throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`VB ASSETS, LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 277 Filed 11/03/23 Page 1 of 19 PageID #: 10895
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 19-1410 (MN)
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`PRELIMINARY JURY INSTRUCTIONS
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 277 Filed 11/03/23 Page 2 of 19 PageID #: 10896
`
`
`
`
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`Page
`
`I. 
`
`II. 
`
`III. 
`
`IV. 
`
`V. 
`
`VI. 
`
`INTRODUCTION AND ROLE OF THE JURY ............................................................. 1 
`
`OVERVIEW OF THE CASE ........................................................................................... 2 
`
`UNITED STATES PATENTS ......................................................................................... 3 
`
`EVIDENCE ....................................................................................................................... 4 
`
`BURDENS OF PROOF .................................................................................................... 6 
`
`CREDIBILITY OF WITNESSES .................................................................................... 7 
`
`VII.  EXPERT TESTIMONY ................................................................................................... 8 
`
`VIII.  DEPOSITION TESTIMONY ........................................................................................... 9 
`
`IX. 
`
`X. 
`
`XI. 
`
`ADMITTED FACTS ...................................................................................................... 10 
`
`NOTE-TAKING ............................................................................................................. 11 
`
`BENCH CONFERENCES .............................................................................................. 13 
`
`XII.  CONDUCT OF THE JURY ........................................................................................... 14 
`
`XIII.  COURSE OF THE TRIAL ............................................................................................. 16 
`
`XIV.  TRIAL SCHEDULE ....................................................................................................... 17 
`
`i
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 277 Filed 11/03/23 Page 3 of 19 PageID #: 10897
`
`
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION AND ROLE OF THE JURY
`
`Now that you have been sworn in, I have the following preliminary instructions for
`
`guidance on your role as jurors in this case.
`
`These instructions are intended to assist you in discharging your duties as jurors and to
`
`introduce you to the case and the law that you will apply to the evidence that you will hear. Also,
`
`because this case involves patents, I will give you some preliminary instructions regarding patents.
`
`I will give you more detailed instructions on the law at the end of the trial.
`
`You will hear the evidence, decide what the facts are, and then apply those facts to the law
`
`that I will give to you. You and only you will be the judges of the facts. I play no part in judging
`
`the facts. My role is to be the judge of the law. I make whatever legal decisions have to be made
`
`during the course of the trial, and I will explain to you the legal principles that must guide you in
`
`your decisions. You must follow that law whether you agree with it or not. It is important that
`
`you perform your duties fairly. Do not let any bias, sympathy, or prejudice influence your decision
`
`in any way. Nothing I may say or do during the course of the trial is intended to indicate what
`
`your verdict should be.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 277 Filed 11/03/23 Page 4 of 19 PageID #: 10898
`
`
`
`II.
`
`OVERVIEW OF THE CASE
`
`This is a civil action arising under the patent laws of the United States. The parties in this
`
`case are the Plaintiff, VB Assets, LLC, and Defendant Amazon.com Services LLC.
`
`VB Assets is the owner of the four patents-at-issue in this case, which together are referred
`
`to as “the Asserted Patents.” During the trial, the parties will offer testimony and evidence to
`
`familiarize you with the technology involved in the asserted patents.
`
`VB Assets contends that Amazon has infringed the Asserted Patents and seeks damages.
`
`Amazon contends that it does not infringe the Asserted Patents, that those patents are invalid and
`
`that it does not owe any damages to VB Assets.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 277 Filed 11/03/23 Page 5 of 19 PageID #: 10899
`
`
`
`III. UNITED STATES PATENTS
`
`As I just mentioned, this case is about patents, which is an area unfamiliar to many people.
`
`To help you understand what patents are and how they are obtained, you will now be shown a
`
`video produced by the Federal Judicial Center. The video will run for approximately 17 minutes.
