throbber
Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 293 Filed 11/08/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 11132
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`VB ASSETS, LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 19-1410 (MN)
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JUDGMENT FOLLOWING JURY VERDICT
`
`This 8th day of November 2023, the Court having held a jury trial and the jury having
`
`rendered a unanimous verdict on November 8, 2023 (see D.I. 290 & 291), pursuant to Rule 58(b)
`
`of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
`
`1.
`
`Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff VB Assets, LLC (“Plaintiff”) and against
`
`Defendant Amazon.com Services LLC (“Defendant”) that Defendant infringes claim 13 of U.S.
`
`Patent No. 8,073,681 (“the ’681 Patent”), claim 25 of U.S. Patent No. 9,626,703 (“the ’703
`
`Patent”), claim 40 of U.S. Patent No. 7,818,176 (“the ’176 Patent”) and claim 23 of U.S. Patent
`
`No. 9,269,097 (“the ’097 Patent”) and that such infringement of each claim was willful;
`
`2.
`
`Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant that claim 13 of the
`
`’681 Patent, claim 25 of the ’703 Patent, claim 40 of the ’176 Patent and claim 23 of the ’097 Patent
`
`are not invalid for lack of adequate written description;
`
`3.
`
`Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant that claim 13 of the
`
`’681 Patent, claim 25 of the ’703 Patent, claim 40 of the ’176 Patent and claim 23 of the ’097
`
`Patent are not invalid as obvious;
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 293 Filed 11/08/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 11133
`
`4.
`
`Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant that claim 13 of the
`
`’681 Patent, claim 25 of the ’703 Patent, claim 40 of the ’176 Patent and claim 23 of the ’097
`
`Patent are not patent ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101; and
`
`5.
`
`Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant in the amount of
`
`$46,700,000 in the form of a running royalty.
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Judgment shall have the effect of denying as moot
`
`all other motions made by the parties pursuant to Rule 50(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil
`
`Procedure.
`
`IT IS STILL FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for any party to move for costs and
`
`attorneys’ fees (including under 35 U.S.C. § 285) is extended to within fourteen (14) days after
`
`the time for appeal has expired or within fourteen (14) days after issuance of the mandate from the
`
`appellate court, and no party shall file any such motion before that time.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The Honorable Maryellen Noreika
`United States District Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket