #6476)
`222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 800
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`iliston@wsgr.com
`jward@wsgr.com
`Telephone: (302) 304-7600
`Facsimile: (866) 974-7329
`
`Of Counsel:
`Edward G. Poplawski, admitted pro hac vice
`Erik J. Carlson, admitted pro hac vice
`Ryan S. Benyamin, admitted pro hac vice
`633 West Fifth Street, Suite 1550
`Los Angeles, CA 90071-2027
`epoplawski@wsgr.com
`ecarlson@wsgr.com
`rbenyamin@wsgr.com
`Telephone: (323) 210-2900
`Facsimile: (866) 974-7329
`James C. Yoon, admitted pro hac vice
`Ryan Smith, admitted pro hac vice
`650 Page Mill Road
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
`jyoon@wsgr.com
`rsmith@wsgr.com
`Telephone: (650) 493-9300
`Facsimile: (650) 493-6811
`Attorneys for VB Assets, LLC
`
`Dated: June 2, 2021
`
`ASHBY & GEDDES
`
`/s/ Steven J. Balick
`Steven J. Balick (Delaware Bar I.D. #2114)
`Andrew C. Mayo (Delaware Bar I.D. #5207)
`500 Delaware Avenue, 8th Floor
`P.O. Box 1150
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`(302) 654-1888
`sbalick@ashbygeddes.com
`amayo@ashbygeddes.com
`
`Of Counsel:
`J. David Hadden, CSB No. 176148
`Email: dhadden@fenwick.com
`Saina S. Shamilov, CSB No. 215636
`Email: sshamilov@fenwick.com
`Ravi R. Ranganath, CSB No. 272981
`rranganath@fenwick.com
`Johnson K. Kuncheria, CSB No. 335765
`Email: jkuncheria@fenwick.com
`Vigen Salmastlian, CSB No. 276846
`Email: vsalmastlian@fenwick.com
`Sapna Mehta, CSB No. 288238
`Email: smehta@fenwick.com
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`Silicon Valley Center
`801 California Street
`Mountain View, CA 94041
`Telephone: 650.988.8500
`Facsimile: 650.938.520
`Attorneys for Defendants
`
`4
`
`