`
`The video refers to a sample patent. Although you do not have the sample patent, I do not think
`
`that you need it to follow what is being said. At the conclusion of the video, I will provide you
`
`with additional instructions.
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 277 Filed 11/03/23 Page 6 of 19 PageID #: 10900
`
`
`
`IV.
`
`EVIDENCE
`
`The evidence from which you will find the facts will consist of the testimony of witnesses
`
`and documents, and other things admitted into evidence as exhibits; any facts that have been
`
`stipulated, that is formally agreed to by the parties; and any facts which I say you must accept as
`
`true.
`
`Certain things are not evidence. I will list those things for you now:
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`Statements, arguments, questions, and comments by lawyers are not evidence.
`
`Exhibits that are identified by a party but not offered or received into evidence are
`
`not evidence. This includes demonstrative exhibits such as PowerPoint presentations.
`
`3.
`
`Objections to questions are not evidence. Lawyers have an obligation to object
`
`when they believe that the testimony or exhibits being offered into evidence are not proper under
`
`the Rules of Evidence. You should not be influenced by a lawyer’s objection or by my ruling on
`
`the objection. If I sustain or uphold the objection, you should ignore the question or document in
`
`question. If I overrule an objection and allow the matter into evidence, treat the testimony or
`
`document like any other evidence. If I instruct you that some item of evidence is admitted for a
`
`limited purpose, you must follow that instruction and consider that evidence for that purpose only.
`
`If this occurs during the trial, I will try to clarify this for you at that time.
`
`4.
`
`Testimony and exhibits that I exclude or strike from the record or tell you to
`
`disregard are not evidence and must not be considered.
`
`5.
`
`Anything you see or hear outside the courtroom is not evidence and must be
`
`disregarded. You are to decide this case solely on the evidence presented here in the courtroom.
`
`Finally, some of you may have heard the phrases or terms “direct evidence” and
`
`“circumstantial evidence.” Direct evidence is direct proof of a fact, such as testimony of an
`
`eyewitness. Circumstantial evidence is proof of a fact or facts from which you may infer or
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 277 Filed 11/03/23 Page 7 of 19 PageID #: 10901
`
`
`
`conclude that other facts do or do not exist. For example, the fact that it snowed overnight could
`
`be proven directly (“I saw it snow last night”) or circumstantially (“When I went to sleep the grass
`
`was green, when I woke up there was a foot of snow on the ground”). Do not be concerned about
`
`whether evidence is “direct evidence” or “circumstantial evidence.” As a general rule, the law
`
`makes no distinction between these two types of evidence, but simply requires that you find facts
`
`from all the evidence in the case, whether direct or circumstantial or a combination of the two. In
`
`judging the facts, it will be up to you to decide which witnesses to believe, which witnesses not to
`
`believe, and how much of any witness’s testimony to accept or reject.
`
`You should consider and weigh all of the evidence that is presented to you. You should
`
`use your common sense in weighing the evidence. Consider it in light of your everyday experience
`
`and give it whatever weight you believe it deserves. If your experience tells you that certain
`
`evidence reasonably leads to a conclusion, you are free to reach that conclusion.
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 277 Filed 11/03/23 Page 8 of 19 PageID #: 10902
`
`
`
`V.
`
`BURDENS OF PROOF
`
`In any legal action, facts must be proven by the required standard of evidence, known as
`
`the burden of proof. In a case involving patents, different burdens of proof are used. The first is
`
`called “preponderance of the evidence.” The second is called “clear and convincing evidence.”
`
`Your verdict depends on whether you find certain facts have been proved either by a
`
`preponderance of the evidence or by clear and convincing evidence.
`
`VB Assets has the burden of proving patent infringement by a preponderance of the
`
`evidence. That means VB Assets has to prove to you, in light of all the evidence, that what it
`
`claims is more likely true than not true. To put it differently, if you were to put the evidence in
`
`support of VB Assets’ claims and the evidence weighing against VB Assets’ claims on opposite
`
`sides of a scale, the evidence supporting VB Assets’ claims would have to make the scales tip in
`
`VB Assets’ favor. If the scale should remain equal or tip in favor of Amazon, you must find for
`
`Amazon.
`
`Amazon has the burden of proving patents are invalid by clear and convincing evidence.
`
`That means Amazon has to prove to you, in light of all the evidence, that what it claims is highly
`
`probable. Proof by clear and convincing evidence is a higher burden of proof than a preponderance
`
`of the evidence.
`
`You may have heard the term “proof beyond a reasonable doubt.” That is a stricter standard
`
`of proof and it applies only to criminal cases. It does not apply to civil cases such as this. You
`
`should therefore not consider that burden of proof in this case. You should put it out of your mind.
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 277 Filed 11/03/23 Page 9 of 19 PageID #: 10903
`
`
`
`VI. CREDIBILITY OF WITNESSES
`
`You are the sole judges of each witness’s credibility. That is, it will be up to you to decide
`
`which witnesses to believe, which witnesses not to believe, and how much of any witness’s
`
`testimony to accept or reject. You should consider each witness’s means of knowledge; strength
`
`of memory; opportunity to observe; how reasonable or unreasonable the testimony is; whether it
`
`is consistent or inconsistent; whether it has been contradicted; the witness’s biases, prejudices, or
`
`interests; the witness’s manner or demeanor on the witness stand; and all circumstances that,
`
`according to the evidence, could affect the credibility of the testimony. The weight of the evidence
`
`to prove a fact does not necessarily depend on the number of witnesses who testify. What is more
`
`important is how believable the witnesses were, and how much weight you think their testimony
`
`deserves.
`
`If you find the testimony to be contradictory, you must try to reconcile it, if reasonably
`
`possible, so as to make one harmonious story of it all. But if you can not do this, then it is your
`
`duty and privilege to believe the testimony that, in your judgment, is most believable and disregard
`
`any testimony that, in your judgment, is not believable. This instruction applies to the testimony
`
`of all witnesses, including expert witnesses.
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 277 Filed 11/03/23 Page 10 of 19 PageID #: 10904
`
`
`
`VII. EXPERT TESTIMONY
`
`Expert testimony is testimony from a person who has a special skill or knowledge in some
`
`science, profession or business. This skill or knowledge is not common to the average person but
`
`has been acquired by the expert through special study or experience. In weighing expert testimony,
`
`you may consider the expert’s qualifications, the reasons for the expert’s opinions, and the
`
`reliability of the information supporting the expert’s opinions, as well as the factors I have
`
`previously mentioned for weighing testimony of any other witness. Expert testimony should
`
`receive whatever weight and credit you think appropriate, given all the other evidence in the case.
`
`You are free to accept or reject the testimony of experts, just as with any other witness.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 277 Filed 11/03/23 Page 11 of 19 PageID #: 10905
`
`
`
`VIII. DEPOSITION TESTIMONY
`
`You may hear witnesses testify through deposition testimony. A deposition is the sworn
`
`testimony of a witness taken before trial. The witness is placed under oath and swears to tell the
`
`truth, and lawyers for each party may ask questions. A court reporter is present and records the
`
`questions and answers. The deposition may also be recorded on videotape. Deposition testimony
`
`is entitled to the same consideration and is to be judged in the same way as if the witness had been
`
`present to testify.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 277 Filed 11/03/23 Page 12 of 19 PageID #: 10906
`
`
`
`IX. ADMITTED FACTS
`
`The parties have stipulated that certain facts are true, and those admitted facts may be read
`
`to you during trial. You must treat these admitted facts as having been proven for purposes of this
`
`case.
`
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 277 Filed 11/03/23 Page 13 of 19 PageID #: 10907
`
`
`
`X.
`
`NOTE-TAKING
`
`You have been given a notebook and a pen. Inside your notebook, you will find paper, a
`
`copy of the asserted patents and photographs of each witness. If you wish, you may, but are not
`
`required to, take notes to help you remember what witnesses said. Notes may be helpful to you
`
`because at the end of the trial, you must make your decision based on what you recall of the
`
`evidence. You will not have a written transcript to consult, and it may not be practical for the court
`
`reporter to read back lengthy testimony. Therefore, you should pay close attention to the testimony
`
`as it is given. I do not suggest that you look to your note taking as a substitute for that written
`
`transcript. Instead, as you listen to the testimony, keep in mind that you will be relying on your
`
`recollection of the testimony during your deliberations.
`
`If you do take notes, please keep them to yourself until you and your fellow jurors go to
`
`the jury room to decide this case. Do not let note-taking distract you to the point that you miss
`
`hearing other testimony from the witness. Your notes are only a tool to aid your own individual
`
`memory and you should not compare your notes with other jurors in determining the content of
`
`any testimony or in evaluating the importance of any evidence. Your notes are not evidence and
`
`are not a complete outline of the proceedings or a list of the highlights of the trial. Do not use your
`
`notes, or any other juror’s notes, as authority to persuade fellow jurors.
`
`During the trial, documents or other physical items may be received into evidence. At
`
`present, however, you will not be supplied with a list of exhibits that are received in evidence.
`
`Therefore, you may wish to make notes about the exhibits, especially their description and number,
`
`so that you can refer to those exhibits while you are deliberating. You will be given a hardcopy
`
`of every admitted exhibit to take to the jury room to use during deliberations.
`
`When we take our recess each day for the lunchtime break and when we take our recess
`
`each night, please take your notes to the jury room and leave your notes there. Do not take your
`
`11
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 277 Filed 11/03/23 Page 14 of 19 PageID #: 10908
`
`
`
`notes away from the Court at any time. No one will read your notes but you. Your notes will be
`
`destroyed after the trial is over.
`
`
`
`
`
`12
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 277 Filed 11/03/23 Page 15 of 19 PageID #: 10909
`
`
`
`XI.
`
`BENCH CONFERENCES
`
`During the trial it may be necessary for me to talk with the lawyers outside your hearing,
`
`either by having a bench conference while you are present in the courtroom, sometimes called a
`
`sidebar, or by me calling a recess. That may mean that some of the lawyers and I go out into the
`
`hall for a few minutes so that we can talk or that I excuse you. If we have a bench conference,
`
`please understand that while you are waiting, the lawyers and I are working. And know that even
`
`then the parties are being charged for the time – i.e., the time spent comes out of their total trial
`
`time. We are not trying to keep important information from you. The purpose of these conferences
`
`is to decide how certain evidence is to be treated under the rules of evidence that govern the trial,
`
`and to avoid confusion and error.
`
`We will, of course, do what we can to keep the number and length of these conferences to
`
`a minimum. If you would like to stand or stretch or walk around the jury box while we are
`
`conferring, you should feel free to do so.
`
`I may not always grant a lawyer’s request for a conference. Do not consider my granting
`
`or denying a request for a conference as any indication of my opinion of the case or of what your
`
`verdict should be.
`
`
`
`13
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 277 Filed 11/03/23 Page 16 of 19 PageID #: 10910
`
`
`
`XII. CONDUCT OF THE JURY
`
`Now, a few words about your conduct as jurors.
`
`First, during the trial and until you have heard all of the evidence and retired to the jury
`
`room to deliberate, you are not to discuss the case with anyone, not even among yourselves. If
`
`any lawyer, party or witness does not speak to you when you pass in the hall, ride the elevator or
`
`the like, remember it is because they are not supposed to talk with you, nor you with them. If
`
`anyone should try to talk to you about the case, please bring it to my attention promptly.
`
`Second, do not read or listen to anything touching on this case that is not admitted into
`
`evidence. By that I mean, if there is a newspaper or internet article or radio or television report
`
`relating to this case, do not read the article or watch or listen to the report.
`
`Third, do not try to research or investigate the case on your own. Let me elaborate. During
`
`the course of the trial, you must not conduct any independent research about the case, the matters
`
`in the case, the technology involved in the case, or the individuals or entities involved in the case.
`
`In other words, you should not consult dictionaries or reference materials (in print, electronic, or
`
`other format) or search websites or blogs on the internet. Also, again, should there happen to be a
`
`newspaper article, internet article or television or radio report relating to this case, do not read the
`
`article or watch or listen to the report. It is important that you decide this case based solely on the
`
`evidence presented in the courtroom. Please do not try to find out information from any other
`
`sources.
`
`I know that many of you use cell phones, iPhones and other smartphones, iPads and other
`
`tablets, the internet, and other forms of technology. You must not talk to anyone about this case
`
`or use these tools to communicate electronically with anyone about the case. This includes your
`
`family and friends. You may not communicate with anyone about the case on your cell phone or
`
`smartphone, through e-mail, your tablet, text messaging, on Twitter, through any blog or website,
`
`14
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 277 Filed 11/03/23 Page 17 of 19 PageID #: 10911
`
`
`
`through any internet chat room, or by way of any other social networking web sites, including but
`
`not limited to Facebook, X (formerly known as Twitter), Instagram, TikTok, WeChat, WhatsApp,
`
`Snapchat, LinkedIn and YouTube.
`
`Finally, you should not form any conclusion as to the issues in the case until all of the
`
`evidence is in. Keep an open mind until you start your deliberations at the end of the case. You
`
`will receive detailed instructions on the law at the end of the case, and those instructions will
`
`control your deliberations and decision.
`
`
`
`
`
`15
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 277 Filed 11/03/23 Page 18 of 19 PageID #: 10912
`
`
`
`XIII. COURSE OF THE TRIAL
`
`The trial will begin shortly.
`
`First, each side may make an opening statement. An opening statement is not evidence but
`
`is simply an outline of what that party intends to prove to help you follow the evidence that will
`
`be presented.
`
`After the opening statements, the parties will present their evidence. VB Assets will go
`
`first and present its case and witnesses, who counsel for Amazon may cross-examine. Amazon
`
`will then present their case and witnesses who counsel for VB Assets may cross-examine. VB
`
`Assets will then have an opportunity to present its rebuttal to Amazon’s invalidity case.
`
`After that, I will give you instructions on the law and the attorneys will make their closing
`
`arguments to summarize and interpret the evidence for you. And then you will retire to the jury
`
`room to deliberate on your verdict.
`
`
`
`
`
`16
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 277 Filed 11/03/23 Page 19 of 19 PageID #: 10913
`
`
`
`XIV. TRIAL SCHEDULE
`
`Though you have heard this before, I want to again outline the schedule I will maintain
`
`during the course of this trial.
`
`As mentioned previously, once trial begins, this case is expected to take up to five business
`
`days to try, between now and Wednesday, November 8, 2023.
`
`The trial will normally begin each day at 9:00 a.m. and will go until we take a lunch break,
`
`which will be about a 30 to 45 minutes, continuing after that until 4:30 or 4:45 p.m. There will be
`
`a fifteen-minute break in the morning and a fifteen-minute break in the afternoon.
`
`What I have just outlined is the general schedule. It is possible there will be some
`
`interruptions if I need to attend to other matters.
`
`The only significant exception to this schedule may occur when the case is submitted to
`
`you for your deliberations. At that point, you will be permitted to deliberate as late as you wish.
`
`This is a timed trial. That means that I have allocated each party a maximum number of
`
`hours in which to present all portions of its case. This allows me to assure you that the case is
`
`expected to be completed by November 8.
`
`Of course, you can help us stay on schedule by being here promptly each morning and
`
`being ready to proceed at the end of each break.
`
`
`
`
`17
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket